Jun 23 2021
View Author
1
We all piled on Rebecca black for having no talent but Nico makes the list of albums You Must Listen To Or Else You'll Die? At least RB's song was catchy and she paid for being famous with money rather than blow jobs. A goat being vivisectioned would be more melodic and in key. If I could give this zero stars I would, Nico is the fucking worst.
👍
Oct 20 2021
View Author
5
Alright, I'll say it. I'm a sucker for this dark, pretentious, avant bullshit. I like the instruments, I like the vocals, I like the production. This is fanfuckingtastic.
👍
Apr 22 2021
View Author
1
not a fan of her voice. I'm guessing this is held in high regard due to her Warhol / Velvet Underground association? First one in awhile I opened Spotify to see how much was left...
👍
Mar 03 2021
View Author
1
Fuck off flute
👍
Jun 21 2021
View Author
1
It sounds medieval and boring. In addition to being grating, the singer's voice doesn't fit the backing instruments at all, and the audio tracks sound like they were unmixed or at the very least mixed extremely poorly. Nothing in this album meshes, and I don't understand why this would be on this list.
👍
Apr 09 2021
View Author
1
You call it ‘artistic’...I call it ‘dog in pain’.
Not gonna lie. This was one tough listen.
It literally could be used as a form of torture. I could just imagine a Russian spy opting to spill the beans in preference to being subjected to another tune from Nico.
Someone please tell this woman she cannot sing, for everyone else’s sake.
The out of tune droning with the comical flute playing in the background had me Googling if this album was in fact a parody.
Unfortunately it is not and it is very real. Apparently real enough to be selected into this list and that’s embarrassing.
The only reason anyone would ever choose this album is because they are insecure and think selecting the shameful piece of noise would somehow elevate their coolness by the ‘in’ crowd.
Hopefully Nico was locked up and institutionalised after this and they threw away her key. -100 Stars!
👍
May 16 2021
View Author
5
Don't deny the greatness. Don't deny the sadness. Don't deny the beauty.
👍
Jun 10 2021
View Author
1
It's painful, in so many ways. It goes beyond interesting and weird into the awful.
👍
Aug 26 2021
View Author
1
Well friends, that was painful. Vocals are flat, monotone and boring. Some of the instrumentals would have been good as background music, but then Nico starts singing again. And what was that noise about 2/3 of the way through "It Was A Pleasure Then"? I've tried to avoid giving out 1's as a rule, but I think this one deserves it.
👍
Feb 05 2021
View Author
1
Nauseatingly bad. Two more albums this bad and I’m quitting this list.
👍
Mar 03 2021
View Author
1
Absolute shit. Production is awful - guitars quiet and muddy with terrible tone. Would have been better without strings and flutes. Bad lyrics, worked into even worse melodies. Not as smart as it thinks it is. Ended up skipping through a lot as I couldn't take it any more. Pretentious wank.
👍
Dec 05 2022
View Author
5
The instrumentation is lovely and Nico's vocals sound raw and authentic. No autotune here. Deliciously soothing.
👍
Apr 02 2021
View Author
5
Great album. Love her voice and the instrumentation is beautiful. Like getting a Velvet Underground record with just Nico vocals!
👍
Aug 02 2021
View Author
4
This album was interesting for several reasons. Nico's deep and untrained voice has a way of cutting through the often lush instrumentation that lends it an air of mystery and sadness. This is truly an enigmatic album, songs written by men sung by a woman who nobody really seemed to know. I was a bit tired of it by the end, but I believe this album deserves a few more listens.
👍
Aug 03 2023
View Author
4
The other members of VU help Nico with her own debut, and it's full of beautiful folk tunes with lush classical arrangements, sorrowful retrospective lyrics, and a deep emotional voice. It's dreamy and entrancing with the mesmerizing guitars and bright bursts of flutes and Caleb's viola.
We starts with a few emotional pop tracks. Then we reach the avant-garde dissonant "It Was a Pleasure Then" which I actually like, especially Nick's angelic vocals. It's a homage to the VU's debut. Following that is my favorite (after "These Days"), a 7.5 minute depressing story about the lives of her fellow acolytes of Warhol. Great chorus, and the flutes and viola work best here.
Next two tracks are vibrant and happy. "Wrap Your Troubles in Dreams" is mythical. I really like the harp instrument. Flute is excessive here. "Eulogy to Lenny Bruce" is a minimalist finale, probably what Nico wanted for the rest of the tracks, but it is a bit dull and forgettable.
Nico wasn't a fan of this album cause the studio replaced the drums and extra guitars for flutes. I'm curious what it'd sound like with percussion, but I think the lack of it adds a mythical sound to it. The flutes do feel over-the-top and take the spotlight too much, feeling unnecessary at times. But there are moments where I felt the flutes do work in her favor. Finally, the production is dated, with bad studio mixing, which makes for a dumb speaker situation. But if you're high and put on headphones or set up your room just right, it could make for an immersive experience.
I really like most tracks, with a good variety and each standing out. I could definitely see how they could improve though. Very curious to hear more like this.
👍
Dec 02 2021
View Author
1
It's so bad that even Nico herself refuses to listen to it. Wondering if this album was included in the 1001 as an example of good intentions gone horribly wrong?
👍
Sep 02 2021
View Author
1
Bottom of the list fire me
👍
Feb 21 2021
View Author
1
This was horrible. Not my genre, awful voice, weird sounding pieces in between. Never again please.
👍
Feb 03 2021
View Author
1
Oufff. No thank you
👍
Feb 10 2021
View Author
1
Just Painful, it was difficult to finish this album.
👍
Feb 24 2021
View Author
1
It is rare that I can't make it through a full album even it's not my thing. Nico's voice makes me want to cut my ears off.
👍
Jan 27 2021
View Author
1
🤮🤢😷☠️💩💩💩💩
👍
May 28 2021
View Author
1
Did not connect with any of that.
👍
Jan 02 2023
View Author
4
The story behind the production makes better than total sense when you hear it, that's for certain. But somehow the disjoint circles all the way around and brings Chelsea Girl together somehow. Irreverently, this makes me think of the Shaggs or Björk forced to work with certain session musicians. More than a touch of odd, here.
👍
Sep 14 2023
View Author
3
I like the music well enough, a kind of low-key folk rock with some pleasing baroque flourishes. The songs are pretty great. 'These Days', 'It Was a Pleasure Then' and 'Eulogy to Lenny Bruce' stand out in particular as moving, eery numbers.
Let's face facts, it's Nico's voice that will divide audiences. I found it winningly and affectedly unmusical about a quarter of the time, utterly bemusing for the rest. It's got character, it is instantly recognisable and occasionally it meets the music at such an angle that it becomes a thing of oblique beauty. Not very often, though.
👍
Mar 10 2021
View Author
3
I love Lou Reed and the Velvet Underground so much that I have an automatic soft spot for Nico, but I'm not sure it quite carries a full album for me. I kind of liked the flutey compositions that I take it she hated. Sort of interested to hear some of the later stuff she had more control on.
👍
Oct 14 2021
View Author
2
Needs an injection of The Velvet Underground.
It's nice, but a bit boring. The kind of thing Iris Law listens to on the tube I'd imagine. 🦢
Chelsea rent girl, Chelsea rent girl, whoooaaa whooooaaa
👍
Mar 14 2021
View Author
1
fuck off nazi cunt
👍
Oct 17 2023
View Author
5
I knew Nico was quite the tortured soul, but it's through this app that I've learned that she allegedly indulged in racist tirades in private sometimes (and probably even did worse than that at one point!). It's a damn shame, because I have always loved her voice, whether with the Velvet Underground or without. But I understand why some folks would rate her one star because of that. Call that karmic balance.
That said, I'm not gonna deny the pleasure I've had listening to Nico's voice for years, even though said pleasure is tinted now. Because that would make me a hypocrite. Few artists can sing out of tune, and in such an idiosyncratic way, while actually *adding* to the songs, and not ruining them. People complaining about her performances in this section should learn that good art doesn't necessarily mean perfection. Frailty and flaws can actually provide a lot of precious emotions to a certain subset of listeners. And dismissing that mere fact as "pretentious snobbery" is quite a paradoxical stance. Snobbery usually pays attention to what's perfect and pristine. And *Chelsea Girl* can't be judged by the usual standards anyway. That's where its peculiar quaint charms lie for some.
Also, I can't help but notice that the vast majority of reviewers who gave this album one star never finished this project anyway. A lot of them used quite hateful words to boot--and, karmic balance or not, those accusations had nothing to do with Nico's intermitent racism in the first place. So, in this case, why all the hate? Well, it seems to me that this app was probably a bit of an ordeal for those casual listeners. Because, yeah, the 1001 album app routinely takes you out of your comfort zone. And unfortunately, you have close-minded individuals everywhere, both in the so-called "plebe" and in the elite. That's life. If you keep the debate in purely artistic terms, who are the close-minded, elitist reviewers, really?
To be perfectly fair, and if it amounts to be accused of being an "elitist' whatever album by Nico you choose for such a list, I would rather have the 1001 albums book choosing *The Marble Index* and *Desertshore* instead of *Chelsea Girl* while I'm at it. Obviously, that would test the limits of those close-minded listeners even further--those two LPs are such *striking* records, far more personal than *Chelsea Girl*, but also more *prophetic*. Like, Nico was the *OG* in those two seminal LPs, the "Original Goth". A missing link between the first "medieval" meaning of the word and its post-punk reenactment a decade later. And this makes her one-of-a-kind as well, as "difficult" as her persona was.
To be clear, I'm not saying that you should "separate the person from the artist" here. You just can't. It's just that sometimes, there's a grey area, especially with relevant performers with a history of mental disorders, and especially when those performers passed away some time ago. I can't listen to Kanye West these days, for instance, it's too much, and probably too soon after the unforgivable horrific words he has repeatedly uttered in public for too long now. But denying the man's impact on popular music in the last twenty years would be nonsensical. Hell, NO, I'm not condoning the dreadful things Ye said, even under the pretext of his supposed mental imbalance. But I'm also stating the facts: if Kanye had never had the impact he has had before, far less people would have noticed the dumb, dangerous "concepts" that spurt forth from his foamy mouth later on. Which means that the man's past artistic accomplishments are part of the sad equation, whether you like it or not.
Nico's impact on popular culture as a creator and a perfomer was far more limited than Kanye, in comparison. But it's there. It's undeniable for people with some knowledge of 20th century music history--so-called "elitism" be damned. You can't "unknow" what you know.
As a consequence, I"m still giving 5 stars for what this album is, that is to say an incredibly original recording, either for the times it was released or for now--and one that ties in with later important developments for both the artist and for "modern" music in general. That being said, it's highly probable that I won't include *Chelsea Girls* in my own list of "essential albums", in spite of that 5-star grading (a very rare exception to the way I use that rating to select my albums). My grade just represents my personal assessments of this record's merits. It won't change its low "global score" a bit anyway. But more importantly, it's important to undertand that I don't want to force my personal assessment on individuals shocked by some of the things found online about Nico. I respect such individuals' sensibility too much for that. And of course, I'm not gonna die on a hill that no one should ever fight for. Ever. Even if Nico's problematic words and acts were not "public", it seems that most witnesses are clear about what they heard or saw. And music, mental heath issues and possible traumatic experiences aside, those reported events make Christa Pāffgen look like quite a despicable figure.
Number of albums left to review: 400
Number of albums from the list I find relevant enough to be mandatory listens: 271
Albums from the list might* include in mine later on: 144 (including this one)
Albums from the list I won't include in mine (many others are more essential to me): 186
👍
Sep 30 2023
View Author
4
Really beautiful. Some of the Nico albums are hidden gems, and this is no exception.
It's more folky than her second one which I listened to last year and enjoyed. Probably largely down to the flutes which I understand she hated but I don't mind here.
Her voice is somewhat jarring against the backdrop and not typically folky at all, but that's part of what makes it interesting.
I did prefer the more Avant Garde offerings of the Marble Index, and oddly was a bit put off by the one here that leaned slightly in that direction (it was a pleasure then).
👍
Oct 23 2022
View Author
4
Enjoyed it, but still not fully on board with Nico's vocals.
👍
Sep 28 2022
View Author
4
strangely haunting and beautiful music. Her voice is unique and I am sure the style was fresh when this was released in 1967.
4/5
👍
Oct 21 2022
View Author
3
Very calm and ethereal
👍
Jan 09 2022
View Author
3
Et bien moi j'ai beaucoup apprecié cet album, et d'ailleurs j'en profite pour dire à rob que je l'emmerde.
👍
Apr 07 2021
View Author
3
This was going to be 2 stars, but I recognized that some of these songs have been in Wes Anderson movies.
Giving them some context, and associating them with a time and place really allowed me to appreciate these songs more.
They are certainly 'of an era'. They're the kind of thing you'd put on when someone broke up with you, or if you were having a very specifically-themed party.
👍
Jan 15 2024
View Author
1
Perfect? No.
Good? No.
Mediocore? No.
Bad? No.
Garbage? Yes.
👍
Feb 10 2022
View Author
1
Did one track feature Kurt Zouma and his cat?
👍
Dec 02 2021
View Author
1
Like being punched in the head by the sound of boredom.
👍
Oct 22 2021
View Author
1
Oof. I hated this. Some pretty instrumentation on some songs, but not all, and her voice was terrible. Songs were also slow and sad. Not a fan. Song I didn’t hate as much: “Somewhere There’s a Feather.”
👍
May 14 2021
View Author
1
Fucking horrible. I turned it off after 20 minutes cause it was too boring. These Days is still a jam tho
👍
Mar 03 2021
View Author
1
Headache machine
👍
Jan 27 2021
View Author
1
Not my kind of music
👍
Jan 29 2021
View Author
1
Nope
👍
Jan 03 2024
View Author
5
I liked this a lot, five stars.
👍
Dec 27 2023
View Author
5
It might feel a little underwhelming, even jagged in places, but I love the simplicity. Being very familiar with The Velvet Underground & Nico, I had not heard this but I'm glad I finally did. It feels as though this album will grow with the listener over time.
👍
Feb 02 2024
View Author
4
One of the great essential truths of rock music, in my mind, is that you don’t have to be a well-trained, professional musician to make a great and interesting record. Ambition can outweigh ability and it shouldn’t be considered detrimental to the music you create.
Chelsea Girls is singular and unique, experimental but ultimately not overly formidable. Sadly, this record seems to have been produced with Nico’s input cast aside and ignored, which is truly unfortunate and one has to wonder what it may have sounded like if she had had her way.
👍
Jan 11 2024
View Author
4
People may not comprehend that certain voices like that of Robert Plant or Brian Johnson, are excruciating to me and yet the gurgling drain that is Nico is far more palatable. Yes, there are conflicts. It would be treacherous to disrespect the person I was named after. She was one of my folks’ first musical loves, and I was taken to one of her gigs when I was but a wee nipper. She’s been in my musical consciousness since before I was born, so my heart is very firmly in her camp. Even though I prefer her album, The End, this is is quirky and wacky and completely lovely. Chelsea Girls is a classic.
👍
Sep 28 2023
View Author
4
LOVE LOVE LOVE NICO! she’s an icon. i want to live like her
👍
Sep 26 2023
View Author
4
good. dreamy, reminds me of belle and sebastian.
👍
Sep 21 2023
View Author
4
Good chamber folk/baroque pop album with hints of avantgarde. Nico's voice (and strong German accent) is very distinctive, instantly recognisable which may not be the cup of tea for many people but undoubtely it brings a lot of character to these songs. I like the arrangements on this album, though the production wasn't that great. Overall it must've been a fresh and different album when it came out in 1967. 3.5/5.
👍
Sep 14 2023
View Author
4
The sad songs are so good here and the one-two punch in the opening would be impossible for almost any artist to maintain. Such is the case here as the wheels kind of fell off for me with the song "It Was a Pleasure Then," but then I do feel like the album recovers pretty well and finishes strong with the Lenny Bruce eulogy.
Great sounding record across the board though! Love the guitar sounds. Random comparison: this album made me think about Jeremy Enigk's "Return of the Frog Queen." Sort of a spin on acoustic/folk music, with a strange voice people either love or hate, and orchestration runs through most of it. Probably shouldn't work, but it does somehow.
I dig it.
👍
Jan 03 2022
View Author
4
Look, I like violins as much as the next person--maybe even more--but damn these overdubs (like they're trying to make every song sound like "Eleanor Motherfucking Rigby"). They're so tacked on, not matching Nico's voice at all, which sounds like she's pulling her jaw back into her throat. And then just listen to "Winter Song": the power is right there in the (rather frightening) lyrics. We don't need a flute to tell us "this is a pastoral song, in case you couldn't figure it out". RYM ranks "It Was a Pleasure Then" as the worst track on the album, but I think it's the best because it's not got those damn overdubs. Everything is more real--the music, the vocals. It's pretty VU at its heart, too, what with the short bursts of howling feedback and the minimalist experimental vibe threatening to explode into a welcome cacophony that never comes. Nope. Bring the flautist and string quartet back in. Break's over!
👍
Dec 22 2021
View Author
4
8/10. What if Leonard Cohen was a girl?
👍
Mar 29 2024
View Author
3
By turns, both exquisite and exasperating. Rated highly for "These Days" and the other Jackson Browne-y contributions; rated 'interesting' for the VU-adjacent stuff, which have their moments.
"Ugh, this is boring and she sings so badly off key" - actual quote from a teenager whose favorite artist is Doja Cat. I worry for the youth of today
👍
Mar 27 2024
View Author
3
Nico often gets some slack for not really being able to sing, which I think is unfair as Lou Reed couldn’t really sing either. Anyway, this is a pretty strong if repetitive collection of songs with amazing orchestration, with the solemnly longing These Days being a clear standout
👍
Oct 13 2023
View Author
3
My ears yearned so badly for at least a little vibrato. Hauntingly wonderful tunes.
👍
Sep 30 2023
View Author
3
She has a lovely voice, interesting subject matter, and occasionally cool arrangements. But it does plod at a fairly droney tempo unfortunately. A good album, but more as a piece of context for a brilliant one.
👍
Sep 24 2024
View Author
2
First off, f**k the Velvet Underground.
I never liked them. EVER. I always hated that rock critics thought they were so amazing. The garage DIY has to come with a bit of skill. They're sloppy, too sloppy, and a bunch of druggies.
Then there's Lou Reed, who can't keep a tune if his gloves were covered with velcro.
So now we come to this album. And quite frankly I couldn't help but wonder if the songs would have hit better if either the singer was in a higher pitch, or used some vibrato.
As it is, it sounds like someone assembled a band and the producer brought in the girlfriend to sing. Maybe she would have been better with punkier songs. She doesn't fit the mood of the songs they're playing.
NEXT.
👍
Sep 24 2024
View Author
2
Nico's voice is terrible. If it wasn't for her Andy Warhol or Velvet Underground connection would she even be on this list? Although that's probably the point. You need to hear this thing that was created by Warhol, and this odd songbird that was one of his things. The musical arrangements are ok, but maybe a bit overdone in their attempt to add elaborate strings to the other instrument simplicity. I always talk about the 80's as being a weird time, but man the swingin' 60's, they might take the cake. The 80's was a bunch of people with no clue doing weird things. But the 60's can be downright pretentious. That's what this album felt like.
👍
Nov 18 2021
View Author
2
First Listen. At first, I didn't like it much. But, as the day went on I started enjoying it more and more. This is definitely different than what I was expecting. I like her when she sang with the Velvet Underground - and that was what I was expecting. This album definitely sound like the 1967, flower-power, peace-and-love scene, and I thought she would have more of that Berlin rock sound. After getting used to the sound, I started liking it more and found myself singing along a couple of times. I'll give it a strong 2/5 for now. It might be a 3/5 next time I hear it.
👍
Oct 20 2021
View Author
2
Honestly just... dull. The arrangements were okay, even interesting sometimes. The songwriting was passable. But man, Nico herself just does absolutely nothing for me. She was bearable on that Velvet Underground record, but here she has nothing to support her. Also, apparently she is super duper racist, so I am glad I didn't care for her music lol.
👍
Sep 24 2024
View Author
1
Holy crap, she's a horrible singer. Note to Andy Warhol, Velvet Underground, Bob Dylan, and Jackson Browne: you can't hear good looks. I might have given this a 2 because the underlying music was often pleasant enough but then I had to sit through "It Was a Pleasure Then" which reminds me why I dislike the Velvet Underground so vehemently. Feedback, awful guitar playing...yup, it's the Velvet Underground. This is one of the few albums that made me regret my commitment to listening to every album at least two times. Awful.
👍
Oct 27 2023
View Author
1
6
Based on this scale:
1 - 0 to 19
2 - 20 to 39
3 - 40 to 59
4 - 60 to 79
5 - 80 to 100
This is bad. The only thing that made this not get a 0 overall was the instrumentation. The vocals were terrible. Absolute waste of time and this is only an album you should hear before you die if you've been convicted of crimes against humanity and must be punished accordingly.
👍
Jul 15 2023
View Author
1
No. Please God no. Nooooooooooo! Awful
👍
Nov 23 2022
View Author
1
Bloody racket
👍
Nov 23 2022
View Author
1
The blueprint for this album was laid out by Nico's performance on 'Femme Fatale' off of the Velvet's banana album; a lush and gorgeous instrumental that had all the life sucked out of it by her drowsy and uninteresting vocals. On Chelsea Girl, that same process is repeated 10 times in what is a 45 minute snooze-fest that perfectly encapsulates Nico's mediocrity as an artist.
It is utterly remarkable how many listeners gloss over just how tone deaf Nico truly is. Each track sounds like she recorded the vocals before even hearing any instrumentals. Her vocal range and register are as wallpaper and monotone as one could imagine, yet this album has been lauded by critics as a timeless masterpiece. Not only did this album fail to push any boundaries, it hardly got out of centre field.
The only redeemable quality going for this record are its arrangements and production. For the 10 to 15 seconds before Nico's voice puts me to sleep, the instrumentals are whimsical and pleasant on the ears, with the clear intention for a strong vocalist to realise the potential of each song. Nico squanders that potential time and time again, that said it would've made for some nice lobby music as an instrumental album. Nico was essentially handed these beautiful instrumentals on a silver platter, to which she adds absolutely nothing of note.
In the same year as the Beach Boys release Pet Sounds; an album filled with diverse arrangements, ingenious songwriting and adventurous vocal melodies, it is one of the great mysteries as to how this album has remained relevant over half a century later.
👍
Nov 23 2022
View Author
1
Just how old is Jackson Browne? Was he signed by Columbia when he was 4? How is it that These Days pops up on an album made in 1967, about 6 years before he recorded it? This odd record has so many cultural intersections, The Velvets and Jackson writing most of the songs and poor Tom Wilson having to do the impossible and "produce" this. To think he went from Highway 61 Revisited to Nico. Andy Warhol wreaked havoc on popular culture, and for Nico alone he stands condemned. If the climate change activists really want to make their case they should throw Campbell's soup over his Campbell's Soup paintings and then stick Nico album covers all over the soup, what a fitting finale that would be.
Nico, dead on arrival. She'd be the Schrodinger's Cat of popular music, except Andy opened the box. Imagine wandering into a New York coffeehouse and sitting down to Nico in 1967, what price a cup of joe? The Wikipedia notes on this are hilarious, that she cried because Tom put strings and a flute on this record and denied her drums. I can't begin to contemplate what he was trying to do to cover up her appalling drone. There are some fine arrangements here in a desperate search for someone who can actually sing. I will never forgive her for the rendition of These Days (ditto I'll Keep it with Mine). I had to immediately play Glen Campbell's (oh aye, there's a Campbell's theme here) brilliant 2008 version, where, with the onset of Alzheimer's looming large, he so perfectly captured the pain of a four year old Jackson Browne lamenting day of yore. Nico needs to be deleted, thrown into the dustbin of history.
👍
Feb 28 2022
View Author
1
Manages boredom and irritation. "It was a pleasure then" is a collection of cacophony. Did those great songwriters (Dylan, Jackson, Hardin) write bad songs, or did she wreck them?
After listening to some other versions, the answer is that Nico can't sing
👍
Feb 28 2022
View Author
1
It was a folk album. I did not care for Velvet Underground and I did not care this album even though it is a solo album. Lyrically unnoteworthy. Nothing about it was good. I ending up skipping through some of the songs because I just wanted it to end.
👍
Feb 10 2022
View Author
1
Nico has talent... if talent is defined as an ability to sing every other note flat.
Awful to listen to.
👍
Dec 02 2021
View Author
1
She sounds bunged up and posh. I sound bunged up and posh sometimes too, but I'm not sure it's something to aspire to.
👍
Aug 18 2021
View Author
1
Awful. Sounded like Joni Mitchel, if she were terrible.
👍
Jul 25 2021
View Author
1
I think this algorithm is fucking with me. They gave me this after I went about panning Velvet Underground. This is a slight improvement altho the German accent makes it seem almost satirical.
Getting some nice Beatles vibes off the melodies and chord progressions but generally I found it a painful process trying to just get thru it. Had to listen to it one song at a time with breaks in between.
👍
Jun 21 2021
View Author
1
An album that really hits all the notes on boring music from the sixties. An album that drags on for an eternity that has absolutely nothing to say.
👍
Mar 03 2021
View Author
1
Dreary, one-note. The only reason it’s not forgettable is because of how annoying Nico’s voice is over 10 songs.
👍
Feb 25 2021
View Author
1
Moany and repetitive
👍
Mar 12 2021
View Author
1
nope. Sound like someone is singing in the kitchen to themselves, kind of amateur
👍
Feb 04 2021
View Author
1
She tires me pretty soon. Nice instrumentation though.
👍
Feb 03 2021
View Author
1
pas inéressé
👍
Feb 03 2021
View Author
1
J'aurais envie d'écrire une joke, mais l'album me laisse tellement indifférent que j'ai rien de drôle à dire. SKIPPPPP
👍
Mar 05 2021
View Author
1
lo peor que he oído en mi vida
👍
Jan 22 2021
View Author
meh, a forgettable album
👍
Dec 15 2024
View Author
5
This was Nico’s first solo album after her work with The Velvet Underground, and it took me a little time to get into it, but it’s really grown on me. The album is deeply rooted in folk, but what makes it so special is the strong influences of baroque pop and chamber pop throughout. It has that melancholic, dreamy atmosphere, filled with lush arrangements. Although the songs were written by other artists, with Lou Reed, Jackson Browne, and Bob Dylan contributing, Nico’s haunting, almost ethereal vocals really bring the whole album together. It’s like listening to a folk tale sung by a mysterious witch in the woods, her voice has that deep, haunting quality that sticks with you long after the album ends.
👍
Nov 18 2024
View Author
5
Overall: 9/10
This album really surprised me. I only know of Nico from her collaboration with The Velvet Undeground but I haven't actually listened to that album so I didn't know what to expect. I'm glad I had no idea cause this is so cool. Nico's vocals are haunting and beautiful and I adore the sparse, minimal instrumentation. I didn't think it was perfect and a couple of tracks seemed to drag on, but I love this style overall and I'm so glad to have had it recommended to me!
Fav Song: These Days
Least Fav Song: It Was a Pleasure Then
👍
Oct 23 2024
View Author
5
yes
👍
Oct 01 2024
View Author
5
Anyone who gave this a one has their ears literally busted. Don't review music anymore because you're physically not capable of listening to music properly. That's not a bad thing. Not everybody can do everything, but know your limits. You wouldn't be a food critic if you had no taste buds.
👍
Sep 19 2024
View Author
5
Loved it, very good stuff.
👍
Sep 17 2024
View Author
5
This album is great. Nico's voice is both beautiful and haunting at the same time. I know many of her collaborators wrote these songs for her to sing, and the arrangements are just beautiful. This is a singular work for a unique artist. Really great early morning listen.
👍
Aug 23 2024
View Author
5
I have a lot of time for this. I’m so surprised the average rating is as low as it is?
👍
Jun 21 2024
View Author
5
Melancólico. Voz oscura.
👍
Jun 18 2024
View Author
5
It blows my mind that this album is from 1967, it could easily have been a new release it still sounds so fresh and relevant.
Something about Nico just grabs my attention. From the first moments of The Fairest Of The Seasons I'm hooked.
Other faves: These Dats, Chelsea Girls
👍
Jun 10 2024
View Author
5
I love the way she drifts in and out of tune, especially on Little Sister and Eulogy to Lenny Bruce. Something hypnotic and tidal about it. The standout track is It Was A Pleasure Then.
👍
May 21 2024
View Author
5
Nico really made the velvet underground special.
👍
May 19 2024
View Author
5
Melancólico. Voz oscura.
👍
May 12 2024
View Author
5
4.5 - Loved this album, the music accompanied Nico's voice perfectly and I found it really unique. Only ever heard These Days and was happy that most of the album was more of that. Will definitely go into my rotation
👍
May 10 2024
View Author
5
Really, really atmospheric and beautiful songs. I love her voice.
👍
May 10 2024
View Author
5
Melancholic and beautiful to its core. I rarely cry to any song, but this whole album wells up my eyes between Nico's voice and the instrumentation. I really love the more experimental side of the instrumentation.
👍
Apr 24 2024
View Author
5
I've been properly obsessed with "These Days" since I first heard it in The Royal Tenenbaums years and years ago. Just remembered, too, that Drake (yes, that Drake) released a cover of "These Days," thought I dreamed that for a second. Anyway, I love Nico. I only know her for that track and her work with the Velvet Underground, but she's got this great spooky '60s voice that's just unmistakeable. She sounds like a ghost or something, she'd fit right in in Night Gallery (doesn't hurt that she looks a bit like frequent star Joanna Pettet). But I don't know what else to say, I'm totally on board with her frequency. I think some people hate her, I guess that comes with being singular. I had this explanation prepared about how it was just shy of five stars but maybe would grow on me more with time, but then I listened a second time and it was already growing on me, and that's from a place of loving it already. This one's a tenner.
Favorite tracks: These Days, The Fairest of the Seasons, It Was a Pleasure Then, Chelsea Girls, I'll Keep It With Mine, Wrap Your Troubles in Dreams.
Album art: Fits right in with my theory that she's a ghost. Huddled in the corner, haunted by her own visage. This is an iconic cover for sure.
5/5
👍
Mar 06 2024
View Author
5
so unbelievably good
Nico is such a one-of-a-kind artist - 10/10
👍
Jan 19 2024
View Author
5
Thin soundtrack to a Sunday at a museum.
👍