I would not be surprised to learn the Radiohead is just early AI. Everything about them says they should be great, but I always walk away feeling like something was missing.

I’d like to rate this higher due to degree of difficulty, but I believe the complexity and overwrought construction of the songs is self-inflected and affected. At times there are great moments, but they feel accidental.

I tried to like this album. I had gone on and read some of the reviews before listening, and I really thought some of the negative reviews were too glib and too harsh. While the positive reviews seemed to consist mostly of fans and people familiar with the work, I was really leaning in their direction. After listening, however, all of the possible advancements and growth by the band didn't translate musically to me. There is certainly quality here, but more like a well made bookend rather than something to get excited about.

Started slowly, but really really grew on me. An amazing album in a lot of ways that I don’t quite know how to explain. There is no single. The album feels stronger as a whole rather than on the weight of its best singles.

Tom Waits as a quirky jazz lounge singer. What more could you ask for? The band is super tight, and Tom is at his gregarious best.

How did I miss this in 2004? Not my thing usually, but Nick Cave sounds and feels like a mix between Frank Zappa, Funk, and Lounge Singer. The most fun I have had listening to an unheard album in a long time.

Started slowly, but really really grew on me. An amazing album in a lot of ways that I don’t quite know how to explain. There is no single. The album feels stronger as a whole rather than on the weight of its best singles.

Clearly a tight, quality band. Still haven’t caught on them… even after 20 plus years.

Amazing production value and timeless sound.

[previously heard] Solid album by the boys from Athens, GA. Not sure I would have included this in the 1001 albums as they have much better Albums in their catalog, but World Leader Pretend is probably the most worthy song from this album to revisit.

I enjoyed this album immensely. I am not an expert on Jazz, Funk, etc., but It is impossible not respect the craftsmanship and craft on every musician involved on this album.

I rated this album lower because I am not a fan of the genre. As such, I lack the competency and the vocabulary to speak to its importance or greatness. The musicality is undeniable, but I struggled to maintain interest while listening. I also couldn't distinguish well between tracks. If this is your genre, I am confident you will enjoy it as it is pleasant enough, but I didn't get it. Perhaps I will revisit this album as I develop a greater ear for the electronic side of the musical house.

I am guessing that this is an album that would really grow on you if you listened to it several times. After my first listen, my impression is that the lyrics must carry it. Musically, it is very basic and similar (to my untrained ear), but the sound is great, but I probably need to pay more attention to understand better why it is on the list.

I was really close to giving this album 4/5 stars, and I suppose that in its context, it does deserve better. In the end, however, I just felt like everything slightly underwhelmed. In other words, I was closer to asking why this album is on the list rather than getting the sense that it clearly belonging here. The sound is good, and the overall vibe is engaging, but I likely won't return to it. Hopefully, I am wrong, and it will just grow on me.

This album didn't resonate well with me. I had been on sort of an Elvis Costello and the Attractions streak having received three albums prior to this one. They were all better than I expected. This one, however, was a bit of a disappointment. My guess is that if you are a fan of EC&TA you will enjoy this album. If you're still trying to determine your level of fandom or appreciation, this one will take more time for you. I can only give it three stars.

This album is an experience. Musically, it is a playground of immense size and scope that I want to play in but lack the confidence and skill. There are moments and flourishes that are amazing, and moments that are beyond me. If you are patient, you’ll be rewarded for sure.

I have mixed feelings about this album. There is a lot to like, but I keep coming back to the idea that this seems like what an AI bot would create as an album. The vocalist has the right sound, there are musical elements that are catchy, the single is very memorable and actually sounds important, etc., but after listening to the album, I don't have a connection with the album at all. Could I spend time and listen to this album more and gain a greater appreciation for its significance? Sure. Will I? Probably not.

This album was a pleasant surprise for me. I am pretty familiar with the 1980s, but I had missed this one. As such, I enjoyed it with keen interest. Really nice, tight, sound. And the punk-vibe was refreshing to hear.

Despite claims that the album is dated (I believe it is), it was still enjoyable and a great effort. This isn’t my favorite genre, but it has multiple solid tracks! I won’t likely return to this a lot, but I am glad I listened

I really enjoyed listening to this album. I hadn’t heard it previously, and I was pleased and rewarded with almost every song. And when the song was a little more of a grind musically, the lyrics would sustain it. While it may not become a go to album for me, I am glad I was able to hear and enjoy it!

I was very impressed with this album. While I haven't listened to a lot of Peter Gabriel prior to So, I was surprised by this album. It didn't sound like 1980. It is moody and assertive, and the percussion and bass drive it all. I will definitely put this in rotation!

The middle album of the Beatle greatest three album stretch of the fab four’s career. Note for note pitch perfect! There is a ton of debate between Sgt. Pepper and Revolver and which is greater, but why? This album is fantastic and that is all that matters!

I tried to like this album. I had gone on and read some of the reviews before listening, and I really thought some of the negative reviews were too glib and too harsh. While the positive reviews seemed to consist mostly of fans and people familiar with the work, I was really leaning in their direction. After listening, however, all of the possible advancements and growth by the band didn't translate musically to me. There is certainly quality here, but more like a well made bookend rather than something to get excited about.

The Beatles at their best pre Rubber Soul. These guys are perfection.

The left too many notes

Pass.

Loved the album. Jams and covers actually made them come across as a more mature band. Great stuff!

This album is an enigma to me. It fits squarely within the pre-disco canon, but it feels like this is a band aspiring to greatness and being completely unable to attain it. They were just waiting for disco for their mediocrity to save them. If I needed to hear this before I die, it seems like it had to be done just so I would better appreciate their contribution to disco. John Travolta should be the most grateful man in the world.

The greatness of this album isn’t at all audible. Tracked with everything around/about the band. Stars dropped when I pressed play!

I never feel comfortable rating rap albums. I am a 50+ year old white guy that doesn't get it. Totally on me. Having said that, I really admire the production value, passion, righteous (legitimately so) anger Ice Cube brings here. At the same time, it is just hard to listen to for me. Not because of white guilt, but because it is just a relentless album.

I was not tracking with everyone’s general take that this album was depressing until the last song. It tipped me over the edge, but on the whole, I would say dark and heavy more than depressing. I’d throw in impressive as well.

This is a nice album for Elvis… moving from Hollywood back to his musical roots. It is just hard to picture this being released in 1969. It’s almost more retro than fresh.

Another rap album that just escapes me. Lots of recognizable samples and such, but ultimately not that compelling to me. Of course, rap just isn't my thing.

I have listened to a lot of Bowie from the 1001 algorithm, and I was reluctant to listen to this one. Bowie is an amazing artist, but his albums are very hit and miss for me. I expected this to be a miss, but there are a few surprises here. Definitely a late career surprise. Fans will be pleased, but I am not sure there is enough here to be on this list.

Tom Waits as a quirky jazz lounge singer. What more could you ask for? The band is super tight, and Tom is at his gregarious best.

I would rate this album higher, if only I could remember it. In all seriousness, this is a fine album. But like most Radiohead, it is good the way a balance diet is supposed to be good for you. In fact, it is good for you. You may even be surprised at how tasty and satisfying it can be. However, you may find yourself craving junk food not long after.

Wikipedia quoted someone suggesting that this album is the equivalent of the Sistine Chapel of electronica, and if so, let's put this genre to bed. While there is a nice vide going on, very little stands out as unique. If you left this album on repeat, you would quickly lose track of where you are. Bland.

Start here. This album is amazing. I can't believe this was released in 1969. Critics have said that it isn't as good as their previous work, but to me, it is their definitive, most accessible, and timeless masterpiece. Bravo... relistening.

I just couldn't listen.

This is a masquerade alright! I tried to keep an open mind, but I don’t see at all why this album is on the list. Two stars because it might be the best honky tonk out there.

This confirms for me that with the exception of Johnny Cash and a small number of others, country music is best done by others. Though it is strange to call Ray Charles modern, his take on some old standards all sound brilliant, nostalgic, and modern all at the same time.

That voice is just peerless. There is something about Van Morrison that demands your attention. I am not sure how to describe it in terms of genre, but the album exudes soul. After listening, I was exhausted in the best sense of the word. Great album!

The question of whether the Beatles or the Stones are better is indisputable with the Beatles clearly being better. Song for Song, they are stronger. But when the Stones are on, they can't be touched. And this album, more than their collective hits, showcase how much joy there is in good old rock and roll. And it is the album that always make you question the Beatles comparison.

I have always been a little sad that Alanis's career didn't unfold better. This is such a good and strong album. It is pop, but it also has a lot of depth to it, and Alanis unflinchingly faces demons that so many women face at the hands of abusers. Despite all of that, she has a hopeful tone that finds it way out in song. Brave Alanis. Great album.

I have respect for this album, just very little interest. Hence, the 3.

This is a very intriguing album. It feels like it wants to be a serious grunge album but the band just doesn't have the chops for it. This doesn't make the album bad, but puts it in a unique place. The sound is accessible, interesting, and compelling despite the lack of strong lyrics. Still, it have a great vibe.

I don't understand Elton John. Clearly, he is a very talented songwriter and performer, but I don't get the hype. The singles shine here, and the other songs are just what you'd expect... well composed filler.

it is so interesting to listen to the Velvet Underground. They are provocative and engaging, and their music is groovy. I am not sure about Nico. She certainly adds to this album in a wonderful way, but it isn't the most natural fit. Despite it all, this album shines!

I don't know a whole lot about Lenny Kravitz's background, but this album is super fun, energetic, and soulful in many ways. It feels like a kid in a music production candy store on a bender.

One joy of this site is that you encounter bands and albums that you are familiar with but you haven't fully explored their catalog. I didn't think I would enjoy this album as much as most of my experience with it is from the radio hits. Listening to this album with fresh ears was a delight. While I don't think it is strong as Deja Vu, it is a real treat.

This album is tight, enjoyable, and pleasant enough, but after the first few tracks it lost its magic and felt more mediocre. I am sure that this has more to do with me that with the Waterboys, but regardless,I probably won't revisit often if art all.

I really wanted to like this album. I remember hearing about them, but I never real had or took the chance to explore their discography. Listening now, I was underwhelmed. I felt like most tracks started strong but became less enjoyable as I listened. The high reviews suggest I should give them multiple listens, but I am not excited about it. Maybe I am missing something.

Apart from the occasional baseline and interesting riff, there is just nothing I like about this band.

I was surprised. I actually liked this album. Not my normal lane, for sure, but I’d come back to this.

Dirt so thoroughly wallows in the the dark elements of grunge that it feels more like exploitation than exploration of the truth or the reality of hard topics. I am sure the quality of the musicianship is exceptional, but it isn’t enough to compel further listening.

Bowie is baffling to me. On one album he can conjure up a hit at will to save it. With Low he seems content to meander around a laboratory of incomplete or inarticulate ideas with mild enthusiasm. Nothing really seems to be great or really catch hold of the imagination. It's like he is showing off the worst kind of artistic entitlement imaginable. Bowie is certainly a talented songwriter and musician, but even the best creative minds lose their way.

Many of the reviews have praised the use of sampling on this album, and I heartily agree. Mostly, however, because it is the only thing notable about the album. In the end, it felt more like a rap version of mystery science theater: three guys rapping over other media as if providing commentary. For MST it works. Not so much here.

Elvis is strange to me. It is clear that he is vastly talented, has great presence, strong voice, and an icon. Listening to this album is fascinating because you can see so much of his influence on bands like the Beatles and even more contemporary bands like Green Day. The strange part is that as influential as his music clearly is, it is not as interesting as what he inspired. This album is good and enjoyable to listen to for what it is, but I likely won't spend much time with it. It is good to listen to mostly to put him and his influence in context, but I have heard enough.

This album was largely overlooked when it came out in 1983. but has garnered some critical respect in subsequent years. Other than an interesting take on the death of John Lennon, I am not sure I see the turn.

While I certainly appreciate the variety that this album provides to this list, it seems unremarkable on its own. Much of this is likely due to the language and lack of cultural context on my end, but still there wasn't enough there musically to compel future listening.

Nice album. Sounds really good. I imagine if Elliott Smith had formed a band, this is what it would sound like.

I can’t quite tell if the is Bowie glow. Just giving him the nod because of who he is. He clearly isn’t just phoning it in, but it also isn’t his most accessible work. That said, it is engaging and compelling

Gold.

Rap is still not my bag, but I did like this album.

Nothing places you squarely in the modern western world and makes you feel comfortable and displaced at the same time like “More Songs about Buildings and Food.” The range of emotions anyone may feel throughout any given day are musically expressed as naturally as work tension and family disruptions with delightfully relevant effect. For every note you ever sang in rage along with Joey Ramone and Sid Vicious, you sing right along with David Byrne except that it seems more personal, probable, and poignant. Musically, this album features a delightful variety of style without compromising its purpose. In fact, its diversity of sound seems to its purpose. Byrne’s outlook on life and work leave no stone unturned to refreshing effect. Whether belting out and anthem of hope in the form of a hint of supernatural and spiritual figure or waxing eloquently about where one hopes to make a home Byrne and the band connect immediately through voice and music. The most joyful thing for me, however, is that for the first time in a long time, all of the catharsis I enjoy through listening to music finally feels more tangible. I may not be up for toppling a corrupt government or taking down big corporations or other institutional giants, but I feel like I can tackle cleaning my own house, enjoy my family, and start to build something meaningful… maybe even produce a new TV show, or finally feel good about moving into the city. This review is for Kenny. He knows far more about Talking Heads than I do, and because of him, I now enjoy their music as well.

What a great album. Listening to it today, I thought, what would it have been like if the full band from the Blonde on Blonde/Highway 61 musicians had joined in on this one... and vice versa. Just a delight.

Nick Drake exists in a very specific musical space. I enjoyed this album, but I have no idea how to differentiate from his other works. Thankfully, he’s really talented!

I think this album is on the list for the fact that it feels like someone won a bet. Something like, I bet you can’t produce an album if you consume inhuman amounts of cocaine and still be recognizable and listenable. It is fine musically, but just not in my wheelhouse.

It feels almost like Glenn Campbell went to France. Le passe

I’m sure the rightism by the right field wouldn’t be any better. Supposedly this is great while taking drugs. That’s fine, but it should also be good when your sober.

Much better than most electronica I’ve heard, but not enough to make me a believer…

Dr. John... needs a doctor. I don't know what's going on with this album, but this is an inexplicable inclusion one this list. I don't have a problem with him as an artist, but as an album, I don't know what I just heard.

This band is the inverse of Duran Duran. For every smooth, slick, accessible, note Duran Duran produces, Pere Ubu has its counter. It’s not that it’s bad (it isn’t), it is just crazy how consistently challenging it is to find an inroad. They are musically talented, but even more challenging at pushing the boundaries of accessibility.

Ugh

What a wonderful surprise. I love the Kinks, but I haven’t listened to their entire discography. This album is amazing. Solid themes, tight lyrics with biting commentary, and almost epic poetry. I don’t hear singles. This album should be enjoyed as a whole!

Not their most accessible album, but you can hear the development of their musical style clearly. The “Black Side” is clearly the better side, but it is all good… especially for Queen fans!

Tedious

Quite the surprise. I’m not a big fan of county, but I love alternative, so this really hit a sweet spot for me. I noticed that many reviewers called it boring, and I just don’t get it. Can you really make a comment like that if you’ve been on a string of electronica I wonder?

A wonderful expression of Janis at her absolute best.

Great voice… ok album.

Amazing. He transcends his genre with power, presence, and haunting narrative! Amazing album!

While these guys really sound like wanna-be Oasis, they are quite good. I enjoyed this album.

I don’t like country. I really don’t like commercial country..

It seems like I hear more about Siouxsie and The Banshees more than I have ever heard there work. It is raw, edgy, provocative, etc., but gets lost in the transition from Post Punk/New Wave to alternative. I kind of like what's going on here, but I have trouble reconciling the raves.

Elton John is one of those artists whose later works continually detract from the earlier substantial work. He is clearly talented and has a great voice, but I guess he is more a product of his time than an enduring artist.

There is just so much more wrong about Eminem than there is good. Can't take it.

I don't know what to make of Depeche Mode. I can't tell if they are too cynical or antagonistic. Either way, they are certainly gifted artist and they produce an excellent sound. I just don't connect with them philosophically.

It seems to me that this could easily be a greatest hits album. This guy was just in the zone creatively and fun to listen to track to track all the way to the end.

Don't know much about this band, but they sound like an American band trying to sound like a band from the UK about a year too late. By 1966, however, they are already behind the curve. I wonder if they made it.

I haven't thought positively about the slasher B movie from the early 80s since I caught it on cable as a kid. After hearing this band, the movie seems even better.

Musically, I found this album interesting and solid. But it seems to me that the lead vocalist is just checking a box. It's as if an imposter is on vocals, and he is trying to be engaging while knowing all along he's a poser.

I would not be surprised to learn the Radiohead is just early AI. Everything about them says they should be great, but I always walk away feeling like something was missing.

Beck is the Dr. Frankenstein of electronica/alt. And not the Hollywood version, but more of the Romantic Anti-hero, creating new life out of the old!

Öne out of Fĩve

I would have loved to experienced what it must have been like to live when this album was charting!

If you want to understand why James Brown is so highly regarded. Here it is. I am only giving it a four star because I now live in regret of never being able to see him live.

This is my kind of Jazz

Wow. Didn’t expect to love this as much as I did. The girl can flat out sing, and musically I found it refreshing. Great find!

A broody mix of early Duran Duran and Television. Fortunately, Japan takes the good from both and delivers a solid album of interesting music.

Lite, refreshing, interesting, but moving on…

Nice surprise and fun listen. Not sure of the significance, but enjoyable

I really like early Wilco... basically everything before Sky Blue Sky. But after a fresh listen, I am happier with Yankee Hotel Foxtrot and A Ghost is Born than even earlier works. I would have shortened Being There, in retrospect. Still a solid album.

I suppose there is something interesting going on here, but I’m more interested in the fact that enough people got it for them to have a career afterwards. I guess heavy metal isn’t for me.

#1 Record is obviously a fairly pretentious title, and sadly they don't deliver. I am not sure what they have that merits inclusion on the list, but I am sure there are some good arguments. They just didn't leap out at me.

Well played 1001. Delivering Christmas magic on Christmas… thank you.

Usually “experimental” has me running for the hills, but this was a surprise. It is a sonic experiment, but it had nice resonance, far better than most stuff in 88.

Yes. This is the origin of progressive rock, an it is very avant guard, experimental, genre fusion, etc. It is also pretty amazing. I admit that I don't understand what is going on, but I also can appreciate what is here in my limited capacity.

What a time it was…

Morrissey and Marr match each other perfectly on this album despite their tense divergent relationship. Makes for great songs!

I am not sure where to place EW&F in terms of genre and significance, but their talent is evident. Emergent disco at its best!

I’d like to rate this higher due to degree of difficulty, but I believe the complexity and overwrought construction of the songs is self-inflected and affected. At times there are great moments, but they feel accidental.

Johnny Cash is just flat compelling. His music is storytelling at its finest, and this album shines because of where and how he tells them with his own powerful narration. Enjoy!

This may be the brochure for sex, drugs, and rock and roll. The presentation may be fine, but most of this is tiresome and uninteresting.

This my 2nd PJ Harvey album, and I think she is growing on me. Great energy and presentation. Brooding and enjoyable. I will likely revisit her work beyond this list.

I get it… former punk rock gods realize they actually are musicians. Love it!

I love Leonard Cohen. He's like Dylan's less sophisticated uncle who may just be holding back to spare you some additional angst. I could listen to him for hours.

There is a new version of this album which includes more of this epic live 2 1/2 hour concert. The original release is 38 minutes. Thank God almighty I discovered this before choosing the wrong one.

I wanted to like this after reading the wiki article, but just didn’t do it for me.

T. Rex is really interesting, complex, and fun musically. It just feels to me that the tracks are not songs, but sonic experiments. The sound great, and have a nice groove, but they don't catch on the way singles normally do. Still, fun to listen to and digest.

The name is better than the music

80s production style almost killed this for me out of the gate, but Cohen talent kept me listening. In the end, he wins. His writing won me over!

Feels like Arcade Fire, but good!

Noise

This just wasn't that compelling for me. Iggy Pop comes with a strong reputation, but it seems like vague experimentation. The single bright spot was hearing/discovering China Girl on this album. Looking into it, it was co-written with Bowie. In fact, Bowie recorded a version for Let's Dance to help Iggy Pop financially. I actually really like the version on this album. A bright spot, for sure.

The music is pleasant enough, but I do not have enough of a world music vocabulary to really evaluate it. It is in cases like this that I rely on the inclusion on the list and the reviews on wikipedia to shape my view.

This could have been pulled out of a time capsule from 1989. I enjoyed it, but I would love to hear them play songs from this on their upcoming MTV Unplugged set. I think this band would benefit from less polish and more heart.

I really enjoyed this album. Of course, I am familiar the hits/singles, but they bring much of the same character throughout the whole record along with a vibe that is distinctly theirs. I still don't quite know what to make of them. Clearly, they are all very talented, and Sting's vocal range and playfulness kept me interested throughout.

This album surprised me. Usually, I give Jazz the side-eye. Never know whether I am going to get something I can enjoy or something akin to a sonic colonoscopy. In this case, I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Like most Nick Drake albums, Five Leaves Left is an enjoyable and interesting album. I have heard multiple albums by Nick Drake, and this doesn't disappoint. On the other hand, it isn't very different from his other work. Artists like this seem to always deliver in their lane, and while that lane is very particular, it is reliable. And it evokes a natural and unforced introspection. I may never be able to differentiate his work within his catalog, but I am always willing to listen.

I feel like from the very beginning, you get the DNA of The Rolling Stones. They have a sort of 'bad boy' reputation, and you can see it even in the early songs they are covering on their debut album. This is really tight garage band work, and you can tell they are having fun doing. Like the early Beatles, I don't know if anyone could have predicted their success or influence from this work, but looking back, you see all the signs that they would become something special.

Norah Jones is marvelous to listen to. She has a great, smooth and sultry voice, and her music has a nostalgic vibe that draws you in and makes you feel like you've been listening to her for years. I can't name a single song, but I am happy to listen again and again.

On paper, Derek and the Dominos should have been excellent. And in many ways, excellent music was produced. Though the band is tight and talented, you get the sense that they knew, even in the midst of everything, that they lacked cohesion. In many ways, I think this describes Clapton... a brilliant guitarist that needs help all around him to be truly great. Despite a few really nice cuts, this album underperforms.

What I love about Document is that you literally are watching this band grow up before you eyes. Each album of there's is taking bolder steps, but they also expand their musical ambitions. Excellent work from the boys from Athens!

What a surprise! This is like a rock and roll version of Vampire Weekend. The band just seems to be having fun and what they are creating. I am not sure about their greatness level longterm, but they intrigue me enough to make me smile... which means, I will probably listen again. Always a plus.

I have a lot of respect for Prince, and this album is a very good album. Both the stylistic diversity and the musical strength are immediately impressive and sustained throughout. In many ways, it is like Prince received his 80's toolkit in 1982 and basically used everything on this album and he used it well. Later efforts don't expand on it musically, but are lyrically and narratively stronger, if perhaps even a little more self-indulgent.

The Temptations are a great listen. There is something really fun about how masterfully they vocalize and harmonize with such heart and energy. Another great album from 1972. Love the funk grove right out of the gate, but I love the soulful groove on the closing, "Do your thing!"

What a surprise. I had not heard of The Coral until the list, but it is a delightful surprise. The album moves between fresh and new to older and familiar. Some tracks sound like they could have been produced in the late 60s and other feel right out of the 90s, and yet they keep it together throughout.

I am not a fan of Incubus. The first track had me curious, but before the song was over, I had a feeling that this was going to be a disappointment. All of the signature 90s alt/grunge/rock are there, but they feel generic and unconvincing.

Somehow it seems that at least one of the members of ZZ Top sold his soul for commercial success. The songs have very fun hooks, energy, and presence, but in many ways they are unremarkable or at least not clearly the ZZ Top of earlier years. They went from Rock and Roll to Pop and it basically ended them as a band. You may enjoy this album, but it is more of a stop down than a step forward.

It is like listening to the DNA of so many great bands that follow. This is infectious rebellion that doesn't have to make sense to work. Everything about the Sex Pistols was unsustainable but holds together on the album that defines the genre. It is not perfect, but it makes its stamp perfectly. I never felt so happy about anarchy! Nevermind the Bollocks!

I recently listened to the first Rolling Stones album, and I previously have heard the Beatles first album. In my opinion, the Who (perhaps by being the later of the three is really terrific. They have the luxury of having the least amount of covers, and the covers actually are eclipsed by the work of Townsend. Super fun!

I don't know much about Randy Newman apart from his big hits (Short People and I Love L.A.) and movie tunes. This album is exactly what I thought it would be, distinctly Randy Newman, and basically a soundtrack for every family drama from 1968 to 1985. It isn't bad music, it just isn't my cup of tea.

Lost in translation. Apart from a few samples of recognizable music and some welcome silence, this was unlistenable to me. Makes sense. I google translated the title… “Songs From My Disturbed Sheet Metal Shop”.

Nope! Unjustified!

I felt the same way about receiving this album that I imagine I’d feel if I had contracted Anthrax.

The list is a perfect mechanism for me to encounter an album like this one. I’m hater, but I couldn’t tell you the last time I intentionally put on some of Madonna’s music. My reaction is mixed. While the music was solid for the genre, I was surprised at the lack of breakout single(s), and by the end of the album the writing was weak and aimless… which was odd because of the length of the album. I would have cut a few tracks.

What do you do if you’re a band that catches the attention of David Bowie, given all of the opportunity to take the musical world by storm, and you tour the world as a glam rock super group, but you’re thoroughly unprepared for the role and unwilling and unprepared for fame, fortune, and the trappings of stardom and you flameout writing songs of lament as you go… a cautionary tale of getting everything you want only to find yourself empty and cynical and aimless despite your many gifts and talents… I give you Mott the Hoople… all the not so young dudes anymore!

Wow. A double album. I tried to get into it, and the music was good. But try as I might, it just didn’t click with me. My friend compared them to R.E.M., but I didn’t believe until very late in the listen. In the end, I just didn’t connect. Probably more me that them.

Bowie is baffling to me. On one album he can conjure up a hit at will to save it. With Low he seems content to meander around a laboratory of incomplete or inarticulate ideas with mild enthusiasm. Nothing really seems to be great or really catch hold of the imagination. It's like he is showing off the worst kind of artistic entitlement imaginable. Bowie is certainly a talented songwriter and musician, but even the best creative minds lose their way.

I won’t argue that the album is interesting or even innovative, but it more like background music than something I would intentionally sit down to listen to. The music almost begs you to do something other than enjoy simply listening to it. Though titled Movies, it feels more like a sound effects track than a score

You have to have a certain level of commitment to the band to join them in their exploration and exploitation of sound, dissonance, distortion, etc., and I realize that I cannot join Jesus and the Mary Chain as they engage in their work/art. Sadly, I believe there was a time in my life where I certainly would have. Glad I listened, but I cautiously wait for their next album.

It is immediately apparent that Amy is an incredibly talented artist. She has great range, style, presence, and seems so comfortable as she effortlessly moves through the tracks of the album. At the same time, there is a bleak anxiety to the album. Despite the confidence in Amy's voice, there is a dark undercurrent of a troubled character. Even if you don't consider all of the controversy surrounding the artist herself, the tracks point to an empty, dark, and doomed worldview that leaves you concerned more than entertained.

What a surprise! I really don't know a whole lot about The Beach Boys post Pet Sounds until the 80s, and the later work kind of makes sense to me. This album is full of interesting and diverse tracks that pack a punch I just did not expect. For the first time, I thought, "I need to explore this band further." Good job, Fellas!

I am much more familiar with Genesis and Peter Gabriel as separate entities, and in my opinion, it is much more interesting if you looked at their relationship in reverse. It would likely be considered a super group... Peter Gabriel joins Phil Collins and Genesis to create an ambitious concept album that explores the estranged vision of the self in the melting pot of 1970s New York City. Still, it is a concept album. While musically, it held my attention, I didn't follow the purported narrative suggested in articles about the album. But I believe them, and I trust Gabriel and the whole gang, so I am guess that it would grow on me. So, today, I give it a three and half, convinced it might eventually move higher in my book.

This album explains Rod Stewart. For years, I didn’t understand the fascination. Now, I get it. This album is a blast. It is raw, has an infectious energy, diversity is style, and solid hits. Under normal circumstances, I find Maggie May cringe-worthy, but somehow, on this album it fits and is tolerable. It doesn’t totally explain Stewart’s success, but I have to give this one to him.

This album is fantastic. I am not really sure I can explain why it is so good. It is like a soundscape for the soul where everything is explored, questioned, and deliberately left unresolved... but in a good way. It's as if the Flaming Lips pictured themselves in a boat on a river with tangerine trees and marmalade skies, and then produced an album with sweeping orchestration made by devices bought at radio shack. Don't try and understand it, but don't skip it. Listen to it (perhaps more than 2 or 3 times) and enjoy the preface album to Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots. You won't be disappointed.

I am not sure this album holds up over the years, but it is great to hear Paul Simon when he is creatively flourishing. The tracks are strong, if a little dated, and I found myself smiling a little more than I thought as I revisited them.

And right to the junkyard this album goes, and it is exactly where it where it belongs. This album is the musical equivalent of one of those mechanical car crushers. I would say, burn it, melt it down, and use it to make other albums, but I kind of want to make sure none of the DNA from this album makes it on to other albums.

I feel like Bowie just gets a pass. He does have some great albums, and he is great - he even can create hits upon demand... none of all that is evident on this album. Yes, Bowie, you are great. This album is the like the unrelated jobs you had that you only keep on your resume to avoid uncomfortable time gaps in your timeline.

The New Tango? I was not super familiar with the old one. As musically sophisticated as this album is, it inspires no love for Tango music, or even a slight body movement toward doing the Tango on the dance floor.

It is undenable that Jefferson Airplane played an important and pivotal role in solidifying psychadelic rock in the 60s. And because of this, I was looking forward to exploring their music a little more. It isn't bad, but this is one of those rare occurrences where the known singles from the album stand out entirely of what's memorable and important for this band. I did enjoy some of the other tracks, but in terms of quality and impact, I didn't find much here. Finally, it is hard to take Grace Slick seriously when you have the Jefferson Starship garbage mingling in your head.

This album is like sitting in on the rehearsal for multiple great albums. There are no standout singles or great songs that define the greatness of 1967, but in these songs and this album are the elements of multiple great albums to come. Neil Young, CSN & Y, members of Crazy Horse, and more. And it works. There is just the overwhelming sense that you are witnessing solid artists collaborating and molding into their next expressions. Maybe it isn't most notable album of 1967, but it shares the same signs that there are great things to come.

This album is an interesting mash-up of psychedelic pop sounds with some interesting techno flourishes and call backs to the 60s, but ultimately it lacks what made that time period so vital; a righteous cause. These guys are certainly talented, and the album did get a little better for me as it progressed, but in the end, I just wanted to go back and listen to better music.

Man. 1967. For crying out loud. I can't imagine living in a time with the volume of incredible music being released. What a fabulous album. There are very few artists who can generate so much power track to track with basically three instruments. I know a lot of technical work was done on the back end to fill things out, but the work of all three musicians in amazing. This album feels more like a greatest hits album than a debut, and at the same time, even lesser tracks soar. Rumor has it that they wanted to include a cover of "Like A Rolling Stone" on this album as they were performing it live. As much as I would love to hear it, this album does just fine all on its own. A masterpiece.

Try as I might, I just couldn't find anything really special about this album. It certainly sounded like the 90s, but without any resonant nostalgia or identifying hook, statement, or... connection. The music is not bad. At points it is pretty good, however, it is unremarkable. In other words, I can't imagine playing the Copper Blue card in any discussion of 90's music, and that feels odd.

Oh, wow! What a time in history to have rage and rebellion sound so good. I really enjoyed this album. While I have heard it before - multiple listens, it just hit me with fresh delight. It doesn't sustain across the whole album, but because it is so strong in the first half, I am happy to go along. And I feel that if Mick and Joe called and asked me to join in the revolution, I would jump! (this is saying something for a scrawny 50 something guy like me).

I am intrigued by this album. It is not really in my wheelhouse, but I did enjoy listening to it. My greater issue is including an album from 2020 on this list. I will have to check-in on the album here and again to see if it sustains over the years, but I can happily say that that doesn't bother me at all. Maybe it will grow on me.

Peter Gabriel has always been somewhat of an enigma to me. From the early Genesis stuff and early 80s work, I never really got him. But this album is fantastic. Easily his most accessible and commercial albums, he gets the absolute most of out 80s production values while exploring a wide range of subjects. From the bombastic and cautionary "Big Time" to the introspective self doubt in "Hear that Voice Again" and need for love in "Mercy Street" navigates complex topics with grace, power, and care at the same time. Look past the hits and enjoy this Lanois produced gem.

These guys feel like the middle child in the family of the Sex Pistols and the Clash. Sure, they are rebellious and angry, but not that angry. They are more technical and to themselves and happy not be front and center among their siblings.

Four tracks clocking it an 45 minutes. Pure soul music and musically complex and groovy at the same time. I have nothing but respect for this album. From the twelve minute re-imagining of Burt Bacharach's "Walk On By" to the anecdotal "By the Time I Get to Phoenix," this album feels like comfort food without being filling. While I enjoyed the listen, I didn't want to get up afterwards. I was happy to continue lying there, wondering if I would ever feel like moving again. I guess that is contemplative.

This album took several turns from the over-the-top grinding rock assault tracks, to alt-rock hit maker, to quirky experiment, and then more and more of the same. Somehow, in the end, it really impressed me more than I expected. I got a very distinctive early Wilco-vibe at its best, and as it progressed, I was kind of sold. I don't know how I missed this in the nineties, but I was glad to get it here. It may be pushing it a little, but listening to this on the 101 on the CA coast on a beautiful day, pushes this to a 4 for me. I guess I'm ready for a range life.

What to do with the Pixies. I always want to like them, but I just don't get them. I recognize that it is me. Many ingredients are there for a great band, intelligent musicianship, strong sound, quirky and poetic lyrics, etc. I can't even say that they are missing something. They just don't resonate well with me. I did find this album more even as a whole than their other albums, but evenness didn't do it for me. Plus, it lacked a strong, breakout track for me. I will always give them a chance, but every time I do, I am surprised at how hard it is for me to connect with this band (despite "Where is my mind" being an amazing song by them).

It's jangly brit-pop from the 90s that is pretty good. If it suffers, it suffers from its time more than anything else. There is just an empty aimlessness of the 90s that keeps the music from being truly relevant. Still, it rocks musically, and the band is fun enough to make the apathy of the 90s sound a little better that they were. I gave them a 3 on a previous incarnation of the list, but despite everything, I found myself enjoying this album more than I remembered. So, I'm pushing to a 4. Good job, Supergrass.