#1 Classic for a reason. Bright guitar riffs.
#2 Where are the drums? Droning monotonous vocals. Interesting guitar.
#3 Somehow all the songs sound the same? Prominent strings. Meandering.
#4 Another classic for a reason. Inflection of their 60s voices is something I cannot get past.
#5 Good voice, I get the appeal of her music now.
#6 British slang, identifiable intonation of the 60s and 70s, folksy, jaunty piano, sounded all over the place. Does this album know what it wants to be?
#7 Please no more 60s and 70s...
#8 ...you know, I went into this project to hear new and unfamiliar music to broaden my understanding of influential music, and that's exactly what I'm getting...
#9 Interesting instrumentals, but feels like an album I could sleep to...
#10 Honestly waiting for modern music, this was all right
#11 Holy harmonica Batman! Dylan's nasal voice puts me off.
#12 Good stuff! An impressive one-woman album, reminds me of Imogen Heap. Might seek out her other music.
#13 I get it, it's Johnny Cash, but his music does nothing for me...
#14 Can't help but think of the SNL skit when "Hello" came on 🤭 overall a monumental album for Adele
#15 Yawn, I'm not impressed, less 60s please 🥱
#16 Thought it was all right, never have listened to Nas and I probably won't return.
#17 Has "Killer Queen" but all the songs here start to blend and sound the same
#18 I heard the first few seconds and could not be arsed to listen to the rest.
#19 Never heard of this band before, and now I know why 🫢
#21 Like if the Beatles and ABBA had a baby. +1 for California Dreamin'.
#22 Better wait for tomorrow to listen to interesting music 'cause it ain't today...
#23 The YouTube comments are right, as if this band is playing while falling down never-ending stairs. Fast and bulbous!
#24 Boring, even-paced songs to fall asleep to 😴
#25 Except for Freedom! '90, the album was just okay
#26 With the understanding that this is Björk's divorce album, and that anything she makes is a work of art, this was not an enjoyable listen.
#27 As soon as I heard the voice, I scrubbed through the rest of the album. ROUGH.
#29 Kinda interesting but eh 🫤
#30 I see Beatles on the list, I snooze 😴
#31 I'm beyond done hearing folk from this list
#32 Banger singles but repetitive as hell
#33 Britain strikes again with a snoozefest 😪
#34 Good first half but back half droned on, almost off-key, could've been 3/5
#35 Not my style, slow tempo, let's move on 😪
#36 Meh it's not bad but there's better electronic music elsewhere, and the vocals were not it
#37 Budget tone-deaf Florence Welch from the 1700s
#38 Thought I didn't know their songs but quite a few were familiar and still good, others were not as good
#39 A down-tempo Elvis, really...
#41 Working in retail during the holiday season over 10 years ago has killed any love for Christmas songs
#42 A couple of bangers, expected a heavier sound overall, too much acoustic for my liking
#44 I appreciate the heavy guitar but that's it
#45 Not cohesive and too chaotic
#48 What decade am I in? Oh, it's modern music? 🤨 This is music for cheesy horror movies
#49 Takes itself too seriously. Used all the sound samples that were available, huh?
