Mostly great, opener track is a little tacky. But there’s some damn jams in this album and the band can play. Who’s on the rhythm section? There great. I do love how Bowie went with a soul-influenced theme, most of the sax could go though…
So much done with so little. As for the music, I like the production ideas often more than the actual execution of them. Sometimes it works, and there’s some very original ideas there, other times it just sounds cheesy or dated. As for the lyrics, woah. It’s hard giving this 3 stars because the poetry is, well it’s often great. But as an all around album it’s an experiment that doesn’t fully work. There are major tracks on here though, stories that one could spend a long time exploring, and my interest in Cohen is massively peaked
One word that’s always come to mind with this band is “underwhelming,” and having finally sat through a whole album… I still largely agree. I respect the distinctness of their sound, I get the appeal, especially in the 90s, and Flea is fun to listen to. There are big hits on this one, Otherwise has always been one I enjoyed, and Porcelain was a cool track to discover.
But otherwise the album mostly alternates between “hit song” and the “funk/rock song”, without either a sense of cohesion or any real journey. The funk stuff is ok but, the players never go that hard, vocal delivery is distinct but boring to me, and the lyrics don’t help. If you’re gonna rap, have something to say. So ultimately in the end these “fun” tracks just have a hollowness to them. I’ll stick with catching a song of theirs on the radio once in a while, albums do not seem to be their forte
It bothers me that this one is on this list, and it's not even Stan's fault. Getz has helped introduce American jazz to samba, it's exciting and fresh here, and his playing is just wonderful. And yet the whole album is just him trading solos with... Charlie Byrd?
I began my Getz journey with Jazz Samba Encore, the follow up to this album, with Luiz Bonfa on guitar instead of Byrd. Bonfa is just SO much better. Plus Maria Toledo on vocals. Encore is one of my fav jazz albums of all time. But this album is just literally Getz and Byrd trading solos, and Byrd is just out of his league in this genre. Most of the time he resorts to some bluesy playing (I cringe), or chordal runs (sometimes those work) - not only do I prefer Bonfa's deft touch and sense of melody, but his guitar tone is also wayyyy better than Byrd's.
Anyway, over the years I haven't let this bother me, because I just rarely listened to this album and listened to Encore instead. But what pains me most is that this album has remained for over 60 years MORE popular than Encore, all the way up to this 1001 album list. Yes, I relistened to it, and yes I'm still disappointed.
Damn it’s just so much better when you consider the context of 1970. Zeppelin was probably the heaviest at this point, and suddenly you have metal music about satan.
It even holds up listening today, as someone who listens to a good deal of death metal I found it actually refreshing to have lyrics that aren’t over the top. Less is often more, and in this case everything is shadowy enough to have an even more haunting effect. Also in the decades where we’re so used to bands using lyrics that blatantly advocate for violence, I notice here that sometimes yes Ozzy is portraying Lucifer, but other times he is terrorized by Lucifer. As a Christian, I think the effect is much more substantial, Ozzy is speaking to the desire and charisma of evil, and it turns out that’s very, very terrifying. Shoutout NIB.
Not five stars just because I’m not too impressed with Ward and Iommi here, I’ll probably be crucified for this… band is a bit sloppy at times, and it is cool and refreshing to my modern ears to hear a real live band playing, but it just feels like they haven’t yet really come into their own musically
Swap the sax for a synth and this album is a banger.
But really it’s a fun summer vibe. Good playing, tasty arrangements and production, and just enough interesting songwriting to make a solid pop album. Shoutout guitarist for the heavy rhythm work, good driving bassist too. Fun percussion. I really just got tired of the sax solos and feel like it kinda sapped up the whole thing, some more edge or grit would have been cool. But these are polished pelicans after all.
This album just bothered me, and I even went in with an open mind.
I grew up with 3rd wave ska/punk and still have a soft spot for the genre. The Specials were the OGs, we all knew them. But, I guess all their good tracks are from the first album. And when it comes to albums in this genre, it's really hard to make one that works. Do you just do every single song as an upstroke ridden ska song, or change it up? Seemed they opted for the later, and it just didn't work.
So yeah, there are interesting or fun moments in this album, some cool instrumentation and production which can give a fun effect. But then there are just lots of weak vocals, the awful dissonant riff in Do Nothing, and really underwhelming songwriting. The vibe did not carry it all the way forward. As a full album, really not sure how it made this list.
Sounds like the blues. Harmonica rips.
I just love this production, it's so lively yet so dark. This album is just another world in itself, where everything is slightly out of focus. As if you spun in a full 360 circle, but then didn't come quite rightside up again, hanging at a tilt. Lots of fresh ideas in the production and it all backs Method Man's delivery so well.
Im sure it was important when it came out, but to me this is a great example of why not all art needs to survive. Just let this rudimentary work die and blossom into all the electro stuff that came afterwards.
It’s like why I don’t listen to the Big Booper when I can listen to Zeppelin.
For me what makes a great album is the re-listen ability. This 2 hour collection of tracks is just not it. And hell I like both the music and the story behind this album. It’s a great idea to do a tribute to genre and artists through this kind of collaboration. But the only way I’m listening to 2 hour country album is if it’s like a concept album or something else driving things forward.
This album has two vibes
“It’s all good”
“Well, it’s still all pretty good”
It’s actually amazing to me that so much harmonic complexity can still sound so mono-sanitized. It’s like she inherited some of the worst aspects of Bacharach writing style.
The bassist is great, the full band soulish jams are when this album is at its best. But overall this has the same veneer that bugs me about most American musicals. That’s the only comparison I can think of, albeit less obnoxious. But worst here is there’s no story to at least drive this album forward, just a tapestry of mostly “feel good” songs. If it was accompanied by some more harmonic tension or good storytelling, I could get behind it. But it just feels so damn flat, safe, and like a world that I just really want no part of
Being with this whole album just bothered me and lacked dynamics.
It’s not just because I can’t hang with the noise, though I understand that’s all some people will really hear in this album. But I did enjoy some of the punk stuff like Eliminator Jr and Rain King.
But overall, just because it’s weird doesn’t mean it’s good. And quite a bit of it is just boring weird, which is not my kind of weird. And just because an approach to an album is influential in its time (noise) doesn’t mean it holds up. It’s often an unenjoyable listen.
It’s interesting when I put on my cultural history hat, fun to imagine how disruptive and fresh it was once, how this impacted the 90s, etc., but that’s about it. Can we just be honest about that? Do we have to revere all music just because it was historically important?
Some music is just better for performance than albums. I’m sure this would have been really cool to see live in 88. As a front to back album though, will not be relistening
Disclaimer, I’ve only listened to the Stooges before. Iggy seems to have grown into his Jim Morrison voice and taken some notes from Bowie as well.
This was fun, loved the synth.
This came out when I was 8 and never listened to it. It’s so fun to discover albums like this for the first time.
It’s just great. Really enjoy the full on exploration of the themes of romantic love and faith. The songwriting and arrangements are impressive, the production on point. I just love a good concept album. The classroom skits were one of the rare times I enjoy the use of skits. I mean really, put me in that classroom!
4 stars only because it’s long and a couple tracks could be scrapped (starting with that Frankie Valle cover….)
Stupid fucking album name.
This album was a very pleasant surprise, as I’m not really a fan of grunge. Really dug the garage punk edge, and then theres some of that subdued feel that will become a mainstay of 90s rock, but then there’s even some late 60s and surf vibe.
There are lots of fun ideas and unique approaches to guitar in particular in these songs, it feels fresh even today. It’s entertaining to me when the guitarist pops out a key for a bit during a solo. Much more my style than a lot of the more boring grunge I’ve heard
I almost gave it two stars, because I know it was a whole thing in 81, but I just really fucking hate this and couldn’t listen to the whole album.
I get it, it’s catchy, it’s female “punk” that is also pop, the harmonies work... but I just really fucking hate it and something about the timber in the vocals just puts me off. Sometimes music surprises me by how fresh it can sound after decades and decades, but this just sounds like a relic of the early 80s in the worst way possible.
Very cool. I went into this blind, never heard of them. They are Japanese women? Idk, but it reminds me of other mid 70s approaches to rock that Queen and Sweet took. It’s just fresh, fun, quirky and theatrical. Could have been 4 stars but nothing jumped out too much at me, but will definitely listen again.
Really wearing out that I-VI chord progression. And, I feel like a parent of a Boomer complaining at all the references to babies, telephones, and twisting.
But still, 3 stars to you Sam. Really brought the energy and was a fun listen to a more gritty version of the man. In 63 I would have been nearby hearing the awesome hard bop jazz instead, but if I stumbled into this place with the teeny boppers I would have had a good time.
Also respect for teasing the crowd with You Send Me and then, not actually sending it.
First couple tracks all I could think of is Y2K, Fatboy Slim, portable CD players. But album got more and more interesting, really liked their use of psychedelic influence and it appears this is a pretty dang unique band
I don’t often boost an album just because it’s historically significant. But in this case, this album is both the fulfillment of bebop and the departure. And it’s so fucking enjoyable. Each listen I notice new textures and moods. The dynamics tell many stories. And it’s fun to hear Miles soloing in his desired setting. This is a lifelong listener
This one was a bit disappointing because I'm a nerd for swingin' 60s lounge music. The cover hinted at that with a more psychedelic feel, and obviously a bossa influence. And... the instrumentation and approach to arrangements is all there.... I personally love when strings are tastefully used alongside rock band lineup. But, mostly the album is just disorganized and does not deliver the potential that the instrumentation presents. There are cool songs, but as a whole it's very scattered. I'm also all for quirky production decisions (such as the high reverb vocals) but they go overboard and it does the album no favors.
I would call this album an interesting experiment that definitely does not hold up like any album on this list should.
I’ve always been a defender of T Swift because she does damn good pop storytelling. Turns out that doesn’t mean she makes great albums. This is the only one I’ve fully listened to, but just a lot of love songs that aren’t as good as her hits. There’s a couple interesting songs, but as an album it’s pretty redundant and makes me glad I’m no longer 25 years old.
Already listened to their debut, wow they got so much tighter. One of my loose "complaints" of that first album is it's a bit sloppy, kinda endearing though. But to go from that to this... awesome. Not only does everyones musicianship shine more, but they're tighter as a group. Their progressive side is coming out here, and I want to rate this 5 stars just for War Pigs and Iron Man. But idk wtf Planet Caravan was, and there's a bit of underwhelm so we're going 4 stars
Ok so I honestly appreciate her restrained style of singing. She has wonderful dynamics and range, and her breathy delivery adds an ethereal and mysterious kind of vibe, partially because I can’t tell what she’s singing, unless I really look for the words. It also makes the big singing parts really pop, great effect. But… it’s too much, she stays in that breathy style and it just ends of falling flat through the course of the album.
It’s weird rating an album that is “by a singer.” The songs are ok. I love the minor key ones, and hot take but Butterfly Reprise is the best one on the album. But overall not many songs stand out, and the production just feels pretty robotic and basic. I think more could have been made of these songs.
Thoughts - is this guy purposely trying to be the clown of 60s music? The album oscillates from "shitty Beatles-inspired song" and "shitty Cohen sounding song"
Ok, I learned that he recorded this as a demo. His producer had Columbia release it without his consent, which was the labels lowest selling release. Who the fuck put this on this list?
This album represents my least favorite approach to this list: the "retroactively significant" release, obviously sensationalized by Skip's turbulent mental health experiences. The album is one of the early examples of what would become a widespread phenomenon: young white men making shitty music that sounds like it comes from a basement. Just because that may be significant in and of itself (STRONG emphasis on may) - why do we need to pretend like an album like this has ANY PLACE alongside the other artists? It's an insult to great albums that did not make this list, pure ridiculous extents our post-modern minds go in the search for meaning in art.
Dude was not talented, and suffered a lot. Get him the fuck off this list
Emo can be moody AND groovy, wish more 2000s bands had taken note.
This is just fucking cool. The album is an entire mood and I really don’t think anyone was doing that in 1980? I’m really listening in the context of classic rock and punk of the 70s, and it’s just damn fresh. They groove, they use weird chords, production is interesting. Not all the songs work well, but the album is cohesive in what it’s after. If some of the songs were better I’d give 4 stars but I really appreciate the swing they took with this one.
This is exactly what I picture the nerdy freshmen in Freaks and Geeks listening to
I'm biased in this one because I'm a hardcore kid. I've heard how this band has been influential in the scene, but never listened. This was just a great time, it felt like if a hardcore band tried to be both more artsy and more commercial, and did pretty well at both.
Also, this was 1989? It sounds so alternative, and hints to nu metal. Definitely feels like an ahead of its time, pushing genres forward, kind of album. One of the albums to announce the 90s
Never hearing this, my impression is it’s a fun kind of bridge from grunge to the more emerging modern pop rock of the 90s that would become Coldplay and a bunch of bands that I’m not a big fan of. At times it verged on too sanitized, and not every song is good. But I thought they mixed styles well, guitarist is pretty interesting both playing and tones, and some of the songwriting I really enjoyed.
Fuck you Go Gos. I had to listen to their album and it was so annoying, this album is great revenge.
Probably won’t listen to this again, but really respect it crashing into the punk scene of 78 and am glad it exists
A little torn on this rating. It’s a great Neil album showcasing so early on his use of folk, piano ballad, and rock. Some of his best songwriting, and the first 4 in particular are just phenomenal. And then side B is mostly just… it kinda hurts more when Neil is mediocre, because you know how amazing his songwriting and poetry can be. But it’s mostly great, and a total classic, so 4 stars
After the first two tracks I’m thinking, “ok it’s pretty good for the blues…” then Stormy Monday, they perform it pretty well and I’m glad for a more dynamic approach to the blues. Then they just fucking depart for the next four songs and I learn for the first time in my life that Allman Bros can rip some jams. They also can make some real interesting arrangments. And they play their asses off, so exciting in a live album. But I’m left feeling kinda stuck between blues, jam band, and jazzy stuff. And it’s not that bad, but something feels a bit lacking in unification that I seek in a great front to back album. So, 4 stars instead of 5 even though it kinda hurts to do that to the amazing performances here…
This is an awful form of jazz, the whole clean and subdued vibe just makes this background music. There’s way cooler 60s soul inspired jazz but this ain’t it. Great players, just really not a fan of this boring approach
