I had never heard of the band before. The songs were ok. Nothing great or memorable about them. I will not revisit

There are already 5 Bruce Springsteen albums on this list. Another one is certainly not necessary let alone, a live album which is two hours long. Let's at least have some creativity. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

It is certainly eccentric. It reminded me of Tom Waits at points. I do not think I would revisit this album, but it was interesting.

Meh. It wasn't that good. Nothing was memorable about it.

This was pretty good. It gave me vibes of Queen. It was eccentric at points but still good.

Meh. It wasn't that good. Nothing was memorable about it.

This was pretty good. It gave me vibes of Queen. It was eccentric at points but still good.

It was just kind of there. I didn't really get into it. The songs could have been edited down.

It was a decent album. I recognized several of the songs. Each song sounded very similar. It was also a little long.

It is modern folk music. This did not need to be a thing. Way too long. No one should have recommended this.

It was decent and a good change of pace. I will round up.

Some of it was decent. There were parts that were super weird. Not sure why someone would want to add this, I will round down.

It is certainly eccentric. It reminded me of Tom Waits at points. I do not think I would revisit this album, but it was interesting.

There are already 5 Bruce Springsteen albums on this list. Another one is certainly not necessary let alone, a live album which is two hours long. Let's at least have some creativity. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Way too long. The album artwork made me think I was going absolutely hate this and that it was going to be garbage. It was not the worst thing I have ever listened to, but I do not think it was really enjoyable. I will round up.

It wasn't awful but it was just there. Nothing memorable, kind of bland. Move along.

An awful whiny album. No need to be added to the list or for it to really be made.

It is entirely way too long. It definitely has that 90s sound. The only surprising thing is the group is Dutch and not American. I have no desire to revisit.

A French electronic album. I couldn't understand the words which is fine. It wasn't too long but it felt like it went on a little too long. It's between a 2 and a 3.

It was very funky. The lyrics were just alright. I will round up.

Ugh I really was hoping to avoid listening to any Dave Matthews Band. But here we are. I did not care for the album and I do not care for DMB. It is entirely way to long and it is just annoying. It is not the worst on the list, but I will round down.

It's not great. A lot of screaming which is unnecessary. I didn't need to hear it. I know that some people like this type of music. It's a no from me.

It was just kinda there. Nothing particularly noteworthy.

Eh. It is just synthesizers and techno. Thankfully it was short.

It was ok. Just kind of there. The dial didn't move much.

It wasn't awful but I definitely did not need to hear it. It wasn't too long. Nothing really noteworthy about it. I have no desire to revisit. I will generously round up.

This album is not necessary. A live album certainly doesn't improve it in any way. Sometimes the music was alright. The lyrics weren't good. No need to revisit.

It's punk music. It was not bad but it was not good. I would not revisit the album again but it was relatively short so I tolerated it.

It was ok. Some of the songs had humorous lyrics. The album was just there and I do not plan on revisiting it.

Ugh. It was bad and very whiny. I suffered through it.

The was just whiny music that I didn't need to hear. It was bad. I suffered through it. It is not the worst album but I will round down

What useless album. It is so dumb. There was no need to add this.

There were times when it sounded like Bruce Springsteen but in indie music fashion. None of that is a good thing. Thankfully, it was short.

This is not a good album. It was short. The album name was humorous. It started off alright then it progressively got worse. So many of these user chosen albums have just been straight trash.

Imagine going to a restaurant and you asked for a recommendation and they gave you one. But it turns out it was just dog shit on a plate. That's what listening to this User Recommendation was. Who honestly thought this was a great album or one people should actually listen to?

It was different sound. Mixing some music and adding more beats to them. It was there. Too long though. It is better than a 2, but not really a 3. I will generously round up.

Eh. It was indie music. He has a whiny voice. I didn't care for it. No need to revisit.

Eh. It was just kind of there. No need to revisit or really listen to.

It was eccentric at parts. I was generally surprised by it. I was prepared for it be awful. Still not sure I would revisit it.

What a boring album. It was bland. Nothing noteworthy.

Let's take shitty indie music and add auto tune. It was still awful. Songs were skipped.

It is such a weird and eccentric album. Thankfully, it was short. I don't see myself revisiting it.

There was already a Korn album on the list. A second one certainly was not warranted.

I knew several songs. It was a relatively short album. It was alright. I don't have a desire to listen to the whole album again, but I would revisit a couple of songs.

It was certainly an eccentric album. I had never heard of the album, the band, or any songs previously. I do not have a need to revisit.

It was a weird 80s metal album. I don't need to listen to it again. Thankfully it was short.

It was pretty good. The beats were good. The lyrics were alright. I was somewhat familiar with his music. I would listen to parts again.

This was an OK album. Nothing really stood out. It was a little long and not really memorable. It is probably better than a 2 but not a 3.

It has a distinct 80s sound but it was released in 2017. Some of the lyrics were humorous. I probably won't listen to it again but I will round up.

Eh. It was a short album, the rest was just there. No need to revisit.

Not that great. It was too long for what it was. Nothing really stood out and the dial did not move much on it.

I have heard this album previously. I was surprised that it did not make the official list given what albums did make the list. I do not think I would revisit the entire album again but I would revisit several songs again. I will round up.

Ugh the Lumineers. I just cannot stand them. Thankfully it was relatively short. Stay away

It was all in Spanish, so I did not understand a word of it. It was alright. I wouldn't revisit it, but I would listen to it again.

It was not good. It was short that's about it. A lot of voice modulators. I did not care for it. It certainly did not need to be recommended to be included on this list.

It was certainly was an album. The cover of Summer Breeze as metal song was interesting. I didn't hate it. It was a little long. I wont revisit. It is probably slightly better than a 2, but not much.

I had never heard of the band before. The songs were ok. Nothing great or memorable about them. I will not revisit

It was an alright album. I would visit it again although no one song stood out in particular

Several well known songs. The first half of the album is better than the second half. I would revisit some of the songs. Better than a 3, not really a 4. I will round down.

Eh. It was indie music and it was annoying. I made it through.

It is a longer album, but it has a lot of well known songs. I have always been on the fence about Sublime. I would definitely listen to some of there songs again, but I do not have the desire to listen to everything by them.

Eh. It wasn't particularly good or bad. It was just there. No need to revisit it.