Starts off kind of fun.. I kind of like big iron. But really quite monotone and samey throughout the album. Very easy to start listening to the album but actually quite difficult after a few tracks

1970! Such early metal! VERY bluesy. Some harp even, but it actually feels right. Guitar tone is so hollow somehow. Mid scooped and treble boosted? NIB slaps. Evil woman though - surely it's parody! Warning sounds like Dave Soper - it's the kind of progy epic that I didn't really know existed back then though. I made the mistake of following with led zeppelin iii which would always make it look bad, but I had a lot of fun

Very disappointed when the album cover appeared in this app - destroyed a lot of enthusiasm for this project. Starts with 3 or so huge hits, will that help? The hits were actually painful. I guess they're so overplayed and negatively associated for me. Slightly more interested in the rest of the album. Find myself wondering if there was an age when I would have heard this and been interested. It feels like it has a sound that I would have appreciated as a teenager maybe? The angsty vocals might be the thing that bothers me the most. Some of the tones are kind of post punk, so maybe it is the vocal style that makes me feel like I would never have got into them? Slught reminder of "the music" but they had funky self awareness. Is it the pompousity that I'm reacting to & lack of self awareness?

Those guitar tones are rich with cheese. I was excited to see the cover after u2 but then started listening and realised how it's not 100% my thing either. I'm getting more of a thin lizzy feel than I expected. So far I like them so much more though. Funny how I feel able to see past the sexist lyrics in thin lizzy better. There is a lot of riffing - wonder if teenage me would have been more into it? Basically fine cheese rock

Really interested to actually spend some time listening to Steely Dan. Surprised that I know do it again. Such a distinctive sound, I can't figure out quite why. The piano bass and drums seem very tight together despite a lot of fancy rhythmic things happening. Of course there are harmonised guitar solos but also tiny licks and fills that seem to be harmonised too, as well as almost all vocal parts. So many layers and yet it all sounds very together. I kind of feel like a couple of listens today won't be enough to figure out how I feel about this record. Definitely very interesting.

A 1997 Dylan record. What was he doing then? Exciting. Reminds me of Tom Waits records from that time with beautiful songwriting and that raspy old man voice. Classic forms, beautiful ballads, feeling of comfort in their songwriting skin. The voice feels like a natural continuation for both Waits and Dylan despite them sounding quite different earlier in their careers. Make you feel my love - is this the original record for that song? I thought it was older than late 90s (thought mj did a version earlier? Did he even do a version?)

First one I really don't know about & what to expect. Sounds like maybe it was a heavy influence for mainstream pop around the time, but this feels cooler and more sincere. Probably harsh to say a poor imitation massive attack. What's up with the katakana on the album cover? Superdry style?

Cool record. First time listening to it since 'you'll hear it' doing facing you. That helped me understand Keith Jarets thing a bit more. Some really beautiful transitions between parts. Harmonicaly complex, completely improvised, but often doesn't feel like jazz - the swing I guess. Must listen to it more.

Ooh what's this. Zero knowledge or expectations. Cool start. It's like Brian eno goes metal. Nice ambient stuff. Really interesting. I'll likely listen again but certainly not once a week every week! I'll stick with darker ambient feel. A beat did break out at one point though

Oh right. I did mean to listen to this more since people at uni were obsessed. I remember from the few listens I gave it that it's not my thing, but I'm really interested to listen with a different perspective now. Disappointed. Takes me back to a time where I felt like the people around me were obsessed with this luke warm pop indie stuff and I felt like I had to be into that too. A boy called Doris feelings though. I've never really been a lyrics guy so maybe I'm missing out on incredible Pete Doherty poetry.

Ah sweet. A huge name I've not really listened to. Expecting something solid. Solid seems absolutely right. Really nice relaxed feel. Cool songwriting, nice diatonic feeling chord progressions. Tones are reverby in a really interesting way. I feel like this sound has been appropriated for some lukewarm indie that I really don't like but the cool feel here reassures me that's not what's happening here. Bass sound in particular feels like it has been used elsewhere for evil. About you has an interesting quirk on Spotify. I wonder if it's part of the track on all formats? Seems like the first 0.2 seconds of the track has been put at the end. Like a chill ramones.

Nice. I'm excited. This should be good. Wow - there are 4 or 5 huge hits on here. This was so good. It hit just right today and the quality is so high. I think I'm going to listen to this regularly

Cool. I think that I like talking heads but now I'm wondering if I've ever listened to an album through. It's so good. Right from the outset. The first few tracks are absolute bangers. Slightly annoyed by the deluxe edition content at the end. I was actually disappointed when once in a lifetime came on because I was enjoying the unfamiliar awesome dance tunes before that.. But then I realised that once in a lifetime is also an incredible track when you let yourself really take it in. Reminds me of that dance indie trend from the 00s (css, the rapture, whatever else) but the quality and feel here is so much better. I think possibly when I was collecting cds I did have the first talking heads record - definitely didn't enjoy it like enjoyed this today.

Cool. Something brand new to me. Feels like a mix of hip hop and post rock. Some really nice atmosphere. Not sure if there's as much movement/development as I would like? One that I'd like to return to to make my mind up clearer about it - a couple of listens in the day wasn't really enough

More black sabbath! My first repeated artist. I enjoyed the first one more than I expected and this one has hits. Looking forward to it. The sounds feel more dated in this one - maybe just because it's got the more famous material on and so I've heard it in clubs etc before comparing against newer stuff. Need to keep both headphones in - it's panned wide. Those hits are really great. War pigs in particular. I don't think I had as good a time listening to this as the other Sabbath record though. Maybe just because that one surprised me more.

Before: Woot. Miles. It's not one of the miles records I've listened to a lot either. Should be fun After: a really interesting stage for miles. Not my favourite but still great. More energetic than [x]'in with records, and much much more than the modal stuff. The tone is still there though. It feels a little bit more arranged. Slightly closer to a count basie band or Ellington etc. There is still mikes' slightly classical feel somehow even though it's quite bebopy.

Before: interesting. No preconceptions. After: that's really cool. Straight up fun rock record. Can imagine returning to it like the datsuns, thin lizzy, the darkness as just a fun highly listenable rock out record Dated ofc. Interested to know what the band name is about. Then songs like good head feel a bit off. Prince of the rodeo and don't say motherfucker, motherfucker are both particularly brilliant

Before: Mid career hot chip - interesting. I might have expected their breakthrough to be on here. I don't think I ever heard this one. After :Oof when don't deny your heart gets funky! That track in general is awesome. VERY high quality. I enjoyed it more than I remember enjoying their two more popular early albums. This will be my default hot chip relistening album now. I'm never sure about hot chip ballads - the couple at the end of this record haven't clicked for me yet. Memories of seeing them at Glastonbury earlier in their career. Their sound was full and funky and I think this record captures that better than what I've heard before.

Before: an artist I've wanted to go back and listen to after learning more about well crafted rap. Don't think I've ever heard this one but my memories are hazy. During: I would have zero time for this guy and his edge lord antics if this was current. I think I'm able to contextualise it though. I don't know actually - this is actively annoying me quite a lot. Saying edgy stuff is one thing, but them for him to dismiss the criticism that he's getting for it lands rough. After: the content and the attitude are super annoying. It's really difficult to see past. A lot of the production really didn't age well too. There are some really impressive schemes though. Really good long schemes that feel very synced and lyrical and rhythmic. He's a talented guy.. Just an idiot. My name is is quite brilliant really. Great idea to rap over labi cifre and very well executed (except for some horrible lyrics)

Before: cool. Only familiar previously with the title track. The title track is an awesome piece of music. The rest of the record was always going to struggle to keep up. I'm a bit disappointed at the rate of the fall off though. For a brief moment I thought I might get a bluesy Jimmy smith, but definitely not. So much less energy and not really pulling off a cool feel in a compelling way to me

Really interesting. On first listen I feel like it's alternating between early smiths style jangle pop and gang of four or even fugazi. There is definitely something about that guitar and bass tone that feels smithsy. Something about the playing too! I'm now getting interpol! (obviously the later acts will be influenced by these guys)

First one I have on vinyl. I'm also going this evening to sing Simon and garfunkel songs with chorus small groups. One that I'm quite familiar with but probably haven't really listened to enough. It's really good. The huge tracks are huge. The tracks you don't think of so much are excellent too. Must listen to more.

Oh. Not elephant or white blood cells (wonder if it's my own bias thinking that they're more important?) Doorbell is so good. I feel like the rest of the record struggles to keep up. The last track is a classic white stripes country ballad - really nice work. Was this the first time he used that kind of octave pedal sound? It's more electronic & modern than I remember from earlier records.

Cool. I've been meaning to go back to this. 2hrs+ what the flip! I like this project because I like the concept of an album - 35 to 50 min as a continuous statement. I am less up for such a long best of type deal. Will be tricky to take in in one sitting as I hope to for most other records. Not my favourite string arrangements. Often feels like just one or two interesting harmonies or melodic lines added to each section. This was a lot of Metallica to listen to. The voice grated on me a bit. Basically interesting though.

Awesome. Love it. Harmonies seem a little bit sparser than in his other work - leaving a bit more open to the listeners feeling. It's a very good trio

Cool. I only know the hits and don't know those all that well. I think I'll enjoy this. Washed over me just a little bit first time. Maybe the production isn't 100% for me. Enjoying it a little more second time - there is some good funky stuff here. Africano slaps.

Nice. A late one though - this isn't from the era of hypermusic etc. Curious to see what she was doing. The first track is EXCELLENT. Such beautiful sounds and arranged so skillfully. Feels a little like a follow up to kid a. Can't think of a more exciting description from me.

So good. Really high quality. I think I will enjoy relistening regularly. Much more beatles sound and influence than I've noticed before in queen. Paul McCartney style I guess. Some quite progy bits too though. You can hear how they influenced muse. (and the darkness.) Love of my life is really excellent. Borap too of course. Layered guitars and the guitar technique are really impressive in parts.

My heart sank a little on seeing a pop record, but I don't know - I think I'm going to enjoy it. Noticed that she was working with different producers before I read it on the notes. There are some really different production ideas going on here and I find it a little bit jarring. It doesn't hang together as a single bit of work. More like a best of I guess. Some tracks hit much harder for me. Drums on don't you remember are ass. They feel like westlife 90s drums and I think this songwriting and this artist deserve better. The vocals are SO high in the mix. I tried turning it up to hear some interesting bass playing and the vocals were getting painfully loud. I could personally do with fewer vocal flourishes - I guess I'm not the target market in this respect. The little Richard high notes for e.g. Just lose some of the sincerity for me a lot of the time. Saying all this there is some high high quality songwriting here. I can also think of ways of delivering it that I would find more objectionable. I can absolutely understand why it's as popular as it is, I just find that it's not what I'm looking for from a great album due to the pop production and lack of consistent earnest messaging due to that (for me) Set fire to the rain is a good enough song to be enjoyable despite the very vocal heavy mix. I'll be waiting slaps. Simpler songwriting and less flashy than almost anything on the record, but the whole thing works so well. Holy f*, I've just read that most of these tracks were preferred to a Rick Rubin produced set of sessions! Goes to show how different tastes are. I think I'd actually be really interested in the Rubin record. (I'll be waiting is a Rubin one.)

An unexpected delight. I forgot that I have a relationship with this album. I used to listen to it quite a lot in the 00's. Great guitar led songwriting. Some excellent bass writing. These guys were so much better before they learned to sing in English

Really cool sounds. First track had me a little bit scared it was going to be violent femmes style nonchalant indie singing, but the guitars already reassured me. I'm guessing this is argued as the start of emo by some people? Love just about all of the guitar sounds. They are so bright and yet all of the potential jangle is caught up in fuzz and screaming overtones. I will look up their guitar setups.

Cool record. Passed me by slightly first listen. From second listen I hear that there are some really funky sounds in there and some good soul like songwriting even if it does feel a little bit simplistic in parts

Beautiful album. The title track is one of my favourite songs in the world. It's just a beautiful melody harmonised in a really interesting way. Previously I had thought that the rest of the album fell short, but today I learned to appreciate it a little more. There's some really good stuff in the same songwriting vein as the title track. I still think maybe I prefer harvest, but it doesn't have to be either/or!

Really tough to rate it. The message, she's fresh and it's nasty are awesome tracks and I love the vibe and what this record has done to popular music.. But there's a lot of poor music on this record to my modern ears and sensibilities. Maybe a rare case of a record that I don't think is good but might return to listen to.

Delightful surprise. I started off thinking I was just being treated to some standard 90s trip hop but the more I listened the more I was rewarded. The more Indian influenced tracks really got my attention. Nadia and Imigrant are both really excellent. Then after reading a little about the concept I'm sold. I'm going to be coming back to this.

I find it super tough to get into double albums. This has some great songs on - I didn't realise so many of his hits were on one double album together. It's tricky to get a feel for the whole work though when it's so long. I think I like Elton John when he's creating really interesting hooky melodies and harmonising them simply but beautifully (I think he does some interesting chord voicings sometimes!) I like it less when he leans into rock and roll clichés. I kind of want to give it more time but realistically I don't know when I'm going to feel like listening to a double album.

Very cool sounds. I'll need to listen more to figure out how I really feel about it. I was expecting electronic and was slightly surprised when I heard jangly guitar. It does seem primarily electric though. I think I like it more when they lean into experimental electronic feel and less when it's more like indie pop singles.

Really great record. I want to listen to it more to make my mind up and maybe away from the context of ozzys passing. It has a little bit of that surprising blend of distorted guitars with acoustic instruments from the self titled album. It also has some of that tighter, more polished, more metal sound like paranoid. There's a little bit more sound design stuff I think. Changes unfortunately reminds me of Kelly ozbourne's pop career.

The nearness of you is great. Why wasn't this all standards? The singing is beautiful and the instrumentation and arrangement is nice enough.. But it's all quite bland. It's pleasant and it must have sold a huge amount, but it doesn't feel like an interesting record to me.

Cool record. I spent the morning thinking it was a little bit bloated and sprawling, then I noticed that spotify only had an extended version and that I was listening to a bunch of bonus tracks that ruined the focus. Good to hear pure 60s pop (/rock and roll) without the Beatles and guitar obsession. Anyone who had a heart is great. Feels slightly like Sam Cooke in some sense. Something about the vocal production (is it distorting?) All does feel like a good singer has been given some "good songs" to sing though - nothing really intriguing going on maybe?

Didn't get a single focused listen through (listened a couple of times but interrupted and distracted.) definitely want to give it more chance. There is something about her voice that (unfairly) signposts to me that this is peak pop and therefore hasn't really been made with art in mind and isn't worth my focus - want to avoid preconceptions like that for this project so want to try again.

What a beautiful beautiful album. I didn't discover anything new to me today but it was a real pleasure to listen and focus on this again. Side 1 swings surprisingly hard for such slow changes. It's amazing to hear Coltrane and Evans leaving so much space. There is so much listening going on! Then side two is just so poetic and beautiful (or I guess the modal ballads at the end of each side.) It really does sound like they are feeling as one and just putting that feeling directly into improvised music together

This was great. Took me a kitt bit of effort personally to see past some of the sound design choices. It all feels very 80s and very metal in a try hard way. That voice is a very distinct sound too and when there are so many strong choices it can get hard to really listen to the music itself. So much great progressive imaginative creations though. Yyz is ear catching and then so good. Track 2 is a beautiful progression between something poppier and the avant garde. Never thought before how they must have influenced coheed and cambria.

I previously thought of Depeche mode as sounding dated. I was surprised that I found the production on this to sound pretty fresh and raw and exciting. I'd also never really clicked with their songwriting before but I really enjoyed this album. I think there was a publicity push for their singles collection when I was younger - I thought those singles were okay at the time. In the context of the album I think they sound brilliant. I can see that they (maybe indirectly) influenced bands like Muse, which I really don't think I would have linked before.

Can't quite get on board. In other context I really love that lofi style but here I can't get past it just feeling annoying. Not much notable songwriting that I can discern. Maybe caught me on a bad day.

Very cool. There are times in the past where I would have discounted this out of hand for the "cheesy 80s production style". I'm glad I don't now. I love it. The range of bass sounds are all awesome. Some of that production is kind of cheesy with the pad strings for example. I'm also not crazy about the lyrical style of over the top life and death romance. Brilliant singles though

Brilliant. The singles are all time classics and personally some of the favourite Bowie I knew before listening to this. The other tracks build this smoothly into a really interesting statement. I don't understand how he makes such bold choices in terms of harmony and modulation and yet it sounds so natural.

Really struggled with this. I feel like it lurches clumsily between sounding like whining emo angst and sounding to cool to care. I guess I can't get any realistic sincerity from it. The sounds aren't pretty. They're also not landing for me as low-fi in an effective stylised way that I can hear working. I know that many love them so I guess I'm wrong.

Incredible stuff. How have I managed not to know this band and this album. Such a great sound. So expressive. So rich in diverse references and textures and feelings. 'City, country city' in particular is such a great piece of art. I feel like this should be required listening / a rite of passage in the same way as dark side of the moon is for example.

It's really good. In the context of this great list of really interesting recordings though I'm not sure if it does enough to stand out for me though? Isn't it a pitty is an absolutely incredible song. Who could pick between this and the perfect nina simone version. My sweet lord is great too. There are some other tracks that have some beautiful textures, but across 3 lps I think I want more to grab me.

Just cant seem to get onto it. Can't find anything very interesting to appreciate

I know I'm wrong, but this record sounds like a pub band, writing very forgettable songs, that just happen to have a good guitarist who plays really well and found some really nice tones. (I realise that it's probably because they influenced a style of pub rock band) The guitar comping is fantastic. That's not really enough to save the record for me.

Really good. The production feels kind of dated - I could do without some of 90s guitar effects and tropes. But the songwriting and feel is just so free and direct and un-self-conscious. Love Australia, a design for life, everything must go. All feels more commercial single focused than Holy bible for example and that used to put me off it, but it's all so good.

So difficult to review from a few listens through. It was more extreme than I expected in just about every way. It was funkier, more sexual (verging on perverted), more dated production, more intense, more experimental. I loved so much of it but there were definitely bits that tried my patience.

What an awesome little slice of soul. Super clean, punchy, expensive product. Great playing. Tastefully put together through and through. Interesting lyrical themes.

I am not a fan of this. It's like stone roses but without that grove and musicianship and songwriting and spark. Kind of like oasis but at least they provide a pale imitation of the Beatles at the same time. That just leaves charmless yowling mancunians.

Awesome sounds. A band so in tune with each other creating a raw emotive soundscape. I'm not a fan of the - pretend it's live - gimik.

I used to really love this band and I have a relationship with this album. Possibly was more of a village green guy though? They have some of that beatles pure magic but of course through their own lens. Waterloo sunset is one of the most beautiful pieces of music I know. Unfortunately on the few times I listened through it this time it passed me by a little bit. Makes me want to try their other records again

Cool record. It's a full atmosphere. It's more psychedelic than I realised. There's some great jams and some fantastic bass work. I don't think it's a good sequencing idea to have waterfall followed by backwards waterfall but maybe that was less grating before waterfall was a huge hit? The jangly indie in the middle of the record lost me a little bit.

Reading the Wikipedia it seems like this album is included just out of shear popularity and supposed quality (not a particular significant moment or genre defier or anything else.) Listening to it I just can't figure out why it's so popular. It seems fine, there's some okay songwriting and some skilled if cliche guitar work, but utterly unremarkable. If it wasn't for finding it under this context I would be sure that this was a record just for the Peter Frampton purists.

Beautiful record. Great production. Great songwriting. Great playing. For a fairly chill album there's a lot of great bass work.

Jungle is massive - it's nearly 2 hours long. There are some beautiful textures though. It's much more mature and definitive than I expected.

Reminded me of Jose gonzales in terms of a very simply written slightly lofi strummy guitar and voice record. Didn't quite charm me in the same way though yet I'll have to try again some time.

Cool record. Seems tighter and more focused than 1999 in writing and production. Much less focused in run time though. I need more time to get into a double record

Tough to grade. Maybe I was just harsh this day. Has some brilliant tracks on and I love her voice and the style. I don't think this hangs together all that well as a single coherent album though. The production feels kind of all over the place with a mix of popier sounds, big band, hip hop sounds. I can't find the thread. There are some tracks that don't feel like they fit in and feel a bit b-side as a result

Surprisingly enjoyable. More progy then expected. A bit of melody in with all the chugging. The sound is so difficult though. There's the no bass thing, but also the guitars sound buzzy and paper thin and the drum sounds are like a toy or something.

Love it. Production is so spot on for me. More to my tastes actually than her later albums which I listen to more. Lyrics feel more early career to - less jaded about her music industry experience!

Solid record. Some great songwriting, fun green day pop punk feel and even some innovative new sounds as they branch into more different types of stadium rock. I admire some of the ambition of this record. I have reservations though. I'm not crazy about the progy concept album rhapsody style pieces. I like the ambition but they don't quite land for me and I want green day to be pure green day. The production is also slightly difficult. Guitars and drums sound really great if comically over compressed. Bass gets a bit lost (which is a huge loss to green day!) The vocals are most challenging though. Heavy heavy effects (maybe a bit of autotune?) just take me out of that punky space I want to be in

I found it interesting at first but maybe a little unfocused for me. I couldn't really stick with it through the record

Had a great time with this. Some really interesting modal mixture type of chord sequences and matching beautiful melodies that really pull you in. It all makes the more indulgent drawn out song forms work. Gypsy woman is a regrettable concept and he leans into it hard. We all make mistakes