Album Summary
Happy Trails is the second album of the American band Quicksilver Messenger Service. Most of the album was recorded from two performances at the Fillmore East and Fillmore West, although it is not clear which parts were recorded at which Fillmore. The record was released by Capitol Records in 1969 in stereo.
Keywords from Reviews
Rating Over Time
Reviews
Sometimes you discover a great new band. This wasn't that time.
You know, they could've shot the messenger.
I enjoyed side 1 as, despite it being a 26 minute song in 5 movements, it was accessible and a pleasant listen. Perhaps helped that it was a well known cover ('Who do yo love?'). It was also well performed - I didn't realise it was a live version until the applause at the end. Side 2 is somehow even more self indulgent. 4 songs this time. 2 are ok covers (although Henry from Neighbours still has the definitive version of 'Mona') and the other 2 just sound like dull jams with nothing going on to keep my interest. My snap judgement: QMS maybe good at noodling on a guitar, but are not blessed with much in the way of creativity or songwriting talent.
"Extended free-form jazz excursion" - Spinal Tap
Oh Christ, here we go. Even just looking at the cover I can guess two things: nowhere near as country as you'd think, and (probably) psychedelic rock instead. Plus it's 1969, so expectations are low. aaaaand boom, not country at all! Just psychedelic rock, extended jam SHIT. It was so boring I forgot it was on and only paid attention once spotify started playing "radio based on" songs. Fuck this stuff. it's an angry 1/5.
Quite a confusing album. Didn't really read or hear anything to suggest it's a worthy "1001" album and didn't massively enjoy it either. 4/10
Holy fuck. What have I been doing with my life that I haven't listened to this before now? This is exactly what I want out of psychedelic blues rock. A whole side dedicated to an absolute killer rendition of "Who Do You Love?" Yes please! I am now looking for the Pure Pleasure pressing of this as soon as I'm done my vinyl diet.
pretty accessible psychedelic rock with some darker, jazzy blues riffs, and a vague desert-y vibe. Good contemplation music. A bit too long for a casual listen.
A song I vaguely know followed by 40 minutes of what sounds like people tuning their instruments, concluded by the worst version of Happy Trails I've ever heard.
Half the album sounds like an improvised jam session and I am absolutely on board with that. A joyous treat of psychedelic rock and amazing guitar work. Will definitely stay in rotation for me.
This album is a great guitar solo, don’t think I needed to hear it though
Maybe it was subversive, edgy or outsider when it first came out but it sounds a lot like every jam band since. Reminded me of the Grateful Dead or Jefferson Airplane. I'm not sure why this would be considered important unless it were earlier than the Grateful Dead or Jefferson Airplane and influenced them.
First off, this album kicks major ass. If I had a time machine I would go back to the late 60's in San Francisco. For me, the psychedelic rock scene of that period produced some of the greatest music of all time and you could go see some killer live music every day of the week. Secondly, a bit of a rant. This album starts with a 25 minute version of a Bo Diddley song, but the entirety of this book is devoid of a Bo fucking Diddley album. The most egregious omissions of this book is it's lack of real blues music. By my estimation there are only 5 actual blues records on the list. No Howlin' Wolf, no Buddy Guy, no Big Mama Thornton, no Butterfield Blues Band, no Fred McDowell, no Mississippi John Hurt, no Magic Sam, no Freddie King, No Albert King, no Otis Spann, no James Cotton, and on and on and on. I don't have many soap boxes but this is one of them. But anyway, highly enjoyable listen for me. The recordings of these gigs at the Fillmore West in '68 had the Grateful Dead on the bill also, it must have been jam band heaven.
This album shouldn’t work as well as it does. I feel like if you asked anyone if they want to listen to a half hour rendition of Who Do You Love they would say no. But if you just put this album on without any context they’d think it kicks ass
truly dreadful. First song is one verse of a Bo Diddley song then 20 minutes of uninspired blues noodling. And that's the highlight! Each track gets steadily worse, with awful hippy grunting on top of amateur guitar riffing. 2nd to last track is literally 13 minutes where nothing happens at all, but even this is preferable to the final track which is as brief as it is awful. might be one of the worst albums I have ever endured.
Wow drugs
I will never understand why this album gets so much hate. I LOVE IT from the first to the last second. It might be on the more accessible part of the psych rock spectrum, but in no way is it underwhelming or boring IMHO.
Saved Prior: None Saved Off Rip: None Cutting Edge: None Overall Notes: This is one of those albums where it inspired a lot of music that ended up being much better. The first couple of tracks were pretty cool how they overlapped and sounded like one long jam session, but not something I'll be returning to.
As much as the music wasn’t at all offensive, I didn’t really enjoy listening to a band jam for 30mins. It wasn’t terrible music and would normally be a 2 star, but because half the album is a cover, I have to mark it down as I did for The Sonics. The infamous “star rating system” is nothing without consistency.
This was good, sorta like ancient King gizzard
A hidden gem.
the past 2 acid rock albums ive heard were both pretty underwhelming, but this one was great!!! about half the album is taken up by one long continuous track, apparently it's a bo diddley cover? im gonna be honest ive never heard a bo diddley song i dont think. maybe one on the radio but thats it. the cover is really good though, it goes thru a ton of sections that're all pretty cool (Where You Love is some rly weird improvisational bs for 1969), and the guitar tones are really good. Mona isnt my favorite thing ever but it picks right back up after that! also worth mentioning: this is the first live album ive gotten from this site! not sure how many there are :o very nice guitar tones on here, cool noodling. most of it is instrumental (i kept forgetting there was a vocalist at all) so its pretty nice to put on in the background and just let it go wild in the back of ur brain. great stuff :D 9/10
Per Wikipedia: Quicksilver Messenger Service began as a SF-based horseback courier, but was forced to pivot their business to psych rock after an unfortunate sexual incident involving a large, valuable parcel and an Appaloosa. Tip of the hat to QMS for somehow, against all odds, squeezing a half hour of juice out of the 2 chord Bo Diddly beat and keeping it pretty interesting. C+ Also very interested to see Josh's review since he usually isn't a fan of live albums but has a special place in his heart for QMS.
this is like the musical equivalent of those 52-in-1 game cartridges for the NES. theres country, jazz, psych rock, blues, and even ambient on Cavalry???????????????? and why are half of the songs named one of the 5 W's with "You Love" stuck on the end???????? this may be the weirdest one yet.
5/5. I just love jam bands, especially ones that don't take themselves seriously. The whole Love Suite is hilarious, just the complete unseriousness of it keeps me entertained the whole time. The solos are awesome in every part of the song and each one feels distinct enough to know which part I'm at. The second half of the album is not as good overall but I wasn't surprised to hear more solos and long winded jams. There are better albums but this one just gave me what I needed and I enjoyed the whole thing. Best Song: Who Do You Love Suite (Who Do You Love Part 2 mostly), Mona, Calvary
Alright I’m biased as a big fan of psychedelic bands from the 60s, especially ones from San Francisco, but surprisingly I didn’t know much about quicksilver other than hearing who do you love on car commercials. I thought about giving it a 4 because it certainly won’t appeal to everyone or be “objectively” great, but it’s accomplishes everything it’s going for and more. It’s an impressive feat to be a musically talented half forgotten live acid band in the 60s and yet still have your music played in mainstream 2020 commercials.
Reminds of my first job in high school, working for the Cheyenne Messenger Service. Used to deliver daily telegrams to ol' Tracy McCraken at the Wyoming Tribune Eagle. He'd sometimes scold me for being late, other times he'd buy me a beer from the Railspur across the street. Then me and the fellas would roll up a joint and listen to Happy Trails behind the rail yard. I dreamed of better days, not realizing I was living them all along. Happy trails my friends, happy trails.
The first 25 minutes or so is a very long and experimental version of Bo Diddly's 'Who Do You Love'? that meanders around pretty aimlessly and doesn't ever come close to being as good as Bo's version. So there's that. It's not a 1/5 but it's unspectacular. Heard better stuff from bands who were wildly off their tits in the same era.
Its ok but not interesting enough to get away with no Lyrics. 2/5
Psychedelic middle section that drifts into some good licks. The whole album seems like one continuous song until the Happy Trails song provides a clear ending. Will listen again.
unfamiliar beat and is not bad
Love that this was recorded live and hat hte musicians just put thier stamp on some Bo Diddley tunes. Great psych rock record to listen to.
Fantastic long form 60’s psych. Experimental and jammy, with touches of avant-garde guitar interplay, noise and feedback, you can hear the influence this record might have had on a band like Sonic Youth. With such a dynamic sense of improvisation and tight rhythmic focus in these live performances, I’m left wondering, “Why on earth would anyone listen to the Grateful Dead when this exists?”
What the f——-? Mind blowing guitar solos. Like Roy Rogers on acid. Loads of fun but I don’t think I’ll be listening to it again except as mood music for my apocalyptic western RPG.
Who spiked my LSD with retrospective adulation? I had a good time with this. Brings to mind Paul Butterfield’s Blues Band - this is a compliment. Those were the days: you could amble onstage dragging curly leads, thwack off over a couple of Bo Diddley covers for an hour, and then sixty years later have some faded Gen-X’er be compelled to write about your vintage jizz as it is now classic jizz that you must listen to before you die. Sounded even better on second listen and only didn’t make it to a four because the last song annoyed me. Reading the Wikipedia page on this album is confusing fun; reading QMS’s Wikipedia page is confusing poignancy - you can tell they were legit from the premature deaths with tints of bitterness, ey.
This was like a recording of a rehearsal where the band were too stoned to reign anyone in, and at the end of it, they just said fuck it, let's put it out, done, now lets go and get a kebab.
Literally just 50 minutes of boomers noodling on guitars. 4/10
Izgubljena karika između grateful dead i television znam da je nekom ovakav stil gitarskih nudlanja dosadan ali meni je sjajan
Ok i listened to the album of the day today actually for the first time ever and it was actually sick i think i could get into this (ill make luke give it a listen too)
Always knew about it, never listened to it, bloody love it!
What's wrong with all these people hating on guitar solos?
Awesome. Great discovery ❤️
This was so good! A new favorite!
Fantastic
Really enjoyable. Just good, well played music, something I plan on coming back to when I need ambient good noise.
I absolutely loved this album! It felt like a fun jam band. This type of music transcends time and space. I could see myself listening to this on a long drive from Chicago to Phoenix (or vice versa). Super fun.
Jam. On.
I’m at a 4.5 that I’ll surprisingly bump up to a 5. From the album cover, I sort of assumed we’d get country music, and I was dead wrong – this is psychedelic rock, recorded seemingly live, and as such, I think there was a slight collective PTSD from that endlessly long and rather drab Grateful Dead album we got a while ago. Not a bad album, mind you, but a really fucking boring one. It did not help that the first 6 tracks of this are a 25 minute setpiece riffing on one track. Thank the good lord above that these guys know how to make 25 minutes actually sound captivating – I actually really, really enjoyed the opening suite that starts this album. It is just one long extended riff on a track, and therefore, maybe the longest cover I’ve ever heard, but they do a great job of keeping it fresh. It certainly helps that each little changeup is its own track here, to keep those changes really obvious, and to stop it from *feeling* like a 25 minute slog. Each individual segment does have its own vibe, and I really, really enjoyed “When You Love” in particular, just for being totally eerie as hell, especially when the audience noises come in. Mona is fine. It’s sort of Hendrix-y, but a bit too lowkey, without being fully in harmony, & it doesn’t really get its own conclusion, which threw me off. It is part of another 3-track set though, and Mona’s shortcomings are quickly resolved by both “Maiden of the Cancer Moon” & “Calvary”, which both really clicked for me. The former feels very Hendrix-y, even with how short it is – it finds the harmonization between everyone and the energy that “Mona” doesn’t. Calvary is a remarkably strong 13-minute track that has a really nice, building, swirling structure reminiscent of Western movies and militaristic soundscapes, before sort of settling into a more serene & ethereal tone for its final 5 minutes – a calm after the storm, if you will. I would’ve ended the album there, mainly because the Happy Trails cover falls flat on its face as a final track after all that, but regardless… I dunno, I really enjoyed this. This is, at its very basic core, just 50 minutes of a jam session, but it does feel infinitely better than that Grateful Dead album that we all had a bit of an ick towards, and I’m just glad they’re flexing their technical chops in a more fulfilling way that doesn’t feel self-serving and pretentiously artsy. It’s probably no less than a 3 – I think the people giving this a 1 or a 2 on the site either have no patience for these sorts of albums, or they just really did not pay enough attention to care about the little details that I found captivating. Realistically, it’s definitely not a flat 5, since it does have a little bit too much empty air at times, but I feel no shame in giving it the bump; I liked it a lot, and for 1969, I think this is about as good as you can ask for in terms of “50 minute jam session” albums.
Country western vibe but great
Don’t believe the low ratings. Wasn’t expecting to like this but from the start it just pulls you in. To be fair the second half is a bit weaker. Well worth a four
What if allman brothers were more psychadelic n less racist, for better or worse
Yeah it's pretty good! Hadn't heard QMS before, and it's kind of a Stones-meets-Dead crossover, a bit more bluesy than most Grateful Dead stuff. Very psychedelic rock. Interesting exploratory parts. I'm not usually one for long-form improv, but it was an above average listen that kept me hooked in.
I really enjoyed this. From the same school as the Grateful Dead. Some great rocking out and noodling.
a faixa where do you love me lembrou um pouco AnCo na era Hollinndagain
I don't know why it took these guys half an hour to play Who Do You Love, George Thorogood pulled it off in about four and a half minutes.
Happy Trails It’s hard to fuck up a song as great as Who Do You Love, and when they are working with the rhythm and melody on the 27 minute version it’s good, with a nice punchiness to it. But when they veer off into extended solo sections its far less interesting and more aimless, becoming the kind of wank fest that’s only really fun if you are in the band, you are off your tits in the audience or if you are a late 60s rock critic jizzing lyrical about it in order to justify that rock journalism is actually like, you know, an art form, man. Mona is a much better, the bass and drums are nicely locked in to the Bo Diddley rhythm, the tremolo guitar shimmers and the lead guitar tone is great, with some excellently interwoven lines and runs, even if there is still a fair amount of the more standard acid-blues rock fret tossery. There’s a touch of Black Sabbath before Black Sabbath to Maiden of the Cancer Moon in some passages, hinting at a kind of ominousness, but as a whole thing it doesn’t seem to go anywhere, feeling very much like the jam that it is. Calvary also has a little Black Sabbath and a little Led Zeppelin over the first few minutes, again prior to either band having released any music, before it moves into a kind of combination of Moricione/Spaghetti Western and blues rock, which I really liked, giving it a cinematic kind of atmosphere. And Happy Trails feels quite throwaway, which I guess was intentional, but it doesn’t really add much. I wasn’t particularly enamoured on first listen, and I’m not really into the Who Do You Love suite, and there is a fair amount of acid rock self indulgence throughout, but I really like the version of Mona and found myself being won over by Calvary, the Morricone, film sound track feel being very effective if it does lean a little towards pomposity at times. That’s enough to give it a 3, I liked it more than some of the other late 60s blues rock albums, and I’d certainly come back and give side 2 another listen. 🐎🐎🐎 Playlist submission: Mona
It is a rule of nature that nobody likes guitar noodling, apart from the noodlers themselves. But you know what, I actually kind of dug this. That can only mean that it was in fact me who recorded this album; all despite never having touched an electric guitar in my life. For that feat alone, this album deserves three stars in my book.
I enjoyed this way more than I thought I would. I'm not into jam bands. And these guys can't sing. I'm not entirely sure they are very good guitarists. And yet I found quite a bit of this album entrancing—the spacey bits, not the more traditional noodley bits. When they were doing kind of standard jammy stuff I was bored. In fact, I skipped through half of the second song. But that third tune (in the Who Do You Love suite) was incredible. The noise and swooping feedback totally won me over. I'm sure Sonic Youth is a fan of this album. Some of this stuff even reminded me of the best of Miles Davis' 70s fusion work. These four dudes had a real chemistry together. And while I didn't enjoy all of this, I did admire their commitment to go OUT THERE as well as their patience to let these jams rise and fall (and fall and fall) and trusting the audience to hang in there with them.
It's ok. Just fine. Don't know why I had to listen to it though. I'm from the SF Bay Area and never heard of Quicksilver Messenger Service before.
A live album of long, "psychedelic," mostly instrumental jams. These guys grew up alongside the Grateful Dead, and I rate both bands about the same, which is to say, "I'm not stoned enough to enjoy this."
No. 229/1001 What Do You Love Pt. 1 3/5 When You Love 3/5 Where You Love 1/5 How You Love 2/5 Which Do You Love 2/5 What Do You Love Pt. 2 3/5 Mona 2/5 Maiden of the Cancer Moon 3/5 Calvary 2/5 (2x) Happy Trails 2/5 Average: 2,27 Didn't enjoy this one.
Too much drugs, too little talent.
Initially I thought this sounded awful, terribly recorded. Then I realized this is a live album, which doesn't make it sound any better, but explains why it sounds like that. So, the whole first side is just them jamming around a Bo Diddly tune and then play a handful of other songs on the second. I'm sorry, I'm just too sober to engage in any of this. What a mess.
Plenty of guitar, but not much I really got into. Long, long periods of instrumental work that just didn't do it for me at all.
Never heard of them and there’s probably a reason for that. Nothing interesting at all on this album. I hate me a live album and this barely even constituted as background noise… yawn
If a messenger turned up at my door and delivered this, I think I would punch them square in the jaw.
lol drugs must have been good
"This is truly exciting and groundbreaking work" is what I would say if I listened to an album that wasn't boring blues guitar noodling.
What if a bunch of guys who aren’t great players, and who have no musical ideas, crucified Bo Diddly, and then followed that up with pointless meandering for what felt like six hours. And then a drunk sang a version of Happy Trails so bad, you’ll be praying to fall off your horse and get trampled.
can't wait to never hear this again
Even by 60s jam band standards, this one was giant pretentious steaming noodly jizzbridge of wank.
Self indulgent as hell.
my heart sank when i saw this record and my fears were justified, a very sorry collection of smelly 60s noodling
Exactly like being in your brother's weird friend's basement. Can't say I ever had a good time there............
Oh man, I find this whole album really irritating. It's all about the self-indulgent guitar solos and it just sounds like boring and annoying dad rock to me. I don't know this band already so sorry if they're really important and popular haha.
Some kinda cool instrumental bits but this is def a bottom 20% album
An uninspiring cover of the much-covered Who do You Love that morphs into what sounds like a post-concert jam and goes on much longer than it should.
I spent most of this album hoping for it to end
Side 1, a saga-length cover of a Bo Diddley song, is incredible. I'd not heard of this album before, and I feel certain it will be in rotation for me long into the future.
Hell yeah, late '60s jam band rock and roll; I love this stuff.
Never heard of this before but it was great!
Wow sorprendida, fantástico, lo quiero en vinilo o cd
Got sucked into this right from the first note. Kind of made me think of I’m in your mind fuzz by king gizzard with the wobbly guitars and how the tracks blend together. So good. I need to listen to more pyschadelic rock
It's been a while. The floaty, not sure what they're doing next bits are my favourites.
Quicksilver Messenger Service may not be as big as The Who, Rolling Stones, The Doors, Beach Boys, Grateful Dead, and all the other legacy 60s acts, but they are firmly just as important as they are. Psychedelic rock took a lot from the blues, where QMS took more influence in classical which made them stand out in the rather lavish SF Psychedelic scene. The band members themselves never really sought out being big personalities and tended to stick towards their music. Happy Trails is a good capture of the band live at their finest, where the psychedelic part of psychedelic music/rock really shows off. QMS doesn't really have a standout album, mainly their debut and this and a greatest hits album or so. But if you were there, in the 60s, they were absolutely one of THE bands to see that people raved about. Though their music kept going, other music genres and niches outgrew them past the 70s, especially within their own genre with the Grateful Dead outgrew them in overall popularity and influence. Quicksilver Messenger Service still has that precious spot in history as one of the more focal bands of the late 60s San Francisco music scene.
Sounds a lot like Derek and the Dominos. Very Eric Clapton style guitar parts. Very good!
i like the grateful dead more because i love throwing on a messy fun set and luxuriating in it for 3 hours but this is perfect for encapsulating that into a tight studio album, which the dead of course were famously not great at
Well with the listen too. Never come across this album so will listen again later.
This was surprisingly good! I thought it'd be more country, more singing - nope, a lot of instrumentals, great music. I'm giving it a 5, fuck it.
Me gustó. 5/5
It's whatever 3/5
Very great, psychedelic. 5?
I have always loved this album. It's a fantastic musical ride. I own a bootleg copy on CD that arrived from Russia wrapped in brown paper and tied with hemp twine. And I bought that shit on Amazon! A total 5!
The many meditations on “who do you love?” were probably the favorites of very high journalism students, but kind of test the patience of most sober people. Overall though, it’s a vibe of a record with a some really cool tracks.
I think there's some rule that whenever I judge ahead of time and think I won't enjoy an album, it turns out to be much better than expected! I was surprised by the date on this one. Some really bangin stuff - a few places where it felt a bit nothingy, but it would always build in a really stunning way. Bops throughout, from the last place I expected!
I’m pretty familiar with this album, and I enjoyed revisiting, as I hadn’t heard it for probably a decade. Jam oriented psychedelic rock, reminiscent of the Dead in many ways. There isn’t anything particularly spectacular about this album, but it helps capture the zeitgeist of the late 1960s. Live music with plenty of jams, such an integral part of that era. Rating a 5 to level out so many negative reviews.
It would’ve been better as a concert film, but regardless, it’s wonderful. Groovy, dynamic, artistic, I’ll definitely come back to this.
A live album, the first track, "Who Do You Love Suite", which would have occupied the whole of the first side of the original vinyl album, is a 25-minute cover of Bo Diddley's "Who Do You Love?" in classic 1960's Psychedelic Rock / Acid Rock style. A great album.
I'm not even finished listening to it and I'm giving it five stars and putting it on the playlist for when I go up to the cottage with my girl to get real high and f*** all weekend
Tasty tasty psychedelic rock! This album has been one of my favorites since my deadbeat school buddies listened to it getting high. Amazing guitar work, joyful jamming. Sure, a bit self-indulgent but I put myself in the shoes of the grooving hippies who got to see John Cippolina live. The man definitely deserves a spot on this list, and this album (especially side 1) shows him off at his finest. Favorite tracks - When You Love