The Suburbs by Arcade Fire

The Suburbs

Arcade Fire

3.48
Rating
29214
Votes
1
3%
2
13%
3
34%
4
32%
5
18%
Distribution

Album Summary

The Suburbs is the third studio album by Canadian indie rock band Arcade Fire, released on August 2, 2010. Coinciding with its announcement, the band released a limited edition 12-inch single containing the title track and "Month of May". The album debuted at No. 1 on the Irish Albums Chart, the UK Albums Chart, the US Billboard 200 chart, and the Canadian Albums Chart. It won Album of the Year at the 2011 Grammy Awards, Best International Album at the 2011 BRIT Awards, Album of the Year at the 2011 Juno Awards, and the 2011 Polaris Music Prize for best Canadian album. Two weeks after winning Grammy's Album of the Year, the album jumped from No. 52 to No. 12 on the Billboard 200, the album's highest ranking since August 2010.Arcade Fire released a deluxe edition CD/DVD of The Suburbs on June 27, 2011 (everywhere except the U.S. and Canada). The American and Canadian versions were released on August 2, 2011, to coincide with the original album's anniversary. The new version included two brand new tracks recorded during The Suburbs album sessions ("Culture War" and "Speaking in Tongues", the latter featuring David Byrne), an extended version of album track "Wasted Hours", Spike Jonze's short film, Scenes from the Suburbs, and an 80-page booklet as well as other exclusive content.

Wikipedia Read more on Wikipedia

Rating Over Time

Per Year Cumulative

Reviews

Sort by: Hot Popular Date Random
Rating: All 5★ 4★ 3★ 2★ 1★
Length: All Short Long

“What the hell, I don't know, but to me a home in the suburbs is a sort of isolated hell where nothing happens." -Jack Kerouac Man the disillusionment just dripped off this album. Its so thick and covers everything. You're not getting to any of the music unless you immerse yourself in it. Once again, at least for me, an album is handicapped by the pace of this project. My initial listen of this album found it to be milquetoast and pedestrian. Sounded fine, very well produced, but it never hit a second gear for me. Then a second listen later in the day was better received. I think if given time and more exposure to this album I would grow to enjoy it. Its got that indie rock persistence, a drip of water that will eventually cut a river through the mountain. This project however, is full of first draft reviews. Spend one day with an album, jot down your thoughts, move on to tomorrow. In that vein, The Suburbs gets 3/5 with an uncertain up or down future.

239. The Suburbs - Arcade Fire (2010) 10.19.26 Variety: 2 Adequacy: 4 Listenability: 3 Uniqueness: 2 Emotionality: 3 = 2.8 rounded up to a 3 "In my dream, I was almost there/ Then they pulled me aside and said, 'You're going nowhere'" "This is important. This MEANS something". This is the vibe I get from the Arcade Fire. At least what I've heard from them. I've liked several of the big singles I've heard, but have always been a bit disappointed when I've attempted album listens. It's been a good 15 years though, so who knows if my tastes have changed enough that they sit better with me. All bad the publicity around their front man and the band's self serious image ( couple of pre-controversy interviews I read, these guys seemed to have a VERY high opinion of themselves) have all rubbed me wrong, so they are starting off with a bit of a disadvantage. I don't really mind it that much when musicians have inflated egos or carry themselves like important artists so long as they can generally do at least the bare minimum to back that up. I say let them act as weird as they want ( within the bounds of good taste and the social contract) as long as they create some work that eases this long painful trek into nothingness that were all on. What irks me is when you have people acting like they are god's gift when they can't hold a candle to someone like Cyndi Lauper who I love but who creates fun, well crafted pop and who seems like a real person made good, or a possibly similarly important indie rock act like Wilco, who, in addition to making better music, seem like they have come at the fame and fortune thing with a bit of humbleness and self awareness. Arcade Fire sit more on the U2, Bruce Springsteen side of the equation where it appears that they think they are making some grand statement about humanity that you need to pay attention to, or that they are putting out some great truth that no one else has thought to realize before. U2 at least realized this was a creative dead end pretty quickly after people got fed up enough with it to hurt them critically, and decided to backtrack and create fun, meaningless pop. Springsteen seems to have doubled down and embraced the crown of meaningful rock that the greybeards of Rolling Stone magazine seem to have bestowed upon him. All that said, hopefully the music is way better than I remember and I can at least appreciate the craft. THE TRACKS "The Suburbs" - I remember being really impressed with this song. Enough so that I checked the whole album out. It still holds up very well, and hits pretty hard with the upsetting nostalgia, and the feeling that the past is gone and there's nothing to be done about it. And besides, was it a hollow and artificial feeling? The piano, Butler's emotional and almost fragile vocals, and the sing along chorus all add up to a pretty good attempt at getting a very specific feeling across in song form. That that's the goal, right? Taking your lifetime of experience and your talent and reaching out to make a connection with the people out there in the dark listening to your art. A+ stuff, but man is it a bummer. Maybe because it feels so true. It's worth mentioning that there was a pretty memorable music video for this that uses, what was at the time, some dystopian, pre-apocalyptic imagery of black masked pseudo-military thugs rounding up families, and scooping kids off the streets for what seems like an attempt to press gang them into service. How, what a difference 15 years makes huh? Depending on where you live and what your skin looks like you might be able to see this very thing happening in your very own neighborhood. I think at the time this was a pretty obvious metaphor for the harsh realities of growing up, and being forced to change whether you want to or not, but it works even better now. "Ready to Start" - Musically this is a bit more up tempo and exciting, but lyrically it's a lot clumsier and sophomoric in it's watered down edgy Holden Cauflieldesque rantings about how fake everyone and everything is. There's an attempt a vocal melody, but it's pretty weak, and it's carried by the electronic aspects and the driving rhythm. It tries way too hard to be epic, and ends with an abruptness that feels less like a bit of a dramatic flourish than they just ran out of ideas for a good finish. "Modern Man" - Some Tom Pettyish guitar work opens this one, and it feels like much more of a rocker. It's bouncy and catchy and very poppy, even with the existential dread that the lyrics seem to be digging into. Bonus points for hand clips ( even if you can barely hear them) and a commitment to the premise. "Rococo" - The band earns the baroque rock label here with almost sounds like a harpsichord, but also might be a strummed acoustic guitar that just sounds like it because of some processing and a buzzy synth behind it? This sounds like it might be a takedown of poseurs? A lot of questions here. It's good, but feels a bit listless and unconvinced of it's own sound. On the verge of being a highlight if it had just leaned more into the baroque aspects. It ends on some discordant noise which seems like a "nah, just kidding" way of hedging their bets and still being cool. I want to hear more unembarrassed E.L.O. style strings and over the top flair, and they seem to want to give it to me, but keep chickening out. ( edit: on a relisten it's definitely in the top tier compared to other stuff so gets a bump) "Empty Room" - I liked the switch up here to Régine Chassagne providing lead vocals as Butler is starting to feel a tiny bit whiny and feeble, but the song itself its featureless, and devoid of anything hooks or discernable features. It's very beige. "City with No Children" - This one opens with a very punchy pop rock sound, all claps ( or electronic equivalents) and cool, slightly fuzzy bass that would be right at home on some late 70s power pop tracks. More metaphors about growing up and the disillusionment that comes with it. I wasn't aware that this was a concept album, but maybe? This was a step in the right direction but ultimately felt like it never picked up steam after that opening bit and just stayed in a holding pattern. "Half Light I" - This works WAY better, and has a sort of sweet vibe to it that's gentle and full of longing. It seems like it wants to evoke something similar to R.E.M.'s "Nightswimming", so maybe the idea of the suburbs is more of a mixed bag than I've taken it for and it's being framed in a more ambiguous light. The strings do a lot of heavy lifting here, but Chassagne's vocals are very pretty as well. Presumably this would be the closer on side one of an old school LP. "Half Light II (No Celebration)" - There's Blondie-esque driving dance club beat on this one that's got big, epic sounding guitars and a galloping bass that makes it feel like it should be some sort of celebratory stadium anthem. This feels the closest the band gets to that giant arena sound that acts like U2 specialize in. It's fine, but feels very wishy washy. The suburbs suck. I miss the suburbs. The city's better. But not this city, it's too different. I'm fine with ambiguous or even contradictory messaging but this feels more less like an artistic choice to portray mixed emotions, and more like someone who will be eternally unsatisfied no matter the circumstances. "Suburban War" - This one seemed like a way more boring re-write of the first track's ideas welded to some even more boring music. It picks up near the end with the pounding, cinematic percussion, but it's too little too late, and I'm left feeling that instead of a bunch of variations on a single theme, I'm hearing just slightly different versions of the same thing over and over. "Month of May" - Now this is more like it. Some actual rock music. This sounds like a very Neil Young heard "Cactus" by the Pixies in a club one night and tried to re-create it from memory. Or more specifically, maybe the David Bowie cover of it. It was exciting and different and a blast compared to most everything else I've heard yet. A whole album of stuff like this would be much welcomed. ----- "Cactus" by Pixies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w8NgvDf4aM ----- "Cactus" by David Bowie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFCDKYCevYs&list=RDqFCDKYCevYs&start_radio=1 "Wasted Hours" - After the reinvigoration of the last track, this one feels like an even bigger dip in energy that it maybe really is. There's a bouncy pace that seems tailor made for a slow drive around town, and maybe that's the intent. But the melancholy sad sackness intrudes on the lazy vibes and the song essentially comes to a screeching halt during the choruses. "Deep Blue" - I can't tell if this is a warning about AI ( points for relevance) or screen time ( ditto) or what but it's still very morose and humorless and it doesn't help that this might be the most instrumentally boring track yet. "We Used to Wait" - Instrumentally I'm more onboard with this one, with it's manic piano and big synths, but am I crazy or has the throughline gotten less and less specific an more hazy as we've went on. There have been plenty of concept albums that lose their way before landing the plane, and that's fine I guess. This song just feels like platitudes strung together with some cool keyboard effects. "Sprawl I (Flatland)" - Man, just called this "Flatland" and the next one "Mountains Beyond Mountains". I really don't need teh pretentious parentheticals. I love me some pretension in my rock and pop music, don't get me wrong. But only if the material can back it up. This was a shuffling woe is me piece of melodrama that felt entirely unearned and stagey in a way that just did not fit in with everything else. "Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains)" - Can we get a Régine Chassagne solo dance electro pop album? This was MUCH more my speed, and found myself thinking of LCD Soundsystem, Ladyhawke, and even Cyndi Lauper at various points during this ( all good associations) and came away thinking it might just be my favorite song on the album - the rest of which it sounds nothing much like. "The Suburbs (Continued)" - A string heavy coda that reprises the first track and coasts off it's greatness, but which was entirely unnecessary. HIGHLIGHTS - "The Suburbs" - "Rococo" - "Modern Man" - "Half Light I" - "Month of May" - "Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains)" MIDLIGHTS - "Ready to Start" - "City with No Children" - "Half Light II (No Celebration)" - "Suburban War" - "Wasted Hours" - "We Used to Wait" - "The Suburbs (Continued)" LOWLIGHTS - "Empty Room" - "Deep Blue" - "Sprawl I (Flatland)" FINAL THOUGHTS There's a general feeling about music from the 2000's onward that feels somehow more characterless than a lot of what came before, and this has come up more than a few times in discussions with my group, and I've mentioned it in relation to the idea that we seem to have halted creatively as a culture, with nothing much standing out music wise as being "of its time" so much as it's from every time and no time at the same.. uh, time. This isn't quite so bad and generic as a lot of that stuff feels, but there is enough of it that it's identifiable. If I listened to more of their albums though, maybe they would just end up being in the category of a very goof greatest hits band. There's nothing wrong with that. There was more good stuff on here than I remembered, but it was still full of so many miserabilist anthems that I'm not sure it puts them in the black with regards to my goodwill going forward. The few tracks I really liked though, along with the general professionalism on display was enough to round up though and make it a more positive experience than not. I guess I'm just expecting too much from a band that was so lauded, so when I didn't get at least a 4 star album out of the deal I'm even more disappointed by expectations that were maybe too large. The almost hour and four minute run time did not help. Three or four songs from the end I started to get impatient, and was finding it hard to differentiate even some of the better songs from each other. I can't say they won me over with this one, but there are two more albums on the list from them, so they'll get another chance. Or two. I'm fine going backwards into the discography a couple more times to see what gems there might be, but I don't think I'll be doing any independent study. Possible turn-Offs might include: - a relentless sense of hopelessness - an unself-aware over seriousness - sameyness in the mood and execution that leaves you with a sense of having listened to one really long song You Might enjoy this if you: - like well crafted, well produced indie arena rock - like hooks but are indifferent when it comes to memorable melodies - love the idea of a stage crowded with 10-15 too-earnest hipsters dressed in vests and stupid hats PLAYLIST ALTERATIONS' - Just the highlights please FURTHER LISTENING Precursors: - Parallel Lines by Blondie - On the Beach by Neil Young - Music for the Masses by Depeche Mode - Surf's Up by the Beach Boys - Wildflowers by Tom Petty - Heathen by David Bowie - The River by Bruce Springsteen Contemporaries: - Return to Cookie Mountain by TV On The Radio - The Hazards of Love by the Decemberists - Twin Cinema by the New Pornographers - The Fragile Army by The Polyphonic Spree Descendants: - High Violet by The National - Hospice by The Antlers - Lost in the Dream by The War on Drugs - Too Bright by Perfume Genius - I Like It When You Sleep, for You Are So Beautiful Yet So Unaware of It by The 1975 - Take the Sadness Out of Saturday Night by Bleachers

(4/5) And I only give them this on the album's timing from this list. I like "Arcade Fire". I don't love them. This and "Neon Bible" I randomly stumbled into shortly after their releases and while I wasn't into modern rock at that time, their big, expansive sound tickled a lot of my music bones. (What a terrible analogy.. imma keep it anyway) Their moody, ennui-ridden lyrics and tone are appropriate to certain times and places. Today was appropriate. So, on the strength of the timing, they get the '4'. Otherwise, it is about 15 minutes too long and the back half suffers from some writers block. They just keep repeating the same tonal stuff over and over.. I forgave it today, but in a worse mood, they would have been knocked down a star.

Since Arcade Fire destroyed their legacy, I haven't listened to them. They were a big part of my formative high school years, and The Suburbs in particular was one of the first album releases that felt like an Event for me. I'd hear the title track on the radio on the way to school and fight to turn up the volume before my mom would change the station. "Sprawl II" was mindblowing to someone who'd never consciously listened to "Heart of Glass" yet. "Empty Room" felt like a connection between the pop punk I grew up with, and this new twitchy and anxious indie scene I was getting into. Yet in 2026, I looked at this album with dread. With all of the baggage, all of the in-jokes about the songs we didn't like, all of the self-importance, all of the ambiguous "us vs them" posturing, I just thought I'd moved past this record. I listened today for the first time in a long time, and I remembered most of the words. I remembered why I loved "Half Light II" and "Ready to Start". I remembered that Regine Chassagne is one of the best singers this genre had to offer, whenever she graced us with a lead performance. I remembered why I hated Rococo, and the vague and pretentious takedowns of "the kids" that stain the record. I remembered the lush orchestration clashing with the muddy guitars. It's all there! This is a perfect record for a beginner music adventurer, jaded teenager, or the nostalgic millennial looking back. If you can look past, well, everything, it's all there.

It’s alright This genre of rock is so meandering I don’t like the whispy vocals they leave no impact, it feels like they are meant to blend in. I did like Sprawl II actually, it sounded different to everything else on the album. It definitely did the job of making me feel the urban drabness it frames its concept around. God I’m glad we moved away from this era

I have a new rating system on AOTY since I first reviewed this, so the change in rating doesn't reflect my feelings for the album! This is really a great example of what Indie Rock should be, and 2010 was such a great time. It still had the atmosphere and quality of the iconic 2000's Indie scene, but wasn't released after 2013 (I consider 2013 the death of consistently good quality Indie music, the bass is often overpowering and I find most of the music to drone and go straight through me!). I find the early tracks to be the best, with 'The Suburbs', 'Ready To Start' and 'Modern Man' being the album's primary highlights. Later on, there's the brilliant 'Deep Blue', but despite it's universal appreciation, I still didn't find myself loving 'Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains)'! This is a very nostalgic album for many, both literally and sonically, though the sonic nostalgia resonates closer to me, with the heavily atmospheric sound.

The Suburbs - Soooo long and does nothing -1/5 Ready to Start - Sucks 1/5 Modern Man - Sucks just as bad 1/5 Rococo - Rocrapo -100/5 Empty Room - Sucks slight less, but still sucks 1/5 City With No Children - Nope 1/5 Half Light I - Does not need a sequel 1/5 Half Light II (No Celebration) - I'm not celebrating either 1/5 Suburban War - Barely listening now 1/5 Month of May - Worst yet -241\5 Wasted Hours - Story of my listening experience 1/5 Deep Blue - Sea? Like the bottom of the location where this album belongs? 1/5 We Used to Wait - Don't wait, please leave 1/5 Sprawl I (Flatland) - How is this still going? 1/5 Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains) - Why? 1/5 The Suburbs (Continued) - Just end zzzzzzzz/5 Thoughts that come to mind: "Why is this first song so long? How many times do you need to play the same boring-ass shit before someone tells you that you should stop? Fire their producer into the sun." "I'm 6 songs in and I already hate this record with a burning (arcade) fire." "I like the transition between the first 2 tracks. Smooth. But sadly, it's like being in a room filled with cow manure, walking through a beautiful door, and into a room filled with dog shit." "This is a painful listen." "'Arcade Fire’s expansive third album turns suburban imagery, conflicted nostalgia and information-age disenchantment into orchestral sweep and piano-driven grandeur.' They spent more time writing that for themselves than they did writing anything for this record." "There's like 7 people in this band and the music sounds like 2 people could have wrote and recorded this in 2 hours, if we're being generous." "Tuning this out and just doing work." "Maybe I just don't get this because I didn't grow up in the suburbs? It's an artistic expression to be so boring? Where I grew up, you were taking your life and any possessions on you into your own hands every time you stepped outside." "Month of May is 4 minutes long and is almost all one chord the whole song. That only works for the Beastie Boys." "They are big fans of playing the same piano/keyboard note or chord over and over and over again for whole songs. I'm not." "The best time to delete this material was before you released it. The second best time is now." "They keep having sequel songs that have no musical connection to the song it's supposed to relate to. I think it's more song naming laziness than an attempt at continuity." "They should gather up all of the copies of this and bury them in the desert like they did with that Atari E.T. game." "One hour and 4 minutes too long."

Have listen to many times an indie classic

This album starts out so great and has such a melancholy soul for me. It loses some steam as it goes on - and it is long.

Incredible album, so happy for a chance to re-listen. It totally holds up. Very coherent theme and sound, yet with enough variation among the songs not for it to become boring. Going in I would have pegged "The Suburbs," "Month of May," and "Sprawl II" as my favorite songs, but I also really enjoyed "Deep Blue," "Suburban War," and the desolate "Sprawl I" on this listen. Easy 5 for me.

For some reason I kept thinking this album was from the 70s until I double checked- speaking of double checking, this band has 4.4 million regular listeners on Spotty and had radio plays judging by the reviews. We've forgotten what indie means if this is what qualifies something as indie. My rule of thumb has once again proven true- if an album is over an hour long it's bloated, it needs revising. I've listened front to back twice- by Suburban War it all starts to blend together. This album is like someone heard midwest emo / alternative and decided to repackage the genre in neater, radio friendly sounds for easier listening to a general audience. And that's not bad, but unfortunately it does mean it succumbs to the worse failing of just being kind of bland. Wasted Hours is a good sound, although it reeks of that repackaging by the artist selling it to bored teens stuck at school without any understanding of why a person may feel that way. City with out children in the best on the album

As good as I remember at the time. An hour long just holds it back, too many cooks in that band

Wasn’t a fan of this sound. Melancholy tech music

Refrito de 2010 en La Página Impar: Arcade Fire, adelanta el primer simple (con su correspondiente Lado B) de su próximo álbum. Hablamos de The Suburbs, que estaba originalmente programado para mayo pasado, pero que por ‘vaya-uno-a-saber-qué-quilombito’ debió ser pospuesto hasta agosto. Aún así, la banda liderada por los multiinstrumentistas hermanos Butler, lanzó The Suburbs/Month of may en 12 pulgadas, y ya se puede encargar el disco completo en el formato que más cómodo nos quede en la web oficial del grupo, que para este larga duración decidió dejar de lado la iglesia como estudio de grabación. El sonido de ambos temas, entre sí, es bastante diferente, incluso respecto de las dos placas predecesoras a The Suburbs. En este caso no hay orquestaciones demasiado ampulosas y pretenciosas, sino que por un lado Month of may suena más post punk que el post punk mismo, en un trajín vertiginoso y sin pausas; y el tema que dará nombre al álbum está encarado con una cadencia pop amena y optimista. Con este desconcierto como premisa, al menos desde el simple y su contracara, quedará escuchar el disco entero a partir de agosto. De todos modos, suene como suene, es un hype asegurado para la prensa como lo fueron sus dos primeros discos, independientemente del mérito hecho por parte del grupo para que suenen bien. -- No voy a volver a escuchar este disco.

This is the first album I've gotten on my list so far that I had no prior knowledge of at all and I really liked it! The instrumentation is really good and the album flows super well overall. Sounds like it could be very timeless as it was released a decade and a half ago and still sounds pretty current. Great album!

It's okay. For some reason Arcade Fire really doesn't do it for me, and I can't put my finger on why.

largo, copado, continuo, buena vibra

Huele a adolescencia y que este scott pilgrim en la tele. Buen album

Bowie + U2 aburrido

El primer tema es espectacular, pero se me hizo muy monotono, no conecté.

It was ok. Like the first track. A little long of an album.

screams 2010's like've never heard before

It's inoffensive without reaching any great heights

It sets a very nice mood and sticks with it, but no songs really stick out. Will probably keep listening to Modern Man, but no other song stuck with me after listening

Boring, corny lyrics

Gostei muito!

Listening to this one today, I'd definitely forgotten how good it was; such is the effect of the diminishing returns of their subsequent albums. Shame. There was something really special here but it feels like a distant memory now. Their 2025 album is barely a shell of their noughties pomp. Although it definitely didn't help that a storm started gathering around Win with some really unpleasant allegations about his behaviour and deteriorating relationship with his wife Regine. No wonder the music also suffered. Just reading back on my review of Neon Bible, two things stand out; I called that LP and Funeral 'possibly their best two?' and also questioned the sequencing. On The Suburbs, interestingly, I feel they have absolutely nailed the sequencing, with a concept album that flows, hits its stride in all the right places and suits its runtime perfectly. On reflection, I actually enjoy this more than both of its predecessors. It succeeds both as a complete work, and with strong highlights such as Modern Man, City With No Children and the two-part closer, Sprawl. It feels more fully-realised than Funeral, while it's brighter and less menacing and dystopian than Neon Bible. Maybe it's because I was living in suburban America at the time it came out and have vivid happy memories of the time, but I feel it captures the spirit of its subject matter and paints a believable, if somewhat cynical picture. It's disappointing how hard and sharply they fell off after this but make no mistake, their first three albums deserved all the plaudits they were receiving and have held up to the test of time.

Arcade Fire is a band that I'm perpetually suggested by every musical algorithm, and should apparently like way more than I do, so I was happy to give a full album of theirs (particularly one that won the Grammy for Album of the Year) a spin. But after listening, I think this could just as easily have been titled Melancholy and the Infinite Boredom. I tip the hat a bit because I think that's the theme they're going for, as a think piece deconstructing life in suburban America. But the persistent sadness and overall long-windedness of it is just boorish. Nothing stands out and there's a perpetual background tinnitus that upsets my actual tinnitus. The second half got a bit more upbeat, at least, but most of the tracks, and the album as a whole, overstayed its welcome and lacked the drawing power to round this 3.5/5 up to a 4.

i would say its mid modern sounding, but a nice chill listen

I like some stuff and not other stuff. Overall I like it.

I enjoyed the high production values and big songs in this. It’s a complicated and layered album, with loads of great songs!

This album was amazing. Such a great variety of tracks. Love the vocals and musical style. Arcade fire is spoken very high of and I see why

Decent. I never liked Arcade Fire at the time but I particularly enjoyed the melodies on the first track. My tastes have changed and I have more time for them now. Will listen again.

The 1st track is a 3/5, I enjoyed listening to it as background noise while I complete my daily Microsoft Reward points, I'm planning on listening to this whole album as background noise. The 2nd track is a 3/5 enjoyed it as background noise, and being ready to start something with someone. The 3rd track is a 4/5, it's a good song about how somethings don't make sense until you're older, I might be completely misunderstanding the message, but the song somehow built on me, so I'm giving it a 4 which is the lowest a song has to get to be added to my main playlist. The 4th track is a 3/5, not a bad track, I enjoyed it as background music, but not going to add it to my main playlist. The 5th track is a 4/5, I don't fucking know, I just enjoyed it enough to add it to my main playlist. The 6th track is a 4/5, enjoyed the lyrics, the track in general, I feel like I'm going to end up giving this album a 4/5 with how many songs I'm adding to my main playlist. The 7th track is a 3/5, good song, not something I would go out of my way to listen to again. The 8th track is a 3/5, good song, wouldn't skip if I ended up listening to it in a different playlist, but not going to add it to my main playlist. The 9th track is a 3/5, good song, same as above, wouldn't skip, but wouldn't add to my main playlist either. The 10th track is a 3/5, good song, same as above, wouldn't skip, but wouldn't add to my main playlist either. The 11th track is a 3/5, good song, same as above, wouldn't skip, but wouldn't add to my main playlist either. The 12th track is a 3/5, good song, same as above, wouldn't skip, but wouldn't add to my main playlist either. The 13th track is a 3/5, good song, same as above, wouldn't skip, but wouldn't add to my main playlist either. The 14th track is a 4/5, I decided to add it to my main playlist, I don't fucking know anymore. The 15th track is a 3/5, good song, same as above, wouldn't skip, but wouldn't add to my main playlist either. The 16th track is a 3/5, not as good as the other songs, but a good final song. I would give this album a high 3/5, I added some songs to my main playlist, but it felt like I didn't add enough to give this a 4 or 5/5.

Not a big indi fan, so I wasn't impressed. Kind of (too) dreary and tiring. I would give it a 2.5.

i think _neon bible_ is my favorite of theirs, but this is still a great album

It was ok

Son la mejor banda del mundo pese a todo, y este disco es increible.

Even though 'Funeral' does this album a disservice by comparison, this record sits in the upper echelon of 00s indie rock. It does what other indie bands at the time did, but with more focus, offering great soundscapes and sounds that now feel reminiscent of the early 00s. 8/10 [KEEP]

While The Suburbs definitely deserves a place on this list, I’m not convinced it’s actually any good. The zeitgeist of mid-to-late 2000s alternative rock: meandering, well-played indie, but it’s just not for me. Ironically, for an album that rails against suburban sprawl and the loss of identity, it embraces both musically.

I'm not going to look up anything about his personal behavior before saying this, but my four stars should absolutely be interpreted as full-throated approval of everything Win Butler ever has done or ever will do.

Not sure what’s so “must listen” about this. Standardish alternative.

Always liked it

very 2010s hipster music. most of the album was just pretty boring to me. its funny though because i listened to Funeral in 2024 and i thought that album was really really good, so i might have to re-listen to that now lol...

Chill. Pa carretera, relax.

6.5/10 - I thought the album started really strong. Suburbs, Ready to Start, Modern Man are all great, but the album is too long and the songs where they try and fuse or bend genres don’t really work for me.

Really good despite the long run time. There are a lot of indie rock classics but the deeper cuts are great too. 8/10

Another great album from our Canadian indie heroes. It's a good album with big sounds and engaging melodies. Maybe a tad monotone, which I am realising is a recurring criticism from me. But there are far worse offenders. Looking at a 4.

Liked the title song, good overall listen w/ no particular standouts

In the days of yore, composers wrote great symphonies. Then orchestras all over the world played them, and broadly speaking, they all sounded much the same. The Suburbs feels a little like that. It’s a collection of very good, very listenable songs, but the performance could be anyone. There’s no unique selling point. No quirky voice, no virtuoso guitar solos, no signature guitar sound, no unusual instrumentation. A bloke sings some songs. A woman sings some songs. Everyone involved is clearly a very accomplished musician. And yet it all feels strangely anonymous. Polished, tasteful, sanitised and just a bit vanilla. Not a bad album at all. In fact, probably a very good one. But nothing about it made me notice.

It has the minimum amount of features to not be completely boring but i would not listen to it on repeat. Its neither terrible nor great. Some songs like Sprawl II stick out for being better than the rest.

sounds like muse lol

Un des meilleurs group canadien

I realised that I was confusing this with 'Funeral' - but upon listening again this is a much more upbeat release than 'Funeral'. Great songwriting, great instrumentation and good melodies. A great album and going to make me relisten to some of their other stuff again today. (5/5)

Not quite as good as the first two albums. Seemed a bit more subtle with some of the rougher edges smoothed however it is still a very good record.

+1 for nostalgia factor

All songs sound the same, not but, but just all the same

I wonder why I always assumed this band was a Warped Tour pop punk band. They're way worse.

This is not the one that should have been on here.

These guys really ran out of stuff to sing about, huh? Seems like they plumbed the 80s and got Neil Young and Billy Idol and Bruce Springsteen out of the deal and put their signature mid-2000s indie pop twist on it. Hey, maybe this album is on here because of its example of how the mid-2000s indie pop entered its death throes. There are beats of the old Arcade Fire in here, but it's half-done. The lyrics are sometimes eye-rollingly bad (what Neil Young could get away with in, say, Month of May sounds corny here), the inventiveness seems like it was given up prior to inventing anything, and the musical crescendos lack the emotional oomph that I'd expect from the diversion of the quasi wall of noise. Win's listless "Woo!"s sound half-assed. They sound bored, and the result is kind of boring. And at over an hour, too. Yech. And with the hater hat off, I still have to say it sounds pretty good. It's nothing new, and it is boring, but it does have something like the 80s rock energy to carry itself (though maybe not for an hour). Compared to the first two albums, I think it pales, but it's not bad. Just disappointing. Giving it a 2 because I'm mean but really it's just fine, even if ending with Sprawl II engenders a lot of goodwill.

Yes, Arcade Fire’s cultural cachet has plummeted in recent years. But this deserved its place on top of the world. I forgot how good this album is. It’s a more complete and cohesive album than Neon Bible, and feels a hell of a lot shorter than an hour. It takes me back to my high school days, which is ironic considering I didn’t first hear this until my 20’s. Top notch stuff.

Happened to listen to this on a bright sunny walk home, so yeah it hit really really well, very easy 5. Standouts are The Suburbs, Ready to Start, Empty Room, Suburban War, Month of May, We Used To Wait and Sprawl II, so like over half the album.

Has a strong start, then there is the middle of the album which is kind boring. Second to last track(Sprawl 2) is my favorite song on the album. This album I feel is too long and it could be cut down from 16 tracks to 10

"Funeral" was such an important album to me when it came out, and this album, six years later, just wasn't. Listening to it again all these years later, I know why. It's loosely held together by the "suburbs" concept, but it's kind of muddled - are we in the suburbs or have we escaped them? And there's some kind of war, pitting us against our suburban neighbors? "Funeral" had such a clear point of view. It tackled life and death, the meaning of existence, and fears of growing up. I feel like Arcade Fire meant for this album to have that sort of deep meaning and it just didn't click with me. The first 3 songs are great, and then it all falls apart.

this album didn't have to be an hour long, arcade fire really don't have anything to say. the songs are all whatever, about whatever

Damn, this is great. It kinda sneaks up on you. They don't front load the good songs, just gets better and better

this feels like the kind of album id have to listen to a couple times for it to really click. ill prob come back to it in like two years and really like it- 2028 me, remember to check in!

Haven't listened to this one featuring H-Town lead singer Win Butler. A spirited run!

It starts out pretty good, then gets a bit boring, then great again at the end with Sprawl II. I could do without the social commentary but the music is decent. 3.5

so indie omg

Favorite Track: Modern Man

Enjoyed a lot. Super consistent in sound and quality.

This was an experience. I never got into Arcade Fire in the 00s as I associated them with a certain crowd - ironic as Rococo is a song about that very crowd. First pass on the album was underwhelming other than stand out tracks Ready to Start, Month of May and Half Light II. It wasn’t until I got to the final track that it resonated with me, the story of lost youth, nostalgia and longing for a past that no longer exists. Subsequent listens uncovered more and more about the album to the point it organically became a five star album by the end of the day

If I was a younger man when I first heard this I’m sure I would’ve liked it a lot more than I did, nothing particularly wrong with it, a pleasant enough listen, but for me it didn’t have an authentic voice to make it stand out, like the band was still searching for who they are, and were just imitating who they thought they should be

Never quite seen what all the fuss is about with Arcade Fire. It’s a good band, but it isn’t a great one for me. 3

Que largo e interminable se me hizo este album, no me gustó tanto como el otro del challenge y se me hizo un poco monotono y empalagoso. Por mas que no es mala musica en ningun aspecto, me agoto 6/10

This album is just alright, to say the least. It has a cool atmosphere, but otherwise it didn't really evoke any strong emotions in me, aside from a strong sense of boredom. The only thing worse than a bad album is a boring one. Favs: The Suburbs,

It will be hard to be inbiased- O have long regarded The Suburbs as a top 5 album of all time for me personally. It dropped my junior year of college, and I remember listening in full around that time. It still brings me right back to that period in my life. With a fresh listen- I still love it. It's filled with so much raw emotion, and true to Arcade Fire, it blends a lot of instruments into a huge wall of sound effect. Said to be an homage to the suburban upbringing experience, the alvum is broody at times (in the best way) and playful in others (Sprawl II being a personal favorite). Even the dud songs are still enjoyable. Overall- masterpiece of indie rock.

A little repetitive but a big evocative sound

The Suburbs was an absolutely beautiful album. After hearing the first two Arcade Fire albums, i was certainly expecting a lot when it came to this band and i am happy to say they absolutely delivered. This is another one of those albums that is just so pleasant and lovely that i enjoyed it regardless of how long it got. The music was absolutely sublime being able to fit any mood that the songs were going for, both Win Butler and Regine Chassagne killed it when it came to vocals and the lyrics are great too. I am definitely having trouble thinking of things to even complain about because there really isn't anything i can think of. Just an all round fantastic album. Best Song: Ready to Start Worst Song: The Suburbs (continued) Side note: Last Arcade Fire album, meaning: 1. Neon Bible 2. The Suburbs 3. Funeral

Just fine

i don't think this type of indie rock is for me. genuinely none of this music is bad but NONE of it stands out to me. it all just kind of blends together and really doesn't command my attention. "sprawl 1 (flatland)" is the only song i really didn't like. there's a chance this moves down to 2 stars.

Why is this album ten years long and how many members does this band need to make such soporific rock? There's seven of the fuckers and they got six singles out of this? Eh, it's whatever. It's pleasant and interminable. I have no noughties nostalgia for Arcade Fire and never really got the hype, and then Win Butler turned out to be a greasy loser – who'd have thunk it – so I'm liberated from trying to like them.

Knowing some of the crap that still exists in the 1001 book, noting that this album has been removed didn’t suggest that it was necessarily unworthy to be in it. I therefore approached this with an open mind. I couldn’t have named any Arcade Fire song if I was asked but at least recognising the name maybe meant I had heard them and paid some attention to them in the past? The first and title track sounded like the opening to a sitcom based in the suburbs but I assume that was auto-suggestion or whatever. The rest of the song was a bit tame and should have been a warning about the rest of the album. They didn’t seem to be putting much effort in on most of the songs. Tracks 1 to 4 were extremely boring. I thought it had started to pick up with Empty Room but despite the occasional burst into life as with Month of May it soon returned to the former lacklustre feel. I carried on plodding through but thought at the end it was overall just a bit meh! Wasted Hours would be a better title track for the album – fortunately just a single hour wasted listening here. Being withdrawn from the list was justified in this case after all.

So boring and plodding- defining an era of boring plodding music. They really thought they were a lot smarter than they actually were oh and the singer is a sex pest.

Not as bad as Funeral but still pretty fucking bad. My problem with Arcade Fire has always been that I find it hard to enjoy music I understand how to make, especially if it’s packaged like a revolution. There is nothing deep about this record, it’s just a pastiche of better bands with a fuzz bass on top. The songs are almost punk in their simplicity, but without any passion, just dull, turgid repetitive vocals and nonsense lyrics with the depth of a 15-year-old’s diary after they did a Philosophy class, and every song outstays its welcome by at least two minutes. Such a boring way to spend an hour. But again, at least it’s not Funeral, and there’s going to be a much more miserable review of this band when that inevitably shows up.

3.5 I like it less than neon bible. I've rated each album lower than the one before. I wonder if that will change.

Superb album. A sublime representation of the indie genre, beautiful road trip music.

although i find it a bit on the vanilla side if alternative pop/rock, i can't fully escape its magnetic influence. for me, certainly not a life changing album.

Boring. 2.49

Like Radiohead, these guys are another band that I like but think I should like a lot more. Everything about this is appealing, but I think I need to have my ears blown out in an arena to really appreciate it.

I continue to not be able to get into this album

The Suburbs in its entirety is great, but the title track has to be my favorite song.

love love love this - defo want it on vinyl

Damn, two duds in a row. And duds to me not to most. Sorry apex twin and arcade fire. Anyway I just dont get arcade fire. Its just very standard alternative or indie music. Thats what I dony understand. Why is this the music thats lauded the way it is? With this record i get the concept. Its in theory a cool concept. Id rather listen to any pop punk band complain about thier suburban town than this. I will give the suburbs to props of having at least some energy in a few places. Nit very many but some. Also I remember the popular songs from this record making the rounds on the alternative radio station I listened to as a teen. And god I hated ready to start and we used to wait. And i still see it as the start of a subsection of music i still cant stand. Alot of that indie stuff isnt for me. And this was just one of many that came on all the time. Im less angry about this than that record with the quill on it. That one I went in on. This is better but still quite shit. Oh well. Hopeing for something good tomorrow. Goodbye arcade fire. I won't miss you

fine, too long

Not as good as Neon Bible, but seems like it will grow on me with further listens (and pretty sure I will be listening to it again). There were no songs here that had the raw power of My Body is a Cage, but maybe Sprawl stands out from the rest on a first listen.