1001 Albums Summary

A classic. People seem to look down on it because it's not OK Computer, Kid A or In Rainbows. Almost any other band though, this would be their magnum opus and the fact that it isn't as good as those other albums doesn't mean it's not still 5 stars. Brilliant

This was OK but if I'm in the mood I'd just go back to Superfly

I can respect what they're doing, it's just not my bag. It's good "sitting on the deck with friends" social background groove but after two goes it didn't hook me to actually play it ever again

I was always more of a west coast guy. This is the best album I've gotten so far

Soundgarden have always been a "I enjoy the odd song if it comes on but never felt the need to listen to a whole album" band for me. They remain that.

It was like a paint by numbers inspirational movie soundtrack

Expected to enjoy this, based on my recollection of Supergrass way back when. Enjoyed it even more than I expected

An elevator in a hotel lobby crashed into an interpretive dance group and said "let's collaborate and sell it to some corporates who want to get some artistic cred".

Someone else said "if it ain't Slick give it the Flick". So true. I always felt I was a tripper born into the life of a computer nerd, so Somebody to Love and White Rabbit have always spoken to me at a DNA level. So I was looking forward to this. In reality, there are two absolutely brilliant songs and the rest are drab pop-folk beige.

Couldn't finish it. The two singles are decent enough - not my taste but they had a uniqueness to them at the time which means I don't hate them - and the first song was OK, but the rest? I got as far as the terrible one with Fred Durst and bailed. I'm a completionist but not THAT much of a completionist.

10 seconds into the first song I was prepared to give this 1 star. Synthy over bright over produced 80's pop - none of those descriptors have ever appealed to me, even back in the 80's. Well, I guess for a week in primary school I thought Transvision Vamp were good, but that passed. Scritti Politti were never on my radar then or since. So I started looking them up. "Leftist punk" was a word used to describe them, but alas, long before this album. They shifted to synth pop a long time ago. "Intellectual and political lyrics" which when I read this I was listening to the line "drowning in my teardrops (teardrops)"... OK then... (Jumping ahead here but having said all that, the lyrics to Lover To Fall were standing out a bit so I looked them up, and yes, despite the MGTOW vibes, there are some clever things going on there.) But by the time Perfect Way started, my head started to hurt. I shouldn't blame them - I'm lacking sleep, over stressed and I had a headache yesterday too - but still, I'm choosing to blame Scritti Politti for this one. But I promised my son I'd finish it. So finish it I did. And it remains 1 star. Oh, one last thing... The vocals are just terrible. It's like he's singing and mewing at the same time

I didn't like this as such, but given the terrible run we've been given (Ute Lemper, Korn, Scritti Politti) I gotta at least say that I didn't hate this. It had a vibe, it had a flow. The beats were cool. It's not my thing but I can at least recognise that it's good at what it aims to be and I can see how it would have been influential. So while I'm not going to listen to this again out of choice, it's not something I'd be itching to turn off if it was playing elsewhere.

Not bad other than waking the witch, but not something i’ll come back to. It was nice that the viral song (running up that hill) wasn’t a standout, but again, i never got that bandwagon so 2 stars for me

Sounds like the soundtrack to a cool 80's movie. Of various genres. But not something I'd listen to for just the music

After listening to and liking songs here and there of Björk since the early/mid 90's, this is the first time I've ever listened to a whole album. On my review of Superunknown by Soundgarden I said something along the lines of "I've always enjoyed when one of their songs came on but never felt the need to listen to a whole album. Now having done so, I feel validated in that belief". Soundgarden are a band I like in small doses but in larger doses they aren't as engaging. I always thought Björk was the same. Ah well, I can't be right all the time and sometimes being wrong is nice. Very solid album, much enjoyed, will listen again, and looking forward to more from her.

I think (well, I know) I am late to this. I suspect if I discovered Elliot Smith back in the 90's I'd be a big fan to this day. So other than him sounding remarkably like songs I've heard in various movies/tv shows (and I'm sure it was him) I had never actually heard of him until now. Which makes it tricky. I listened twice. There are definitely some tunes that are stuck in my head. At the same time, this is a little over produced for my tastes - he's channelling The Beatles hard and sometimes that feels a bit forced. And, despite being a Beatles fan, this turns me off a little. There is a conflict between "vulnerable and raw" intent and "bright and polished" production. My rating system is "3 stars means it was good, but not something i'm likely to listen to again". This get's 3 but I will give it more of a go.

I can hear the influence on PJ Harvey and Hole. I can also hear the influence on 4 Non Blondes and Counting Crows. So you win some, you lose some. It's all a bit bright and manic for me. I think I'm more of a shoegazer. I wanna feel it in my gut not buzzing around my head.

It makes me thankful I'm not American and surrounded by religion. I kept wondering "are these guys critiquing their upbringing or lamenting what they lost when they broke out of it?". Maybe it answers that with extended listening but the revivalist tone never connected for me. So stars for this are hard - is it good? Well, I think so. On an initial listening at least I think I got what they were aiming at which is a positive. Did I enjoy it musically? No. Did I hate it? No. Would I listen again? No.

Frank channelling Dick Van Dyke referring to the "chim-en-knee red" - a capering pronunciation - as he watches his house, murdered wife and hated chihuahua burn is just one of many signs of brilliance here, a subtle layer to the joy felt by the loathsome Frank. With the cacophonic sound and Waits' gutteral voice it can be easy to miss things like this on Swordfishtrombones, but there are plenty of them to find. As an Australian, Town With No Cheer captures the vibe of the region very well. Yes, he uses Fahrenheit to refer to the heat, but I can forgive that as him talking to an audience that won't understand that 40 degrees is actually hot. As an side, I read about Serviceton and the border dispute a couple of years ago. It's a story well worth digging into. I particularly like that the music is not just a beat, vibe or feeling. It's part of the story. The beat in 16 Shells From A Thirty-Ought Six isn't just a weirdly timed stomp-march beat but it is also a mimic of the ritualistic cocking and firing of rifles in a military memorial. Some might find the beat jarring, but I felt it was the actual story being told and the lyrics were the history behind that story. Previously I'd heard and enjoyed Bone Machine and Franks Wild Years (the album, not the story as told on Swordfishtrombones) and enjoyed them. This is perhaps a better introduction to Waits than those albums. Franks Wild Years can be a bit melancholy, and Bone Machine can be almost too harsh in its presentation. This has melancholy, it has harshness, and it has a whole bunch of other stuff too. I think next time I'm in the mood for Waits I won't be reaching for Bone Machine again I'll reach for this instead.

Fun i guess but all a bit samey for myvtastes

Getting real "late 90's-early 00's ensemble rom-com" vibes from this. Dianna is runing back to confess her love to Craig, finally realising that Chet was actually just a jerk in a fancy suit, and Louise was just about to start the journey back to Kansas when Anthony steps out the bus door holding roses, and Somewhere is playing over it all. In the pre-release version of the movie Steve never kicked his needle habit, but that was removed from the final edit, but remained in the soundtrack. That is not to say this is bad - soundtracks to bad rom-coms are often good. I don't see myself ever listening again, but if someone ever does make my screenplay "Love Stories From New York" and uses this in the soundtrack then cue the Leo pointing meme. I just hope they leave Steve in, he was the heart of the tale.

I saw Steve Wonder about 20 years ago at Rod Laver Arena. 10's of 1000's of people dancing like they were in rapture. I have never felt like such an outsider. I just didn't get it. It's like Abba - it clearly speaks to people, makes them feel joy and wanna get up and dance. I get no such feeling. I can appreciate the technical elements but it just doesn't connect with me at all. I'm not hating here, not being contrarian, it's just what it is. 2 stars because Living In The City is a great song, although the version on this album has 2 minutes of bloat on the end that I expect was meant to make us feel like we were on the streets but just made me want to click "skip"

As background this is great - never felt like it was dragging, never felt anxious to move on. Listening critically, there are some great tones in here, especially in the first song where you can almost hear the delamination of the guitars. It makes me want to check out the documentary. But will I listen to this again? The answer is no. Not because it's bad (it's most definitely not) but the language gap means I have no idea what they are singing about which makes emotional connection hard, and the style has a vibe and feeling but it's not a vibe or feeling I'm ever in the mood for.

I can respect this but it's all a bit polished for my tastes. I like my blues to sound like it's being played by a virtuoso who is a dozen beers and bottle of rye deep and he's had to tape his guitar back together because a good old boy thought he looked at his woman the wrong way - it's held together now by rage, torment and gorilla tape and damn it sounds good. This is not that. They don't sound like they made a bargain with the devil. They sound like they practised for thousands of hours, dialling their tone, their rhythm, their cohesiveness. And, as I said, I can respect that, but it's not what I like in the blues. After the first few tracks it turns very jam-band. Again, I'm not opposed to jam music but I feel there are two styles - this is the "let's vibe on this for a while before resolving back to the original song" style jam. It's wandering, noodly, and it creates a vibe but doesn't tell a story. I prefer the jam that is telling the story - think some of the stuff on the Elder album Dead Roots Stirring, or maybe Hendrix (or even better - Uluru Rock by Earthless). Jams that are telling the tale - they feel free form but they have a structure: an escalation, a variation, a climax, then a resolution. One is saying "we're having fun, let's just hang out for a while longer" while the other is actively moving the story forward. Both have a place, but only one of them do I actually enjoy.

Never been a Zepp guy. Having said that, Since I've Been Loving You is a bloody great.

This album used to get played almost daily on my school bus back in the 90's. I think there is much to be said for listening to this album through a shitty cassette player and rattly bus speakers because listening now with decent headphones it is all a bit polished and hollow. It sounds manufactured. Maybe I'm just cynical. It's clearly a classic, but it sounds much better in my memory than it does 30 years later.

Maybe it’s just where I’m at but I really liked this. My beach boys experience has been “california girls” (blech) -> pet sounds (incredible) -> kokomo (double blech) so i really didn’t know what to expect. Thankfully, the album title is misleading. It’s a bit all over the place (Disney Girls going into Student Demonstation is certainly a choice) but i will definitely be putting this in rotation and it may well grow into a 5 star

Not my thing

Not my thing. Didn't finish

The highs on this album are very, very high. Four Women is incredible, and Lilac Wine made Jeff Buckleys version feel hollow - Buckley performed it but Simone LIVES it.

His cadence and inflections remind me a bit of Dylan, which is not a bad thing to me. I was into it, at first, but then it kind of just dragged. Because have to give whole stars I can't give it 2.5 so in this case I rounded down.

Loved this as a teen. For a month or so. You can sense the "we're moving from punk to pop-punk" in it, although at least some of it is closer to punk than subsequent stuff. It maybe gets an extra star for the memories.

Couldn't finish it. I think I'm doing real well getting through things but maybe it's the day, maybe it's the weather, maybe it's me, or maybe it's just the album, but I got to song 6 and just couldn't go on.

aaaaaa.... eeeeee... aaaaa-aa-aa. neeeee... ahhhh-ah-aaa. I have an English mate of a certain age who likes "football" (it's soccer mate, get it right) and he loves the Stone Roses. I have a feeling he may have a reference to them tattooed somewhere but that could be Dropkick Murphys reference too, I dunno. Nothing alike but he loves them both. And he loves that awful Disturbed cover of The Sounds of Silence. Which prompts me to ask: "why am I mates with him"? Beggers can't be choosers, I guess. This is at least not even half as offensive as that awful Disturbed cover. At least it's a vibe, but I can't understand the cultish love my mate has for it. I can understand saying "this is alright". I can't imagine loving it enough for a mate to think I had a tattoo somewhere.

Offensively bad. The title song is a boring , soul-less piece of saccharine tripe that somehow removes half the lyrics yet still seems to drag on forever. The cover of It Ain’t Me Babe is even worse. Both songs have the potential to invoke feeling but The Byrds transform them into hollow, meaningless shells. And this is why I find it so offensive - they put so much effort into sounding “pleasant” that nothing is left.

Don’t have much to say. Didn’t grab me but it was kinda cool. I now have 110th street stuck in my head though which isn’t actually on this album.

Well, this is a tough one...I went down a rabbit hole here. Aqualung (the title track) is a very sad tale, but I was curious what others thought and looked up a couple of reviews on google. People were really, really critical of the titular character. I'm not convinced. He's not a disgusting letch, he's a poor homeless man that we see through the eyes of the people observing him - the young girls, the salvation army, the person wandering the park, people who look at him with disgust/contempt, and/or sympathy. Yet some of the reviews were VERY critical of the songwriting as trying to make us feel sympathetic to a pedo - something I did not get at all. Seems some reviewers can look past the actual disgusting behaviour of bands like Led Zep, Aerosmith, MJ, etc, but a writer asking us to have sympathy for a homeless person is a step too far. Similar can be said for Cross-eyed Mary - a young girl seeking validation through destructive means, but convincing herself she is above her peers because of it. I think this behaviour is far more common - if mostly not as extreme - in many youth. But instead of feeling sorry for Mary, and being critical of her environment, the reviews seem to think this was intended to be voyeuristic. Am I being too generous of the intent? I did not find it voyeuristic at all, I again found it sad and confronting. It's an interesting album. Some stuff is great, some is close. A lot is confronting and thought provoking. But is it something I'll come back to? I don't think so. Usually my metric is "3 stars means I won't turn it off if it comes on but I won't choose it" and "4 stars means I'll put this on when the mood strikes me". I might have to deviate a little because while I won't choose to put this on it DID make me think a lot more than most the other stuff I'm being fed here.

I like Bowie, but to paraphrase the great Alan Partridge, when asked what my favourite Bowie album is my response would be "I'd have to say, The Best of David Bowie". Maybe that will change as I get through more of his stuff but for now it holds. I guess to be more specific for this album, I'll say that the Prettiest Star is both undeniably Bowie, and also undeniably bland - and the same can be said for many of the songs on here.

I was a bit surprised to see how polarising reviews for this were. It's certainly not a favourite but it definitely isn't a 1 star either. Gave it a couple of listens, enjoyed it. Favourite song was probably "What Time?" which was very different to the rest.

Hadn't heard of Robert Wyatt before. Looked at some reviews in the leadup and really didn't know what to expect. The reviews implied chaotic art gibberish. It wasn't what I got though. I should have trusted the name/cover and ignored the reviews. This was hypnotic and beautiful. Criticisms of his voice, as usual, seemed to miss the point. Yes, he hovers around the tune and never hits it, but that just adds to the floaty, ethereal feel. The flaws add to the music. I really enjoyed this.

Not just one of Dylans best, one of the best albums ever made full stop.

I’ve had Bowie and Dylan this week, and now I get this. It sounds very Bowie with the odd Dylan mixed into it. I mean, it wasn’t bad but if I never hear it again I won’t feel I lost anything

Not my thing, not something I can say I enjoyed, BUT... I at least respect the variety. This is a huge mix of different things - world fusion, dub, trip hop, and all in a sort of 80's/90's pop dressing. I don't like it - as I said, it's not my thing - but at least this is different. I got into this challenge to get exposed to new things. This was definitely a win in that regard. Song one is a pretty of the times pop tune, then song 2 goes almost into Church's Under The Milky Way territory with a world music fusion spin, then when you get to Everyman's An Island (song 7) and if someone was to say "Massive Attack cite this as an influence" I'd totally believe it (almost certainly not true, but the vibe is there). So while from a personal enjoyment perspective this is a 2 star, from a list objective perspective it's a 4 star.

Two all-time great albums in a week. Happy days for me.

Didn't grab me, didn't push me away. She sounded familiar (and looking her up, yeah, I know a couple of her songs) but didn't recognise anything on this album.

I can't believe I finished it. Genuinely didn't think I would halfway through Roundabout. But I made it. Yay for me. The only song I even remotely enjoyed was the last one, "Heart of the Sunrise". But even that 3 star song was not enough to elevate the rest of the album.

If I wanted to feel like I was sitting in a cocktail bar I'd go to a cocktail bar. I can't imagine any other reason I would ever listen to this.

Was never a fan of their hits. Indeed, I hated whenever the Aerosmith crossover appeared on Rage (and felt the same hearing it again now). And now the first time hearing them in full, I remain unmoved. There is no atmosphere here, it's sparse beats and metronomic delivery. They are clearly influential, they get my respect, but I remain a non-fan.

I’ve always been mildly drawn to these guys but never gave them a solid listen. One of those “these guys are cool i should check out more” bands. I was kinda expecting a four star. Alas there is a lot of just noise on this. Some good stuff, for sure, but a lot is just a mess. I’ll give 3 stars but i think i may be being generous here

Cream... The first "supergroup". Metal pioneers. Greatest band ever assembled. Pioneers. There is a lot said about them, but beyond Sunshine Of Your Love, I've never really heard them. And Disraeli Gears is their best, and not just their best, one of the best albums ever. And my experience? Very underwhelmed. The Sunshine... riff is obviously iconic. Not just iconic, it's an all time great riff and I love it. But the rest of the album? The best I could describe it is "flower power psych blues". But I don't like flower power psych blues, I like swampy gutter psych blues. I honestly didn't get anything from this that wasn't being done better by their peers. Hendrix did psychadelic wayyy better. Led Zeppelin did dirty blues wayyyy better. And yeah, maybe it's not fair to say "Cream is not good because they aren't as good as Hendrix or Zeppelin", but I'm also not saying they were "bad" just that they were "meh". All that time saying to myself "I should give Cream a go at some point" leading to "well... That's done". On paper it should be right up my alley. But now I've been there I won't be returning.

I'd never heard this before, but I'm now on the third listen. I'm not a fan of "performative" singing. The kind where the singer clearly has talent and uses that to hit every note possible in every song. I find it showy and never adds anything that I find important. Well, I say "never", but again, sometimes I'm wrong. Joni hit's notes that are all over the place. She can go from a near speaking tone to high pitched crooning in the middle of a word. And... I love it. She doesn't sound like she's showing off, she sounds like she's living the words. With seismic shifts in pitch and micro shifts in timbre she can change between urgent, melancholy, excited, angry... And that's not even starting on the lyrics. Incredible. Personal lyrics, sung like we are eavesdropping. Brilliant.

Did I like this? No. Did I hate this? Noooo. It was just glam rock - boppy, fun, not my thing. But I spent a lot of it thinking "I've heard these guys, I'm sure of it". So I dug deeper, and they have a song "Merry Xmas Everybody". I will say that I much prefer hearing that in the local supermarket during the Christmas period than Mariah Bloody Carey. It wasn't on this album but thought I'd bring it up because I hate Mariah's Christmas songs and I'd much rather just hear Slade on repeat than another Mariah Carey Christmas carol ever. I have to rate this higher than Mott the Hoople so I'm bumping it to 3 stars but really it's a 2.5 for me.

On a personal enjoyment level, this gets 2 stars - not offensive but also not something I'm into. But, as a musical expansion experience, it's totally worthwhile. I like that this is presented as an educational piece by Ravi, and I personally found this interesting. Got me looking into the differences between things like Indian Raga's, Jamaican Riddims, 12 bar blues, etc. And that's cool and something I'm going to listen out for next time I'm at the local spice shop where this sort of stuff plays.

I tried. I really did. I'm not an R&B fan, at all. It's one of my boomer "If it's supposed to be rhythm and blues where is the rhythm or the blues?" takes. Obviously, the first three songs were unavoidable back in the day. They were not my thing then. They are even LESS of my thing now. The backing music sounds like it's done on a cheap midi keyboard, then pumped through a hundred different production layers to sound like it's more than it is. But what it is is generically bland. It's musical airbrushing. The vocals are not much better. Don't get me wrong, they are talented. VERY talented. They don't need a dozen vocal tracks to fill in weak voices. And they don't need to flutter across an entire scale just to accent an emotionless lyric. But for some reason, they did decide to record a dozen vocal tracks and spam notes everywhere. I tried. But at 4 songs in I started skipping halfway through the songs, and then a few songs later I just gave up.

Hell Yes sounds like he's trying to do a grown up Where It's At. And it's terrible. Where It's At had groove, funk, uniqueness. Hell Yes has nothing. Go It Alone has that kind of roots rock/blues/soul feel that you can picture in a Coen brothers movie. And Farewell Ride has that chain gang/dry landscape feel that would fit also. But even though they are some of the only songs to standout to me, they don't standout enough to actually appear in a Coen brothers movie. I guess what I'm saying is... This was a bit of a nothing to me. Not bad, just a bit bland. I was a big Odelay fan in the day, and even when he tries to channel Odelay such as Hell Yes or Missing, it's like it's been ran through a dishwasher. Really, quite disappointing. I have since found out that Karen O was in Rental Car. Why include someone like her with such great emotional range only to have her go "la la la" and filter the absolute hell out of it? This makes it hard to rate. 3 stars for the actual songs. 2 stars for the disappointment, so 2.5 stars rounded down for the weird Karen O bit.

Not bad. Psycho killer is awesome

The night train pulled up to the rain blasted platform, slowing, sun down, the sodium lights dimmed by the incessant downpour, casting the concrete into spots of black and white. The train door opens and a man steps out, tall, lean, a long tan trenchcoat wrapped around him, a brimmed hat tipped slightly forward. His feet make small splashes as he briskly strides out of the station to hail a cab. Oh Valerie, why aren't you here? But why, why are his thoughts stuck on her, now of all times? Just a second hand woman, dust in her hair. But there is no Valerie, just a spanish dancer spending too long on the stage, the same moves going nowhere. Going nowhere. Much like most the songs here - starting with something, but overlong and going nowhere.

I've never heard this end to end, but the hits are massive hits, and Goodbye Yellow Brick Road - the song - is an all timer. So I went in excited. It's starts a bit rock opera. Not my thing, but that's OK. It's a big album, he's setting the scene. Then we go into a triple threat of bangers. Yeah, good stuff. Then This Song Has No Title hits and I'm losing the vibe a little, but that's OK. Then Grey Seal, not really sure where this album is going. Clearly not the concept album I thought it was. That's OK. Then Jamaica Jerk Off arrives and... 30 Rock did a better homage to Jimmy Buffet than John and Taupin manage here. It's TERRIBLE. Genuinely bad. I've Seen That Movie Too starts to get things back on track, but then we get a run of three more stinkers - Sweet Painted Lady (terrible), The Ballad Of Danny Bailey (slightly better but only slightly), culminating in Dirty Little Girl which was just as bad as Jamaica Jerk Off. So I look it up, because seriously, WTF are they doing here and apparently it's a satire! Well that makes it better! Oh wait, no it doesn't because now it's not just a shit song, it's a shit satire too. A little further down the track we get Sister Can't Swing, a lesser version of Crocodile Rock I guess. But heck, I can forgive it because... Oh wait... It just went into circus music. I take all that back. I can't forgive it. It's another stinker. Which almost makes me hate the next song but no, while I never thought Saturday Night's Alright was one of Eltons best I'm now discovering it's most definitely not one of his worst! What a mixed bag. The highs are high, but the lows are just awful. He could have made one of the greatest albums ever if it was a single, but instead he made it a double and I can only think people still call it a great because they forget all the garbage mixed in there.

This is another easy 5. Big Dylan fan, and this and Blood On The Tracks are my two favourites, but really there is not much in my top 5 of his stuff - all are brilliant. I keep seeing people talk about Dylans voice, or as they seem to think, lack thereof. I have no idea what they are listening to. Dylan may not have the vocal range or power of many "great" singers, but he has an emotional range and texture that is as good as anyone. In Maggies Farm, you can hear the anger, but you also hear that anger is almost dying - there is anger at the injustice but there is also a sense of apathy creeping in there. He's not just angry at the system, he's in the process of becoming emotionally resigned and giving up on the system. In Bob Dylans 115th Dream, his tone is both mocking/sneering and jovial/bawdy. He's deriding "discoverers" and "innovators" who take credit for things that existed before them, but he's having fun doing it. Its superficial absurdity wrapping scathing insight. In Gates of Eden, he sounds like a prophet. His voice spirals, and you can feel the wind, the clouds, the earth, all in his voice - part dirge, part chant, all doom, delivering his vision as a futile warning. In It's All Over Now, Baby Blue, you can hear the desperation, the sadness, even the hopelessness. He's made his choice, but it was hard, and it hurt. It's a closing statement to the entire album - the electric first half, and the controversy surrounding that, followed by a reflection on this, a lament that he can only be driven by the muse, not the audience, and that the cost of moving forward is leaving something behind. I gave The Bryds Mr Tambourine Man 1 star, and given the chance I would do it again, and again, and again. They stand at their microphones sounding pleasant, harmonic, melodious, and they suck the heart out of it. Dylan doesn't (although he can do harmonic and melodious, see Ballad Of Hattie Carrol or even his cover of Copper Kettle) but instead he sounds like someone living the story. He doesn't perform the songs, he IS the songs. And the songs are BRILLIANT. The first songs are all great. Not just great, some such as Maggies Farm or Subterranean Homesick Blues are foundational. But the final four song stretch starting at Mr Tambourine Man and ending with It's All Over Now, Baby Blue, is the greatest closing set on an album ever. But... I feel this was all a bit of a wasted rant. The fact is, the people who dump on Dylan will not hear him. To paraphrase Sidney Deane - “Look man, you can listen to [Dylan] but you can’t hear him”. I urge the haters to try and hear him, but much like Dylan singing Maggies Farm, I'm resigned to the fact I won't win this fight - I am preaching to people who already know, or who (and I'm not casting judgements here) just can't hear.

I find it funny that yesterday I was talking up Dylans singing, specifically his emotional palette. When I listen to Dylan I can hear him embodying the song with a huge gamut of emotions. Springsteen does not do that. He is a storyteller telling a story but his voice, here at least, has a single emotional timbre - bleak sorrow. It works... But it also drowns. It becomes oppressive. I started enjoying this, but I ended just feeling heavy. At first I thought I'd listen to this again and give it 4 stars but as it wore on I just read the lyrics and felt that to be a more enjoyable way to consume it. As a single album, it's unfortunately less than the sum of its parts. The individual songs are great, but as an album it's exhausting, so in the end it gets 3.

I blinked and missed it. Seriously was this only around 15 minutes long? Some great songs (duh), some more very much meh songs. The highs are high, and beyond the obvious I appreciate the arrangement/production but I just can't motivate myself to move my mouse a little further right to click 4 stars instead of 3.

Another reference to the great Alan Partridge here... So what's my favourite The Doors album? I'd have to say, The Best Of The Doors. L.A. Woman, the song, is arguably their best. It's sounds like they're hungry. It sounds like they mean it. It holds up. As does Riders On The Storm, which honestly sounds like it was produced in a competely different era by a competent producer. The other big hit on here, Love Her Madly, stands out on this album, but honestly doesn't beyond here. Most of this album though kinda feels like they're going through the motions (including Love Her Madly TBH). It's too much lazy bar band blues where they sound like they're struggling to keep their eyes open.

The title song is awesome - a kind of stoner atmospheric guitar piece. The rest is very different and more aligned with the band name - funky. Some of it sound like drunk funk, some more spaced out. It’s a 3 star for me but I’ll bump it up a star because of the title song

Another DNF, but I'm well within my goal of less than 10% DNF so I'm fine with it. I made it a long way - only 3 songs to go but gave up. I get that Kate Bush is art pop, but this is taking it way too far. It's disjointed and discordant. It feels random, but in a "I specifically placed this odd yell at this point to maximise randomness" way. It just feels incredibly synthetic and insincere. Honestly, it felt more like "look at me, I'm an Artist!" art than actual art.

If I hadn't have just come off Kate Bush's The Dreaming, there is a solid chance I would have DNF'd this. But after that meticulously curated unlistenable mess, I had to at least accept that this had some groove to it. I wouldn't say I hated this, but it's also a long way from something I enjoyed.

The guitars sound like someone dragging a tin can along concrete, the drums sound like rubbish bins, and the bass, famously, is almost non-existent. But... I still have a soft spot for this album. Haven't heard it in over 30 years, but I still love it. It's PROPER Metallica, not the short haired dad rock that followed a few years later. I find myself playing that double kick under my work desk, air guitaring, and wishing I still had long hair so i could start windmilling. The guitars sound like shit, but dammit they shred. Lars has become an internet meme for his lack of drumming ability, and the tone as noted above sounds like he's banging rubbish bins, but he's hitting them like they killed his parents. And dammit, they're just some great thrash songs. Despite its many flaws, this is a classic album, the end of an era, a proper great. A worthy addition on the list, and probably my favourite Metallica album. I almost went with 5 stars but honestly that's nostalgia talking. At the end of the day while this is awesome its production is definitely flawed. Still, despite the flaws, it deserves a strong 4.

A couple of good songs, one song tarnished by a cover version (it's not The Who's fault, but what can I say, it's tarnished), a few OK songs, and some really bad ones (My Wife, Going Mobile) mean I didn't really rate this. WTH, I'll round up for Moons drumming.

Prog is really not my thing. It started OK with the first couple of songs but it all becomes a bit much. Overall I guess it wasn't bad, if I try to be generous and ignore my dislike of the genre. Indeed, I can respect aspects of it (in particular, Collins on the drums, and the guitar work had good feel to it). But I'm gunna drop a star because of The Battle of Epping Forest which I genuinely DID find bad.

It’s REM. Hard to get excited, hard to hate

Could certainly take it or leave it. Honestly, I'd rather leave it given I was told the reason we don't have many blues icons (but seem to have every single album ever released by a British guy who ever played the blues) is because the list "doesn't do compilations" but this is a compilation. So yeah, I would have given it 2 stars but it drops down to 1 because I'm petty

Some highlights (Gasoline) some lowlights (Ms Jackson, I'll Call B4 I Cum). And seriously, I'll Call B4... is BAD. Ms Jackson isn't my lane and I always felt it was pretty weak, but even it looks good compared to I'll Call B4... In a VERY roundabout way though, hearing this led me to DJ Screw and right now I'm vibing hard with him, so Stankonia loses one star for I'll Call B4 I Cum but it gets one back again for inadvertently leading me to DJ Screw so there ya go.

I can respect it but I don't have the time to dig into it lyrically which I believe is where the good stuff may be in this.

1 song played slightly differently 15 times and 1 other song. I'll leave it to the reader to figure out which one. Or maybe it's 1 song played slightly differently 16 times and I'm just being bitter about sitting through this and setting you on a wild goose chase. If I have to hear "GirrlllLLllLLLllLL" sung again... My god the way he does that vibrato thing with his voice makes me want to hate Dead Kennedys. And I don't hate Dead Kennedys but if next time I listen to Holiday In Cambodia I think of The Undertones I'm gunna be PISSED. I really want to give this 1 star but I'll be generous this time around.

Meh. Interesting because of when, but not interesting because of what.

We're currently dog sitting. It's a poodle/border collie cross. Why would someone breed these two together? You have a border collie that requires stimulation, work, etc, and a poodle, a breed known for boundless energy and never leaving the puppy stage. Last night he tried to jump on my bed to sleep with me. The thing is, our dog sleeps on the bed. Our dog (a golden retriever) was not happy with this. WTF are you on MY bed? She jumped up, started bouncing up and down and barking - Get off! Get off! So today, I'm quite tired, but I still need to work. Which all means I did NOT need this. My only experience of these guys before was "Missing" which was a bit of a snooze but had a beat and stuff. This is a whole other level. Starts with a snoozy cover, moves on to what I assume is a snoozy original, and my eyes are getting heav, this three-minute song feels like it's been going for 15 minutes... And there is still a minute and a half left? DNF.

Fine. Hints of his more adventurous later music but was expecting a bit more TBH

Had a good ride, felt like i had a good flow-state going on the DH trails. Then hopped into the car and this kept the flow state going. Good fun. We want the funk, gotta have the funk.

The instrumentals on this are quite good. Some of the "bigger" songs like the opener and Sunlight are decent if a bit vocally flat. And then there are songs that don't seem to belong and feel like they just half-assed it. The album would have been better without, for example, Don't Let The Rain Bring You Down. As it stands, it's a 3-star album with just a few too many 1-2 star additions. So while I award 3 I may be feeling generous here but the rhythm section has a nice feel to it so I'm OK with that.

I got right into this record way back in the day and when it appeared in the list I was "oh yeah, they were good!". It took me a while to recall that I only thought they were good for a couple of weeks back then and I never returned. Listening now, 20-something years later, I recall why I never went back. The beats are good, they have groove. They're clean but with great vibe. But most the tracks follow the same pattern, each guy throwing a bar, and all kinda sounding the same except for Chali 2na who despite having such a distinctive voice is also the most boring of the lot. I thought this was gunna be a 4 star. And after the intro and then Freedom, I almost had it locked in. But then I kept going. And by the time I got to What's Golden I was growing increasingly over it, and What's Golden is what really brought the memories back. I bought the CD based on that track, which hooked me immediately when I heard it on the radio (I'm soooo old). But back then, that song was one of the first track that started to drag the album, and hearing it now it felt flat and dull. This is a very negative sounding review. But really, it's a solid 3 stars and I'm not being generous here like I was with yesterdays album (Elephant Mountain). But it ain't a 4 star. It's got some good beats, a few good rhymes, but it's also just a bit boring.

This opened as a bit of a mess to my tastes. A bit chaotic, a bit too party-energy. Soul Flower was a step up but I was still kinda itchy for it all to end. It was a 2 star but without Soul Flower it might have been lower. Anyway, it gets better. Doesn't get great, but butter. Passin' Me By, Otha Fish, Pack The Pipe - all a step up. Plus, Quinn[ton]'s on the way and everything's OK.

After the disappointment that was Cream, I went into this a bit unsure. But now I've experienced it, my review can be summed up with two words - Fuck yeah! Proper early-metal. Really good.

My very limited experience of Sonic Youth had me kinda shoe horning them into the “moments of greatness mixed with large moments of pretentious excess”. Glad to be wrong as this was just pretty great

Sabbath. One of my favourites yet i’ve never actually listened beyond self titled, paranoid and master of reality. This, of course, rocks

Bit surprised TBH. Pretty good album. A high 3 stars

I know it's cool to hate on RHCP but this album most definitely deserves a spot on pretty much any list. Some pretty great songs, and not too much filler. RHCP aren't the kind of thing I choose to listen to but while it was a bit too long it was still enjoyable enough.

I'm very, very tired this morning, and I'll be honest - the first few minutes of this were well on their way to a 2-star review. But it grew on me. I started bored with it, but then I realised it wasn't dragging. I let myself just kind of let it happen. And before I knew it I was telling someone "I'll be 45 seconds late to our meeting" so I could let it finish naturally. It both felt like standing on a salt flat staring at eternity, and laying in a eucalypt forest on a calm, quiet morning. It doesn't conjure anything grand. It's not huge snowy mountains or a forest in a storm. But it definitely conjures something at a more fundamental level. It's the ground and the sky with me in the middle.

I really didn't enjoy this. There is a part of me wanting to give 1 star but I can accept I'm tired and it probably deserves 2.

This really could have gone either way but... I kinda liked it. I was telling my son about it and he asks "what genre" and the best answer I could come up with was "yes, exactly". There's stuff that sounds like Sgt Peppers, there's full on chaotic psychadelic, there's stuff that sounds like it's playing the main stage at vegas. All over the place, but it works.

Not my thing. Could have been worse

I can't argue with what he was and the impact he had. But it was also a bit samey. So "personal experience" is 2 stars but I'll bump it up a star just because.

Seriously I got Christina two days ago :( I tried. I did. But my patience for glossy pop was burned out last time. And this time all the old school callbacks (Back In The Day, Candyman, etc) were just too much.

Never been a Zepp fan. Never hated them, but never, ever thought "I could listen to some Zepplin now". I already got III in this list. On that album, Since I've Been Loving You has long been a favourite and the only real Zepp song I genuinely enjoy. I preferred II to III, but it also don't have Since I've Been Loving You, so it gets the same rating in the end. I will say that JPJ really stands out on a lot of these songs. I can see why some people evaluate him as the best musician in what is a pretty generational lineup.

I honestly find this stuff so boring. The opening song, and one of his biggest hits, seemed to have 3+ minutes of the synth looping, people chanting "party!" and the odd tiny flourish here and there. I didn't feel in the groove. I was bored out of my mind thinking "Are these people really still bouncing up and down yelling 'party' as though they were ecstatic?". It goes nowhere, just the same loop, the same energy, the same, over and over. And this pattern repeated throughout the album. No build and release, just loop, loop, loop. Prince has always been the "really?" guy whenever he is brought up in online music discussions. He was never really that big in Australia - he had a few hits, but never really entered the cultural core. But it seems in other places he was not just a "few hits" guy, he was THE guy, up there with MJ, not just a guitar virtuoso but a music vituoso, perfectionist, Icon, etc. And then I listen to his stuff and I'm BORED. There is no dynamism. The songs start at a certain energy level and they stay there. There's no build up, just a synth looping. I don't get any of the love for it. And I don't feel bad about giving one star.

Never heard of Scott Walker before so I did a little research. Interesting sounding career, intriguing. Scott 4 itself was decent - not entirely my bag but a step up from the recent stuff I've been fed here. A solid 3 star album - which for me means "enjoyed it enough, wouldn't be upset to hear it again but not going to choose to put it on". But then I thought I'd dig deeper and gave Tilt a go. A whole other beast. He dug a hole, filled it with darkness then made music to it. And unlike a lot of avant garde, it's not structured randomness, it's focussed intensity. He's committed to the void. Then I tried The Drift and to say Clara is awesome would be an understatement. I could feel my wrists ripping apart. Given Tilt and The Drift aren't on the list, I'll bump Scott 4 up a star. Crazy to think this guy went from what was essentially a proto boy band to collaborating with Sun O))). So while I won't be choosing to listen to Scott 4 again, it DID prompt me to look at his other stuff and that's where 4 stars sits for me.

Classic album, some classic songs. But a lot more honkytonk-whimsy than I recall. I guess I remembered why it's never something I go back for.

I got Fragile earlier in this project and really, really didn't like it. This is... Moderately better. The title track is the excess I hate, and the version I listened to had a cover of America which... yeah, less said about it the better. But I guess And You and I was bearable so this gets one more star than Fragile.

I got halfway through it and you know, it was OK, but at the same time I felt like I'd been listening to it for 2 hours and I was still only halfway done. It's just over an hour long, but it feels like so much more. Which basically means it was a three-star album that I didn't finish so.... 2 stars.

Bit surprised at how varied this was.

Two "punk" albums in a row. Both with a degree of musicianship. The first song I was a bit worried this was gunna drag and bore me but by the end I can honestly say I didn't mind it. A bit one dimensional, but hey, it's punk. Although, it's also a bit mid-tempo. But that's OK. It didn't wake me up but it didn't put me to sleep and sits firmly in my 3-star region.

Really not my bag. Ask me to identify a point of difference between any of the pieces and honestly I couldn't. It's the kind of music you hear playing in the background of a classy bar scene in a TV show or movie, but not the sort of music you'll ever hear in my house by choice.

The term “slaps” has become meaningless. I’ve heard people use the term to describe somber ballads ffs. Right here, right now, i’m planting a flagpole and saying that from now on when someone says “what does ‘slaps’ even mean” i will say THIS. This album slaps. It’s the kind of music that makes you want to move your head but not in a nodding way, in a way where your jaw sticks out at an odd angle, your lips curl, and, if you’re my age, your neck hurts tomorrow.

Decent. Wasn't a fan of Black Out or The Secret Life Of Arabia, but the rest of solid, and the title track is a classic.

If I wanted to listen to the music that plays in the "lesson" moment of a Scrubs episode I'd watch Scrubs. At least then the music only goes for a minute or so. Too alt-poppy for me.

I can totally picture some of these on a fallout soundtrack. I feel it dropped off in second half a bit so kinda glad it was only 30 minutes but a decent 30 minutes .

I grew up with my mum playing the hell out of a Eurthymics best of album, so I came into this thinking Annie Lennox is a massive talent and they're a very underrated group. Yeah, they're synth pop, which I hate, but they're also a step above them with a distinct artiness. And of course, Sweet Dreams the song is iconic, surely the rest isn't that much of a step down? The opening track, Love Is A Stranger, is a good song. Not their best, but good. So we've started OK. But then I've Got An Angel comes in and there is the artiness but... Not much else. It's sparse, it's dull, and Lennox is wholly uninspiring. Then Wrap It Up comes on and let's not mince words here - it's not just "rough", it's shit. It then goes into some slightly better if unremarkable songs before the big hit, then we get Jennifer, which according to Spotify is the 4th most popular song on the album. It's trying to be sparse and floating, but unlike Bowies Moss Garden which I heard for the first time last week - sparse and floating and feels like its name - this is just dull. And dull is kinda the theme of this. Lennox is underutilised, often just droning or monotone. Such a talent, so much power and dynamic range, just droning. But worse is the arrangements. They're boring. Sparse drums, a couple of synth notes, and the odd random noise. I like sparse, when done well, but this is not that. So I kinda feel bad giving this 2 stars, as I wanted more and the title track stands up. But honestly, it is what it is.

Surprisingly good. Simz has a nice laid back flow but with a delivery that shows restrained tension, which matches well with the excellent beats. It's a high 3-stars.