I dig Steve Winwood's voice, and the record is remarkably clear, probably a testament to Jimmy Miller as one of rock's great producers.
What an incredible record!!
Side 2 is a classic. Side 1 kind of grates on me and always has for some reason. Kind of a bouncy, pedantic offering, but it's a debut, and they clearly formed a sound and style shortly after this.
Surprised by how enjoyable this record was. Kind of a bit repetitive in style, but well-written
Monk! Not my favorite, but it's a great listen.
Dated. I’m sure it was fantastic in its day.
This album came out in ‘88? Could’ve come out in 1968, could’ve come out yesterday.
1st of an unparalleled 3-album run in rock history. Still holds up as fresh and exciting. Pales everything that tried to match it over the next 25 years.
Like Carole King, but seemingly less pop sensibility and a much more powerful voice. Not familiar with her work prior to this, but love it.
I keep thinking I’m going to go through a Joni Mitchell phase and I can never do it. I get the musicianship is unparalleled. No question the vocals, the structure and the atmosphere are singular as to who the artist is. It’s just a lot of that is fingernails on a chalkboard for me and I can go forever without ever listening to it again.
Is this great? This feels pretty even, with good melodies and some strong poetry. I guess that makes it better than most. Still, Morrissey.
Hate this record for being so big when I was a teenager. Still, the recording is impeccable. The sound, the tunes, the blending of genres and the timelessness of the title track only mesmerize as they age.
Powerhouse, soulful and sweet.
One of the most influential pieces of art in the 20th Century. Resonates nearly 60 years later.
I want it to be that I don't like hip-hop, but as great as the catchy pop tunes are, the misogyny, the lack of humanity and baloney sandwich rags-to-riches stuff is a bore. "aspirational" hip hop I've been told is the term, but yawn.
The inclusion of this record on this list is an abomination. I mean, 1-star for the crisp sound, but it's sterile butt-rock that AC/DC did 100x better a decade earlier.
Transformative, exciting, relevant almost 30 years later. One of the great listens of recorded music. Want to start a party? Put this record on. Want to get inspired to fight the power that corrupts your world? Put this record on.
Hands down, all-timer. Influential on so many levels.
Surprising on first listen. I knew the hits. They're catchy and all that, but the album has a sparse sound and vibe that - no shit - sounds like something Sinatra would've put out.
One of the best records ever, hands down, bar none. Each song is a classic - epic in pop song format. Story behind the record is fascinating. Story behind the band is fascinating. It all fell apart for reasons out of all their control. Jonathan Richman is a national treasure.
Fun listen. Kinda one-note, but upbeat and groove-centric. No real standout tunes, IMO.
Spread your good songs around an album. What's the point of leading off with your best tune, then getting worse and worse with each track? Especailly when you're already have a craptastic sounding outfit like DM. Not a fan. OK intro tune, rest is a drag. Mid at best.
A sonic experience. Total headphones record. It's so ubiquitous a sound that it wears a little repetitive after nearly 50 years. Can't imagine what a party one of these shows would have been back in the day.
I don't think I like hip hop the way the rest of the world does.
Repetitive. Atmospheric. Some flourish. Prefer other records of theirs.
Fun beats, and obviously her voice is important in the genre's ouevre, but not really my bag.
The production is great, but the songs aren't that interesting when it comes down to it.
Oh yeah, bong hit commence! 10 stars wouldn't be enough. I love listening to this record and focusing on just one part of what's playing - Elvin Jones, McCoy Tyner, Jimmy Garrison, Coltrane - it doesn't matter which one, because everyone is operating on a level that transcends the whole. This record never sounds the same twice, equally thrilling and soothing.
Not a fan. Sounds like the 60s.
Listened with preconceptions, and surprised at this gem. Great sound, interesting songs. I think it was a full concept album about WW1 or something, but I enjoyed it.
Noisy. Don’t understand the appeal. Becomes diva-esque by the end with some lush sounds, but I don’t get this at all. A terrible sound, often-screeching.
Atmospheric, some brilliance and some half-assed notions. Hard to call it a great album, as it has one defining track and a couple other interesting listens. I can't imagine telling someone, "Hey! You got to listen to this record!".
Lots of classic pop soul stuff on this record, but some amazing gems. "Ain't No Way" is one of my favorite songs of this genre.
Kinda fun, kinda background music. Don't know how it was groundbreaking or considered such an achievement.
Stylistically all over the map, yet somehow repetitive. I think this was their debut, never really listened to them. Bet they're killer live. Not sure they're more interesting than, say, Tool or Rage Against the Machine, or whomever they're lumped in with timeline and genre-wise.
You, classic supergroup, but what are we getting out of this? It's dated pop country at the end of the day.
Perfect sounding record. Side 2 is something of the best music ever recorded.
Help me Rhonda gets this 2 stars.
Powerful blend of rock, hip hop and the punk rock ethos. Somehow every song ultimately sounds the same – a good sound of course, but the depth always feels pretty surface.
Psychedelic rock at it's finest. 1967 was a wild year. Not quite as impactful as AYE? or EL that followed, but as a tryptich, there isn't anyone who did what Jimi did. Took everything that happened before, crushed it up and blasted it out of an amp with explosive gusto, and re-made everything that came after.
Great record. One of the best of the 80s.
I dig the concept of what Zappa's doing, but it can be repetitive and kind of go nowhere for me.
Not my bag, to be fair. A little groovy.
A great record. Turned into a cartoon character, but the initial band was a really good one that had as much impact on 80s hair metal as anyone else.
Surprisingly doesn't hold up as well as the esteem I've always held it in after not listening to it for a while. I don't know, Neil has 15 great songs and then his self-righteousness comes through on the rest.
Nothing really will ever top this record. One of the best ever.
Good early American hardcore stuff, but not that interesting.
Improv. Think about that. Improv.
Meh. It was a hit when it came out, but it isn't Metallica.
Nothing ever really tops this. Way ahead of its time. Sounds 40 years younger than it is.
A great record start-to-finish. Better than the Greatest Hits.
Yeah, I don't know. It's like Ska is kind of a dumb idea to begin with, but we can all handle 3 minute hits of dumb. Two great songs and some attitude that carry the record.
There's the hits on this record, and then there's the rest of the tunes that are as beautiful and impactful as anything of the era. A triumph of R&B and pop music.
Hey man, the early aughts were weird. Turns out it was more or less the dying embers of rock as the last great period of good albums coming out. This one has hooks, riffs and solid storylines. I'm a fan and think it holds up really well.
Historically, it mixed the pop with the politics of the time. Groovily, it just soars musically above everything else from the time period besides Coltrane.
Hasn't aged well. 3 stars for the two great pop tunes. Haven't listened to it for awhile, surprised how dull it is.
Would love ot know the backstory of this band. Sounds like the singer might have been a dick. The one song shoula coulda propelled them to megastardom and it didn't. Album has some highlights other than the hit.
This is a good record, executed well. It's interesting, but he'll go on to do much better stuff. Waits records are best when they mix things up a bit. This one drones on too long like the stranger you pony up next to at a bar that has an interesting personality and a tall tale or two for a couple of drinks then gets annoying by the third.
Great ambiance of a record. The Cure always has great songs on their albums, but they also are so aggrandizing that they start to get repetitive.
I recognize that there's some amazing musicianship and the songwriting and style is unique. I'm not a Joni Mitchell guy.
I'm not a boss guy. There's like 2 songs on here that could probably rip live if it was a bar band and the singer wasn't so polished, but I don't live in Jersey and I'm not into cars.
Well, one killer track that undoubtedly was a template for dance music of a generation, but the rest kind of pales in comparison.
Only because it's not as consistent as Zep 1, but it came out a year ahead of it and Beck's Bolero is as hard as anything that came out of the Clapton/Page/Beck era.
For 1998, it feels both derivative and cutting edge at the same time. Lots of 70s and 80s art rock/Kim Gordon influences, but also forbears the sounds of Sleater-Kinney and the like. A couple of cool tunes to throw on the DJ sets once in awhile.
I'll give it a 2, but that's because I know people loved this record. I don't get it now. I didn't get it then. I got to see a few bands in clubs, in theaters and then arenas – and Radiohead is one of them. Amazing live band, but there's not a single track on this album that does a thing for me except want to skip over it.
I've never listened to a Coldplay album, only a couple of snippets of hits I'd immediately judge as sounding like the 20 yr old child of U2. I was a little surprised that A) the band is 4 guys and it's always been the same 4 guys. Thought it was just that Paltrow fellow. B) This record wasn't the worst thing I'd ever heard. Almost an easy listening Arctic Monkeys.
It's got Waterloo Sunset, one of the 5 best songs of the 60s. Ray Davies is one of the best to ever do it.
Powerhouse record of one of the hardest rocking bands ever. Yeah, they peaked in 1970, but it was a helluva peak. Pretty much every hard rock band from Sabbath to Maiden to Metallica are direct descendants of this version of the Who - not the bloated version of the 1970s.
I'm always a little iffy on Radiohead because they were The Best Rock Band On The Planet after OK Computer, and then crapped it all away with Kid A and Amnesiac. This is post-traumatic listening with this record. It's 20 years old, but I've never really listened to it until today. Back to what made them a creative force and a sonic army few could match in their prime. A little of the electronic hangover exists, but pretty good for mid-00s.
Never really done a deep dive into Peter Gabriel-era Genesis, because I have preconceptions, and this doesn't change those notions. It's purportedly a concept album, but I didn't really notice the link via lyics other than it flows well. There's a handful of cool songs, and its a great sounding record. A little bloated, but that's the 70s.
Is it fair to criticize any Neil Young record for being boring? The through-line from him to alt-country, alt-rock and anything folk-related is impossible to ignore. The only complaint is the one-note sound of this album never feels like something to listen to on its own. I'd give this 4 1/2 stars if I could. 5 seems too generous, 4 seems too light. I wish I could be moved by Joni Mitchell the way this record moves me.
A couple of bangers on this one. Funkier than it gets credit for from anti-Southern rock folks.
Wasn’t expecting the jazzy, neo-soul elements. At its best when it’s not trying to be conventional 80s new wave pop.
Sounds like the Buzzcocks....because apparently it's the original guy that isn't Pete Shelley. Also included a future Banshee. It's ok for the early wave of British punk, but echoes that signature Buzzcocks sound. One cool tune, but that's about it. Otherwise, probably a staple of the genre/era, but dang near 50 years later, it's somewhat unremarkable.
Three-part harmonies as distinct and beautiful as anything Brian Wilson could conceive. Suite: Judy Blue Eyes is one of the greatest songs ever written. Beautiful concept coming from some pretty wildly different musical directions coalescing into a feeling that transcends the moment.
Not a huge Nick Cave guy, but this is an epic, sprawling, engaging double album with a handful of great songs.
I've already forgotten it.
Not that interesting, but a couple of bangers.
What's funny about classic rockers getting older is their attempts to sound "fresh" through modern sounds, which end up sounding nothing like what they used to sound like, or, really, the style they were trying to emulate in the first place. This is one of those records that probably isn't going to be on the list of great Bowie records, but it sounds interesting, and that's better than a lot of things.
A little T Rex, a little Who, a little Beach Boys, a little Sabbath. Too bad that terrible Freddie Mercury movie got made. This was an incredible talented and inventive band who had a style all their own and had to have an amazing creative collaborative approach that should've been documented better.