1001 Albums Summary

Listening statistics & highlights

Journey in Progress

Discovering music one album at a time

206
Albums Rated
3.9
Avg Rating
56
5-Star Albums
19%
Complete
883 albums remaining

Rating Speed

6.5
Per Week
223
Days Active

Reviews

203
Written
99%
Review Rate

vs Global

0.61
Avg Diff
3.9
Avg Rating

Rating Distribution

How you rate albums

Rating Timeline

Average rating over time

Ratings by Decade

Which era do you prefer?

Activity by Day

When do you listen?

Taste Profile

1950s
Favorite Decade
Funk
Favorite Genre
US
Top Origin
Generous
Rater Style
4
1-Star Albums

Taste Analysis

Genre Preferences

Ratings by genre

Origin Preferences

Ratings by country

Rating Style

You Love More Than Most

Albums you rated higher than global average

AlbumYouGlobalDiff
Kala 5 2.91 +2.09
Aha Shake Heartbreak 5 2.97 +2.03
Done By The Forces Of Nature 5 3.04 +1.96
No Other 5 3.18 +1.82
The Blueprint 5 3.22 +1.78
Lady In Satin 5 3.23 +1.77
GREY Area 5 3.24 +1.76
Live Through This 5 3.28 +1.72
Live At The Star Club, Hamburg 5 3.28 +1.72
A Christmas Gift For You From Phil Spector 5 3.28 +1.72

You Love Less Than Most

Albums you rated lower than global average

AlbumYouGlobalDiff
Bummed 1 2.64 -1.64
Cupid & Psyche 85 1 2.38 -1.38
Eagles 2 3.29 -1.29
Trout Mask Replica 1 2.28 -1.28
Rum Sodomy & The Lash 2 3.25 -1.25
Pyromania 2 3.13 -1.13
Scum 1 2.07 -1.07
Electric 2 3.02 -1.02
Let Love Rule 2 3 -1

Artist Analysis

Favorite Artists

Artists with 2+ albums and high weighted score

ArtistAlbumsAvgScore
Beatles 2 5 3.8
Fela Kuti 2 5 3.8
Nirvana 2 5 3.8

5-Star Albums (56)

View Album Wall

Popular Reviews

Adele
3/5
First of all, credit where credit is due: an album doesn’t sell over 31 million copies without extreme talent and widespread appeal. What’s often overlooked is that 21 was released on the indie label XL Recordings. While Adele’s debut, and especially "Chasing Pavements," hinted at potential, no one could have predicted the stratospheric success of 21. Today, it’s hard to separate the album from its overwhelming cultural presence. These songs—still omnipresent on playlists, soundtracks, and radio—remain as epic and timeless as they were a decade ago. Despite the numerous high-profile collaborations, Adele retains songwriting credits on most tracks, but crucially, she makes it feel like no one else in the world could ever sing these songs. The opener, "Rolling in the Deep," remains one of the best tracks recorded this century, blending gospel and blues in a way that was both fresh and unexpected from her at the time. The retro-inflected "Rumour Has It" follows a similar path, its rhythm-driven, almost Motown feel makes it immediately memorable. It suffers solely from being in the shadow of such an electrifying opener. The album's main issue is that as it proceeds, the tracks become less memorable. While "Set Fire to the Rain" and the closer "Someone Like You" certainly keep up the emotional intensity and songwriting quality, they shift toward more straightforward pop territory. As Adele dives deeper into heartbreak and lost love, some tracks feel less impactful. The vocal performance is (obviously) flawless, but certain songs play it a bit too safe. Rick Rubin’s involvement had my expectations high, but his contributions, unfortunately, fall short. His work, on the tepid cover of The Cure’s "Lovesong" for example, lacks the spark it could have achieved considering the people in the room. Rubin’s production feels overly reverential and flat here. Did/Do I own this release? No Does it belong on the list? Absolutely, given its massive cultural impact Would it make my personal list? No Will I listen to it again? Whether I want to or not, I’ll hear these songs again soon. 21 is everywhere.
11 likes
1991 was a watershed moment in music. Grunge exploded, hip-hop broke into the mainstream, and genres from jazz to electronic evolved in unprecedented ways. This was also a pivotal year for hip-hop: The Low End Theory by A Tribe Called Quest pushed jazz-rap forward, while De La Soul, Public Enemy, and the underground sounds of Cypress Hill infused the genre with creative, politically charged, and darker Latin influences. In this landscape, Ice-T’s O.G. Original Gangster serves as a fascinating bridge between late ‘80s and early ‘90s rap, standing as a high point for gangsta rap. The album solidifies Ice-T’s reputation as a candid storyteller of street life, violence, systemic issues, and police brutality. His portrayal is raw and rooted in survival, often reflecting gritty reality rather than glorification. Musically, the album dives into funk, rock, and jazz influences, all laid over hardcore beats with relentless yet catchy intensity. Ice-T’s rapping is gritty and conversational, defined by vivid, almost journalistic storytelling rather than lyrical complexity. His style is foundational—direct, no-frills, and packed with authenticity. His delivery commands attention, offering raw, straightforward narratives without metaphor or introspection. Compared to the intricate flows of artists like Nas, the introspective style of Tupac or the conversational style of Jay-Z, Ice-T’s approach remains uncompromisingly blunt. Every line hits with purpose, and his voice carries a power that's hard to ignore. Considering how many times Ice-T curses the police on this album, I can't help but chuckle that he would later go on to play a cop on Law & Order. Talk about becoming that which you hate! Did/Do I own this release? No. Does this release belong on the list? It exemplifies gangsta rap well, though other albums from the same period may represent the genre more fully. Would this release make my personal list? I find myself more drawn to the intricate rhyme schemes and flow changes of later rap. Will I be listening to it again? It was an enjoyable listen and made me feel vaguely menacing while driving, so sure.
8 likes
Kings of Leon
5/5
Kings Of Leon Aha Shake Heartbreak (2004) Back in 2003, I was a fresh-faced twenty-something-year-old intern at Sony Music. It was my dream job, despite the gruelling hours and lack of pay. The upside? I got to hear albums months before their official release and received a heap of records and merch. One of these albums was Kings of Leon's follow-up to their debut Youth & Young Manhood. But let me be honest: there wasn’t exactly a buzz around the office. This was just another record to push out, with much more attention given to a certain diet Pepsi version of The Clash that shall remain nameless. Perhaps unsurprisingly with such indifference from their own label at first, Aha Shake Heartbreak didn’t immediately grab the mainstream spotlight. But over time, something began to shift. The album earned the band a solid following and critical praise for its energy, lyrical maturity, and perfect balance of roughness and polish. Slowly, people at Sony started to pay attention. The album felt like a sharper version of their debut, which was already gaining cult status, and marked a fundamental stepping stone in the band's evolution. Aha Shake Heartbreak solidified the band’s unique voice, laying the groundwork for the massively underrated Because of the Times and the more commercially accessible Only by the Night. I enjoyed this album at the time, but if anything, as I’ve aged and delved deeper into the band's Southern rock influences, my appreciation has only grown. Listening today, the music still stands out for its infectious energy and emotional depth. The gritty swagger of King of the Rodeo captures the band’s Southern rock roots, while Taper Jean Girl brings a punchy, punk-infused edge. The Bucket perfectly balances anthemic energy with urgency, while Pistol of Fire delivers explosive choruses that feel like the musical embodiment of a spark igniting. Tracks like Milk and Razz reveal a quieter side to the band, showcasing their ability to move between hard-hitting rockers and introspective moments. Meanwhile, Four Kicks stands out with its dynamic power and melodic catchiness, exemplifying their tight songwriting. What really makes Aha Shake Heartbreak a key album in Kings of Leon’s discography is how it navigates the space between their Southern rock roots and their desire to explore more expansive sounds. It's a record that feels both like a natural progression and an ambitious leap, capturing their energy, vulnerability, and boldness in equal measure. The album marked the last moment Kings of Leon could truly be considered young upstarts rather than credible contenders. Here they found their footing and, in doing so, eventually solidified their place in the annals of rock history. The Followills are quoted as saying that their 2005 arena tour with U2 pushed them to change their sound to be more adaptable to this massive setting. In other words, we have Bono to blame for Kings of Leon's loss of innocence. But at least Kings of Leon didn’t develop a sudden urge to wear sunglasses indoors and release a song about peace and love every other album. To conclude on a personal note, I still own a signed vinyl copy of this album, which I was gifted by my boss after a particularly gruelling day. She didn’t seem to realize how big this band would eventually get. Did/Do I own this release? Yes, on vinyl and at least 3 promo CD copies. Does this release belong on the list? Aha Shake Heartbreak marked Kings of Leon’s leap from indie-rock upstarts to a band mastering the balance between critical acclaim and commercial success. Would this release make my personal list? I love the first few releases by this band, but I struggle to pick one over another. Will I be listening to it again? Yes.
7 likes
When I decided to commit to listening to all the albums on this list from start to finish, I was fully aware that there would be some releases I’d find challenging and others for which I’m simply not the intended audience. What I didn’t anticipate, however, was encountering a Limp Bizkit album—let alone this one. Let’s get the album title out of the way first: Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water. It’s based on a joke so puerile that even Beavis & Butt-Head might roll their eyes. As for the cover art, it baffles me to this day how no one in the band’s immediate orbit—whether management, the label, or even the guy selling t-shirts—pulled Fred Durst aside and said, “Look, man, this is embarrassing. Maybe we can put some of the 'Significant Other' dollars towards something a little less... awful.” But as the old saying goes, "Don’t judge an album by its questionable cover." So let’s talk about the music. Nu-metal was a curious phenomenon of the early 2000s, and to be fair, this music was everywhere for a while. I was once an angry teen too and while the music doesn’t speak to me as much today, there are a few releases from the likes of Deftones or System of a Down that I’d gladly revisit. Unfortunately, this isn’t the album that best represents the genre—or even this band. Let’s highlight the high points: "My Generation" (not a Who cover), "My Way" (not a Frank Sinatra cover), "Take a Look Around" (not a Temptations cover), and "Rollin’" (not a Tina Turner cover). These singles were omnipresent in 2000, so I had some ingrained familiarity, and I was surprised to find them still enjoyable. They showcase some unexpectedly strong songwriting, great musicianship, and some of Durst's most memorable deliveries. But beyond these hits, the rest of the album is a mixed bag. Tracks like "Hot Dog" and "Full Nelson" lean heavily into aggression but feel repetitive after the initial shock value wears off. "Livin' It Up" lacks the cohesion of more successful genre crossovers, and "Getcha Groove On" sees the band experimenting with hip-hop elements, though the result feels more like a novelty than a serious blend of genres. "Boiler" stands out with a darker, more brooding tone, showcasing a more introspective side, while "Hold On" provides a rare moment of restraint, even if it doesn’t quite stick the landing. Tracks like "The One" offer some variety, but they ultimately get lost in the album’s overwhelming reliance on loud, chaotic energy. The band's tendency to crank everything up to eleven often detracts from the overall experience, making some tracks feel exhausting rather than engaging. By the album's end, the lack of dynamic range makes it difficult to remember any one individual track. The riffs blend into one another, and the reliance on copy-paste distorted guitar tones feels extremely dated today. Then there’s Fred Durst. Lyrically, he operates in three modes: pissed off, really pissed off, and really really pissed off. This would be fine if the words or music were particularly memorable, but too often it comes across as whiny self-agrandization. While I believe Durst’s delivery, vocal timbre, and sheer exuberance actually suit the genre, the problem is that he rarely has much to say on this release. The now infamous (over)use of the F-word becomes numbing after a while, its impact diluted to the point of irrelevance. Now that I’ve sat through all 74 minutes of this album, I’ll admit I didn’t hate it as much as I expected. It’s certainly not the worst album I’ve encountered on this list. I suspect it was hastily included out of fear of missing out on a cultural phenomenon during Limp Bizkit’s peak, suggesting Dimery and his team are not immune to passing cultural fads. But it raises a bigger question: what was the purpose of this album in 2000 beyond cashing in on the success of 'Significant Other'? And perhaps more importantly, why would anyone listen to it now? If you’re after nu-metal anthems or crunchy riffs with real bite, there are far better options from this era that have stood the test of time. Unfortunately or fortunately depending on your viewpoint, *Chocolate Starfish* just isn’t one of them. Did/Do I own this release? No Does this release belong on the list? No Would this release make my personal list? Never Will I be listening to it again? Hopefully not
6 likes
Fats Domino
4/5
(BTW: Spotify mistakenly lists this as a compilation, while Apple Music correctly labels it as the original 1957 album.) Fats Domino, revered by everyone from Elvis to the Beatles, often doesn’t get the full credit he deserves today, despite his immense influence. This Is Fats Domino! was released in 1957, and though it may sound neat and polished now, it was groundbreaking at the time—anti-establishment music that got tongues wagging and hips shaking. Standout tracks like "Blueberry Hill" and "Blue Monday" capture Domino at his best—smooth vocals, irresistible piano rolls, and a blend of blues and early rock that defined an era. These songs shaped the sound of rock and roll, making waves far beyond the R&B scene. The album's influence still echoes in today's music. Whether in piano-driven pop or the evolution of rock, Domino's impact is unmistakable. And as an aside, “Fats Domino” remains one of the greatest stage names in music history—perfectly fitting his larger-than-life sound and persona. Domino’s legacy is undeniable. He crossed musical and racial boundaries, influencing everyone from rock legends to modern pop stars. This Is Fats Domino! is a cornerstone of that legacy, a reminder of just how revolutionary his music was. Did/Do I own this release? My dad had some compilation or other. Does this release belong on the list? It is time Fats Domino gets more respect. Would this release make my personal list? Perhaps too dated now for my definitive list, but never say never. Will I be listening to it again? In the right setting, this is a no-brainer.
6 likes

4-Star Albums (93)

1-Star Albums (4)

All Ratings