OK. A couple of well-worn classics. Not sure that I'd put this album on repeat.

This isn't music.

Fine. Probably important for its time.

A true classic. Part of the fabric by now.

Very good. Clear how it inspired the music of it's time as well as subsequently.

Good. A classic? Solid 3 to 4.

Fine example of early hard rock.

Pretty big for its day. Sure to have made an impact. Music is fine, but I'm not singing along. Adding - it does have Mr. Blue Sky which was huge.

Meh. . .If you like this sort of thing.

It's alright, even approaching really good. Tends to be musical w/o too much showmanship. Def. a 3, maybe a 4.

A true classic. The material from which all subsequent rock was created.

OK. Approaching modern techno. Very repetitive.

Fine example of metal. Not to my current taste, but it is music and represents its genre truthfully. A 3 because it doesn't suck.

WTF. This is laughable.

Very good. May be a "concept album," but everything holds together and the music is relatable while varied. Def. a three, prob. a four.

Simply excellent. Maintains energy without falling into incomprehensibility. Wish I had discovered this album earlier. Five stars.

Part of the background sound of western society. At least a three.

It's fine. Not offensive. Maybe great for it's time, but sounds like every other 80s band.

Fine album. Don't know that it rises to extraordinary in as much as I don't know the genre. A solid 3 for being understandable as music and not offensive.

Not bad. Not great, seminal, or classic, but not bad. A three for a middle-of-the-road album.

Not good. Noisy and not melodic.

It's fine. Talking Heads have always been their own thing - something different, but not so different that people won't listen to them. Solid middle-of-the-road.

Good. Solid album. Prob. a 4.

Unimpressive. Muddy, undistinguished sound. Probably well suited to become elevator music or some other background sound track that no one really cares about. It's not objectionable, but I'd give it a "2" just because it's useless.

Not sure that Judas Priest is objectively better than any other hard rock band, but their style appeals to me more than others. A 4 for personal preference.

Solid. A three.

Not for me.

Wow. Great stuff. Don't know why I haven't heard of them before. Solid 4 for this album.

Good stuff. Solid 3.

Strong 80's sound. They don't move the ball down the field musically, but it's fine for listening. Solid 3.

Unique in its time. A 3.

Typical of the singer and style (or she led the way and it has become typical). Fine for what it is - trite and predictable. A three just because it's not actually bad.

Fine. A three. Feel like some of this has been picked up in the popular media over the last few years???

Unremarkable. Nearly experimental in its manic switching of forms. A two is probably fair.

Meh. A three.

Occasionally good. It did move things forward. A three.

For me, a two.

Moved the needle. Innovative while still being good. Basic, yet complex. A definite 4.

Nice. Very like Florence + The Machine. A three.

Noise. Solid 1 on a scale of 5.

Can't believe that this ever made it out of the garage. One.

Could easily be mistaken for Elvis Costello.

Simply a classic.

Sounds good. Too bad that time has made it part of the background.