Heroes is the best known song from this album, probably because it also the only one really worthy. The rest are quite chaotic, without coherence, and not very enjoyable. Exception are Moss garden and Neukoln, with a more Zen, easy style. rate: 5/10

Not of fan of the pair; never sat down to listen to them. I probably already knew half of the songs, and listening to the album was a really pleasant experience, even if they are not what I usually listen to. 8/10

A few well known classics like Proud Mary, and many less known sons, some of them also good. 7/10

Michelle, Norwegian wood, Drive my car, and other easy listening song of different stiles. 7/10

A little bit bland, but has a couple of interesting tunes. 6/10

Funky and catchy. 6/10

Incredibly diverse album, and even though no song really stands out, it has no weak links in it. Delightful to listen to. 8/10

I usually enjoy orchestra-enriched rock, but this cooperation doesn't seam to work. They sound disconnected to the point that I had the feeling I was listening to some Metallica live recording while watching the old Mission Impossible series. I can't recommend it 4/10

A fresh breeze in a warm day. The album might seam at first just another guy with a guitar, but it provides a really enjoyable experience. 7/10

A timeless classic with a few incredible successes, including one of my favourite Man in the mirror. Other minor songs might have not aged that well, but the album as a whole is consistent. 7/10

Rather short album that is a bit more than just Hotel California. 6/10

I wanted to like this album, but I did not enjoy some of the rather dissonant and chaotic, and the rest were just ok. 5/10

Not a fan of the genre; can't say I enjoyed it. 2/10

Could not finish it. There were maybe 2 songs that were ok; had a hard time listening to most of the others. 1/10

Raw, frenetic, powerful. Yet, personally, the Stratocaster sound and the noisiness gets on my nerves. 4/10

24 songs, no waste. 8/10

Some powerful 90s punk. Highly recommendable, but only if you are into that kind of music. I am not. 5/10

4 tracks of very dynamic Jazz. I probably cannot appreciate it as much as it deserves. 6/10

Not Elton Jhon's best. 6/10

Fuzzy, Magic, Noisy, and sometimes a bit much. 6/10

Always pleasant and uplifting 7/10

A rather short and simple Reggae album. Not bad; not great. 6/10

Twisty, jumpy, catchy. Not bad if you like 50's music. 6/10

Not their best, nor their worse. 6/10

Really not my shite, but I went through the entire thing, so I guess it was not that bad. 4/10

Different, variated, interesting... but didn't resonate with me. 4/10

Somehow not as good as I remember it. 5/10

Didn't like them much in the 90s. Still don't. 5/10

Much punk. 5/10

I though about passing on this album, mainly because the genre has never been my cup of tea, but hey, nigga has rhythm! Glad to stand corrected. 7/10

Raw, disconnected, basic. Sounds as if each of the 4 focused on their own instrument ignoring what the rest are doing. 2/10

Reminded me a lot to the Beatles. But I guess I'm a bit older now. 6/10

Bland. Irrelevant. 3/10

Easy listening. 5/10

Laid back and easy, not very interesting though. 5/10

No. 2/10

I can't believe The Passenger is almost 50 years old. The rest of the album didn't age that well though. 7/10

So so. 6/10

80s, Funk & Soul. Only for fans. 4/10

I don't think I new any of the songs. Not bad. 6/10

Chaotic, full of cacophony. But it also lots of positive energy. 5/10

Bland. Very bland. 3/10

Great tunes, awesome energy. Not a fan of live disks though; sound is not the best, lots of talking. 7/10

A beautiful, timeless gem. 8/10

I guess I was not in the mood for this kind of music 3/10

I expected more. 5/10

Not bad 7/10

Some really nice tunes. 7/10

Bland. 3/10

Not bad. 6/10

Interesting 7/10

Average 6/10

Much more than just pop music. 8/10

Annoying imposed voice. Awful pitch. Yes, there that song everyone nows, and some of the songs are fine, but it was actually hard to get through to the end of the album. 5/10

OK? I guess? I wouldn't say it belongs here though. 4/10

Messy, punky, noisy. An acquired taste. 5/10

A couple of well known songs, yet not Led Zeppelin's best 6/10

Brilliant 8/10

Interesting, pleasant, but not involving. 5/10

Different, heterogenous, interesting. 7/10

Carefully crafted. Insipid. 5/10

Very long, repetitive songs that seam to only serve as excuse to never-ending solos by different instruments. I mean, it is not bad, makes for good background music. 5/10

Power album, if perhaps a little bit too homogeneous. 8/10

Haven't listened to them before. Reminded me of the Rolling Stones. Didn't like them either. 3/10

I'm not sure what I was expecting, but really didn't find anything worth this list. 3/10

This is not Tortoise, but Torture. 20 minutes song that is not good even as elevator music? The rest is just OK, sometimes, but nothing more. 1/10

Never heard of them before. Not bad. Forgettable. 5/10

The songs are quite plain and rather boring. It has a nice positive energy though. I guess they are in the list for being among the firsts to use this style? 5/10

I tried to like it, but I can get myself to enjoy this kind of music. It just feels flat and repetitive, musically uninteresting. 3/10

The recordings are not the best quality, but the songs have a certain charm that, together with the clicking language, make for a quite interesting and entertaining result. 7/10

I can understand why, and even agree, why they are in this list. All I can say is that it did not resonate with me. 5/10

Happily surprised. Warm and homey. 7/10

Physically painful to listen to. 2/10

Folky, Bluesy, old-school guitar picking. Surprisingly pleasant. 8/10

A little bit too psychedelic for my taste. 3/10

Disc that seams to be taken from the late 70s. Too "crispy" for me. 3/10

Can't objectively grade it; just not cut for me. 2/10

Incredibly influential album that keeps rolling like new. Great riffs, melodies, and lyrics. What's more to ask? 9/10

Not a fan of live albums. It's not bad, just not great. 6/10

Light, Beatlesy, enjoyable for the most part. 6/10

Mostly instrumental, focused on but not limited to the percussion. I would guess it had a huge influence in the future of funk, disco, hip-hop, and so many other genres. I enjoyed it more that I would have guessed. 7/10

A bit insipid. 5/10

Perhaps U2's best album, even if a bit uneven. It has a special place in my heart. 8/10

Pleasant background music. 5/10

Too focused on parody and too little on the music. I'm sure they had a blast though. 2/10

No. 1/10

Not sure why, I was expecting more. 4/10

Not their best. 6/10

Not a fan of the band, but I recognise their relevance and importance. The album has one, maybe two well known songs. The rest are absolutely forgettable. 4/10

Can't say I like the band, but this album is quite interesting. It includes studio and live recordings, well known to more obscure songs, and genres that go from pop/disco to some sort of punk. Still, not something I would choose. 6/10

It is not that it's bad, it's just bland. 3/10

Didn't know much of the album. Nothing surprising though. It's fine. 6/10

Funky Rap, not too shabby. If you can look past the lyrics, that is. 3/10