User Submitted Album
View Submitter's ProfileReviews (page 2 of 2)
Fairly nice fairly bland funk
I had never heard of this band which is not surprising given that they seem like a pretty niche regional 90s funk band. I am not a good judge of what is good and what isn't when it comes to funk, as it's never really spoke to me. I'm sure this is good as far as 90s funk, but it's not for me.
I really swung between loving and hating this at different times. Really in-your-face funk that’s just obnoxiously silly at times - sometimes in an endearing way and sometimes just really annoying. Some of it was magnificent. Some of it absolutely sucked. The Beatles cover on here does not deserve to live.
Chucklehead built their brand on impressive live shows, but that doesn't always translate very well to the studio. In this case, their brand of jazzy funk rock just sorta washed over me with no one song standing out. Also can't stand the RHCP-style rapping. Not notable in the slightest, but they were fine otherwise. CONTENDER FOR THE LIST: I can't think of a single reason why it should be.
Hunh. Jam bands have rabid followings but their albums never really capture the trance that they cast on their enraptured fans. It’s another funk band from the 1990s without much major media exposure. Ok but derivative of RHCPs.
Jazz with heavy bass lines. It didn't really draw me in.
It's fun and I'd love to see these guys live but really speaking this is a Tribute band. They are recreating a genre sound.
Not bad! Cool little modern funk album.
Unmemorable I’m afraid
Basic stuff
Yeah I just have different tastes than this submitter. Dr Octagon is apparently a five star album while Pet Sounds is one star. Sounds like a random band you’d hear in a bar. Rating: 1.4
Bad Frat party music.
Det kommer mer musik från mig när jag ätit ärtsoppa. Och så har de mage att göra en våldtäkt på en Beatleslåt. Katastrofalt dåligt.
Trash.
Very, very funky, but mainly in the sense of a bad smell. Rating: 1.5 Playlist track: Retrosexy Date listened: 19/11/24