Highly Evolved

Yeahhhh very much not my thing. They feel like a cheap parody of a rock band.

Wow this is just awful, really awful. This is even worse than I remember it being. It's musically a dribble of piss.

Hard rock. Pass.

100% background buzz to me. Wikipedia says "The Vines were frequently compared to Nirvana". I totally disagree.

two albums in a row where i’m like. yeah this is music. not much more.

1/5

Listened to this while walking home in a severe thunderstorm at 3am and got pissed that I might get hit by lightning while listening to this bullshit

1+ Stars (3/15)

Naming a record containing 45 mins of the most run of the mill early 2000's rock music 'Highly Evolved' is either beautfiully tongue in cheek or willfully ignorant

No

They're like the modern day Beatles. Shite, if you will

Boring.

trash can

Why do I get the impression, that most of the 'Indie'-Bands are trying to learn their instruments. I think there is a cause for their indipendence - most of the major labels don't want to take the risk. This Album gives me this impression. Beside of learning their instruments, they are seeking verry hard any direction - from pop - balads in some kind of Beatles - style to shouting punk tunes. for me it's absolute clear, that they have nothing to do with the 1001 list

Boring at best. This is an inconsistent mishmash of styles and it's not very well executed. Found myself getting annoyed with these guys. Even after a few listens it never really clicked. I have it on CD, but I won't bother taking it downstairs from the loft.

Highly Evolved Get Free

This entire album just sounds like a grunge record from Nirvana and The Smashing Pumpkins released 10 years too late. Listeners should just stop fucking about and go listen to the real thing. The Vines bring nothing of themselves or originality to this album and therefore it does not belong on this list. There were plenty of bands that were releasing original and vital records in the naughties and this is not one of them; and frankly this lists' record of selecting records from the naughties has been utter shite.

This album is a good reminder of why the British considered throwing tea into a river as one of the highest forms of violence one could commit. Bland, uninteresting record that's indistinguishable from the plethora of other British rock acts from this period who were all trying to be the modern Beatles. There's a song called Mary Jane and guess what the fuck it's about.

why does this guy like pink floyd so much jesus christ don’t know if i even finished this album it was so boring i wanted to kill myself some of the slower songs are not bad, but it doesn’t make up for how basic and unremarkable the rest of this garbage is wish it didn’t suck as much as it did finding very little redeemable or interesting things about any of this ok i’m calling it i don’t think i’ll come back to this, and if i did, i wouldn’t even remember the name of the song i liked the most and i don’t want to wade through audio feces to find gold

no no

Get Free was okay but this was boring at the time and hasn't got more interesting with age. Possibly the low point of early 00s NME barrel scraping - at least the Libertines had the occasional melody .

Ok

Like a lesser Stone Temple Pilots... which is like saying, "Worse than sucks."

A while ago 1001 generated Ash:1977. This album is more garage rock and has even worse songwriting.

Not really my type of music. Favorite track: Factory

Langweiliger Rock

Unbearable. Generic early 2000 indie rock. Hated it back then still hate it now

Rock muy basicon de los 2000. Bajísima calidad, todo ruido. Un Green Day pedorrisimo.

I tried to find a redeeming quality in this music. Too bitter I lost 45 min of my life. 1/5

forgettable

Not in the mood

Meh

Det här är ju bra trist.

Highly dull.

Hey album, what are you doing on this list? No one, certainly not the critics (4.1 by Pitchfork), finds you remarkable. No problem you exist and that some persons like you, but to me you're just another 1.5 hours (two spins) waisted by very mediocre rock. Now I feel like a bully, but I'm just being honest.

The only comparison to Nirvana they deserve is that I'd rather take a shotgun to the head than listen to this worse-than-Bush grunge parody'

Oh man this record rubs me the wrong way. Its way too shouty and quite annoying.

Highly bad. Been six days since I heard this and the memory has the sensational impact of a stale eggy fart.

Take a slice of Nirvana, cook it in a Britpop sauce (part Blur, part Oasis), sprinkle with abundant portions of psychedelia and early 2000s garage rock (à la The Strokes), and what you get is a predictable "indie" success at the time this one came out. The thing is, none of those great ingredients gel or interact in any sort of cohesive or satisfactory manner in *Highly Evolved*. I felt it at the time, and I feel it even more now. Worse, there are quite a few embarassing moments in this LP. The verses of "Factory" sound like Paul McCartney circa 1975 playing a ska song. Should I really need to say more? I mean *really*??? Two things ruin this record overall: first the transitions between the different sorts of songs are absolutely jarring. Sometimes topsy-turvy albums have their charms. Here, unfortunately, the stylistic 180-degree turns are just awkward. Yet the *real* problem is that the songs are themselves pretty lame, even taken on their own. The chord successions are unoriginal and predictable. The compositions are boring. Long tracks have grating vocal lines that meander aimlesly, and short tracks feel half-cooked. Only the rockers "Get Free" and "Highly Evolved" are fully enjoyable--mostly through the energy that's displayed in those Nirvana and The Strokes rip-offs... Too bad those two decent cuts are not enough to save this record from disaster. On their strength, I could have been led to believe the album was somewhat even remotely interesting. Glad I didn't fall into that trap at the time. And also glad that I could listen to that thing again. Sometimes, as you get older and broaden your tastes, you end up changing your mind about some acts. But not in here, and not me. 1/5 for the purposes of this list of "essential" albums. Which translates to something between a 4/10 and a 6/10 grade for more general purposes, such as assessing the hard work made a professional band. Hey, it's still better than the 1 or 2/10 mark I would give to Limp Bizkit, at least. Next please. 😏 Number of albums left to review: 533 Number of albums from the list I find relevant enough to be mandatory listens: 224 Albums from the list I *might* include in mine later on: 108 Albums from the list I will certainly *not* include in mine (many others are more essential to me): 136 (including this one)

Nothing in it really caught my ear