1001 Albums Summary

I had to look up these guys. They look/sound like that band that has a great work ethic and have had to jump between labels to get their exposure. But, at the same time, they sound like an indie version of Counting Crows. There were some nice melodies, I actually really enjoyed 'Jenny' a finger picking ballad with melodica/accordion part. However, there's nothing exciting to grip me. I only get one listen. And I'm not sure a second would make me any more excited about this. Bog standard, pop rock. 3 stars. Good on you, American Music Club for not being on Spotify!

This was really soulful and really positive. Mo-town vibe, great vocal performance. Unfortunately, my son came up to me and spent most of the album listening to Roald Dahl's 'The Enormous Crocodile's on my knee (an excellent performance from me!). It provided suitable accompanying music to the excellent voices I used to Humpy Rumpy and Mugglewump the monkey. 4 Stars.

This album gives off all the vibes that a David Bowie album should be. You can tell it's him, he brings his style. I'm not a huge fan or know a lot, but I'm guessing this is rather late in the career. The sound is very 2000-2010s. There's a nice amount of synth, the guitars rock. It sounds like he's got KASABIAN or a band of that nature as his backing band. I ran while I listened to it. I thought it was pretty catchy. However, the lyrics aren't great. There's some shockers. There's some average prose and average rhymes. 3 Stars.

I'd heard this album was 'a lot'. Random sporadic jazz, weird keyboard sounds. Not entirely awful, but hard to pin on to. It's either way too complex or a simple melody repeated over and over. I didn't particularly enjoy myself. It felt like the achievement of reading an old time classic book. You're glad you got to the end but not really sure what was going on in the journey. If it was a live band, I'd have walked. Or at least spent the night at the bar. 2 stars.

I tried listening to this album a few weeks ago, I got annoyed and turned it off. Today, I put it on while I was ironing a massive pile of shirts. And, actually, I really quite enjoyed it. While the songwriting doesn't always hit the bullseye, there's a really nice range of sounds on this album. He can sing, of course. And, the 2nd half was quite funky. It really made me enjoy a mundane chore more. And at my age, that's what you need. My only criticism was that there were songs that I felt like I'd heard them before, I'm wondering if his discography is a bit same-same... 4 Stars.

After 'Raw Power', I was worried this was going to be more of the same. However, this album is really saying something! Particularly for 1969. It's edgy, got plenty of attitude and the musicianship makes a statement. It also features a bit of range. Not sure how I felt about the closer. I'm not entirely into the 'soundscape of noise'. But, otherwise it was a decent listen. 4 Stars.

I am fond of a few LCD Soundsystem songs, but generally capitalised on the ones more based on melody than the disco/indie/dance sound that they are well known for. As a result, I've never really bothered to listen through a whole album. School boy error! I knew I'd like this from the first song that I'd like this album. And the opener 'Get Innocuous!' was like a demo version of the album. It had the drum machine type beats, the understated disco guitar, quirky vocals and grimey bass. In fact, the grimey/garage bass that ends up on the album throughout was a highlight. I haven't done HUGE research into this group, but I can imagine a guy in his bedroom with drum machines, keyboards and a bass really having a great time coming up with there. Boy! I should have been doing that in 2007. 'All My Friends' and 'New York, I Love You but You're Bringing me Down' are epic indie tunes, and I am a huge fan of the latter. But, the rest of the album was a real pleasure to listen to. My highlight would be 'Someone Great', a dance tune that captured the indie song sensibilities in the lyrics/vocal performance. I enjoyed the dance elements as well. 5 Stars Album 4 (done over the days of 2 and 3) 23/7/2025

I thought I wouldn't like this. My first impressions, No-Jacket-Required-Era Phil Collins trying to be Bowie (which after a few Bowie albums on this list being absolute stinkers, is an ominous sign!). The instrumentation seemed pretty dated, in that 'hasn't aged well' kinda way (not old enough to be cool). Seemed like the kinda album an uncle would give you. Mine would give it to me and give me a taste of his favourite joke, 'the penguin'. However, there are some nice spots in this album. 'I Don't Remember' was quite a nice song. I did take to 'Biko' initially with the mixture of indigenous vocals, pipe band and african drum combo - then I remembered Crowded House did it better on Together Alone. AND... it sounded like one of the members of Baha Men was shouting 'Who! Who!' in my ear. Whatever happened to those guys?! No. I know you, or anyone else, cares. I did HATE 'Games without Frontiers', and I was glad the album was over. This one sits in the middle, it's not going to leave an impression on me, but I wouldn't openly slate it vocally to everyone (looking at you 'Soft Machine'!). 3 Stars.

I went into this one with two differing opinions. One friend told me it was 'overproduced and coulda rather than shoulda trash' (or something to that extent), and another told me it was absolutely epic (rose tinted with, and I quote, 'a can of cheap bitter in my pocket and the choir on stage at Glastonbury!'). I was pretty impressed with Elvis thing at the start. The album reeks of the 90s. I had it on with some friends last night, and a girl asked me if it was 'Blur' and then tried to argue it when I said it wasn't. There is A LOT going on throughout the album. And the closer (17 minutes! What?!) was a bit much! But overall, I found myself enjoying this far more than many albums I've heard on this experiment. 4 Stars.

I didn't know much about Jeff Buckley. I knew he sang 'Hallelujah'. But, when I listened to it, I didn't think I'd ever heard that version before... So, perhaps it's one of those things you hear so being done so much, you don't bother with the original. There's probably a movie or two that I could name quotes from without ever having seen it because it's been 'done' so much. But, I digress, the album: It was a rollercoaster of the 90s. There seemed to be songs across this album that reminded me of something else, but then were original in their own way. I liked that. I liked the range of the vocals. I liked that he could sing a song that sounded like it was a hymn, and then go dirty rock afterwards. I liked the songwriting, I liked the singing. I liked the album. But, I didn't love it. At least not yet. 4 Stars.

Angry girl punk. But there are a bunch of cool horns. There is also a real sense of melody amongst the aggression. I quite liked it.

I think I owned a copy of their follow up to this, but rarely listened and I vaguely remember it being a synthy affair. This album really pumps! It was grungy/garagey and had a cool range of songs. It began heavy, and then became more complex as it went on. Maps, the single I vaguely remember was enjoyable and then the two follow ups were even better. 4 stars. And, sorry for the lame review....

I was originally going to say that there was far too much horn in this album. But, seriously, the further it went on, the more it felt like I was reading a detective novel (which ironically didn't pair AT ALL when I tried to read several pages of the one I am reading now...). The jazz I've had on this list normally pairs well when I am doing work or jobs, but this album actually was really gripping as I went for a walk listening to it. Probably a bit too much horn for me, but big names and a lot less big band sound than the last Miles Davis album we got. Think moody, dark little venue. Wait, is that Del Paxton! Nope, he's fictional. But that's the kind of music I'd expect to hear in that venue. A solid 4 stars.

I really like Public Enemy. This album is a nice progression from 'It takes a Nation of Millions to Hold us Back'. They've ditched the catch phrases a bit. But, we still get the odd 'Yeah boy' and 'Here we go'. Again, I love the sampling. There's a nice range of familiar sounds (including their own, can you sample yourself?!). The raps are quite political and racial. But, I'm cool with that. I particularly liked Ice Cube joining in on a song about hating Hollywood (well, Ice, famous now in Hollywood...). The more I hear from these guys (35 years too late!), the more I like it. 5 Stars!

When I heard the first song on this album, I thought of 60s groups like 'Them', in fact I thought I'd found a new cool group I've missed. Maybe it was the album I found, there were like 3 different versions, but half of the songs just had a weird ringing/synth/funny voice that droned throughout. It distracted me, a lot! I'm going to guess this is/was something that people have enjoyed. But as a one time listener (yep, probably won't again!), I didn't really see the point to it. They're a classic 60s group in a time with many 60s groups, I don't see what made them special. Really. 3 Stars. They're still better than The Hollies.

Whenever this list throws me a turd, I seem to bounce back with an album I quite enjoy! Rose tinted glasses perhaps? Perhaps. Anyway, sweet afro/jazzy/Latin beats. Great horns. A general good feeling. I actually thought about dancing, or asking my wife to dance in the living room. Then I remembered I'm an awkward dude and can't dance! 4 stars! Should be 5.

I asked a friend to pass his Arcade Fire collection onto me in 2012, but I never bothered to listen. Fast forward to 2014 and I was at Glastonbury, on the Headline Stage, playing the first two tracks off this album. They quickly joined the rotation of my playlists. However, I never really bothered to listen beyond that. Well, today, I did. Unfortunately, I was stuck at work and had it on in the background. However, I did really enjoy what I was hearing. It didn't pull me away from what I was doing, but there was a lot I liked in it. Not a very helpful review, but I'm giving it 4 stars.

This album ranks as my second favourite album of the members sitting in a bath on the cover. 'Monday, Monday's sets the tone for the album well. Great harmonies, a nice orchestral section. I watched a documentary on the this sound (I think it was called 'The Valley Sound', but I'll only quote this in brackets because I'm not that confident! There's a nice blend of vocals and the songwriting is fairly catchy. I did enjoy it, however there is fair bit of dates lyrics which didn't sit well with me. I enjoyed the inclusion of my favourite underrated Lennon/McCartney track. However, I felt like it was music I would enjoy by myself but not with company. I mean, I wouldn't openly let people know I was listening to it... It's cool, but not THAT cool. 4 stars.

Cue the 2000/2001 vibes. Kelly, Beyonce and the other one (Michelle?) can sing. And the independent woman song that was linked to the Charlie's Angels movie is fairly catchy, as are the next two songs. The album is top heavy and slumps after that. Including a depressing song at the tail end which is about sexual abuse (but the girl still being beautiful! Which I understand, but I feel there's more to address here). A gospel number addresses that they can sing, but not much else. And, I skipped out of the last song because it was just them being thankful to each other, not my thing. My big problem with the album is with the oxymoronic themes. 'I'm a strong independent woman and I will survive', but at the same time 'I'm sexy and my butt is too sexy for you, and I can get down with the rest of them'. I'm just not sure they've got a clear message. Perhaps I have the wrong end of the stick, I wasn't that engaged to listen to the lyrics to heavily. Perhaps I didn't understand. Perhaps it's a product of the times. 2 Stars.

The Eagles suck. I grew up with my Dad pumping a greatest hits in the car, which actually contain no songs from this album... I knew from the intro to the title track that this would be awfully drawn out. Look, I get Hotel California's place in rock music, but track two was back to that country sound that would burn a hole in my ear while driving to Orienteering events on Sunday between 1998-2002 (before I got my own Discman). Life in the Fast lane, 70s rock, eh... Not particularly inspired or interested. Shocking lyrics. It sounds like a lame attempt at ZZtop (but perhaps it's the other way around, I don't know the 70s that well!). Wasted Time speaks for itself, waste of time (clever, Dan!) and it really doesn't need a reprise. A nice classical score, but not beneficial to a bland record. Coincidentally, probably my favourite track (the reprise, that is!). I skipped through 'Victim of Love' 3 bars in... Just struck me as everything wrong with 70s rock. Pretty Maids All in a Row, I actually quite enjoyed the quiet intro (way to be innovative, Eagles!). I actually thought it was Dave Dobbyn singing briefly. But as soon as the flange/phaser guitar came through on a lounge piano I lost interest. The penultimate track had a nice riff and a pleasant melody. Felt like one of the more enjoyable tracks for me going in blind (or deaf in this case?) until that ghastly Eagles vocal 'Oooh' harmony came in. If I remember correctly, that was a staple of my Dad's greatest hits CD. Some redeeming features in the guitar playing, the nice kind of flashy, decent arpeggios. And, I love a stop in a song! So perhaps this is the winner on my 1001 best songs from my 1001 albums... Disappointed that they ended with a piano ballad. But then the prog synth came in and I could sense the build up. However, the reward was not there. I love an epic ending, this one fell short. Ironic as the Album title track would have been a better closer. Did I hate the album? No. It's something I could have on in the background at a dinner party. Turned down low, and I would probably make it clear to everyone else that someone else had picked the music. But, I went in with opinions and attitudes to begin with, so that one is on me. Dan's review number 1 (21/07/25) Hotel California - two stars.

Unlike yesterday's record (Hotel California), I went into this completely blind. A friend had raved about the artist. But apart from 'it's awesome!', he gave nothing away. Frank Ocean sounded like something indie. Also, I was lying on a beach, staring up at the clouds. Not lying exhausted in bed, cursing that I had to give away my time to listen to the The Eagles. What a difference it may have made. So, I was pleasantly surprised when the intro had the Playstation start up music in it. The synths and drum machine entered, and then voice. I like it. The melodies in each song are a bit strange and don't necessarily stick, but this guy is a talented singer. From track 2 and 3, I got a 'The Love Below' vibe. Think Prototype, hip hop sensibilities, but something different. I was then not surprises to see that Andre 3000 himself makes an appearance on the album. The instrumental is what I really like. Nice mixture of orchestral, drum machine and synth. Then, I was pleasantly surprised to hear a cool guitar line at the end of Pyramids. Then! John Mayer turns up on an instrumental track! My track of the album (the one being added to my playlist) is 'Super Rich Kids', a melody that I can't put my finger on. Cool inclusion of rap, nice backing. This isn't something I'd normally listen to. I get the vibe of it being blasted inside a trendy cafe or a boutique clothes store. I like it. However, I wouldn't see myself walking the streets listening to this, soaking everything in, singing along... Perhaps one day. I'll add it to my rotation. 4 Stars Tuesday 22nd July - Album 2/1001

I saw Ozzy Osbourne at a 2 night rock festival in 2008. Unlike the band I'd come to see (KISS. Yep, I know...), and Alice Cooper, I'd not really listened to a lot of his stuff. Nor much Black Sabbath. I think I learned the riffs to Paranoid and Iron Man in a guitar lesson as a teenager. In fact, I'm not even sure I'd watched the Osbournes on TV (apart from that cameo they had in Goldmember). It was a fantastic concert. He performed well and it since led me to have some appreciation for his work. Not that I've ever bothered to actively listen to it. It's a shame that he died, he was clearly a talented guy. But, I digress. Black Sabbath: Paranoid. Extra points for a brilliant cover. War Pigs! What a tune! My wife and I listened to it on a drive today to pay some homage to Ozzy, and then when I checked the website and saw that it was todays album, we listened again. She mentioned that she really liked the drums on the song. I agree. But the riff, and many on this album, are rather epic. Got to throw out a mention for it's use in 'Metal Lords' (love that movie!) To kick off an album with 'War Pigs', into 'Paranoid' is quite a statement. I'm not sure your average heavy metal fan in the 70s would have appreciated the softer and more sombre 'Planet Caravan'. But, it felt like a welcome change. Particularly with the follow up of 'Iron Man' Alright, that's the songs I knew (minus one). So, the rest! It's dark, brooding and sludges away. Not normally my bag. It's loaded with riffs and Ozzy's singing has a lovely drone to it. The drums were surprisingly enjoyable. The drum solo on Rat Salad was a highlight! I've stood at the back of crumbling music venues and watched people try and emulate the sound over the years. Tony Iommy has certainly inspired the masses. I like the riff idea, but I prefer when it's used in punk... Heavy Metal is a genre I wished that I loved more, but sadly, it just doesn't paint my wagon. I liked the rest of it. But I didn't love it. My take away track would have to be 'War Pigs', I know I'm looking for new tracks to add to my 1001 albums playlist, but it's the song that I thought I liked, but actually loved. So, some growth there for me. RIP Ozzy. 4 Stars - Album 3 (23/07/2025)

This is the first album given to me that I thought I'd take to very quickly. I knew the era, the I knew a little about the band, I thought I had an idea of what the band would sound like... However, this album didn't really do much for me on the first listen. The guitar sound felt like I'd heard it a hundred times before, the bass sound identical to a hundred punk records I'd listened to years before. I have since read a review that claimed it could be the 'blueprint for Britpop albums going forward'. Halfway through the album, I was disappointed, struggling to find a groove it. Yes, there is attitude! I can see why it would have been popular at the time, but the flame didn't burn particularly bright for me. I could often predict the chord changes, a lot of songs sounded like I'd heard them before by other bands. I enjoyed the 'Indian Song' (not sure if we would still be able to call a song with a sitar vibe with that title). 'Vaseline' was a jaunty way to end the album. 'Connection' felt like a staple of Britpop, and probably my takeaway from the album. Don't get me wrong, I didn't hate it. But, it while a solid album, it didn't make me want to explore the band further or add it to my permanent rotation. 3 Stars

Rick Rubin making Johnny Cash relevant again! I have listened to this album a few times. I remember the stripped back sensibilities, with an aging Cash crooning over the top. The opener is a great tune, gives us an idea of what (I hope) to expect, which in my opinion is exactly what track one should be. And, great that the guy was still penning absolute bangers at his age! Unfortunately, that's all the original music we hear for a while. So, on to the covers: 'Hurt' had it's moment in the sun when I was younger, in fact, I'm not actually sure I've even heard the original. Great emotion in the performance. Cash's voice gives off a broken man vibe across a lot of these songs, and at this stage in his life (not long before his eventual passing), it is a great way to go out. But, sadly, the covers don't keep up with this consistency. I'd call the covers the 'tale of two albums', there are tunes which have been performed in a way where they stray drastically from the original recording. Or, they blend well into what I believe Johnny Cash is famous for; risky, honest country music. 'Personal Jesus', 'I Hung my head' and 'Sam Hall' are other good examples of this. The rest are just stripped back performances of famous songs. 'Desperado', 'In my Life' and 'Bridge over Troubled Water' fit into this catergory. Yes, it's the Man in Black. Yes, he performs with a lot of heart. However, at the same time, it could be anyone. Any busker on the street. He hasn't really done them the promising justice the first two songs promised. 'Tear Stained Letter' was a welcome refreshment, and I wonder what this album would have been like with a few more self penned songs on it. 'We'll Meet Again' is an ironic end to the LP. I also have a super soft spot for a clarinet (particularly on an album closer! I'm hoping another one of my favourites turns up on this list!). And having the 'gang' with him, nice way to end it. Yep, you know what? That'll be my one I'm taking away for my playlist (I know the opener quite well already, so it doesn't make the cut!). Well, it's certainly not my favourite Johnny Cash album (I'm mad about his live concert at San Quentin!), but it made its impact at the right time and I appreciate the efforts put into it. And, 2002-2006, everyone my age knew all about him (also thanks to that movie). 4 Stars (JUST!).

Honestly, this album was a slog. I'll start by saying that performance from the musicians are absolutely top drawer. The level of skill is very clear. They can sing, they can play and they have obviously spent a long time throwing this together. But, that's what it feels like; thrown together. Each song is broken up into small pieces of songs that span across a wide range of genres. I know, I know! That's prog, right? However, I found it hard to latch onto any one of the four songs I found on this album (and I was gutted to find out that there were bonus tracks on the version I located!). It's disjointed for a verse/chorus/verse/chorus simple mind like me, and frankly, I didn't enjoy this. There's a lot of 70s stuff that I'm sure they pioneered, but we've heard heaps of since then and I don't really like. I did enjoy the 70s synth, I'm a big fan of that sound. 'And You and I' is probably the one take away from me, probably because it has some melody that sticks, amongst all of the randomness. And, personally, I preferred the bonus track version (so, I'm not even sure it counts!). I cap my song length at about 8 minutes. Sorry, Prog. 2 Stars.

I can't say I've ever sat down and listened to a full Taylor Swift album. Partly because of my age, gender and taste in music. However, I was surprised how many songs I recognised. She's popular. For someone who has been accused (on many occasions) of being an uptight music snob, I've never really had a problem with her. She produces (writes as well?) catchy music. She appears to have ditched the country sound I recall she came onto the scene with. Anyway, the album. 1989 starts with an MC-808 beat and a song about New York. I'm sure there's a reason she started it this way, but there wasn't anything particularly inspiring about one of the world's most sung about cities. It's been done, love. It's been done. However, as the tracks went on, I actually didn't mind it. She knows how to write a good melody ('Bad Blood', 'Shake it Off' and 'Out of the Woods'). While the lyrics didn't particularly hit home for me, I could pick up on the vibe she was trying to give. I read a little about the album in an incredibly expansive Wikipedia article and nodded along when it go to section where it talked about synth pop. I've decided that my song I'm going to add to my playlist is 'Blank Space', upon second listen I realised I was listening more intently to the lyrics and enjoying the melodies more than yesterday (when I wrote most of this review). I'm sure it's a hit, but I'd not heard it before. In fact, the second listen found me enjoying the melodies more and more. Taylor Swift (and I'm sure a series of writers/producers) can write a catchy song. I understand why she's so popular. So, in summary, I didn't hate it. I'd even perhaps admit to others that I kind of liked it. Perhaps. 3 Stars.

It's the album I wanted to like. I've heard enough people talk about bands like this. The Shins, The Tragically Hip etc etc. Cult followings, people who have had their life changed by it, and cool people who listen to them. And as the album came through the headphones, I found that while the musicianship was fun, the songs sung with heart; there was a boring level of simplicity to it all... Each song felt like two chords. You could tell a lot of work had gone in to the final project, but it all stemmed from utter simplicity. And when I only get one to two listens a day, I wasn't particularly over analysing the lyrics. I enjoyed it, but nothing really stuck with me. Dare I say it, it felt like background music. Now, background music to a party full of trendy people! But that's not how I consume music. I want it to make me feel something, he energised or inspire me to perform myself (yep, I'm weird like that). This album did not. 'War on War' was probably the one that I'll take away with me. Although I really enjoyed the melody of the finale track (and a great way to close in epic form!). I await the hate from the hipsters. I really wanted to like this more than I did. 3 stars (Just!).

I was not excited at all for this album. Red Hot Chilli Peppers are a band that I've had forced at me through friends, radio and party music. I knew a handful of songs on the album. Who doesn't with the state of radio in my home country? However, I've never actually sat down and listened to an album. Possibly out of spite. Possibly because I had formed an opinion. Possibly because I thought they were everything wrong with popular alternative music in my life. But here we go: Firstly, I was actually quite impressed with the range of music they produced in this album. I've come to associate the band with loud aggressive singing, that slap bass and Hendrix inspired guitar lines. 'Give it Away' and 'Suck my Kiss' are two numbers that I know well and I found them quite grating to listen to. However, across the rest of the album is a nice blend of funk, rock and even ballad in sections. I am sure I've had 'Breaking the Girl' shoved down my throat at some point, but I'm not sure I'd ever enjoyed the shift in guitars. This guy plays such a wide range. I don't really know the history behind him in full, but he's so diverse. Backed up by a solid rhythm section. Even I'm not too hipster to enjoy Flea. My take away is 'I could have lied', a nice bit of mellow melody brought further forward by great guitar work later in the song. The thing I didn't enjoy was the vocals. Frankly, they just pissed me off. Yes, he can sing. But I found it more often than not just a shouting/talking in my ears. It's an album that I enjoyed, but I'm not quite ready to slam it on repeat just yet. 4 Stars.

I went into this album blind. I've always thought Bowie was just a cool musician. He had significant impact on music and managed to turn up in some of the cooler pop culture moments in my youth. He was the guy you liked if you really understood music. Well, that's what my younger self thought. Fast forward fifteen years and he died. Around that time I was playing in a band where the singer was obsessed with all of his music, and the radios were blasting his hits at full force. I tried to listen, but I lost interest Low begins with the instrumental, 'Speed of Life'. There are cool, quirky synths, tasteful (but also quirky) guitar lines and a dance beat. I was hopeful that this was a taste of what was to come on the album. Certainly making my playlist. Low is littered with instrumentals. Sadly, very few match the energy of the opener. They range from strange and ambient which could feature as a soundtrack to a 70s sci-fi, to sad and miserable. There's only once that they set up a song too. The songs themselves are Bowie. You can see his stamp on them. There's no absolute catchy banger, but there's what I can only guess if him experimenting without losing his identity. I read up about the album and see what he was aiming for. Did I enjoy it? Yes, I think I did. Would I listen again? Probably not in a hurry. 3 stars.

My brother had this on cassette when I was younger. Being not too aggressive, it was allowed to be added to the rotation on road trips. A true honour. My dad famously survived 18.47 seconds of RunDMC (yes, we timed it). I will be honest, I'm not a U2 fan. I have not listened to this album in at least 20 years and it doesn't get a lot of radio play, bar 'One'. I did however enjoy 'Zoo Station's, nice harmonies, loved the driving bass in the chorus. Edge has his ambience in the guitar. Bono's wails aren't terrible. I was hopeful. 'Even Better than the Real Thing' delivered too. The riff feeling like it could be home on a 60s album. Bono's voice was starting to grate on me. I remembered reading about this album. How it was incorporating dance beats in and moving away from a rock record. The tour was huge too. Cementing them as a stadium band... Perhaps why I hadn't ever seen them live. Ha. As if that isn't the only reason. As a kid I had a soft spot for 'One', catchy. My favourite performance of this one is actually in the Irish comedy, 'The Stag'. I won't explain the joke. But it's quite well done. The album felt more 90s as it went on. Bono's lyrics got pretty awful: 'In the garden, I was playing the guitar. I kissed your lips and broke your heart...' Yuk! And did he not just mention spiking a drink?! Edge comes through with tasteful guitar to distract though. He's the real hero here. It seems. Love is blindness is a pretty lame way to go out. Did it hold up? It's probably the best U2 album. They tried to break ground. And, I think they did. Am I sold on the band? No. But it's a good jaunt in the park. 4 stars.

Despite cracking my teeth on punk years ago, I've not really listened to a lot of Iggy Pop (nor the Stooges for that matter). The album title, 'Raw Power' I found a little unfitting. Perhaps it was that I listened to it while running on pretty low quality headphones (with not much volume - sorry, Iggy). I wasn't kicked in the gut like I was hoping to. Strong punky guitars. Not a lot of memorable variation between the songs. I did enjoy 'I need somebody', which boasted a grunty blues acoustic and that wailing that I've come to associate Iggy with (or what my friend used to channel in a band he played in 2009). This felt like an album that I would put on and enjoy but not soak into. Not quite 'Raw Power'. More, 'Powered, but not Blasting'. Smooth, perhaps? Ah, 3 Stars.

A few years ago, I would raid the thrift store/op shop record bins, hoping for an excellent vinyl. I struck lucky a few times with jazz records. The sort of album, I could toss on while making a cup of coffee on a morning, enjoying the morning sun and relaxing sound. I'd never got any Ray Charles, and when it said Country and Western (yes, that's right, both kinda!) I was a little unsure. The songs themselves don't sound at all in any country manner (except the odd string of notes). Hank Williams's 'Hey, Good looking!' has been given a big band revamp. And that's the highlight of this record, the backing band. It's strong, tasteful and very busy! Lovely cinematic style orchestration, jazzy horns and backing choir that sounds straight out of a 50s Disney movie. Charles can sing! Even the solemn numbers he still belts out with exceptional baritone. I suppose I never appreciated his pipes! This is the sort of album, I wish I picked up. I will get copy one day! And, usually 5 stars is for albums that I could proudly blast out of an aux chord in someone's car. But, hey, I don't care anymore! 5 stars!

I own this album. I know this album. I know how influential this album is. I also think it is full on drones. Ostrich guitar. Droning orchestral parts and droning voices. Nico's voice is haunting and the rest of the band sing well also. There are some gems in here and decent songs too. But, on my listen, I found myself annoyed by the droning and some of the more experimental parts. The guitar solos on 'Run, Run, Run's, and basically the end of the closing track. I can see why this album is some important, but also why critics are divided on it (when it was released). 'Sunday Morning', 'Femme Fatale' and 'Heroin' are favourites, and I discovered how much I liked 'There she goes again'. But, holding it back from five star status is the reusing of melodies, experimental parts and drones that at times can annoy me. 4 stars.

Someone had raved about this group to me a long time ago. Yet, based on the guy's previous enjoyment of music (he wanted to start a U2 cover band!), I'd ignored it. It was a pretty hefty listen (double album at 1 hour 22), but overall was actually quite decent. All of the music was clearly well thought out and I enjoyed the mix. Lyrics were a bit questionable at times, especially when the vocals sound like a man in his 50s is blasting them out. And yes, that old guy voice isn't my favourite. But, I did find myself engaged in the music and found some catchy stuff on here. 4 Stars.

I put this on when I went for a run this morning. Electronic drums started, weak toned garage style guitars and bass joined in. Random girl shouts and a whole lot of attitude (with random sound effects in for good measure). I got what they were going for. I could have said I'd heard it all before. Yet, four or five tracks before the end, the albums became more sophisticated. It sounded like something that would go well on a soundtrack to a cool movie. Hell! I'll say it, I felt cool listening to it. This carried on for a few songs before a back to basics closer. Inconsistent throughout, but it was a nice listen. 4 Stars.

'Introducing the Band' came on and it was giving me horrible flashbacks to an old Spotify algorithm where it thought that I liked Suede. The voice grated on me, and I didn't think it was particularly inspiring musically or lyrically. In fact, it took me three listens to really get through this album. I will admit that it got better. I even found myself caught up in the hook of several songs, including 'Heroine'. And, as the album progressed, I found I wasn't that bothered by it. In fact, I kind of liked it. I really emphasise 'kind of' here. Not sure I'd look them up, but they have their place. 3 Stars.

This album came out of the gate with a massive early 90s feel. The bass, the vocals, the delay in the drums, the percussion. Felt like a theme to a cop show. Wait, was this used on the Wire? (I realise that's not 90s). I listened while doing housework, and while I have no complaints, I wasn't particulary engaged. No melody stuck out. Despite the fact my five year old son ran and got his toy microphone hoping to sing. That's never happened before! 'Unfinished Sympathy' stuck in my head a bit. I'm sure I've heard it before. But nothing else on the album was memorable. Not bad, but not memorable. 3 Stars.

Someone had put me onto this album 5 years ago, and I remember listening to it, enjoying it. And then, never listening to it again. I'm not sure why. This time round, I really enjoyed it. Particularly for the variation in backing music, sampling and the vibe it was giving off. It wasn't lazy hip hop. In fact, the lyrics are particularly clever within the raps. I think if I'd been a teenage when this came out, I'd have been a fan. Sadly, I was born this year and broke my soul on down strums and moody music instead. Funny how that happens. "Yeah, boy!" (or something to that effect) makes it's presence known throughout the album, and it's cool to hear a motif (or catch phrase) without finding it to irritating. I actually really enjoy his (Flava Flayv? right?) voice on this album. A lot of the rhymes sounded familiar, had they been used since and there were some really clever lines in there. I also like how the sampling was used to the extent that I vaguely recognised what they sampled at points, but then it was changed straight away before you had time to pinpoint exactly what it was. Don't believe the hype. 5 Stars.

This album started with what I thought was going to be a lofi solo album. The sort of thing Graham Coxon or someone cool would list as an influence. And the first song possibly was there. Afterwards, what followed was confusing, and quite unpleasant. The melodies random, the instrumentation difficult to listen to. In conclusion, I thought it sucked 1 star.

This was a pretty punishing listen. I have heard a lot about Prince, 'the guitar player's, but a lot of his work on this is awful 80s soloing. His vocals were quite whiney and I didn't really enjoy it. Yes, Purple Rain and Doves Cry are catchy enough, but it doesn't do much to make up for the rest of the album. 2 Stars

I had never heard this album, nor had I really listened to Elliott Smith before. I put it on and did some housework. The guitar on the album was the first thing that jumped out to me. It had that jangle sound I quite liked. The lyrics also seemed thoughtful and his voice didn't grate on me the way some singers on this list have so far. 'Somebody That I used to Know' was a good example of this. And as the album went on, I found myself finding it pleasant. But, really, 'pleasant' is the only word I could find for it. When the album finished, nothing stuck with me. To be fair, perhaps I was focusing on the aforementioned housework... However, one album a day, I can't linger on relistens... Still, 4 stars. Perhaps I'll give it another listen in the future.

Firstly, I think it is important to highlight how diverse this album is. To me, R.E.M. is usually just indie songs with catchy melodic guitar. But there's a nice selection of rock riffs and heavy bass to compliment some of the softer catchier songs. There was even a grungy one on there. Stipe sings with passion and there is a wide range of guitar to compliment his vocals. However, not a lot sticks for me. I ran to the album and it kept me moving, but not inspired to run faster or further. They'll always be a middle of the road band for me. 3 Stars.

This album really captured the 2000 vibes (despite being a motion picture soundtrack set in 1970). Air are a really cool band. The finale really annoyed my wife. But she hates monologues over music. Solid 4 stars.

I ran to this album. They're a band I've only known for raw aggression. And that snare that sounds like a glass bottle being smashed. The first few tracks ticked all of those boxes. It kept my heart pumping, and while I wasn't hung on every sound (dancing between stereo for a lot of the 'extras'), I did find myself enjoying it. Even if 'Smack my Bitch up!' isn't the most appropriate line (it's gotta be satire, right!). But, between the shouts and angry bpm dittys, I found a really nice mix of different sounds. They veered towards an Asian and Indian sound in various points, 'Mindfields' being a nice break from the shouting and 90s aggressive guitar-over-beats-n-bass. 'Climbatise' was also a welcome addition, and in my opinion, should have been the closer. The Asian drones over the tight bass and arpeggios left a pleasant experience in my head (and provided much needed tempo for my run in the hot Korean humidity!). I probably won't listen so aggressively again, but a solid 4 stars. Wait a minute! Is that a crab on the front?! Can I give it another star for that? Probably not.

Who starts an album with a song that is an emoji? Really, I am of firm belief that this album only made the list because it's Bowie. But, the more I listen to his whole albums, the more overrated he becomes. The musicianship has little pockets of interesting. The lyrics tired. Kinda cool to hear him swear, but overall it was one of the harder listens on this list. I didn't mind 'I can't give everything Away', as it was more conventional. But the rest of it was a challenging smack to the senses. I was going to give it 2 stars because it is Bowie. But, I'm better than that. He's better than that. 1 Star and I want 37 minutes of my life back.

Epic long piano music, played solo. Boo! Hiss! However, this was actually quite listenable. Not in a actively sit and watch the live concert, but in a feeling stimulated while listening and doing other stuff. A decent housework or, in my case, schoolwork record. Korean coffee shops have given me a new appreciation for piano music. I'm not quite sure why the applause is so excited at the end of the record, but I get it. 3 Stars.

We put this album on for a drive across the island I live on. I think I'd picked the score from the first 3 notes. The drums on this album were really top notch. A real highlight. The horns, not so much. It was just that sporadic jazz style that I think if I watched live at a show, I'd eventually shout obscenities at. I like jazz, but this seemed like one of the albums that sent people towards Jazz fusion (something I don't like!). My wife said, 'this is good background music.' I'm inclined to agree. Middle of the road 3 stars here. When do we get to the Dave Brubeck?!

'Know Your Product' blasted through my Bluetooth speaker and I was automatically excited about this album! The horns were absolutely pumping! The rest of the band (singer included) reminded me of generic punk bands of the 70s-80s, a kind of groany/flat voice and that guitar sound/riff type that is prevalent in that era. Sadly, the rest of the album is fairly generic. The horns waved goodbye and I don't remember hearing them again. A harmonica turned up at some point. There were small areas of catchyness and you could tell they were trying to vary the tone throughout. I'm sure if 'I was there' when this album was big, I'd understand more. But, like a lot of albums/bands of this time ('The Replacements', I'm looking at you!), I didn't buy the hype. 3 Stars.

In the late 90s around suburban New Zealand, there were tonnes of kids who claimed they loved this album. Kids under the age of 12 who claimed they loved this album. Wore the tshirt etc. I can't really complain, my mother bought me a South Park tshirt with the word 'ASS' on it when I was 10 (which is MASSIVELY surprising considering she would have skinned me alive had she caught me watching the show!). Call me all the names you want, but I would be horrified if my ten year old son was listening to this crud. It's angry, uninspiring and quite depressing. You can tell that there is a talented musician calling the shots, as there is a nice range of guitar lines and structures within the songs. Sadly, it's overridden by tasteless screams and kind-of-whine-and-cry-but-still-sound-menacing vocals. There's nothing wrong with raw angst and anger, and there were plenty of albums that did this well in the 90s, trust me! But, this is miserable. I gave up. Couldn't get past the halfway mark. Go on, judge me! Ice Cube (cool!) and Fred Durst (not cool!) make cameos. But even that doesn't help this age well. I'm sure there are a lot of lawyers, accountants and surveyors who have embarrassing memories of listening to this (and probably even more so when they read the lyrics!). Say 'Okay Boomer!' to me if you wish, but this was a 1 star. And hell, I'll say it, would have been 1 star in 1998 when I was a ten year old! 1 Star (even though I cheated and never finished it!).

Think what you want about Michael's personal life and controversy (not that his corpse defend itself and his legacy...), but this album is a classic! An album with rock riffs (and 80s guitar stars making cameos!), catchy hooks, nice mix of different beats and an overall positive tone. There's a reason this sold the way it did. 'Wanna be startin' somethin'' opens well, and is probably my standout track. I love the use of the African vocals towards the end. Yes, 'Billie Jean' and 'Beat It' are firm favourites from yesteryear. Not that I played A LOT, but 'Billie Jean' always reminds me of GTA Vice City (was that track even in that game?!). I also forgot how much I liked 'P.Y.T (Pretty Young Thing)'. I bought this album in 2009. 2 months later, my copy was stolen! Then he a month or so afterwards, MJ died. I felt like such a loser buying the album again post death. I did buy a special edition, however with a bunch of Quincy Jones voiceovers at the end, which were actually quite interesting to listen to. It's clearly a 5. But, there are weak points. 'Thriller' is catchy, but if you think about what a thriller actually is and the lyrics he (and the late, great, Vincent Price) are referring to are really more about a horror movie. But, the ultimate insult is teaming up with 80s Paul McCartney (his worse incarnation!). Two guys (one old enough to be the other's Dad) singing about a girl they both like. Macca's voiceovers are punishing as well. I like that you got him back by buying his royalties from under him, Michael! Nice one. Still, 'The Girl is Mine' doesn't pull it away from 5 star status.

My sister (or brother) had a copy of this album when I was child. I vaguely remember the cover sitting in a CD stand during the 90s. So, I was eager to see what this was all about. A nice mix of electronic and contemporary music. What was surprising was each song started with a sad depressing and often quite strange melody. Only then to become something catchy and enjoyable as the song peaked. The ender had 'She's So Heavy' style arpeggios (love a bit of that!). And overally a pleasant listen.

Am I allowed to slate an album for its drum sound? I didn't find this album very exciting. Hated that 80s drum compression. The vocals weren't really my cup of tea. It really seems like an album/band that has a series of die hard fans, but for everyone else; they were just there at the right time. Perhaps like Alien Ant Farm. 2 stars from me.

I'd been warned this was a slog. And, yes. It was. I didn't hate it. But I didn't finish it. Firstly, Ryan Adams was making a bold call putting him in front of the American flag for this one. Nothing is overtly offensive in this album, it's just not very exciting. It's soft, folky country. Kind of like an updated but less exciting Dylan. Yeah, yeah, he can sing. But it felt like watching a b grade sitcom. I wasn't ready to wait it out for the 'will they, won't they'. And for goodness sake it's a double album. One star. I don't even feel bad for cheating.

For me, Janis Joplin's name has only ever come up when people talk about the '27 Club'. So, it was refreshing to actually listen to some. This girl can/could sing. And, she comes straight out of the gate belting it on '...Move Over'. She then proceeds to continue throughout. Her voice is raspy and on the edge of peaking at times, but it's pleasant. I listened to this album after 'Elvis is Back' and while both albums were quite similar (in a way), it was nicely welcome. How were they similar? They're both albums that focus highly on the vocal performance. Elvis is Elvis! But, Janis has a great variation in the performance of her backing band. There is a nice mix of different styles of songs. I really enjoyed the accapella bluesy Mercedes Benz. The only downside was the organ sound. It's all a bit 1970s for me. I can't describe it. But I was turned off by each song, the more the organ arrived. And, yes, it got heavier as the album went on. Still, a great performance. 4 Stars.

I promised myself that I'd go into this album cold and not research it. So, here's my inference-based thoughts on this LP. Elvis is back? He must be fresh out of the army. Time for a bunch of crappy movies and the stepping stone to a Vegas residency/being built like an ostrich. Oh, boy! That Tom Hanks movie really stunk. Elvis can sing! He's got a lovely range. Unfortunately, the album does not. 'Fever' (again, inferring here) is a decent cover. But, the rest of the album is very similar. A lot of that 50s rock piano. And blues progressions. He belts out and shows his range as a singer, but there is a serious lack of 'rock' (and/or roll). A lot was similar in the writing/arrangement. 3 Stars. From a guy who starred in an Elvis themed musical.

I didn't think I'd rate this album that highly. I bought it twelve years ago. I had inherited my brother's copy of 'The Bends' as a teenager (I think he traded it for Shihad's 'Fish' album, ironically the first 'cool' album I ever bought/received as a kid), and I really liked it. However, the intenseness of Radiohead fans, led me to not listen beyond this particular album (I know we're going to get 'Hail to the Thief' at some point on this!). If my memory served me correctly, I was expecting a few catchy singles ripped off the Beatles' White Album, No Surprises (which I've always enjoyed) and that weird song where the robot speaks. 3-4 Stars, why not? But. While I remember a lot of whine and a lot of drone, there's actually some great work on here. Some songs that are upbeat. The jangle of 'Electioneering' I really liked. The final two were great ways to go out. Paranoid Android is still brilliant. I get why this band is so popular. Not sure I'll listen to any albums beyond this willingly though. 5 Stars.

This album is like the time a couple of girls invite you and your mates over to one of their houses to watch DVDs. One of your mates chooses the movie 'SWAT'. It's not memorable. Yes, it has action scenes and a big budget, but you couldn't quote a line now or remember who exactly was in it (was Terry Crewes in there?). But it's an exciting romp. Predictable and not difficult to listen to you. One of the girls wants to snuggle up close to you (I know?! I'm just as surpised) and you ignore the movie for ten minutes. But who cares? You know how it is going to go! The movie finishes, you forget it. The girl never texts back despite the texts you end with 'tb'. You'll do the same again next week with Ben Stiller in 'Starsky and Hutch'. 3 Stars. Imitation in the highest for of flattery.

I was weary about this one. The previous Dylan album I'd listened to was pretty awful. I don't know the history very well. At some point, Dylan goes electric, and everybody goes poop in their pampers, right? Is this the album. Because it made a massive difference. His ramblings suit a full band more than just a guitar, and I actually enjoyed a few of the numbers (even if my wife didn't really care for them). I recognised the odd tune here and there, and there seemed like more of a melody that was accessible woven throughout. I say woven, because there were still some of the same style songs that I didn't particularly enjoy from 'Free Wheelin'...' But, 'Mr Tambourine Man', yep, it was alright. And the closer was actually a really nice song. I was going to give this a 3, but actually I feel it's more like a 4. 4 Stars.

Dennis Wilson always seemed like the second coolest Wilson. He surfed, he was meant to be the actual link to the California scene. Yeah, really cool. Not hard when you're with Brian Wilson (clever, very clever, but not cool) and Mike Love (villianously uncool!). Brian Wilson said some nice things about Dennis in his book (and some very unpleasant things about Mike Love. Ha! Ha! Ha!) in his book. But, apart from being a Wilson, he leaves no impact to me as a Beach Boy. He started writing songs post Pet Sounds, so I'm out. The album is inoffensive, over produced and his crooning comes across as an old uncle who has got his hands on the mic. There's nothing pretty here. Yes, a few melodies are nice. On my first listen of the first two songs, I said aloud that I'd had enough and put on some 2000s pop punk to clean out my ears. I'd like to point out that I did this while walking, so anyone nearby would have heard me talking to myself. The Farewell song was quite sweet. I didn't hate it. But I won't be listening to this album anytime soon. Welcome to the 2 club. Keep Purple Rain company! 2 Stars.

I'd expected to like this. It was pleasant, tight jazz. A big band sound was woven in and out, but each time I decided to classify it as such, it would cut to some nice piano. I like jazz, but I think I'm still not in the frame of musical enjoyment where I can devote my full attention to it. As a result I drift in and out a little bit. Perhaps if I was watching the performance, I might think differently... That's something to ponder later. One album per day. 4 Stars.

Little Richard can sing. I really enjoy his voice. I love 'whoos' (personally think they are better than The Beatles imitations - even though 'She Loves You' rates as one of my favourite songs! How about that?). And, I enjoyed every song on this album. In saying that, there was no variation on this album. I put it on, my son said 'This is great music', and it was. But, each song followed the same progression, had the same sort of performance. Am I a wimp for wanting a ballad? Yes. But, the blues progression was so prominent, it almost felt like listening to a punk album where everything sounded the same throughout. It put me in a great mood though. 4 Stars.

It felt good to finish this album, but there were mixed feelings throughout. Part of me has heard this band a hundred times before. I'm standing at the back of a dingy venue (and not because there is no room up the front, there's plenty of room!) holding a pint, pretending I am enjoying myself. The band has put together a series of droney/dischordy riffs together, but with little melody (or at least what I can hear, the PA is crap. So is the vocal mix on this record...). The band ends, and I try to find a part I like in the set to compliment them on. Now, Sonic Youth are very progressive in this regard, and there's some cool stuff. They beat 'Tritone' and a selection of bands of that nature that I have since forgotten. But, amongst the dischord and feedback intros, there's not a lot of melody to keep me entertained. And if there is, it's inconsistent. On the matter feedback intros, there seemed to be a lot. Too many? I know that Sonic Youth have gone on and have an extensive back catalogue, and they are a band that come up in list of influences for lots of bands I like. Yes, I did enjoy the album, but I'm not sure what part. I won't be diving into their discography. It's like the TV show 'It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia' or 'Curb Your Enthusiasm', there's just too much, I'm too far behind and not everything is that easy to enjoy. 3 Stars.

I'm sure we'll be getting a fair bit of this guy, so here goes. I really like the album cover. It's really sweet. My brother owned a copy of one of his albums (Blonde on Blonde, maybe?) and it just showed a grumpy looking man on the front. Uninviting. This cover actually made me WANT to listen to this album. 'Blowin' in the Wind' was nice. But as the album went on, the nice disappeared. By the end, it felt like he was just rambling. 'Talking World War III Blues' I could liken to a guy who shouts random comments on Courtnay Place in my hometown. There are some little moments of respite, 'Corrina Corrina' is a nice one. But am I the only person who doesn't like his harmonica playing. His songbook has been reproduced by everyone, Albert Hammond Jr did 'Dont think twice, it's alright' a few years back. I was actually annoyed to discover it was a Dylan tune. So, is it fiiiiiiiine? It's okay. I wouldn't listen again. Country folk that wasn't promised by the mood set on that cover. Speaking of judging things the cover... Nope, I don't have a snappy line to go out on. 2 Stars.

Okay, I'm a huge Beatles fan. I played in a Beatles' tribute band off and on for 10 years. So, clearly, I have my opinions. But, I promised myself I would listen. And it's a nice chance to reflect and see if everything holds up. Got to love that first chord. The song itself, is weirdly simple, but holds up. Harrison showing off that Rickenbacker 12 string. Which, if I remember correctly from hours of reading books and watching/listening, will make several more appearances and define the 60s sound for other bands. Go here to listen to my old band attempt it in 2013: https://soundcloud.com/thegetbackbeatles I always really enjoyed 'I Should Have Known Better' when I watched the movie as a teenager. But having to play it live for drunken punters, I never really thought it went down that well. Still, it evoked good memories, so it gets a pass from me. 'If I Fell' is sweet and whilst it took a while to grow on me, apart from the 'Just Holding Hands' line; ten on ten. The rhythm guitar in 'Happy Just To Dance With You' is bitchin'. The song, not so much. 'And I Love Her' is the beginning of Paul's ballad run (if you don't count 'Till There was You' - But he didn't write that... so, eat it). I remember reading interviews about his amazement at coming up with the Middle 8 for this. It's two chords! Not a great tune, even if the Classical guitar is a welcome addition. Being the first album to be all Lennon/McCartney originals (without giving Ringo a song!), there's plenty of filler. And now we're onto it. 'Tell Me Why', has all the elements of a Beatles song, but just sounds clumsy. Apart from the falsetto part. That's cool. And I suppose the walking baseline is alright. They should have axed this and put on 'I Call Your Name'. How it made the movie is beyond me. Yeah, yeah. 'Can't Buy Me Love' is a solid single. Next. 'Anytime at All' falls in with 'Tell Me Why'. Cool 12 string work on the solo. 'I'll Cry Instead' is much the same. 'Things We Said Today' is a snorefest. How they were touring with this in the 60s is inexcusable. It's clear John was the better songwriter at this point. 'When I Get Home' is not a strong number either. But, the attitude when singing the song, is a welcome relief. And their are some good melodies inconsistently spread throughout the song. 'You Can't do That', now that's a banger! This song should have been a single. A great 12-string riff, killer vocals and a rare Lennon guitar solo! I've got a soft spot for I'll Be Back (originally 3/4, but changed to 4/4 - you probably didn't need to know that). Nice way to end the album. At this stage in their writing career, Paul and John didn't quite have the covers to fall back on. The album suffers slightly as a result. The Beatles fan in me should give this 5 stars. But, it's really more a four star affair. 4.5 at best.

This album was a welcome relief. This experiment has tossed up so many albums that follow a consistent tone or theme throughout. ZZtop has gone through three genres before the end of the second song. There's a lot of staples that I associate with the band littered throughout. The sludgy blues, that little pull off that Gibbons is known for... I knew what I was in store for, but I didn't... if that makes sense. However, the range! There was funk (someone told me RHCP vibes, not quite there, Mama Tiger, but funky!), 'Hot, Blue and Righteous' was a nice harmony rich ballad. Of course, 'La Grange' is just cool, but then doesn't just follow the regular blues song. I've seen the documentary on these guys, and I really enjoyed it. I'm glad I've been forced to listen to it. 5 Stars.

I really am starting to see why Greatest Hits albums are a thing. There's nothing wrong with this album. But. It's pretty much the same as the last R.E.M album we got. Still got the arpeggio guitar with occasional rock drive. The guy sounds exactly the same. And, the melodies don't venture into anything catchy. It's like a stock draft beer in a bar. Yes, you could drink it all night, but it's never going to change. I couldn't tell you the difference between the third and sixth song. I know these guys got famous for a reason, but surely not for being progressive... Perhaps 'Losing my Religion' was a flash in the pan. It sure ain't on this album. Dear Administrator/composer of this list, they're not something I need to listen to before I die, they're something I am going to hear a hundred times before I die! 3 Stars. Because that's what they are. A run of the mill band. Down the middle. 2.5 actually! Damn rounding up at the 5!

This album put me in a really good mood. Bossa nova, Jazz! It was a really nice change from the last album we were given (looking at you, R.E.M. Boo! Hiss!). Personally, I have a dislike for Saxaphone outside of 90s Punk/Ska. But, this album is turning me around. There was a nice mixture of parts within each song. Moments where I literally shouted out loud: "Yes!" And, 33 minutes in length. Nothing felt drawn out. No overtly long 'squibbly jazzy do' parts. Just a nice mixture of good songs. I really want to give it a 5. Can I? This is what this is experience is all about! I just wish we got a few more inbetween. 5 Stars.

I have never listened to this album, but I felt like I'd listened to this album already. Where I grew up, bands were doing this over and over again. Katchafire etc. A big staple of New Zealand culture (and summer). As a result, I didn't really enjoy it. It slung itself into the background (like the soundtrack of a bbq?). A few catching songs in there, but apart from Jammin' and Three Little Birds, my ears didn't prick up much. 3 Stars.

I don't like Paul Simon. I don't really like him with Garfunkel. This wasn't as bad as I thought it would be, but it still was a painful slog. The highlight for me was when there was the line from The Simpsons about the lamppost (Who Shot Mr Burns Part 1). Otherwise, snorefest. 2 stars.

Fleetwood Mac seems to be the band that your parents had in the car if you were born in the eighties/early nineties. And, if they were cooler than my parents. I seem to remember being 12 years old and my uncle putting this one. My Mum said she enjoyed it, so my Dad bought an album called 'The Best of Early/Young Fleetwood Mac' (or something to that effect), it didn't go down as well with my mum. Ignoring that pointless anecdote, I did actually Fleetwood Mac live in New Zealand (my mother in law bought the whole family tickets). So, I'd certainly heard a good handful of these songs. I don't remember being particularly excited about the gig. Neil Finn was playing the role of Lindsay Buckingham's vocals, and Mike Campbell was doing his guitar parts. Two artists I quite like. My main problem was Mick Fleetwood. He did this incredibly cringey drum/shout solo. I understand his importance in the musical world, but he just looks like the kind of guy I wouldn't want to talk to. And, like many people my age, I don't have that weird crush on Stevie Nicks. Anyway, my pre-existing convictions aside, the album: First song in, I said "This really sucks!". My wife laughed. I'd really like to find that CD my Dad bought, because this is English classic rock combined with an Americana country tone. I don't actually think it blends that well together. There are plenty of singles in there. I can see why they are important. But, bar 'The Chain', I'm not holding them in particularly high regard. I did enjoy 'Never Going Back Again' for its guitar work. But, I don't get the hype. Isn't this one of the most streamed albums of all time? Or something to that effect? It's a bit frustrating that this album is a common choice for people over taking a risk on new artists. Although, I'm listening to them today... So, I guess they win that one. 2 Stars. Yep, 2 Stars.

I know everyone expect me to hate this album. When you find the right hair/heavy metal band, there's a kind of weird sincerity to it. I'd like to hope that all members have agreed that they weren't really that cool. I like to hope there is a bit of embarrassment for the mass of shredders in cover bands with Zoom multifx pedals. I did actually watch (without even knowing any song on the album) a documentary on this album when I was sixteen. I remember being vaguely impressed that they tried hard to vary the guitar parts (all three of them!) across each song so that they each played a different part (wild for 16 year old me, trust me!). Each song played with aggressiveness, but there is kind of a catchiness that cancels out the stuff I don't really like. Hysteria was a good example of this. Pour Some Sugar on Me is a bit crud, but I found a few high points. Not enough to admit to anyone I was listening to it... 3 stars. Don't tell anyone.

This is the sort of thing that I joined this project for! Quirky albums that stimulate the mind! African beats, funky/ jazzy guitars and probably a bit too much horn! I will say it gets a bit repetitive, I've played on an African drumming song before and I remember sore hands and repetitive parts (the guitar and bass get a lot of same same). The horns often play rippoff riffs of famous songs (I swear I heard 'The Last Post' butchered in there at some point!). I'm in two minds about it. Yes, it's fun, but at the same time, a bit repetitive. I think a few drinks and good company could sway that opinion. 4 stars.

An 18 minute avant garde opener. Well, what was I expecting? And it's live?! Wait, the closer is like that too?! This album is no good. I can see why it is something you might need to experience once. This is why I signed up for this. Normally, I pick a song I like to put on a playlist. Not this time. They're long, esoteric, and sporadic. I'm not saying there are odd bits which I admire or liked, but they are too far between randomness and weird sounds. I feel like it's a joke the band are in on but I am missing. They're currently touring by the way, I won't be going. Even as background noise (which I sometimes use some of these albums as - Looking at you Ryan Adams!), it's a tough listen. I just became angrier and angrier as this went on. There was a moment in the one song I remember with vocals where the singer left in a mistake and his reaction to it (professional choice?). It's too well thought out to be a jam session... but too random to be a series of well written songs. I once saw Yoko Ono, I left by the second song. I'd be leaving by the first song for this one. Otherwise, I'd stay and boo (or hiss!). 1 Star.

The bass lines were predictable, but fun. This guy has a bit of range in his voice. Wow! A spoken word introduction. This guy has 51 studio albums to his name?! A few things that came to mind while listening. It's plain country, before it got what that cruddy pop country we get out the USA now. It has a bit of sincerity to it. But it's more of the same... Kind of the thing you'd expect your Grandma to put on and tell you it's some pretty 'riske' stuff. My wife reckons it reminded here of John Rowles, cue the 'Cheryl Moaaaaaaaaana Marieeeeeeeee'.... I did like one song that started with, 'I got loaded on gin'. But probably only because of that line. Sits with the rest of my, it was fiiiiiine but nothing exciting albums. 3 stars.

This album didn't start well. And there's quite a lot of randomness to the mix. But, the more it went on, the more I enjoyed it. I like the soulful vocals that mix in with the poorly mixed grunts. There was a nice mix of psychadelia in here (without moving into Velvet Underground-esque droning). Terrible artist name, by the way! It's a product of it's time, bit it has aged better than a few other albums I've seen on this list. I liked the array of instruments on 'Croker Courtbullion', the tune could have been used on a James Bond film, but certainly not this recording! Maybe it's parody! In which case, I am all on board for that! It did end in dribble.... Actually, I take that back! Animal noises! But, then it kind of has a nice drums to bring it home (jury is not out yet...) 'Mama Roux' was a nice one. Can we get more albums with Harpsichord!? I was going to say this sits in my catergory of, pleasant experience, but not particularly exciting or stimulating. But actually, I felt while listening there were plenty of moments to enjoy... I'm saying it: 4 Stars!

I really didn't like this. Simon and Garfunkel have their moment in time. They have a nice folk sound (well, as nice as I'll enjoy), they have a few catchy songs. This stinks. It really does. His soft folky voice just grates on me. I really don't like it. I also hate the drum sound. I don't really care for much of it. There were some pretty poor placed lyric lines. I didn't find many redeeming features. My wife even told me to turn it off. "We don't want to suffer with you." she said. Probably a little unfair, but 1 star. Patch things up with Garfunkel, it will make you suck less! 1 Star.

The cover made me hope I was listening to some edgy girl punk group. Unfortunately, this groups under another 70s punk inspired album (English perhaps? I don't know, I went in blind). The bad: the vocals. It's that 70s talky/shouty and hard to pick out a melody. It's the one thing that really annoyed me about this album. However, by the back end of it, I'd gotten over it (and myself?). It's a product of the times. The good: I'm going to guess here, but I feel like the guitar player is a genius. The album varies greatly which a great range of instrumentation. There's a nice dottering of synth (is that a word?) and the musical style jumps in and outwards around the aforementioned 70s punk/new wave. In a world where I have to listen to one album each day, I've now decided that 3 stars counts for 'more of the same' and this wasn't. I'm really sorry, Taylor Swift, you're album should have been 4 stars. This took me on a journey, and while the lead part was played by a 1 dimensional actor (I'm thinking Vince Vaughn), the ensemble cast were eclectic and exciting, with a little visit from Rodney Dangerfield (I don't get any respect at all!) to hold it in a consistent territory. Did that make sense? 4 stars

My ears peeped up when it was 'Take on Me', then peeped up again on the last song, which sounded very similar to 'Take on Me'. I understand why they had some fame, but it's more of the same the whole way through the album. The Scandinavians know how to write a song, I know. But, for the most part, it was more of the same. The bass playing that is/was intriguing in the single, is prevalent throughout the rest of the album, the falsetto... Yep, more of the same. 3 Stars (and that's only rounded up from 2.5). From a guy who wrote a song that referenced this band.

I've been waiting for this one. First note, so cool that the cover has neither the band name or the album name on it. Yet, is so iconic! Anyway, here goes: For the 'last album', whether or not it was intended that way, it summarises the legacy the band left. There's a bit of everything in there. The singles/songs that frequently live on Greatest Hits albums are very strong. George Harrison offers up two of his best ('Something' and 'Here Comes the Sun'), Lennon's 'Come Together' is a timeless tune, and even Ringo offers up a worthy number (made better by an excellent underrated backing vocal section and fun guitar work). I have a lot of time for 'Oh! Darling', a real tune. I relistened to this album while ironing shirts and had a great singalong. Sadly, 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer' doesn't quite hit the mark, and while slightly catchy, is boring granny music that I would rather people didn't know I listened through it. I think the best thing is that the instrumentation on all of these songs is so well thought out. McCartney chews the scenery on his bass, tastefully of course (with the exception of 'Maxwell's Silver Hammer' - but did George play bass on that?), Harrison's at a peak soaring guitar solo, and the drum fills are iconic. Adding to this the Moog Synthesizer (a new product at the time!), and subtle, but powerful orchestration; it's an excellent vibe. My favourite, 'I Want You (She's So Heavy)' is one of the best Beatles songs of all time. I still remember the day I bought this album and walking down Glenmore St to that epic outro! This was 2009. Listening to Blur a few years later, I understand it's impact (in more ways that one). But, what did I think of the 2nd half? The whole blended song thing? It's not my favourite, but it works. Yes, there are hits and misses. But if you got rid of 'You Never Give Me Your Money', you wouldn't have a great reprise in 'Golden Slumbers'. It's something you enjoy in a different way to the other half of the album. 'The End' is a nice way to go out, 3 guitar solos! 'Her Majesty' could have been left on the cutting room floor. 5 Stars.

I always think Fleet Foxes is going to be enjoyable. It's such an indie name. I made the same mistake when a friend suggested them to me. "Thanks for the tip, John Philipson." (nice guy!) I said. I bought the first EP, and found them incredibly boring, uninspiring and was really disappointed with my recommendation from a cool (and, let's not forget, nice!) person. But, hey! I was twenty four then. I'm older now. This could be the ticket. I didn't feel like much had changed in the sound (or in my opinion of it). There were a few catchy melodies and some cool harmonies. Overall, it felt like quarter of the albums I've had on this list; more of the same. Same, as in the music doesn't vary much from a set vibe dictated in the first song. I came home from work, put it on and did try my best to actively engage in it. And while I didn't find myself not enjoying it, it really could have been anything. Sorry, John Philipson (did I mention he's a really nice guy!), I really did aim to like this more. Also, Fleet Foxes! Great name (this coming from a guy who playing in 'Gold Wolf' - another not-so-monumental member of the 1 word + animal club). 3 Stars.

I own this album. But, to be honest, I couldn't name a song other than the big three: 'Time to Pretend', 'Electric Feel' and, of course, 'Kids'. I'm ashamed to admit that I probably put the album on my itunes and picked out those three. Wow! That's a real sign of the pre-Spotify/Streaming service times. But, I digress, the album. 'Time to Pretend' is an absolute banger. The lyrics are so childish, but it works. And, perhaps that's the theme across this album. There's a charm to it, that just makes sense. What really surprised me was that I really enjoyed the rest of the songs. There really aren't any duds. Perhaps the ender could be a bit stronger. The melodies seem more complex than they actually are. And, the synths seem to be in the same vein. I got this album about the time I really discovered what a synthesizer was (and how it worked). I always thought a synth was a true sign of sophistication in music. Perhaps this album fuelled that. 'Kids' is still awesome. I saw them play at Glastonbury (and then everyone leave after they played it - this was 2013 post their weird album that came after this). I never really liked 'Electric Feel', but actually really enjoyed the bass this time round. However, there are winners deep in the album for those not like 2010 me (yep, I was that uncool I bought it 3 years late!). 5 Stars.

What an epic album! We all knew this one was going to appear. It is always number two on greatest album lists. I was a diehard Weezer fan in my late teens, and this album was always mentioned as being the inspiration for most of their early work (and I don't really care about anything past 1998 from that band! Take that! crappy teal album!). So, I happily purchased a copy of this with my first proper paycheck (or the second or third... who's counting?). Having the 'Beach Boys 20 Golden Greats' album blasted by my mother in the car growing up, I was a bit surprised how slow the album became after track one. There was a lot of gentleness. But, it was enjoyable. 'Let's Go For a While' really captured me from the get-go (all the way back in 2009!), I still remember the moment it came on in my car. 'God Only Knows' is a great piece of songwriting. I've read the Brian Wilson book, which gave a bit of insight into the album, and there is that movie about him too. I was a bit gutted when I found out there was a lyricist involved. Big fan of 'I know there's an answer' or as it should be titled 'Hang on to your Ego', until I found out Mike Love sang co-lead on it. I don't think there is a weak song on it. But, it is an album that you do have be in the right mood to listen to. 'Still Believe in Me' doesn't always inspire when you're annoyed at the world. Still, I really like this album. 5 Stars.

I put this album on while I had some friends over for dinner. It really fit the 'dinner party' vibe that I wasn't necessarily going for. I actually quite enjoyed the album, my ears perked up for 'Taj Mahal' (though I quite enjoy that dreadful Rod Stewart song, so no comment from me!). But, I don't have a lot else to take away from it. Everything kind of went smoothly. It sits in the albums that I would put on in the morning on vinyl and then make a coffee. I'll keep an eye out for this one next time I'm raiding the record bins. Look out, NZ op shops! 4 Stars.

Three funk songs that have a sum of over an hour. Laced with electric guitar solos in pure squibly-doo style. I admit that my mind was elsewhere while listening, and whilst it was cool to hear something new, I didn't feel particularly captivated by it. 3 Stars.

Pretty decent performances, but it really just felt like a jam. I once played with a friend who would stand at the mic and raise and lower his arms to show us how he wanted the music around intensify/detensify as we played. I imagine the band leader doing the same (which would be for AGES because there are some long lead breaks!). I was a bit disappointed as I was really hoping for a country and western movie soundtrack theme by the cover. Honestly, I've got a vinyl with that exact title and it really hits the spot. There was some cool guitar work, but it gets lost amongst the rest. 3 Stars.

It's everybody's third favourite Pixies record. These guys are like a good 80s action flick. You don't watch it for a while, and then when you watch it again, you remember how much you liked it. Except there's way more depth! The band are fantastic. There's the right mix of scream, rock and gentle surf/Hawaiian. Honestly, I love it. Okay, it's not Doolittle! But it's an awesome album. Well worth the hype. Not enough Kim Deal vocals... Love the closer! And opening with a surf cover! Brilliant! 5 Stars.

Yeah, we all know it. It's a huge album for my generation (oh god! Did I just say that out loud?!). Yep, the singer's not very likeable. And apparently they're massive bible bashers. Oh, and 'Mr Brightside' is a massive 'woo girl' anthem (is it still in the charts?). Still, it's a good album. But, is it good the whole way through? Tracks 1 - 5 are well known. Love them or hate them, they are important. I could take or leave 'Mr Brightside' (because I'm just a hipster like that). But the rest are decent, catchy and well produced songs. And, it might be a little cheesy, but I've always been a big fan of the closer 'Glamorous Indie Rock and Roll'. However, there's that group of songs inbetween. I have never owned this album, but feel like I've heard it many times, until this grey area. So, let's review: Andy, You're a Star - not bad! On Top - Still, alright! Change your mind - I like this little synth song, I really do Believe me Natalie - Yuck Midnight Show - Meh Everything Will Be Alright - It's alright... A little top heavy, but still an important album and worthy of it's ranking. 5 stars.

I was really excited after hearing the first track. It sounded like a really cool electro-2000s thing. An MC came in on track two and I lost interest. It took me back to 2001, I remember there was a lot of this sort of thing on radio. While my ears perked up at different points throughout (the last two songs were really cool), I wasn't buying it. 3 stars.

Did not finish. It was dreary, boring and piano heavy. It's a shame because I liked the last album of his I did. But, this stunk. A friend was doing the dishes while listening and these are her comments: That song only has one lyrics on repeat! Every song is worse than the last! Boo! Hiss! (Okay, that was me). Dan, this really sucks! No stars. I mean, 1 star.

I remember friends raving about this in 2012. I think I had a copy on my iPod, but never really listened. I found it quite pleasant, but lacked certain aggression. The melodies were sweet. But a friend listening with me called it; 'slightly beyond cafe music'. 4 stars

Am I the only person who was confused on the gender of this singer based on their voice when I was younger? My younger brother (who has a very questionable history with music) was obsessed with 'Fast Car' when I was a teenager. So, as a result, I've never enjoyed it (and I think new pop song that uses it sucks too!). So, no nostalgia goggles for me. Yep, she can sing. There's a few catchy songs in there. But overall it's pretty bloody bland. I did like the acapella number, but not enough to bring up review on this. It's a product of its time. She's got a strong social/political undercurrent that I respect, and it makes me feel something on one listen. So, nice one there, Tracy. But, still. It's boring. 2 stars.

I've always been intimidated by this band. They're well known, but have dozens of albums. Where do I start?! That's a lie. I do have one. I don't find it that exciting and I was, honestly, expecting a 'more of the same three stars album'. The sort of thing this list is loaded with. But I was really impressed with the opener. And while it never quite hit that peak catchiness again, I can see why this album is on the list. The vocalist's indie-soft Neil Young voice came through quite well on the album. It was a bit of fun. 4 Stars.

I bought this album in my 20s. A friend put me onto this band. I'm not a huge fan, but there's plenty to appreciate in the guitar work. I find David Lee Roth a little bit creepy. However, I've always been a big fan of Hot for Teacher and the attitude he sings it with. There's some great guitar parts. Drop Dead Legs is my favourite. Jump is, of course, prolifically positive (despite being about suicide...). It's an important album, but not really my cup of peppermint tea. 4 stars.

I really enjoyed reading about this guy... What a life story! The music, however, was pretty ordinary. Soulful, plenty of nice bass lines. Not really cup of tea, but I enjoyed it somewhat when I put it on as background music. 3 Stars.

I joked to my friends about this album. I only know the one song, and ironically that day I was driving to sight see some waterfalls. Well, it's very 90s. I can imagine it's a blueprint for the girls' Rnb album of that era. Light rap, and that classic hip-hop beat that so many albums have are all there. The melodies catchy, and enough attitude to know that it's not three white girls singing. I had it on for a car trip, so I was listening in and out. I will say that it was quite catchy. It didn't pull me away from trying to entertain my son though. I would say that the lyrics painted an odd picture. I'm a bit indifferent to the whole 'we're sexy' vibe that gets put across. These are, of course, very attractive people. And perhaps it's just a product of the 90s. But there must be more to shifting albums than this. I mean, they can sing! Surely that's the selling point! I'm glad I listened to it, but I'm not sure I would bother again. 3 stars.

Experimental, yes. There's cool synth on here and nice ambience. I think a lot of stuff that would have seemed new and edgy in the early 70s. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that this was inspiration for excellent and influential albums that came afterwards. I mean, I didn't hate it. But I wasn't particularly whelmed in any form. Not what I want from music necessarily. 3 stars.

Classy bossa nova/jazz you'd put on if you invited a girl around for dinner. The first song you will have heard in movies, probably around the seductive looking heroine. Great song. The saxophone is delightfully jazzy, without being too erratic. The rest of the album follows the similar theme. The singing is all very relaxed and I felt classy for listening to it. 4 stars.

This is jazz. This is quite random and sporadic jazz. This is jazz I couldn't work out if I enjoyed it or not. There was a lot to respect, but a lot to challenge. It felt like Mingus decided that he wanted to challenge his listeners, but also write some cool music (quite a big step in the early 60s!). 3 Stars.

I was quite excited. Gearing up for some old skool (yep, I spelt it that way on purpose) hip-hop with funky overtones. There was plenty of funky overtones, by the way. The bass slapped pretty consistently throughout the album. The raps were a bit of fun. The first song talked about honouring your mother (but also the girl being super attractive too, I'm guessing not the mother?). There was a song about Stevie Wonder... And an ode to Jesus at one point. But, then it got dark. It painted a picture of a real miserable recession. And I have to say, that really hit me where I live. I was really taken in by all of it. So, was it fun? Or was it a hard listen? I'd like to think I could take it depending on how the mood suits, perhaps that's why it resonated with me at points. 4 Stars (some of the hiphop elements haven't aged as well as other albums on this list).

I read about this being one of the best debut albums of all time. I excitedly ordered the SUPER-MEGA-MONO AND STEREO-MIX. I hated it. I was given dozens of different versions of each song which would jump into shuffle on my Ipod. I really loathed it. Yeah, I enjoyed 'My Generation' (the song!), and 'Please! Please! Please!' (was there 3 or 4 pleases?). But the rest, I struggled. So, I was a bit gutted when this popped up. I'd have to listen to it. THE. WHOLE. WAY. THROUGH... What was I thinking? This album was really great from the get go! 3 great musicians (and a guy who can kinda sing! -No, I jest!), playing some great rock and roll. I will admit side 2 is a bit weak. 'It's not true' is a dog of a song (even if I wrote something with similar lyrical themes as a teen, *cringe*). But it is brought home well with a rock out instrumental (before they were cool too!). I was going to say 4, but actually. I think it's a 5! 5 Stars.

Love albums are such a 70s thing. Nice one. You get to have a greatest hits but in a live setting, make a bunch of money. Don't care, Thin Lizzy! YouTube and streaming services ruined that idea. It's a pleasant recording. The band play pretty close to the album and the brief banter inbetween songs isn't too much. I don't really care for the band that much. I enjoyed a few songs, but it wasn't an amazing experience, I'm not there to watch the magic and I don't hold massive nostalgia for these songs. Even Boys are back in town was a bit of a let down. It made pleasant background music as we drove across the Island. 3 stars.

This is why I hate country music. This guy has some great ideas and I was impressed the way the songs would jump between grooves! Everything was clearly thought out. But. And I mean but. The lame country lyrics, that horrible country twang, and the synthy honky tonk really brought this album down. I listened to this album while doing school work in my classroom. It really brought down my already miserable Sunday morning. It was listenable. Just. 2 stars.

A guy I know from an epic Simpsons episode! Yes please! But, I wondered, what does this guy actually do?! In the epic Mr Burns song, someone else sung. Someone else turned the condom machine back and forth (loved that gag!). So, he just plays the timbarelo? Oh! Thanks Wikipedia, he's the band leader. This was a really pleasant listen from start to finish! I really loved the mood it put me in. And, a highlight was the percussion. It was laced between awesome Latin melodies. These are sort of albums I want to get while doing this project. I hope there's an even better follow up. ... Peter Gabriel....again?! Boo! Hiss! 5 Stars! And a big smile on my face!

When I was a kid, I used to hate maths. During each lesson, I would make exactly one drinking fountain break and one toilet break. This would ensure I would spend as little time as possible in the lesson. My year 8 teacher, understood this. She was always ready for it. Bless her, that's probably why I followed in her footsteps. I knew I'd hate this album. I left the room to fill my water bottle twice, went to the toilet twice. It stunk. Why do we keep getting this jerk?! It's just lame Phil Collins-esque 80s music. Sledgehammer?! What a dumb song. Yeah, fine, there was a little bit of musical entertainment in the odd baseline throughout. But it's just an old guy making crap music. Stop giving it to us. No stars! Oh, I mean 1 star!

I actually have inherited a copy of this from my parents of wax. It's made better from the fact it's not JUST Paul Simon. But, as I was visited by several co-workers during my listen, I couldn't help but complain to them. Props to the guy who told me that Garfunkel looks like he has a sweet moustache on the cover. It's pretty depressing album, but good use of horns and percussion. The album title is a catchy song, I guess. In fact, I did enjoy this more than I thought I would. 2 stars.

I worked with a guy who once tried to describe this band to me. In fact, he tried to describe the whole meaning of shoe gaze (I'm not sure he knew that I was an amateur musician myself!). Regardless, I'd never heard of the band then, and was quite happy to have an excuse to listen to them now. His description was; 'they always used so many effects, so they had to always look at their pedals. So, shoegaze was born.' One song in, I was saying, 'weak chat, [insert coworker here].' It seemed like pretty simple rock, kind of a like a softer Oasis with a few effects thrown in. The singing wasn't amazing, but I forgave it for the genre. But. The more I listened to the album, I more I found myself enjoying parts of it. It felt like picking up a band demo tape five years too late (story of my life!). The quality of the recording wasn't fantastic, but I found myself happily enjoying parts of the songs. Catchy? Probably not consistently. Amazing musicianship? Not particularly. But, something I can't quite explain (which is odd because I've been getting better and better and vocalising my thoughts about music I listen to over a day!). I'm not sure I'd rave about the band the same way this guy did. I'd also like to point out this guy tried to ask me if my Beatles' tribute band could play ACDC so he could play the bagpipes on 'A long way to the top'. But, I guess I see what he was getting at (about Ride, not the bagpipe thing - that was just weird!). I want to say 5 stars. I feel like I've given more for less, but there is something that is just holding me back. Ah, boo hoo! This better not haunt me! 5 Stars.

Like most guitar playing teens, I had a small Hendrix fling. I'll say just a fling. Because it really was enjoying 'Hey Joe' + learning a fair portion of it on guitar (but if course not the entire thing!). Couple that with the intro to 'Purple Haze' on guitar and enjoyment of a few familiar songs (I seem to remember liking 'Crosstown Traffic' and 'Fire'). The fling ended at University when I discovered alternative rock music... But, what an album! I feel like this has aged really well. The guitar playing is awesome, with a good amount of melody. He's not just going squibbly-do over everything. I think I actually enjoyed the deep cuts more than the songs I remember from the greatest hits album I borrowed as a teenager. Not a dull moment. I promise. 5 Stars. Hell! Can I give 7?!

The thing I've found with Beach Boys' records (bar Pet Sounds - what an album!) is that they were generally written, recorded and wrapped in pretty quick succession. So, you're given a single or two, a few catchy covers and some originals that fall short. This album follows the format. I enjoyed parts of it. Their 'Do You Wanna Dance' isn't as good as the Ramones' version. 'Help me, Rhonda' is an absolute banger (even with the false ending, I always hated that part). 'When I grow up' is a bit wimpy. There's some decent harmonies, but also a few risks have been taken in certain songs, and the effect isn't always as pleasing/refined as they got later in their career (which was only like a year away if I'm right!). A fun little jaunt, but not enough to warrant a place on this list. 3 Stars.

It took me a while to find the actual EP, hidden amongst the massive reissue. I can see why it's on this list. It's aggressive. Probably a big deal in the 80s on Sub Pop, it also probably sits highly in many influences of those who came after it. I own a Brubeck punk album that I really like. I think it makes a really bold statement. But, I'm not sure I'd flaunt it for everyone. It's a little piece of punk rock that was a big deal to me in 2002. I think that's what this is. At least from the one listen I had. 3 stars.

I think this album really showed me the range that The Who have. I enjoyed their debut (eventually!), and have always known them as a powerhouse love band. However, never bothered to look up their live show (which is still going, right?). So, the set: Entwistle chews the scenery and I never quite fully appreciated the work that Moon does. It's energetic and fast paced, yet their cover of Summertime Blues was a slow let down. The medley was long, but epic. 4 stars.

Stevie Wonder definitely engaged me more this time round. It wasn't just the oomph of 'Superstition'. I'm still not entirely sold on him, and I we haven't had 'Songs in the Key of Life' yet, so the jury is not out. However, there we catchy melodies, and a decent vocal performance. I listened actively. 4 Stars.

I always thought Costello just wrote wimpy geek music. And, on this album, he does. To an extent. His voice is like dark chocolate. You eat it, don't enjoy it, yet keep eating it. Suddenly you realise it's actually quite good (and good for you). There are moments where he pulls out some punky-ish numbers where he really puts in a great performance. He knows how to write an unusual (yet engaging melody), and I'm not sure how much of the music he played on, but there was some cool guitar/bass work. Wait, do I like Elvis Costello now? Nah, still a bit of music that sits in the stereotype I have/had. 4 Stars.

Power-pop riffs, with the 70s punk vocal sound. It sounded very American (I was quite surprised to find they were from Northern-Ireland). There were parts of the album that I did enjoy. But, at the same time, it's one of those albums that has clearly inspired and influenced others who have gone on to do it better. Some pretty lame lyrics in there too. Song about chocolate?! Not great. Did enjoy the Under the Boardwalk cover. I listened, I got it, I didn't actively enjoy it. But I didn't hate it. 3 Stars.

I actually quit enjoyed this. It was a lot calmer than the debut. But, still kept up some weirdness (particularly the penultimate track). I couldn't resist and read all about it. It's a shame John Cale got the boot. Amps underwater! That would have been good! I will say, I didn't miss the droning guitars... But maybe I should not say that out loud. 4 stars.

I was going to rant about how it was 65' brit invasion music that was old a year later. Then I found out they were American. I've always been a fan of the Monkees song (I'm not your steppin' stone). It was nice to hear the original, yet I was not overwhelmed. . There were some cool parts linked in between a fair bit of 'meh'. Not offensive, but not exciting. 3 stars.

It's a really fun album. There's plenty of catchy beats and I had a bit of a sing-along/rap-along for the few songs I knew. I ran to it. And, I found that while I did really enjoy listening to it. There were a few dud tunes. Who sings about their Adidas?! Dumb Girl? (That one didn't age well!). Why I like the group, I like the sound and I liked a lot of the songs... I didn't think it was worthy of 5 star status. Oh, and I don't like Aerosmith, so don't get me started on that Walk This Way business. 4 stars.

I know this is really grime and NOT hip-hop, but I was hoping this album would be a lot more fun than it ended up being. It's very aggressive, not particularly pleasant and I didn't find it catchy. Even some of the lyrics invoked a pretty miserable feeling. 2 stars.

I always wondered why every compilation album had the live version of 'No woman no cry'. It sounds like a fast paced demo. I'm all about Monkey Island nostalgia. And Monkey 2 having Dread and Marley in a title is always a good sign. The horns were quite pleasant, but nothing else drew me to enjoy the album. Background music. 3 stars.

My sister won a copy of Version 2.0 in the 90s (early 2000s), and I used to think I was cool listening to it (definitely wasn't). The album is moody and brooding. I went to school with a lot of girls I could have mistaken for the singer, aggressive and dark. It's a relatively catchy album, and a lot of effort has gone into the production. I actually enjoyed in, listening on a day stuck on trains, it didn't make me any more annoyed/stressed than I was feeling. My only query, who wrote the 'stupid girl' line first? Them or Matt Sharp in the Rentals' song 'Brilliant Boy'? This was released first, but still, the mind boggles! Oh, 4 stars. It was good, but not life changing.

I'm not sure there's been an album I've listened to in the last two weeks that I knew would be awesome from the first eight bars. It was positively moody. It all say together well, and gave the vibe of a great album. I can see what the author of High Fidelity was on about. 5 stars!

I am always really intimidated and never know where/when to start with Beck. It's a shame, because this album was awesome! Killer beats, alt-melodies and a decent vibe across the whole record. 5 stars, easily!

I knew I'd like a few tunes already from my mother/sister/younger brother being big fans of TP (different people, I am not a hillbilly). But, what really made me keen on this was the energy. Yep, Petty's voice isn't always the best. But you can tell how rock and roll this album meant to be. Mike Campbell is awesome too. 5 stars.

I got a copy of this a decade ago. I always liked the idea of the concept album, and that cool bass delay effect (which I'm adamant was inspired by KOTOR). I had listened to a few of the songs, but never the whole album (funny how I did that in youth). I'm guessing this is the most approachable/easy to get into Flaming Lips album. I think NZ adverts had 'Do you realise?' in ad campaigns just before I left. It's a catchy album, it's well thought out and indie/quirky enough in the right spots. I once went to my nephew's school play and remember watching the Year 6 class sing Yoshimi while one of the kids pretended to do karate in a box costume. C- performance. This, on the other hand, is 5 stars!

I respect that Taylor mixes up each album.But there was little to keep me engaged. Nothing overtly catchy, a massive break up vibe and that weird song about murder didn't really make my flight to any faster. Was pleasant to do a sudoko to. 3 stars.

I found it a bit explicit for my liking. But, beyond the lyrics, there were some catchy beats and overall it was cool. 4 stars.

Country. Sigh. John Prine pulls out all of the country tropes that you could expect: Dated lyrics, country progressions.... The list does get longer, I promise... But this album album.activrly annoying me at times..... 2 stars.

Moody and emotional, but actually really fun. I loved the cover of Femme Fatale. This was a really cool experience to listen to. Admittedly, I was doing housework while listening, but it was really engaging. Who would have thought piano music was cool? The jangle guitar was a nice touch. 5 stars.

Normally I try to write what would make a better single album (combining the tracks) when thinking of double albums. And, yes, you COULD do that for this album. There's a lot of tracks that don't necessarily stick to the contemporary run of a hip hop record. I bought this album in my early twenties (I think my friend had it in high school). OutKast were one of the hip hop bands that I felt like I could enjoy (big words for a wannabe punk rocker...). And, my brother had an album and it had a naked lady on the cover, which was always a big deal when you're 13 and a half. I'd say I prefered The Love Below in my younger years. It certainly got more air time on popular radio (and I used to love the Roses video). But I started off with Speakerboxx. Apart from hearing the title eight or nine times played like a radio jingle between songs, this is a decent more hip hop focused album. Big Boi raps well. I was almost going to say that it was the better of the two. And then... The Love Below is an absolute masterpiece. Jazz, rock, drum and bass! And that's just a bit of what you will hear. Now, I'm not going to do track by track (it's not a Beatles album!), but highlights included: The drum and bass favourite things cover! Prototype! I remember this being the third single that everyone kinda went 'what?' to. But the more I hear it, the more I love it. Great bass lines and really cool melodies! Gotta love the modern day cupid! Killer album, in my top 50, 20 maybe! 5 stars!

Finally! Some quirky indie! This had some really dirty guitars and indie sensibilities. I was doing work while listening and felt that perhaps it didn't get my full attention. I also heard some things I would associate with that bad side of britpop. 4 stars

I like Stephen Malkmus, who is currently playing an SG because of Kim Thayall. Apart from one or two songs, I'd never listened to the band. It's a bit grungy for my liking. The singing is strong and the guitar work is clever, but a bit too Seattle... A decent outing, that I possibly would have been more into if my teen years had gone differently. Not inspired to buy that guitar yet... 4 star.

One man, one guitar, and lots of discordance. This was a nice breath of fresh air. I'd recently reviewed a folk album for a website I write for. So, I suppose I was primed for more folk, but Nick Drake was doing some really cool stuff. I like his voice too.

I listened to this while in the gym. It was fun, the synth-meets electric/blues licks was quite a lot of fun . The lyrics are a bit bogus, but I feel like ZZtop had other things on their mind. I don't think I quite appreciate Gibbons' guitar playing enough. He plays really well. Tv dinners is a bit crap, and the album is a tad ironic. But it's still a decent find! Not my favourite ZZtop album.. 5 stars though.. just.

I thought I liked this guy, but actually, he kind of just whinges. And not in a nice way! The massive overproduction was not that great either! I didn't actively hate it, but I didn't enjoy it much either. There was very little of the punky grit hidden amongst the pretentious horns. You're not in the Beatles, pal! 2 stars.

It's hip hop that hasn't aged too badly. And, I say too badly because there were a few moments where I cringed slightly. He raps better than he acts, I'll say that much. 4 stars.