Violent Femmes by Violent Femmes

Violent Femmes

Violent Femmes

3.5
Rating
29360
Votes
1
4%
2
13%
3
30%
4
32%
5
20%
Distribution

Reviews (page 15 of 15)

Thoroughly unenjoyable

weird in a bad way

Very, very rough, and outside of the lead track surprisingly un-fun and low energy. Their singer is horrible. The usual punk rock playbook is to cover up for lack of ability with manic energy and winking mockery (self + otherwise). They really don't have either - it's just slow, sad, and low-quality. Contrast this with "Fresh Fruit For Rotting Vegetables", which came out around the same time and is also not going to make anyone forget Ludwig van Beethoven. There's barely a track on there clocking over 3 minutes or under 180 bpm, and Jello is at times downright funny. Violent Femmes fall way wide of that mark.

LOL.... no.

Lyrics are bad and vocals are like nails on a chalkboard.

what the fuck

Hier zullen vast liefhebbers voor zijn, maar als je zo zingt win je mijn hart niet 😉

Annoying as hell

Didn't like it at all.

Amateur hour.

A highly irritating album. Mostly because of the vocalist. Twangy guitar, terrible bass sound and no hooks/catchy phrases that ever stood out. No thank you.

Apart from "Blister", this is weak poor music. Not actually bad music, just completely mediocre and weak post-punk. Not sure why it's on the list. Disappointing.

So not my thing

sorry but this music makes my heart hurt.....

Gonna have to pass, even the Crazy cover wasn’t doing it for me.

Wasn’t a fan

What a load of crap

blister in the sun was good, went downhill from there; not really an album for me

Drunk Beatles & Creedence Cover-Band

Average

Oddly familiar