1001 Albums Summary

Fun, albeit a bit repetitive.

Relaxing, chill. Some songs that i like, nice.

It's curious: they have a unique sound that somehow carried within their albums, that's probably associated with Dave Grohl's voice and emotion. But, at the same time, they also have some other sounds different from what I've come to expect from them. ¿And a bit of the Nirvana sound, in the guitars and repetitive lyrics in some songs?? IDK

Seems to me like standard synth-pop. I mean, I don't know jack shit about this genre, so it's probable I don't get its importance. Anyway, it's nice, but it doesn't have anything special.

It's incredible how good this album is

Groovy, a bit repetitive. I don't really know too much about it's influence.

Amazing, experimental, incredible that this was from Chicago.

Folky, slow, chill. I guess the impact from this album is that is a female country singer and the lyrics seem to be personal. But it feels kind off slow and a bit boring to the end.

Wow. Dense, complex, but also really accessible to people like me that only like the musical part of the songs. It's this kind of works that reminds me of my limitations, as I cannot understand much of the meaning hidden in the English language. I wish I could understand more.

Meh. In a good way.

It's somewhat prophetical and really forward-thinking with some of its notions. But at the same time the flow is kinda boring and has a boomer song, that doesn't grasp the media and focuses only on "the tv" It's a mixed bag, i guess.

Kind of chill, but I don't really grasp what makes this album worthy of being in the book. Maybe is my lack of knowledge.

Really enjoyable, even without knowing too much about the band or listening to them little. Something interesting is how their sound is so far from Joy Division and even other albums that they made?

Fun, energetic, short songs, great hits.

Intense, rhythmic, really fun. I liked it a lot.

Really felt like an improvement in front of their previous album. Less repetitive but maintaining what makes their music so catchy: drums, guitar and something?

quite interesting how this album has many rock variants at that time. Nonetheless, the lyrics are emotional but not that interesting? IDK

alright

She has a good voice, and you can tell effort was put in this album. But the sound of the samples and that 80s kind of style (?) sounds atrocious

Some of these songs seem to be referenced or notorious, but the synthesizers are too much 80s to me

Groovy

Nice, happy. Iconic songs.

It has some really nice songs, nothing bad in the others.

Ehh, nice but not remarkable.

Something about famous artists that you've never listened before is that you probably will understand why they are so liked. I don't know anything about him, but i can sense the emotion and the quality of his music.

CLASSIC

cold, and dark, and ominous. And with some bangers. But thats it, for me at least

It's fascinating, the music from the Beastie Boys. Their flow, the way they sing, combined with the choices in the beats and the music, make them special. Nonetheless, I liked more the instrumental and musical decisions, more than the lyrics, so in that sense, I probably would like more their earlier albums.

okay

To some extent, good. A lot more experimental and complex that I could have expected

this is not folk, this is actually interesting to listen

despite being folk, it's so calm and easy that is really enjoyable

meh. notbad either

i don't like his voice. kinda monotonous, but not that bad

good, but the mixing and quality of the music leaves a lot to be desired

really good

i've find myself quite fond of some country bluesy classics. This is great stuff

Really enjoyable, albeit a little bit monotonous

Listening this album, and reading about it, you can understand why it's so high regarded. It's fun, well recorded, and it's a good way to listen to the band for the first time

nice, chill. cool. idk what to say

good, but that Sixteen song hasn't aged well. And it makes feel weird listening to the rest

meh

chill, nice. You don't feel the length, it flows easily

meh

almost as good as Duke Ellington at Newport. these live albums are great, energetic and have really good performers

Something notable with some hiphop albums is that, the ones that i like the most trascend the lyrical part. This is one of them. i don't usually care about the lyrics, but with this one, i can feel invested because the beats and the musical part is superb.

Despite not really connecting with the songs from him that I had listened before, it's a really fun and cool album. Even without getting how is he that popular, the music is not bad, and can make for a comfy afternoon

I remembered it a lot weirder. It's not. But also, it's not my type of singer.

Really cool. Chill, relaxed, good.

Ok.

Nice, chill. And the principal song, lmao

meh

Wonderful guitar playing, but felt a little bit long the album

Cool, a chill album

enjoyable, eclectic to some extent and comfy. really liked that guitars, and Shangri-La

Good, really good

it's like a warm blanket. but not too much warm

ok

really cool. I really like their music, and its influence can be seen i other artists like NIN

ehh

a clasic

zzzz

Really fun

ok

ok, chill and comfy

nice

really good

ok

CLASSIC

really good

better in total, but kind of passed me in it's meaning

really useful to get into something and focus

i really enjoyed it. night vibes

eeh

Cheerful, nice

it has an interesting context and it's enjoyable musically. but it's a bit long

more soft and sentimental than expected

it's great to listen to someone that can sing really well

truly somehow the way i'm feeling now

classic, some famous songs

great, underrated even

probably the best way to enjoy some metallica songs even if you don't like them that much?

enjoyable, albeit a bit repetitive in the second disc

eenrgetic, fun. not the best that i've heard, but probably due to not liking the songs that much

interesting, experimental. kinda trippy. but weird that they are french?

zzz

chill and nutritious. really enjoyable

i like the second part more

not what i expected, but okay

really fucking cool. but Jailbait 🤢

really good, with a classic hit. enjoyable

another set of bangers. I think the obvious issue with this band is how much their songs feel the same. It's not bad if you like them, but if you expect something more or don't like them, it's a big problem

impressed. i knew Bowie took many stylistic approaches through his career, but this is one that i didn't expected. really enjoyable, hopeful and good to me right now

With albums like this, I understood that I don't like certain type of 80s music. In some new-wavish style with eclectic instruments, synths and repetitive drum patterns that are interrupted occasionally by baffling decisions in the form of quirky noises. But this, at least it's not as sonically insulting as others. It's well thought and complex, pleasantly.

despite the hate for this band, i find myself baffled by how good they are. i think there's some merit in their music, long from the plagiarism and popularity. And how most of the songs here slap, i think that's the reason

besides A Forest, gloomy and pretty meh. Cold and sleepy

I haven't realized until now, how intense, sweet and contrasting is this album. dreamy lullabies and intense rage and fury, at the same time. Bittersweet and divine, in a classic gods sense.

I probably wouldn't like her as a person. But I get how incredible is this as a debut album, with the lyrics and her voice. It's powerful, and despite feeling strongly about some of the things, it's proof of the intensity and honesty of her experiences.

i remember reading about how Matt Bellamy from Muse got inspired to sing despite having a tenor voice, thanks to hearing Jeff Buckley. I think this goes beyond the vocal range, and has to do with how honest, vulnerable and sensitive it's his music. Every time i hear this album, i'm mesmerized with how powerful it is. I think i feel the way he felt. Listening to this, with better headphones than the last time, was an intense experience. His voice makes me cry. And i'm thankful for that.

quite varied, a lot of genres and well executed. I couldn't connect with it despite that, sadly

for such an interesting name, it's kind of similar to the Beach Boys. Not bad, i guess

not what i expected. Really cool some tracks at the end Chill and fruitful

somewhat unique and different from other country albums. chill

the duality of a man, in the lyrics of violence and vengeance against a woman, and the suffering and crying when she lefts with another. Despite that, it's catchy music and soulful. Enjoyable country

with the passing of time, and the years and the experience, i've come to understand that sometimes things don't get to me, until some time has passed. i can't get the grasp, i can't understand, i get lost and i lose the opportunities and the importance of some stuff that gets to me. But, in the due time, in the exact moment, in the precise sleepless night, in the rainy afternoon of gloomy and thunder and melancholy, sometimes, i get this stuff. I understand, and now it becomes important to me, and i become a new person because of it. this album feels like that. now it's cool and good, but not as radical and profound. but i feel, deeply in my being, that with some time, in the fight moment it will be important and i will understand it in another, more transcendental way.

it has a lot of importance and context, the why this concert it's so revered and regarded. but, at the same time, i find it very mood-dependent and far from what you would expect from Nirvana. That said, it still has some of the most interesting and brilliant performances of some songs. I still have "Where you did sleep last night" as a chills-inducing song. And that speaks by itself

comfy, but normal

like a faded memory, a feeling too intense that i cannot hold and slips through the crevices of my brain. a lot of pain, and sadness, and it's hard not to listen to this and not feel something. but even then, i can't grasp it

i'm guessing that this one it's some kind of proto-punk album that has become of cult. it's quite unique. not sure if that makes it better, but definitely it's not something i would expect from that cover and that time period

inoffensive, but 80s music. eeh.

grungy, but ehh. not that mindblowing

it's interesting the way that the figure of John Lennon has such an importance in the pop culture of the last century, that even today it has circled back to being despised for many things (pretentious, wife beater, said the n word, hippie, etc). But beyond all these stuff that mostly gets relegated to memes and chit-chat, i find interesting the picture that is painted when you really take the time to listen to his stuff. More than the Beatles, i feel that all the trajectory and events that lead him to his music feel in certain way that's only possible in a peculiarly organic way or a construed myth. I don't know which, but nonetheless, i'm intrigued by it, and listening to this album only empowers that feeling. I think that for such a depressing and personal album, ending it with a dedicatory song to his wife, says a lot. ¿Was he true in his words or it was just posturing? It doesn't matter really, as what's relevant it's the question and the discussion in itself

endearing, quite guitar rich and nostalgic. nothing exceptional, but it doesn't need to

kind of knew what i was expecting, but man. it's so incredible to find an album of these kind of genres that it's great from start to finish. even without knowing their importance or influence, it's stunning how creative and fun and intense their riffs and their songs are. truly a joy to listen to this

i think it's an album that it's really hit or miss: you really gotta like this sound, or it's quite repetitive and not exceptional. ehh

it's a unique album, but it's very dependent on your tastes and the moment you're listening it. While reading The Invisibles, worked really well. But outside of that, it's quite harsh and uncomfortable.

i love trip-hop and i love Massive Attack. Despite that, this it's not something as complete and realized like Mezzanine. Has some good songs, but feels more diverse and varied. Good in general but not as mindblowing

Interesting mix of harsh rock with electronic sounds. energic, rough, intense. not chill for today

it's deeply ingrained in my head, the quote from his publicist, about how his music didn't sold, but someday someone will realize how great it was. and it feels exactly that, how specific of a person must you be to like what he does. It's so dark and moody, in a nighttime way, that's difficult to recommend. But, when you get it, it's like nothing else. This album in particular, surprised as it was more than him singing and playing guitar. has some other decisions musically, that i liked.

Wonderful voice. The picks from this album I think mean more if you already knew them, but even without that knowledge, you can appreciate her voice and intensity. But, the last track it's a complete sidestep, and it's baffling to me how bad it is. I feel that it has that dissonance and weirdness of some contemporary music that the elite listens and that's only understandable under some serious layers of privilege and spiritual emptiness. Like the point where you don't feel anything anymore and resort to listening horrid music under the pretense that's complex and made by artists patronaged by you. And i say this as someone that has listened a decent spectrum of music. Like man. What the fuck is that repetitive guitar.

if you're told of it's importance related to being one of the first punk albums, it's noticeable in the way it sounds. but if you don't know, the album despite that, its good and funny. Nothing to call home about, but i think it's funny that nowadays an album about hamburgers, chicks, cars, and the most controversial stuff, getting high on friday afternoon, feels quite tame and casual.

technically, it's good, they make good albums. but nothing called my attention in this one

i tend to be against about albums having short songs. that tend to make them filled with a bunch of barely completed ideas. But this one is an example of how you do it. All killer, no filler. Even when i came cautious, after seeing this is the most well regarded album here, this album surprised me. Even when i loved before The Chain, i found other very enjoyable and good songs. It's so intense, it's so emotional, in a sense that comes honest, and really powerful. And all that its in 40 minutes. That's impressive

with this one i know that i have issues with this era/style of hip-hop. this bombastic style, that is so charged and energetic, can get so fucking distracting. it's ironic that i'm used to expect more complexity/musicality on modern hip-hop, but this it's like the monkey paw result of that. To say something, it felt like listening to some kind of Trout Mask Replica of Hip-hop, with how chaotic it was. Aside from that, it's lyrically interesting, but i would lie if i said anything more. It was really convoluted

the vibes and aesthetics of this album are quite unique and difficult for me to define. to say that is what i think the british and the UK were in that period of time, would be the best. But more than that, and more than the superficial feeling of this like something similar to Skins (the series), i feel that the aura of decadence, and corrosion, and this torpor that permeates the album, makes it something really special for me. like chemical flashbacks, like tasting the color orange. the odours and spirit of a puke and trash filled street. it's unique in the way that's not really that conventionally dark, or obscure, more happier and mellowdramatic. I think that's what makes it so special . specially essex dogs, paints really well the aura and feeling that i get from this album. perfect for a rainy afternoon, with your brain cooked, coming home.

It would be weird to think about Kanye becoming a neo-Nazi antisemite with a lot of personal issues, drug addiction, porn addiction and all the controversies that he acquired through the years, at the moment this album came out. But if you really listened to the things he has said through the years, even in this album you can see that Kanye's career came to be thanks to his personality, his pigheadedness that made him work even in some dire situations (Through the Wire). And this characteristic, that made him so well estimated as a hard-working artist with no compromises in his work, became a show of arrogance and dubious working ethics. But more than that, we can see how here, he already exposed some of the thinking and way of seeing the world that influenced his work and decisions in the years to come: His disdain (somewhat justified) of the academic system, dropping from college and how he feels it's not only something people fear due to it being the standard route of life, but that school indoctrinates people in a studying wheel without experiencing or doing real things. And how this became an anti-academic nightmare, believing conspiracies and harmful ideologies. His strong believing and faith, represented through the famous "Jesus Walks", and how he feels this strong assessment of "people can't sing of Jesus in the radio" that nowadays feels like typical crying from Christian nationalists, but then could be felt as a differential factor compared to other artists. And how it became nothing more than soil for his, and other people, weird nationalist Christo-fascist beliefs, that even when he tried to distance from them, a lot of people still have and celebrate, thanks to him bringing to the mainstream. His general contempt and opinions that more than the typical bravado and presumption a rapper must have, today is more known as the real personality and thinking of Kanye. What I think these things reveal, is that the life of Kanye has been the result if all of these characteristics took the worst outcome possible. We could talk about at which point it went like this, or what could've been done to prevent it, but at the end of the day, the way Kanye West is today, should not be strange considering this: that he was the same from the beginning, and despite his music changing in technical and artistic aspects, the content and message was at his core, the same. All the good and bad, and dirty aspects of his work are here in some or other way. In that sense, I feel this album it's quite good, albeit a bit weird to listen nowadays with all the recent events. As a debut album, it's impressive. In musical and technical aspects, I prefer more recent works. I don't love it, but it's quite sad that it's so well regarded, more than anything, due to how an asshole and an egomaniacal drugged, washed-out artist he has become.

I've felt this compilation of albums tends to be quite Anglocentrist. It's logical, in the sense that marketing this as other thing than "some good and interesting albums for an Anglocentrist audience" it's nonsense. But it shows how limited in its worldview can be a book about some essential and important albums that you "must" listen, and then, these albums are from principally from 3 or 4 countries. In that sense, and in risk of sounding orientalist, it feels so much like a fresh and interesting take on electronic music, this album. It's noticeable that some artists have evident influences from music from other countries, sometimes due to their ethnic roots, sometimes due to experimentation. But this album in particular, I've come to found it quite enriching and honest in his interpretation of sounds from Indian music ( and other cultures music, now that I've read how it was made ). It's quite a mix, and maybe it's not what some people would prefer (the Beatles take in this type of sounds it's more popular and accessible). But the way it's executed and represented, I like it a lot. It's this type of world music, that since I was a kid, makes me feel like it would be an agglomeration, a mix of human music and can represent us in front of the aliens. In other words, with this album, and Tool's albums, i realized that I like the Tabla.

On one side, I don't like that much the sound of some instruments in this album. It's a gripe that I have sometimes in some specific eras of music. Also, I don't like how near the end can feel somewhat repetitive and a little bit tiring its thematics. But all that aside, it's powerful. Intense and emotional near an uncomfortable level. One thing is to whine and bitch about being sad and how life it's terrible while being rich or having everything solved, the issue a lot of bands tend to have and the reason some people hate listening to sad music in general. It's common to find that the problems and the way some artists talk about sadness and problems, tend to be banal in some genres and ages. And some get distanced from their fans once they get popular and rich. But here is all different in the sense that the problems and issues depicted here are not only very real, but common. This anguish, existential dread about the common life, this lifestyle in England at that period of time feel very prescient and still applies in some sense. It's not only that, but I feel really real the way it describes the protagonist of the songs, not victimizing them, but talking about their issues, the things they do, love, sex, being a jerk, having fun, and facing the consequences of that fun. All that makes it real, and impactful. It's how the last song describes it: you can dance and party. Drug yourself and fuck people. Wait for the weekend and get wasted. Live day by day and don't think about the future. It's not a question of waking up, or changing that. You're conscious of these decisions and this life, but you can't change them. You can only take the best parts of this reality and survive the rest. At the end, it's a world full of broken people, and you must do the best you can. ¿How they make this sound so happy and fun?

it's my favorite album to listen and get high. but more than that, it's extremely chill, classy, aesthetic. it's one of the reasons i like so much trip-hop/downtempo. It's so evocative, in a retrofuturisc way. in a personal sense, i feel very strongly this album, and the way in can make me so relaxed and thoughtful. As Kid Cudi said "the lonely stoner seems to free his mind at night". But it's not sad, and that's essential to make it so differential from other albums in this genre.

Having only listened to their original album, I feel this one is unique in how they explore with some alternative sounds. Feels in general, on the same vein that Led Zeppelin, without a bad album in their numbered repertoire; but at least they feel less repetitive and more interested on doing other stuff. Changes is quite a song, isn't it? Now, after reading some historical context, feels surprising how well composed and cohesive is this one. Insane stuff in perspective

really mood and time dependent. i only liked a remix and that it's sad in some way

grungy, with some tabla and indian influences. It's what you would expect, but that sounds make it a bit more interesting

there's a level of intimacy and simplicity that's simply hard to convey with an album that's at the same time poppy and full of instruments. it was surprising to me, read that it had more musicians beside Nick Drake. It's an album that made me so relaxed, and comfortable doing chores that it's just representative of the power that has music.

if this album was something you heard on youtube on a random finding, it would be ok for a lazy afternoon, having it on the background and not thinking. But this is supposed to be one of 1000+ albums that you MUST hear. In that sense, there's nothing remarkable here. It's not even too experimental, or plainly boring. Disappointing.

comparisons are a hateful nasty thing. but is undoubtably that Sananda Maitreya is pretty similar to Prince. In some sense, the weight of that notion makes it hard to appreciate his work for what it is. In that sense, i feel, that this album made me like only 2 songs. but there's that same sensation i felt with the earlier works of Prince, that assures me his next works will probably be something more interesting for me. in other words: i like soulish heartfelt music from androgynous singers and this album is ok.

is notable that even when most of the songs are not written by her, her interpretation is outstanding and emotional. At the same time, some songs really worked for me, and others were forgettable . idk

soulful, emotional, but not that interesting

while her voice is pretty powerful, and her albums are personal and sincere, i find that the production that accompanies her music is really functional but quite simple for me. Maybe my mood made me not connect as i should.

I thought about a lot of things while listening to this album. But most of them relate to my personal relation to it, or its history. In general, I think that Pink Floyd has the case of a band that it's extremely well regarded to the point of overrating, but the time and the changes on the public perception has given them a fair assessment and place. This album is great. It's profound, complex, and intricate in the way a prog rock album can be, BUT, in difference to other bands, they were able to make it at the same time accessible and easy to listen. It has that long guitar solos and sound experimentation, but I think it's fair to say that they made some of the most concise and well crafted music on their genre. On other aspect, the personal theme related to Syd Barrett feels honest and quite sad. A lot has been said, but what matters to me is that despite the years, Shine On You Crazy Diamond and Wish You Were Here feel so potent and heartfelt as an homage to an old friend. You can not know about its inspiration, but these songs are still potent and powerful. Through the years I changed and grew. And despite this, Pink Floyd keeps remaining as an incredible band, that no matter how much I listen to them, are able to amaze me and make me feel so much as a human being. This album keeps doing that, and I'm grateful for it

not my kind of rock. kind of zoned out

his music has a lyrically complex and well written aspect, but i tend to find that musically is pretty servicing and simple. Here, this is somewhat ok, as i find the music good enough. But aside that, i can't concentrate on the lyrics. Idk why

so unique their sound, that everything from them is distinctive when you hear it. In that sense, calling this a "dark" album is quite simplistic. Even naming the genres of this one, is not enough to conceptualize the music and sounds here. Like a faded polaroid. A gritty street. Electrical impulses. a shadow over the forgotten suburbs. brown-tinted suns and corrosion that cover us like a blanket. These are some of the ideas i get when listening this. It's not only the sound, but the lyrics are really evocative and their use of monster thematics, with such punctual and corporal words. It's hard for me to describe, but the feel of intertwining, of being engulfed by another and the force of that desire, of the relation with another is something that bleeds strongly from this band and i feel deeply.

Felt more long and repetitive than i expected. But this is due its genre more than it being boring or dull. I'll be damned if this isn't a fun and energetic album. Some things haven't aged all that well, but it's really representative of that punk mentality and depicts an image of the UK that's important to think about. In some sense, things have not changed in how there's a portion of the population with problems and concerns against the government and the rich people. Nowadays, its just other music genres and more concentrated wealth

somewhat varied for a folk-rock album. i was expecting more intimate sentimental sad songs, but it's a testimony to how varied can be that genre, the way they made it.

i don't know how to rate this, due to how Sinatra works as an artist: prolific, with a lot of performances of songs that are not written by him and an excellent vocal ability. In that sense, some albums like this are "perfect". I don't find anything wrong, they are a comfortable listening and despite not being something revolutionary, his voice is superb. How can you classify an artist so proficient and so out of your temporal zeitgeist, that you're probably oblivious to much of other references and factors to judge?

there's a song that i think i recognize. beyond that, nothing remarkable.

energetic and fun. i think most of the remarkable showmanship skills that he had, are shown in the longest jam songs where he interacts with the audience and in the fast transitions between short songs.

Portishead on itself it's a legendary band in the Trip-hop space. They are easily one of the most recognizable faces, and they have a decent discography that's interesting in how they only released music when they wanted. That's remarkable due to the high quality of all of their albums and the strong aura and energy that contains their music. It's dark. That's the best word, but more than that, the nocturnal, dreamy, loopy, sad and nostalgic vibes that Trip-hop usually has, is something that's well represented in their 3 albums. The interesting part to me, is how these 3 albums (and their perfect live) despite being trip-hop adjacent albums, are different and unique in its own ways. In short, the first is a quasi-perfect definition of what is a trip-hop album. The second, is most grimey, noisy, obscure and, I must say, alien in some way. While the first was very cohesive, this second one feels expansive and an exploration contained to what you could expect from them. And there's the third. I must confess that the first time I heard it, I didn't like it. Its such a big departure from everything that was done until this point that felt jarring and uncomfortable listening to it. But that's the crux of it: while the first two albums were quite sad and nostalgic, this one is another level. In a second listen, with a better pair of headphones and more concentration I realized that this album is the logical conclusion of what they were doing before. It's a sad, intense, discordant and heavy album. But at the same time, is based on loops, samples, minimalistic in some parts and has the haunting voice of Beth Gibbons, similarly to the previous 2. In some way, if someone asked what could Portishead say after more than 10 years, this is the logical answer: nothing gets better. The pain, the longing, the nostalgia, all of that remains. And some of it gets worse. I do not think this album is something accessible and its totally understandable if someone outright dislikes and hates it. It has such a dark vibe, that at some point i feel it has somewhat of a spiritually negative connotation. But, I think, that it's an honest and compelling artistic work, and that I don't see how the repetition of the same style and thoughts of the first 2 albums would be artistically good. And even if I don't like it that much for casual listening, I find it essentially, without flaw. That's why Portishead is so well regarded, I think.

funny and sunny. i feel a lot of these albums are "remarkable" to someone that never heard much music before. But if you have listened to some Beach Boys, it's somewhat redundant to listen to this and not Pet Sounds. At least that one has some technical importance

i wasn't expecting such a relaxing and homey vibe from this album. The instrumentation and slow rhythm in its songs, with the use of bells makes it feel like a Christmas Album. And it's quite strange considering that is more of a popurri of songs. In that sense, can feel a bit samey. But if you're in the mood and need a relaxing and comfy album, this one is excellent. Considering that the little information i know about Ray Charles makes me think about him in a more soulful music related style, this is a great representation of his skill and versatility.

i don't really like the idea of John Zorn. This guy, that's a saxophonist doing a lot of performances, with chaotic and weird interpretations, with weird esoterica, mystical and even BDSM symbology in his works. With satanic and strange imagery. That has a following and a reputation of doing music that's relegated to fringe and niche communities of insufferable people on the corners of internet. But, this album is weirdly entertaining to me. It's my first intentional dive to some form of chaotic/free form jazz. And I liked it. Kind of helped me to tune out and don't overthink that much. At the same time, I don't think there's so much merit as people gives to this kind of stuff. I mean, you have to be talented and pretty good in what you do, to be able to perform something like this and make it somewhat cognoscible. But I don't think this is repeatable, or formally an album of songs. It's a personal gripe, but I think that music that falls in that "Theseus" category, where it can't be repeated to the exact bit, is part of a jamming/experimental/ interesting category or a bullshit category. And this album risks heavily on falling in the later one.

A monolith of music. Totally incredible and intense. Impressive as a first album. Conformed as a flow of songs more than individual ideas. Making the best way to listen: in its entirety for a better context. But i'm not feeling a 5 or 4.5. I don't know why. Maybe too much cohesion.

not my kind of rodeo these guys

Listening to this, I got lost thinking why was Coldplay not well regarded or acquired some status, compared to other bands. I read something about the earnestness of their music and how hard it was for something like that to resonate in an era of apathy and cynicism. And I'm in favor of that view. But listening, I don't really feel that big of a connection or amazement from their music. They are not bad, for a debut album is decent. But beyond the singles, this is not remarkable. And I think that's the problem: their music on this album is okay. In that logic, their next works, where they experimented and delved on other genres are probably more interesting. But sadly, I got this notion of them making music for "normies", so I didn't listen more. Maybe they indeed became a pop band. But in some sense, ¿Don't we want to see our favorite artists explore and experiment? ¿Is not this a monkey paw situation? Maybe the most valuable part of this exercise of listening music is the capacity to recheck some artists, their music and appreciate more with a new perspective

I really like Elvis. His music and career can have a lot of criticisms, but I find listening to him quite enjoyable and varied. This one is a popurri of everything, a show of many moods and emotions. But that makes it more akin to a "Best Hits" album than something more cohesive you could find on other artist. So, I guess it's not for everyone in that sense.

intense. i feel the choir adds a meaningful and emotional background that the artist by itself do not convey. In some sense, its quite confusing the concept of Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds by how little glimpses i've taken of his music and work. This is one of the most unexpected

maybe he's a great lyricist and this album was important for something. But here, his voice i find it atrocious. I don't know how an album with decent instrumentation and sounds, has such a contrasting and uncomfortable voice.

i was expecting something more boring or generic or basic, considering how these instrumentals seemed to me as nothing more than the prehistorical pieces of modern music. But to their merit, they are so catchy and fun and dynamic and entertaining, that they can stand by themselves. Listening to this while playing Death Stranding totally changed the mood and dynamic of the game. And i think that attest to the power of this music, not only as sampleable, but as music by itself

So chill and hypnotic, a pleasure to attest. A loungeful experience, of calm and rest. Nocturnal animals, of great charisma. Lyrical spirits, of wisdom and rythm. Its such a good album that you can see how influential was. Despite the years its such a specific subset of Hip-Hop, that its not common to listen to something like this in the mainstream. And for that reason, is refreshing, invigorating. The lyrics are something hilarious in how despite being in a flow so old and kinda 80s generic, are so capable of illustrating and constructing complex and interesting narratives. Narratives that are funny and varied in a way that feels like a novel. It baffles me how this album flows, from song to song, from story to story. I liked it a lot.

there are songs here that sound like every other Beck song from this time. And there are some that sound a bit unconventional and then Beck starts singing, This means, that if you like Beck, you will love this. If you hate him, you will have a bad time. In my case, sadly, and despite his musicianship, i have a hard time finding something that i like from Beck. Is so alien to me, that i feel indifferent to his music, and keep forgetting him. It's not bad his music. Only forgettable to me.

good voice, good singer folk. but nothing remarkable

Chemical glory. a lot of artists try to portray how it feels to being high. Maybe It's not so much that there's a perfect depiction, but more than there are different perspectives as different drugs hit people in different ways. In that sense, this album makes me feel high. Druggy. Fried. Relaxed. Loopy. Elevated. It's dense and sparse, and so energetic but contemplative. I think how they make it so sonically varied but cohesive in how they sing and transmit these feelings related to being in such a glorious state, is why I find this album so accurate. It's not the sound effects as the intention and psychedelic sound that make it so effective to me. In that sense, I think that even if you aren't a drug user, you will find it an experimental and entertaining album with a lot of party/danceable energy. Beyond its thematic, the energy and mood here is happy and good. ¿What more can I say?

i find his voice and tone so emotional and expressive, that even if i don't mind that much the lyrics when listening, there are some remarkable songs here.

such a fucking great album. I find LCD Soundsystem to be a group that makes really engaging and energetic music. But more than that, is the emotion and power that their anthemic songs have. Is sonically optimistic, and with funny and powerful lyrics. I think that the ability to make so much music that is easy to remember, has to do with how even if you think some parts are simple or easy, they are well crafted and well thought songs. And here, in a cohesive and well integrated way, all of their songs work. The way they managed to encapsulate and dictate the optimistic feeling of the 2000s is why every time i listen to All My Friends or Us V Them, i imagine a 2000s movie. Not because they were destined to be overused as music for media, but for how powerful and reaching their music is. Is hard not to like this or to remember it. Really good music.

i was expecting some weird album about animals, but it's a quite fun and energetic album that happens to have some songs with animal-related lyrics. It was alright

fun IDk

I feel that Pink Floyd is one of the most virtuous and better prog rock bands, only for the merit of making the most accessible and popular music in their genre, to the common public. Maybe there are other bands more ambitious, prolific, with better skills or ideas. But what separates them is the ability to present these ideas in a way that are musically good and accessible. I say this cuz, compared to other Rock Operas, I feel this one is really accessible and doesn't fall on this necessity that some bands have of making the instrumentation all orchestra and classical, only for this genre. And more than that, despite being over an hour I feel this album as something that flows really well and is very cohesive. But more than that, after evading and ignoring this album, now that I listened it, I've realized how impactful and important it is today. Beyond the general thematic and common commentary about this album being about a drug addict musician that builds a metaphorical wall around him, and how it came to be due to the conditions of his environment, also as an autobiography from Waters, i found that the real themes and the content that seeps from this album is related to masculinity. All the conditions, the travel that he endures and the way these things affect his life, mostly are related to the "patriarchy", as one would say. But what I found more interesting is that in the honesty of this record, you see that it's not so much a critique of this, but a confession, a story with all the nasty parts. And the only way one can reach the truth is being honest with itself. I probably would understand someone not liking this album, seeing it as whining or victimization. Specially considering the halo of rock star that these guys have and how the part that i least like here are the voices. But, I've got to say, I cried to some songs. And i feel that connecting so profoundly with these lyrics and ideas, of how are we raised, the expectatives of our environment, the results of our conduct, the pain we inflict on others, the rising of fascism as an answer to the uncertainty and search of meaning on authoritarian figures that fill the void with purpose. All of these things were relevant then, and are as relevant now. Maybe I've not lived all of that experiences. And maybe i'm not in the same conditions as Pink. But i feel deeply and this has made me think about all the stuff i have to get better in my life.

french voice, passionate and interesting, but the quality of the recording is mediocre. eeh

based on what i was expecting, with that cover and the eighties looming over, i was gratefully surprised for it to be a competent, with punk sensibilities rock album. But that doesn't mean it was something remarkable. okay at best

blood pumping energetic heavy metal. What i think is remarkable about this album, are the more introspective and longer songs. It's a pleasure that this type of album was able to contain these songs, with those solos that are really emotional. i also find the technical level quite apt for a debut album enjoyable

long and bloated. But, what's long and bloated, are songs, that despite not being every of them bangers, have the sensibilities and sounds of songs a decade later. They were far ahead of the time, and that's surprising. On the beginning, after some time, there are good songs, but many feel like mediocre 90s songs. idk

there's like one song that i like in this album, and despite the consistent sound and merit that has this band, felt mostly boring. In some sense, it felt like something where everything sounds the same.

i feel Thundercat has a style of production so peculiar that every time I hear something from him, I know it's him. At the same time, despite all the songs having some bass related ideas, some of them don't feel that fleshed out. Maybe it was intentional, maybe it has to do with the psychedelic, sparse vibe of this record. But sadly, for me, it meant that as a drone out album, it's really good. But not something more.

on one side, i don't really like the sound of REM. On the other, some songs here surprisingly are bangers and deviations of that sound. So 50/50

it was a surprise that this album was here, considering how anglocentric tend to be this list of albums. But despite the importance of Tropicalia and Caetano Veloso, i feel there are better and more important spanish-speaking albums. meh

i can say that this is an album that falls on a personal category of mine: foodie albums. Albums that relate to food in some songs, but not only that: albums that have the feeling, the sensation, the hedonistic persuasion, the pleasure transmitted, that you get when eating a good food. Sonically is like that. This album sounds exactly as the internet says about this band: sloppy, bassy, relaxed, chill, like that cool friend that has drugs, a place to chill and smells a bit bad. In that sense, i find this band a great surprise, a likable band under my sensibilities. But, if i must say, a problem, is that i find to some point, the song blend between them due to the overall vibe of the album. And if you don't like one, you will probably hate the rest.

It could be argued that AC/DC it's a substandard band by how similar and same sound all of their songs. That such a band gained such fame and success, it's also arguable. But, and I think here's the crux of the thing, their music fucking rocks. That's undisputable, at least on these classic albums. There's not much that can be said about this music. It's catchy, rhythmical, energetic, fun. Their songs have ear-catchy melodies, and are easy to remember. A lot of singles, bla bla. I think this is music that you listen when you start to explore rock music and popular music in general. And despite the time and other music, it still can be a safe spot for something fun to listen. That's all you can expect, and sometimes, ¿what more you need? ALso, i love Night Prowler. what a song.

"punk-pop" seems really obvious listening to them. And in that sense, they are energetic, with simple but catchy songs. I think that despite their abilities to make songs that don't feel as repetitive or monotone like other punk bands, they also can be a lot, 26 in some release. And that makes it a lot different in the experience. 10 good punk songs under 30 minutes are a good experience. An hour, not so much.

you can clearly see 2 things in this album: -it comes from the 80s, with those sounds, those synths that i tend to dislike -It clearly is a drowsy, edgy album that could only come from a drugged out, party influenced context. It was funny that I was thinking "this sounds like what I could expect from the Madchester movement, from what I've read. But without having listened some of that, I can't make that assumption". I've gotta say, is a trip. Not only sonically, but lyrically, with those absurd and edgy lyrics. If you like all of that, you will probably enjoy a lot of something like this. But if you don't like just one of the parts, it's quite probable that you end hating the rest.

the byrds go psychedelic. This album was better than the last one. Buy in some aspects, it feels the same, only with a psychedelic, acid inspired vision and sound. If you're into that, is a nice trip. it was for me

to make an album is by itself, a test against your mortality. There's certain aspiration, to immortalize oneself by making art. Maybe this thought is a stretch, but in the context of this album, and specially considering it's deep and personal meaning, I think it's accurate to think that. And to make music, in some elements, there's a logic, a language, a deep feeling of meaning in the music that comes from the conventions and basis of the musical theory. So, in that sense, to make a compelling album, sometimes is to make a compelling conversation. ¿Maybe, this album has so much weight and importance, beyond the ability and prestige of Coltrane, due to the audacity and ambition of making a conversation that conveys a profound meaning of adoration and humility towards a God? I don't know, for sure. I'm pretty ignorant in what regards to jazz. But I know for certain that listening to this album in that context, adds a layer of meaning that makes it impossible to see it with some respect and care. Maybe are my beliefs, but is conceptually compelling this album in that context. And that makes it good for me, even if I don't understand that deeply the musical and theoretical mastery in its performance.

a interesting song with synths, but another band that sounds indistinguishable from something like Grateful Dead. Maybe they were influential, but I fail to see that in the sea of other rock albums that feel as lackluster

in its own way, this band has a unique style. But i don't think that means, that this style is something that everyone likes. I find it interesting, but not appealing. and ok.

it's such a short but great album that i have nothing bad to say. Not only it has classic songs, the others are pretty good. maybe the lyrics of some of them, but i wasn't expecting anything else

when the vocalists voice works, i think is a really emotional and heartfelt album. But sometimes feels really whiny and uncomfortable. That said, i really like the brass section in a rock band, or any group really. So, it wasn't that bad

love me some psychedelic rock and the Latin American influenced, is sooooo goood. i find this one surprising, due to how contemplative and disposed to long songs and passages was this one, considering what I expected from Santana and his popular songs in media. At the end, I've realized that this is despite all, classic rock. Somewhat different, but follows the expected patterns of short singles being the recognizable parts to the public, and some of the others and sometimes, lengthier parts of the music were left to the album. And sometimes, those parts were the best. I think here is that way. Good and a fantastic vibe. And the cover is wonderful.

classic after classic after classic. I have nothing bad to say. It's quite an album made of songs that could have been singles. And what surprised me most, was realizing that so many songs had interesting lyrics beyond what i could have expected from a classic rock band.

i wish i liked this one more. i feel there are two great songs here and some others that despite being competent indie rock songs, felt not that special compared to other groups. But comparison is the thief of joy, i guess

i find it hard to define this album and what makes trip-hop and Massive Attack so special. Maybe is the moody night vibes that carry the specific combination of hip-hop rhythms, psychedelic sounds and female voices. But I think that there are limitations with that definition, as it doesn't encompass some other trip-hop albums. So I think, is more of a general definition that achieves to classify a lot of musical works influenced in a specific period of time and place (Bristol in the 90s). And a sound, that usually has this and that, but due to its experimental approach, can be quite varied. That said, i don't think this is the best album from them. I don't even think is a stellar or exceptional album of trip-hop. But i think is pretty good in perspective, and sets the bases of the more interesting and important sonical explorations that came after.

sadly, those jokes about how Björk sings, are a bit too real to me. I don't think she's a bad singer or artist, her career is a testimony to that. But, as i said with other artists, it depends a lot on your mood and preferences. And here, i must say that i don't like how she sings, even if the music is interesting.

i had to listen to this album like 3 times, due to errors in my scrobbling. and what i come to think after all that is that Pixies sound like nothing else. it's funny to me that in the wiki it says that this album is space rock. Not because it's inaccurate, but because to me, it sounds like other Pixies music. And that says all about this. If you like them, it's really cool. If you don't, you will despise this. I like them. I find this one appropriately abstract, comfortably disjointed, like a sunny day in the beach filtered trough nostalgia, anger and a drugged-out-colored-glasses. Is chill, has some nice songs. Maybe it's not as interesting as other albums from them and i must admit, i don't like the mixing in this one. The songs sound really compressed and not as differentiated and expansive as i could wish. Maybe a remixed/remastered could do it favors to the sound of this one.

more adventurous and experimentative than i expected. nice

There she goes and the last track, are absolute bangers. the rest, passed over me like waves of forgetting

Poetical and heavy feeling. Wish it would have been more musically diverse and experimental, feels contained and not so interesting

i liked the bluesy tone of this one. but it was disappointing that the first song was the longest and most interesting one

such a unique album. an indie album with a vibe much older and distinct. Soft, easy, melodic but not by the means of other conventional groups. a curious experience and an album that i think deserves the spot here. If i had to say anything bad, maybe, it feels really diferent to really have a point of context and comparison and i don't really know what to compare it to

apart from Heroes, there are some interesting songs here. Like really unexpected for someone that doesn't usually listen to him. And that speaks lots from Bowie and his ability

i think this album requires to have a more mature palate towards music. I say that, cuz, i remember listening to it some years before, and it was such a different experience from now: felt boring and weird. But after listening to some of the genres this album is clearly inspired, and after dipping my toes on making music, it's noticeable how hard is making music and how hard is making electronic music the way they did here. What i mean is that it's easy to listen to some rock group made an album with electronic elements, some electro-pop or synths. But I think Radiohead made an album with some songs that are primarily experimental electronic music with some rock sounds and instruments. It's clear with the use of these textured and complex sounds that feel primordial and the center of interest on most of the songs. It feels like such a logical and better version of OK Computer, or KID A in the sense that here is a full immersion in that electronic sound. Besides that, i really dig the nocturnal vibe and thematic here. Is obviously melancholic and sad, like other albums from them. But more than that, feels somewhat minimalistic and more personal in its sounds. More close. I must say, i probably prefer other albums from them. But this one is a shocker under the new lens of perspective, time and experience.

i love this band. they are such fun and engaging musicians. And the lyrics are also wonderful. I don't know if it's all that about Pete Doherty being a poet, or how easy going but pretty concrete and exact with the language they use. I also find the way they play and the songs are composed, to be pretty interesting. As an example, their guitars in some songs are more focused on leading the rhythm and energy of the song through repetitive but creative riffs. It's pretty interesting to me how unique this sound is to them and how different feels when playing. I must also say, i don't think this thing i'm going to say is healthy or rational, but I find the heroin chic vibe of the is cover so iconic and powerful. Besides the story behind, there is some nearness, some love that you can feel depicted there, and it's unconventional between men. It speaks volumes the way this pic reflects the profound relationship between Doherty and Barat. and how it's in its own way, rebellious and unconventional, as the music of the album

easily one of the best albums from them. I have not heard many others, but here are Stairway to Heaven and Black Dog. And beside them, I find it so engaging how each song has something interesting to say musically: the groove, the melody, the concept. I find each of them remarkable in some way

i was sad, and listening to this, i got happy. Basically because Johnny Cash was hilarious, and i didn't expect that. I find these prison concerts really engaging and meaningful. Knowing a bit from his story, you can see how authentic and genuine what he does, is and how deeply he can connect with the inmates. And the country songs, the stories, are good stories, parables even. A great artist.

a fascinating album the way it is like a mainstream rock band doing their songs in a prog way. It sounds incredible and i feel it's due to this approach to making songs like Child in Time. I think even in other songs, you can see this style and that little more complexity, gives a lot of interest and appeal to this album

Absolutely relaxing, comfy chill. I don't know much about bossa nova or this type of jazz. But is so calming that it is inits own way different from other albums here. That said, i can't lie: it flowed and sounded like an entire long song. And in some sense it was indistinguishable from other similar things I listened to in the past.

i think i don't like 80's/90's rappers. (with some exceptions) There are some beats here that are interesting, but mostly, this flow of rapping boastfully over a repetitive beat, without anything else, feels anachronic and boring

i love this album. i find it pretty influential for many reasons: -the graphic design of the punk movement it's here a lot. and it was really influential, is so creative in how with this limited resources approach can make a style so iconic and influential. the lettering, the cover of the "God Save the Queen" single. And the colors, it's a choice so specific that transmits that rebellious acid energy -you can say what you want about the non-existent virtuosism or ability of the musicians here. same with the logical destination of a band so nihilistic and caothic. but you can't deny how important and influential was this sound and the political meaning of the punk movement. it's so radical, and i feel it stills holds a lot of importance. i think with the time, some songs have only more power in their vision of the decadence of the british empire -the energy here, how they sing and play it's sloppy, its half-singed. nowadays, a lot, if not much of the rock bands that play carry that energy and vision of performance. It's a standard that you couldn't see with other bands in the rock sphere in that decade, a distinctive style. it's interesting to me how this idea of a band being disruptive and chaotic became more normal with the time. not to say that they were the first or the only ones. but that they are distinctive. i find some songs iconic. i like the sound, is a short listen and it's not boring. ¿what else i could ask for?

the whiplash i got when i recognized the tune of the Exorcist. I think it is a profound and experimental showing of prog music. i find it difficult to classify due to its instrumental nature. But that is what's more impressive: making such a compelling, flowing, and emotional work, without words. that said, i feel it suffers from having such extended songs. Is gratifying and awards the listening time, but it's not something you can hear easily in the day or something.

enyojable punk. i find interesting how here are longer songs with a style singing more dramatic and relaxed. feels weirdly cohesive with how the the guitars and lyrics keep that punk vibe

a really impressive album. on the vein of artists that make incredible debuts while being in their 20s. it's interesting to me how underrated/ not that known is this before the appearence of Running Up that Hill on Stranger Things. And more so, how little of the other songs have been used on media. while listening i got this strange relation with the debut album of SOPHIE and how i feel that Hounds of Love feels like the Oil of Every Pearl's Un-insides of that era. Maybe is the similar pastel tones on the covers, that both artists are women, the song about drowning/cold/strong emotional poweful feelings, but more so how, Hounds of Love is more experimental and creative that i expected. Obviously is not electronic and so avant-garde as SOPHIE's album, but i think that for that moment, is a really risk-taking pop album. Songs like Jig of Life are something i would never expect from an album and artist like Kate Bush. And that makes it so appealing and surprising for me. That said, i must say that the second part of Waking the Witch is an atrocity and fails due to using that horrid 80s sounds that i detest. That makes me doubt if this album is a 5 stars one, but the rest is pretty good

really interesting and exploratory album.i remember some sampled sounds here and what makes it so interesting is how it doesn't care on maintaining a similar form on all of the songs, giving space to some songs without lyrics. And despite that, it has certain mood and cohesion. i can say, a nice background album. not an insult, a really nice album to chill

some i liked, some i did not. i guess Rod Stewart is a musician and singer with a long history and prestige, but here i didn't see anything remarkable or interesting

on my head, the RHCP are a band that i really enjoy in some songs, and has a extended discography with that songs. In reality, i only liked 2 songs here, and the rest where background noise. idk

interesting how a "Country rock" album that starts with 2 songs that can be resumed in "woman, am i right?" has a song of draft dodging it's like the worst parts of country and rock merged: monotone songs from the point of view of a conservative man with a twinge of rock sounds and distortion, and mentions to drugs or a little antiwar. it's this type of albums that makes me question the validity of this book. ¿Why was this album so important to include it in? The monotone sound? the sexist and typical lyrics? the name of the fucking band? Even Hippie Boy, that is somewhat of a narrative and more competitive song, feels bafflingly dull compared to something from Johnny Cash. Now, that's a good country artist that can sing songs from the point of view of a man an touch themes of drugs, rebellion, redemption, etc

angry, hateful mug. i liked it a lot, has energy, has good rhythm and a really consistent sound. If i must say something bad, it's a really specific album for a specific mood. if you're not in the mindset or energy, it's a bad ride

this is something that deserves it's spot here. personal, intimate, calm. and interesting in a way i find compelling personally. i'm a sad person and these type of albums gets me deep

i expected something a lot better, and well mixed. but this sounds horrendous at times. chaotic in a bad way. idk, but even if i liked parts, there are other moments that are weird in a bad way

they are a band that has such a weight and popularity, that when you listen to them, you can understand why they are so loved and hated. but that weight makes it difficult to properly judge and evaluate their work. Here, i like everything i hear. is what i expected from 60s Beatles. but beyond that sound, what i find intriguing is how there are elements that feel "rebellious" or pretty rockish for a boy band. in some sense, is logical and obvious, but nevertheless, is something i didn't expected that evident. So what i'm trying to say, is that with a cold head, i never really listened to the Beatles. I only listened what other people says of them. and that makes me think that to properly give an opinion, i must listen and talk based only in my assessment. and that is, that i like this album

good iconic riffs, angry energy. i was expecting more of Pantera, but is functional and what you could expect from a metal band

i hate 80s music sounds. but Prince is Prince. Truly a work of genius how i can dislike aspects of his work, but there's always something i love in his albums, and all of his songs are competent, fun and engaging. i never find myself thinking that something he did was bad or meh. always good

cool, soulful but not that interesting

i was expecting more. and i don't really know what i was expecting. knowing that my knowledge of Queen is limited to their hits, here i found nothing remarkable or interesting. But, i say that considering that they are proficient, and good musicians. the performance of the band, the voice of Mercury, they are all good. So in comparison to others, this is an average album from a really good band.

Another album that makes me doubt the credibility of the books. is nice singer/songwriter music but absolutely nothing remarkable, for the standards of women musicians that are better than her

there are interesting parts here, but it's mostly another english rock band that nobody thinks much about them nowadays. i've come to notice that, a lot of albums and groups here are absolutely average and are only selected due to the great pride and market that the UK has culturally. Not only on music, but critics that are able to make livings of talking about unremarkable music from their childhoods.