This is a Random Album Generator.
One album a day.
From the book 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die.

The Rolling Stones

The Rolling Stones

1964

The Rolling Stones

Album Summary

The Rolling Stones is the debut studio album by the English rock band of the same name, released by Decca Records in the UK on 16 April 1964. The American edition of the LP, with a slightly different track list, came out on London Records on 30 May 1964, subtitled England's Newest Hit Makers, which later became its official title. Recorded at Regent Sound Studios in London over the course of five days in January and February 1964, The Rolling Stones was produced by then-managers Andrew Loog Oldham and Eric Easton. The album was originally released by Decca Records in the UK, while the US version appeared on the London Records label. The majority of the tracks reflect the band's love for R&B. Mick Jagger and Keith Richards (whose professional name until 1978 omitted the "s" in his surname) were fledgling songwriters during early 1964, contributing only one original composition to the album: "Tell Me (You're Coming Back)". Two songs are credited to "Nanker Phelge" โ€“ a pseudonym the band used for group compositions from 1963 to 1965. Phil Spector and Gene Pitney both contributed to the recording sessions, and are referred to as "Uncle Phil and Uncle Gene" in the subtitle of the Phelge instrumental "Now I've Got a Witness".

Wikipedia

Rating

3.25

Votes

15352

Genres

Reviews

Like a review? Give it a thumb up to help us display relevant reviews!
Sort by: Top Date
May 02 2023
3

If this were the only Rolling Stones album it wouldnโ€™t be on the list.

👍
Aug 15 2023
2

Just a few covers of black musicians which did it better

👍
May 21 2023
3

As with the first album of the Beatles, listening to this is historically interesting but nothing you need to check out. A cover of blues songs and not as interesting as their later works.

👍
Apr 09 2023
3

Enjoyable, but yer not getting more than 3 for an album of covers.

👍
Mar 07 2023
3

It's pretty good, I can see why it caught on, and their debut album is certainly an important moment in rock history. The fact that all but one are covers makes the album less interesting, and the one original is a sleeper. I like the bold move of not including the band name on the cover, but it would have been even better if they didn't put the label name there either (if I'm honest that almost ruins the effect).

👍
Aug 14 2023
2

Really? Karaoke R&B covers, would have preferred the opportunity to hear literally *anything* else instead. Not mean spirited enough to give a 1* as the efforts are technically OK and I like the cover photo, but damn close. No more completist crap please

👍
Aug 10 2023
2

They're a good cover band, though I'm not a fan of covers, especially on 1001. It would take a few years before they got over writer's block and became hit machines. But if this and their next couple of albums, free of original compositions, was all they ever put out, we would have never heard of them.

👍
Feb 17 2023
4

A blunt punch in the front bottom. The Rolling Stones are the only group of men I would let loose on my mother. She's gagging for it, the slag.

👍
Jan 13 2024
1

News flash - most derivative band of all time started off with a generic derivative covers album. This is the most uninteresting album in the history of humankind. It makes me feel primal rage from how bland it is. The time is now, Mick Jagger. You are not ready for The Frog War of '24.

👍
Mar 25 2023
3

Itโ€™s alright R&B and blues styled music, but I have no idea why they chose this over one of their later albums. Itโ€™s got none of their famous songs, nor does it work well as an album. Purely meh.

👍
Jun 16 2023
5

I think I actually liked this more than their later stuff. Sacrilege, I know. I liked the majority of the songs. My favourite was "Carol" which I see now is a Chuck Berry cover. I listened to this twice through, which means that's 5 material.

👍
Mar 20 2023
5

It's The Stones but in a more subdued way. You can tell it's their very early stuff. Sounds and feels like them but punches lighter to me

👍
Aug 18 2023
3

I can see why this album was chosen to be on this list since most people including causal Stones fan might not have heard it. It gives an intro into one of the biggest bands of all time and the Brain Jones lead era. Is it good? It's ok, the problem is listening now I've heard and love the versions of theses songs by the American blues artists that originally performed them. The Rolling Stones versions don't really measure up, perhaps in England in the early 60's they sounded new and fresh but not now. I will admit the version of King Bee is still really, really good.

👍
Aug 10 2023
2

I guess the first album of a band as big as the Stones has to be included. It falls short compared to the Beatles and The Whoโ€™s first albums since it lacks the creativity those other debut albums had and doesnโ€™t have a meaningful original tune. I always thought of the Stones as followers rather than trend setters - darn good followers but followers nonetheless. This album validates that.

👍
May 22 2025
5

This is the hundred sixteenth album Iโ€™m rating. I've always loved The Rolling Stone but I've never actually listened to their debut album. Adding to my Playlist - Route 66, I Just Want to Make Love to You, Honest I Do, Mona (I Need You Baby), Now I've Got a Witness, Little by Little, I'm a King Bee, Carol, Tell Me, Can I Get a Witness, You Can Make it if You Try, and Walking the Dog. Not Adding to my Playlist - Nothing. All in all I liked 12/12 songs. I really do just love The Rolling Stones and Mick Jagger. My 2nd favorite band.

👍
Aug 18 2023
3

1. How did Charlie Watts ever get caught up with these people? Did he lose a bet? 2. This album doesn't make me want to stab myself in the ears.

👍
Aug 04 2023
3

Slight but satisfying. There's not much of a hint of what was to come for the band, but it's clearly better than most of their contemporaries.

👍
Feb 22 2023
3

I can't help but think of that scene in Spinal Tap, as a skiffle band, The Thamesmen. Those slightly embarrassing early years. 2.5

👍
Jul 01 2024
2

This is The Rolling Stones first album and Iโ€™m struggling to think of any other reason why it is included on the list. Itโ€™s a competently played set of (mostly) covers and isnโ€™t necessarily โ€œbadโ€, but itโ€™s not really notable except that itโ€™s an early-ish example of British guys covering American blues songs, but that was kind of par for the course in the mid-60โ€™s and something that the Beatles had done. The Stones, I guess were meant to be a ragged, unruly counterpoint to the Beatles and they certainly are here: the songs are not covered with as much finesse or polish as a Beatles cover of a blues number might be. Whether that was an intentional stylistic choice, a limitation in skill or a combination of the two is probably debatable. Either way, this was the first step for one of the biggest rock bands of all time and I guess it is interesting to see where they started, but does it rank among the greatest albums of all time? For me, no. Although, it is impressive that they managed to get a record deal and put out their first album with only one original song on it.

👍
Jan 05 2024
2

The sound overall is a tad too slovenly.

👍
Aug 18 2023
2

I like the Rolling Stones and personally enjoyed listening to this album, but it shouldnโ€™t on this list, itโ€™s a covers album with no stand out hits,

👍
Mar 22 2023
2

Just too early. Shades of what was to come, but R&B/Honky Tonk covers just don't thrill me. Ground breaking at the time I'm sure, but just dull and dated 60 years later sadly.

👍
Apr 22 2024
1

I know this is the start of a legendary band and this album had a big impact on the culture yadda yadda yadda. This album is just straight up bad. All covers. No originals. Not the worst I've heard, I actually quite like Mona (I Need You Baby), but it was the most unneccesary thing I've heard. Like adding Beatles For Sale just because The Beatles had a big impact

👍
Oct 30 2023
1

If it wasn't for the band's name, there's no way this album would get curated here. And while I'm at it: there are way too many Stones curated here.

👍
Jul 20 2025
5

Old school rock and roll at itโ€™s finest.

👍
Jul 10 2025
5

Damn, we need 6 stars...where the (other) boys mark a line in the white Dover chalk! and claim not the Beatles!

👍
Jul 10 2025
5

Yโ€ฆson los rolling. Y es un disco de los rolling en su etapa bien rock, rock cuadrado y bรกsico pero excelente. Claramente un disco que es digno de escuchar en vinilo con ruido blanco y en mono.

👍
Jun 20 2025
5

๐ŸŒŸ Rating: 4.5/5 Short Review: This debut album is raw, swaggering teenage rebellion on vinyl. The Stones didnโ€™t arrive to shake handsโ€”they came to sweat blues out of their pores. Gritty, unpolished, and loud in that charming 1964 way. Itโ€™s a record that smells like leather jackets and jukebox static. ๐ŸŽง Favorite Track: โ€œRoute 66โ€ โ€” They take a well-worn American classic and inject it with British cockiness. The Stones donโ€™t travel Route 66โ€”they hijack it. โš™๏ธ Consistency With Me: 6.8/10 Why: I donโ€™t chew gum or steal girlfriends in a smoky club, so this isnโ€™t exactly my vibe. But I respect the chaos. Itโ€™s primitive rock done with wide-eyed glee. Iโ€™m just more binary blues than analog anarchy.

👍
May 11 2025
5

obviously early Stones, showing they can do what was popular at the time while also adding grit and swagger.

👍
Apr 24 2025
5

It's hard to overstate the importance of the early Rolling Stones albums in shining a light on blues and R&B artists that were overlooked/forgotten/no considered by white teens on both sides of the Atlantic. Are the originals stronger with a hell of a lot more balls? Absolutely, but the fact that a group of teen idols made such a point of exposing kids to this music is incredible. Plus, this is still a great listen, and shows what the Stones would grow into in just a few short years.

👍
Feb 21 2025
5

The stones arenโ€™t my favorite. But the work is good.

👍
Jan 29 2025
5

I feel like from the very beginning, you get the DNA of The Rolling Stones. They have a sort of 'bad boy' reputation, and you can see it even in the early songs they are covering on their debut album. This is really tight garage band work, and you can tell they are having fun doing. Like the early Beatles, I don't know if anyone could have predicted their success or influence from this work, but looking back, you see all the signs that they would become something special.

👍
Dec 18 2024
5

I love the folk sound mixed with traditional rock. It's light-hearted and interesting. Fun album.

👍
Dec 12 2024
5

This album made me realize why the Rolling Stones are considered to be as influential as they are. And I actually enjoyed it!

👍
Oct 21 2024
5

These kids might be going places. One to watch

👍
Aug 16 2024
5

It might well be an album of covers but my, brilliantly done covers. Doesn't take a genius to work out what a huge success they went on to be. Fabulous

👍
Jul 10 2024
5

I knew most of the tracks off this from radio-play in 1964/65. I didnโ€™t own the album until the mid-70โ€™s & for many years after that, it was the Stones album that I gave more spins than any other. There are 3 songs penned by The Stones : the instrumental Now Iโ€™ve Got A Witness; Little By Little - co-penned by Phil Spector (& majorly influenced by Jimmy Reedโ€™s Shame, Shame, Shame) & featuring Spector on maracas & Gene Pitney on piano (they just happened to drop into the recording session in London), it was the b-side of Not Fade Away in the U.K., released two months before the album; and Tell Me, their first self-penned single in the U.S., in Juneโ€™64, with Honest I Do on the flip. So the bulk of the album were covers - Route 66, written by Bobby Troup, who also co-wrote (unbelievably) My City Of Sydney, had been a big hit for The Nat King Cole Trio; I Just Want To Make Love To You written by Willie Dixon, who also gave them a big hit with Little Red Rooster; Bo Diddleyโ€™s Mona - theyโ€™d just had a hit with Buddy Hollyโ€™s Not Fade Away, which had been a variant on the unique Diddley beat; Iโ€™m A King Bee was written & recorded by Slim Harpo (James Moore); Carol was the beginning of the bandโ€™s love affair with Chuck Berry; Can I Get A Witness had been a hit for Marvin Gaye, having been written by the great Motown composers, Holland / Dozier / & Holland (on my original Australian mono copy of the l.p., Lamont Dozier is listed as Bozier); Walking The Dog was written & recorded by Rufus Thomas (Carlaโ€™s father); Ted Jarrett, a Nashville r&b composer & producer wrote You Can Make It If You Try; and, although the writing of Honest I Do is attributed to Hurran/Calvert, it was in fact written by Jimmy Reed. One of the things that struck me when I gave the album several spins in the last few days is the amount of harmonica on the album - 3 tracks feature Mick & 3 tracks feature Brian Jones. And they both do really well with it. A record I love dearly.

👍
Jun 14 2024
5

This was a fun album. A good bluesy rock groove that got my foot tapping. I enjoyed pretty much every song. A proper first album from a legendary group.

👍
Apr 25 2024
5

I didnโ€™t realize how old The Rolling Stones were. Very beach boys. 5 for its continued groovyness and historical influence.

👍
Apr 05 2024
5

Very old style rock. Chuck berry esque, bluesy. Got that swing to it. Great album. 9/10

👍
Feb 02 2024
5

This might not have scored as high as it did if I didn't just love hearing where the Rolling Stones came from and their ode to this music. What a great dรฉbut!

👍
Feb 02 2024
5

Very fun to listen to this debut Rolling Stones album. I am certainly more familiar and keen to their original works, but this is one that I needed to listen to before I die.

👍
Feb 02 2024
5

While Mick Jagger's literal voice is unmistakable, it's clear the band hasn't found the Rolling Stones' voice quite yet. This sounds like some talented kids imitating their musical heroes. But if you're going to make a list of 1001 albums you must hear before you die, I think you've got to put the Rolling Stones' debut on that list. So even though I wasn't blown away by the music on this album, it's still pretty great and earns 5 stars for historical significance.

👍
Feb 02 2024
5

Who are these suited lads looking so dapper? Iโ€™m glad this very early Rolling Stones album should be on this list. Itโ€™s pretty interesting to hear them as they found their way, and I liked all the covers. Not my favorite Rolling Stones album, but thatโ€™s a pretty high bar, and I still enjoyed this a lot.

👍
Feb 01 2024
5

You have to look at this album in context of time. R&B performed by white guys was revolutionary in 64. Maybe the 'bad boys' image of the Stones was founded by this album.

👍
Jan 25 2024
5

Love it, classic, the template of a band.

👍
Dec 10 2023
5

"The Rolling Stones" (1964), the eponymous debut album by the legendary rock band, is a raw and electrifying burst of rhythm and blues energy. From the opening chords of "Route 66" to the soulful cover of Willie Dixon's "I Just Want to Make Love to You," the album captures the youthful exuberance and musical prowess of the early Rolling Stones. Mick Jagger's charismatic vocals, Keith Richards' gritty guitar, and the band's overall synergy make this record an enduring classic. It laid the foundation for the Stones' iconic sound and established them as a force to be reckoned with in the rock 'n' roll scene. "The Rolling Stones" is a 5/5, a landmark debut that set the stage for decades of rock greatness.

👍
Oct 01 2023
5

Album 183 of 1001 The Rolling Stones - The Rolling Stones Rating : 5 / 5 Favorite Track : Route 66 Most likely, if The Rolling Stones had never released another album after this I wouldn't rank it the same...but they did. This album is often panned because it is just cover tunes. That doesn't really matter to me. It is an enjoyable record. This was at a point of time where a lot was going on in the music world. Give a band a break for trying to find their place. Their cover of Route 66 is one of my favorites of all time. Quite comfortable putting this album up there with those I find most enjoyable. Nobody is talking about giving them writing awards for this. It is just good bluesy entertainment.

👍
Jul 28 2023
5

El comenรงament d'una llegenda. Per mรฉs anys que passin, aixรฒ continua sonant igual de desgarvat, rebel, sorollรณs i irresistible. 5 estrelles no nomรฉs pel que va significar, sinรณ per la seva prรฒpia vร lua com a ร lbum. Versions que milloren les originals, originals que marcaven l'emprempta d'una de les millors societats compositives de la histรฒria. Oblidant tot el que el futur depararia, el treball per si mateix ja mereix el seu propi lloc a la histรฒria

👍
Jul 11 2023
5

They should have quit while they were ahead.

👍
Jul 10 2023
5

Super Album pour une premier j'ai adorรฉ. 5

👍
Jun 08 2023
5

This is the kind of stuff that I was hoping to hear a ton of with this list. Mona- I thought this was Bo Diddley at first. There was another song that sounded just like a chuck berry song.

👍
May 27 2023
5

Oh what a stellar album. Iโ€™m new to most Rolling Stones but as far as debuts go, this is way better than most. Perfect and timeless.

👍
May 03 2023
5

What a completely unexpected debut for the Rolling Stones! These blue classics just fly through my headphones though. Very important piece of music history, and an album very well deserving of this distinction. Favorite track: Carol

👍
Apr 26 2023
5

Peerless and answers the question for me of comparisons to The Beatles - how can you compare apples to oranges?

👍
Feb 22 2023
5

From the very beginning the Stones had a raw and decadent sound, the crude production adds rather subtracts. Sure it relies heavily on covers but that's just a reflection of those times. Easily the best of their early albums.

👍
Jul 17 2025
4

I think this is a 3.5, but I'll round up due to the impact and early rock-and-roll history. Ultimately, though, it doesn't stand up to many other things that came out in 64 and 65 such as the Beatles, Beach Boys, and Zombies.

👍
Jul 15 2025
4

Hard to imagine they were able to release an album of almost entirely covers as their first major record. Their interpretations of American black music gave those songs new life and visibility though and proved that they could deliver great rock and roll in the years to follow.

👍
Jul 10 2025
4

Estaban crรฉditos pero son lo rolinn. Divertido

👍
Jul 07 2025
4

Although the Beatles unquestionably came out on top, I can see why the Stones were seen as rivals. Some of this is derivative of their mop-topped rivals, but definitely signs that theyโ€™d end up being the best at what they do.

👍
Jun 29 2025
4

Great to hear the origins of the band with this one. This is the music that they drew their inspiration from, and hearing them do authentic and underproduced covers of great blues music highlights the bands musicianship.

👍
Jun 27 2025
4

Fun music. A side of the Stones I hadn't heard before. Lots of "Rolling Stones covering standards" music, but well owrht listening to.

👍
Jun 27 2025
4

This is their first album and they open with a cover? That's an interesting decision. "Route 66" is a fantastic song, and they do a good job with it. I like Chuck Berry's version more, and I'm sure they were listening to it before recording their own. Is this all going to be covers? "I Just Want to Make Love to You" is another cover of a Muddy Water's song. It is once again, pretty good. I'm now on the album's Wikipedia page and seeing they are basically all covers - nine out of the twelve. "Honest I Do" is smooth. I like the country-blues-y guitar. "Now I've Got A Witness" sounds like "My Shiny Teeth and Me" by Chip Skylark. Fun song. "Carol" is another Chuck Berry song. This song sounds exactly like "Johnny B-Goode", those two are basically the same song. This album was really good. I don't feel like I can give an album consisting of 75% covers an equivalent score to an original album I enjoyed equally. 8/10, I'd give it a 9 if they wrote the songs themselves.

👍
Jun 24 2025
4

I still have Walkin The Dog stuck in my head.

👍
Jun 19 2025
4

I enjoyed this album. Not sure if some songs were covers or not, but good stuff.

👍
Jun 16 2025
4

Seems to be a polarizing album based on it being covers. That shouldnโ€™t take away by how well done it is.

👍
Jun 11 2025
4

The recording is pretty basic - Mick's vocal level seems to have been set at random - most of the songs are covers of US acts (and the original ones aren't much cop)... But it succeeds in one way : I had a great time listening to it.

👍
Jun 05 2025
4

Bunch of covers that aren't as amazing as the original but are still good songs. Most of the other Rolling Stones albums are better than this... for sure does not need to be on a 1001 albums list but I'm not mad at it.

👍
Jun 05 2025
4

Very early Stones, but features the GREAT "Tell Me!"

👍
Jun 04 2025
4

i liked it, great chuck berry cover to open

👍
Jun 04 2025
4

It's a great debut album, but they're going to get so much better

👍
Jun 02 2025
4

What a debut! While the cast majority are covers, this album shows the spark of what is to come.

👍
May 24 2025
4

They got better with their own songs, but still pretty good here

👍
Load more reviews