The whole album kept swapping between loud rock and softer acoustic. The rock was pretty bad, and the acoustic was okay, but nothing great. I’d give it a 2 for below average, but not horrible enough to deserve a 1
Not my favorite genre, but still had a couple of songs that I enjoyed. Overall an average album, but definitely on the higher side of a 3.
I’d initially given this album a 4/5, which was still surprising, considering that I expected it to be a 2 or 3 stars. However, re-listening to a lot of the songs, this is simply a 5 star album. Its dramatic rock is just simply awesome to listen to, and the instruments in the background are just an amazing touch that takes this album to the next level. I think I especially liked these instruments because it reminds me of my favorite band since I was 2, a Japanese band named Mr.Children.
I would probably never listen to this album again. I never liked Heavy Metal, and found this album unpleasant. The only thing that kept it from a 1 were the impressive guitar riffs and good drumming, but honestly, I don’t get how this made the 1001 top albums you must listen to.
Jazz is one of those genres that are pleasant to listen to, but aren’t necessarily something that I’d put on when listening to my music on my own. This album was a good jazz album, with many solos and other musical elements that make up an album of the sort. A solid 4 stars; fun and pleasant to listen to, but nothing rivaling my favorites music of all time.
The lyrics in this album were very deep and well thought-out. That said, Disc 1 fell short in terms of musical aspects, with Bob Dylan’s not-so-pleasant voice taking the spotlight of a song with boring guitar and (perhaps controversially) slightly annoying harmonica. In Disc 2, however, things took a turn for the better. “Tell Me, Momma” and “I Don’t Believe You” starting the chain of songs with great guitar solos, drums and more that add to a more exciting musical affect. So, half the album is full of songs that were honestly probably better as poems, and the other half is full of good rock songs that I genuinely enjoyed.
This album is full of cheesy ‘80s pop that we’ve all rolled our eyes to in parties and grocery stores. That was kind of my experience this time, too. Objectively, I can’t give this a 1 or a 2, but I also can’t say I enjoyed it. I think a 3 is fair for this album; not something I’d turn on on my own, but not something that I actively despise either.
No one’s gonna argue that Jimi Hendrix’s guitar solos are anything short of extraordinary, or that he isn’t one of the most influential rock artists of all time. But this album seemed to go on forever (which it shouldn’t, because it’s only 75 minutes long), and I’m not sure if I really like this psychedelic rock genre. That said, this was one of the rare consistent albums; all of the songs were around a 3 out of 5. A pretty easy 3 stars; Jimi Hendrix is a great guitarist, but not as great of a musician.
It’s always cool to listen to music from different cultures and regions, and this West African album was no exception. The instrumentals were very pleasant, showcasing guitar, drums, and a consistent beat that was easy to follow. I’m probably not going to listen to this album again, but there are a few songs that I added to some instrumental playlists.
Hip-hop can be an acquired taste, with its best songs, albums and artists taking months to truly be appreciated by a given fan. This album was no different. When I initially rated it, I’d given it a 3, due to my lack of exposure to the genre. I would soon change it to a 4, but it stayed like that for a while after. However, since listening to and falling in love with artists such as Kendrick Lamar, Drake, Kanye West, and J. Cole, I just have to bump this up to a 5. It’s weird how music tastes change sometimes.
The musical aspects of this album were very nice, with the guitar, drums, flute and other instruments creating an upbeat rhythm that I’m sure would be fun to play. The lyrics, however, were pretty weird. They were the kind of things that I might be embarrassed to sing in public, which is not a good look for this album. Overall, I enjoyed it, but there were a few things missing that prevented it from being a “good” album. A high 3.
This album sounded like a bunch of grown men playing with instruments. This resulted in horrible screeching sounds of guitar and flute, and the only times we were spared of that was during either the boring, repetitive solos or horrible singing, with its lyrics also fitting this experimental vibe. I honestly don’t know if I can make worse sounds come out of an electric guitar than some of the sounds in this album.
Not great. There were some parts that were pretty good, but there was a lot of weird, repetitive, or boring parts. Admittedly, I’ve never liked experimental music, so take this as you will.
This genre isn’t something I often listen to, but the songs in this album were really nice. I’m pretty surprised at this rating, but I have to give this the rating of a good album; a 4.
I enjoyed this album; the background was pretty cool. It got pretty repetitive, though, and I can’t say I loved the songs. This was a high 3.
I actually enjoyed this chill rock genre. I didn’t expect to like a 1980s rock album, but this one was quite pleasant. There were no outstanding songs in this album, but almost all of them were decent or good. A solid 4/5, but not close to making it to 5 stars.
This was definitely a cool album, and had some interesting perspectives. I enjoyed the dark voice of Cohen combined with an overall chill tone.
I think the guitar in this album was really nice. The fact that there’s a song titled “Song with No Words (Tree with No Leaves)” shows the confidence that David Crosby has in his guitar-playing abilities. None of these songs were outstanding, but all of them were good. 4 stars.
Certainly an interesting album, as its name suggests. It was very good at making me feel the emotions it wanted me to. I’ve never listened to anything like this; certainly interesting, but can’t say I loved it.
This is a classic rock album, with enthusiastic drumming, crazy guitar riffs and powerful but admittedly unpretty singing being prominent all throughout. But I’m not sure I’m all in with this energy; I prefer soft rock, which in my opinion is more pleasant. If you like classical rock, you’d like this album, but it wasn’t too enjoyable for me. This album cover has to be one of the worst of all time, though.
When I first found out that this album was written by an artist named “Primal Scream”, I imagined it to be another heavy metal album full of deranged screaming and crazy sounds that overwhelm my brain with an obnoxious amount of volume and sound. Thankfully, however, this album was more of an experimental genre. To be honest, though, I’m not the biggest fan of this genre, either; I’ve rated albums like The Velvet Underground & Nico and Sound of Silver much lower than the average listener. This album was a decent experimental album, with a few good songs, but it’s gonna take a spectacular experimental album for me to give it anything above a 3. Maybe I should just stick to soft rock.
This was a long album! There were a few songs that I especially liked, but most were just average; nice to listen to but nothing that I’d listen to again.
This was a nice, chill album. I enjoyed it, but nothing that I would re-listen to. The piano was nice.
It’s no surprise to me that this album’s global rating is about as close to a 3 as it can get. Everything in this album just screams “average”, from the melody to the singing. The fact that I don’t know what the lyrics mean also adds to this; from my point of view, the lyrics are neither “good” nor “bad”. I say this a lot, but I truly mean this: it’s the easiest rating I’ll ever give.
This album had a pretty unique, chill style. I’m not sure I loved it… I didn’t dislike it, but it simply wasn’t exciting enough for me. Not bad, though.
It’s not at all surprising that this album made this list, and I’ve been expecting it since I started. I admire Bob Marley and his music, but it was never something that I was super into. All of the songs were a solid 3/5, but there were no exceptions. It’s a good album, and definitely needs to be on anyone’s list for the 1001 objectively best albums of all time. But subjectively (for me), it’s not great.
There were a lot of good songs in this album. I don’t have much to say; nothing was insane, but nothing was bad. All songs were 3-4 stars. It’s close, but I have to give it a 4.
You can never go wrong with a jazz album, and of course Ray Charles is going to get a high rating from anyone who believes so. I’m not a jazz superfan by any means, though, and wouldn’t put it on on my own. Objectively, it may be 5 stars, but for me, it has to be a 4.
This was one of those albums that just needed a little bit more to take it to a 4 or a 5 out of 5. Maybe its songs require a more dramatic segment, or a softer tone, but whatever it is, it just isn’t at that level. It’s still a decent album, but I wish it had that extra thing to take it up a notch.
I liked the activism in this album, but I can’t say the same for the music itself. I don’t know what it was; it could be the slow tempo, the unexciting melody, or how similar all of the songs were, but it just didn’t hit. It was still a good listen, though. I really liked the way they faded the songs together; it was really well “built” as an album. It felt so much shorter than it was since I lost track of how many songs I’d listened to, because I didn’t even know when a song started or ended. It was just that well blended.
There are some albums on this list that I listen to because I want to complete this challenge, and not because I genuinely enjoy it. This was not one of these albums. It was genuinely enjoyable, with an enjoyable rock "genre". I can be really picky about my rock music, but this album fits all of my criteria. None of the songs were exceptional, but they were all good. I should listen to more of The Triffids.
The songs in this album were good, but the album as a whole was better. This is an example of the strong correlation that I’m noticing between the quality of an album and its genre, and rap/hip hop seems to be a genre with many artists who care about their albums. This album specifically was more “rap” than “hip hop” in my opinion, and wasn’t as energetic as other rap albums. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, and it was actually a really nice aspect of the album.
I’d always wanted to listen to more of Radiohead, and today was my chance. Many people around me had talked about them being a good band, and someone they’d always enjoy. Unfortunately, I can’t share the same opinion. They weren’t bad, but just not something that I’d call good, either. Bummer.
I’m not someone to criticize music for being explicit. In fact, I am a huge fan of rap and hip hop, and artists like Eminem and Kendrick Lamar regularly dominate my “Top Artist” lists on Spotify. However, the swearing in this album was just so… lame. In fact, a lot of the lyrics just didn’t sound at all tough. That said, I really like the drums and guitar, with some pretty cool riffs and solos. I just wish that the singing and lyrics were better, and this could’ve been a 4 or a 5.
Banger album. Every single song was good, with the mellow-ish melodies, good guitar and drumming, and decent singing making for a great rock album. I can be very picky about my rock, and this album just hit the spot. That said, none of the songs were close to being a great one that would make a top-rock-songs list, so I have to keep it at a high 4.
This was a cool album, because Ravi Shankar was walking us through significant ideas in Indian music and how it’s played. The Indian music itself was also cool, with crazy instrumentals that rival the best instrumental artists in all of Western music. It helped expand my tastes a lot, and sure, it does feel more like a class as opposed to an album, but isn’t the point of doing this 1001 albums challenge to expand your knowledge on music?
