Really, really enjoyed this. I’ve had to endure U2, Metallica, Suede and Tom Waits to get to this. It’s almost been worth it. Almost.
Rating Distribution
Rating Timeline
Taste Profile
Breakdown
By Genre
Top Styles
By Decade
By Origin
Albums
You Love More Than Most
| Album | You | Global | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rip It Up
Orange Juice
|
5 | 2.9 | +2.1 |
|
Music Has The Right To Children
Boards of Canada
|
5 | 2.92 | +2.08 |
|
Tom Tom Club
Tom Tom Club
|
5 | 3.03 | +1.97 |
|
Done By The Forces Of Nature
Jungle Brothers
|
5 | 3.04 | +1.96 |
|
Selected Ambient Works 85-92
Aphex Twin
|
5 | 3.2 | +1.8 |
|
Tigermilk
Belle & Sebastian
|
5 | 3.22 | +1.78 |
|
System Of A Down
System Of A Down
|
5 | 3.27 | +1.73 |
|
Kenya
Machito
|
5 | 3.27 | +1.73 |
|
A Christmas Gift For You From Phil Spector
Various Artists
|
5 | 3.29 | +1.71 |
|
The Man Machine
Kraftwerk
|
5 | 3.31 | +1.69 |
You Love Less Than Most
| Album | You | Global | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metallica
Metallica
|
1 | 3.77 | -2.77 |
|
White Blood Cells
The White Stripes
|
1 | 3.65 | -2.65 |
|
good kid, m.A.A.d city
Kendrick Lamar
|
1 | 3.64 | -2.64 |
|
After The Gold Rush
Neil Young
|
1 | 3.61 | -2.61 |
|
Black Holes and Revelations
Muse
|
1 | 3.59 | -2.59 |
|
Franz Ferdinand
Franz Ferdinand
|
1 | 3.57 | -2.57 |
|
Everybody Knows This Is Nowhere
Neil Young & Crazy Horse
|
1 | 3.53 | -2.53 |
|
Tidal
Fiona Apple
|
1 | 3.47 | -2.47 |
|
The Marshall Mathers LP
Eminem
|
1 | 3.46 | -2.46 |
|
Iron Maiden
Iron Maiden
|
1 | 3.4 | -2.4 |
Artists
Favorites
| Artist | Albums | Average |
|---|---|---|
| Radiohead | 3 | 5 |
| Pixies | 2 | 5 |
| Nick Drake | 3 | 4.33 |
Least Favorites
| Artist | Albums | Average |
|---|---|---|
| My Bloody Valentine | 3 | 1.33 |
| Metallica | 3 | 1.33 |
| Tom Waits | 2 | 1 |
| Morrissey | 2 | 1 |
| Leonard Cohen | 3 | 1.67 |
| Neil Young & Crazy Horse | 3 | 1.67 |
| Nick Cave & The Bad Seeds | 3 | 1.67 |
| Elvis Costello & The Attractions | 3 | 1.67 |
| The Byrds | 2 | 1.5 |
| Aerosmith | 2 | 1.5 |
| Neil Young | 2 | 1.5 |
| Eminem | 2 | 1.5 |
| Rush | 2 | 1.5 |
| Eagles | 2 | 1.5 |
| Iron Maiden | 2 | 1.5 |
| Spiritualized | 2 | 1.5 |
| Suede | 2 | 1.5 |
| U2 | 3 | 2 |
| Brian Eno | 3 | 2 |
Controversial
| Artist | Ratings |
|---|---|
| Grateful Dead | 4, 1 |
| Nirvana | 3, 5, 2 |
| David Bowie | 5, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2 |
5-Star Albums (47)
View Album WallPopular Reviews
Never understood the appeal of Metallica. This shit wouldn’t be out of place at Eurovision.
Once you’ve heard one Adele song you’ve heard all her back catalogue and anything she’ll produce in the future. The uniformity would be something Ford would be proud of.
Like getting to like Guinness. I like Guinness, I don’t like Prince despite repeated attempts to do so. I’m always left thinking ‘right, so it’s five minutes to the song in and I’m ready for something to happen’.
Urgh. Too dull to care about.
1-Star Albums (76)
All Ratings
Outstanding album. Perhaps a little lull (drop in tempo) in the mid-tracks, but overall an absolute belter
Really liked this. Full of various styles and sounds. Short.
A solid 4. Not really my kind of music, but I can appreciate it for what it is.
Not their best album. Some interesting songs in there, but didn’t really do enough to elevate itself from background noise to something I was actively listening to.
Again, I can appreciate the music for what it is and the massive Nile Rodgers influence, but I’m just not a huge fan of disco.
Could be mistaken for thinking you are listening to an extended play of one song they are so similar. Not unpleasant, just not really anything to get excited about.
Dislike this Blur album. Much prefer Blur (1997).
Better than I remember. Faded in the second half. Seeing a lot of comparisons to Weezer’s Blue Album. This is far inferior.
Not for me this one. First I’ve not finished.
Great album. Hadn’t listened to it in a fair few years, but didn’t seem as long once played. Very familiar.
Country Pop. No, no, no. Not even the best example of the genre.
Absolutely stunning. Wonderfully witty lyrics. Have fleetingly listened to some Belle and Sebastian before but they were big before my time. This is fabulous!
Not an Elton John fan, but enjoyed this album.
Enjoyable enough. Don’t think I’d actively seek it out to listen to again.
Funky. Filled with classics. Doesn’t have any weaker songs and oft sampled, which again shows its quality.
Really didn’t like this. Passin’ me by is alright. Of its time. Misogyny writ large.
Great album, but not as great at Kid A.
Not for me.
Knew of this band, but never listened to them. Was expecting something different from ‘hard rock’. This was eclectic and I liked it.
Meh. Nothing really distinguishes one track from the next.
Great album. Can see how it influenced a lot of bands in the 90s/00s.
Didn’t enjoy this. Can’t really see the reason why people hype them.
How this is one of the 1001 albums is baffling.
Bought this on release. Come on! Feel the Illinoise Part 1 is a particular favourite. Lots going on. Lovely
SOAD passed me by in the 1990s/2000s. Like this. Will seek out the rest of their back catalogue.
Middling. Never really got going and all I could think when I was listening was that I’d much rather be listening to Nick Drake.
Great music. Love it.
This washed over me.
Enough Beck already!!!!!
Bought this when it was released, but never really thought much of it at the time. Relistening now, I’m appreciating it more. Nice lyrics and melody.
Not a huge fan of The Who. This album has done nothing to shift my opinion. Always feel like if the world wasn’t mad for British music at the time then this band wouldn’t have got anywhere.
Mixed. Solid air is an excellent track, but the movement between genres means that as an album it’s not very coherent.
Not for me
Middling. Not any standout tracks, partly because they all sound the same. Will I listen to it again? No.
Not for me.
Dated. Lacks any variation in the songs so became tedious.
Great live album
Fucking awful! First three songs are incoherent. Gave up after that. Life is too short to spend it on this.
Clearly one of the few who cannot stand Prince’s music.
Björk, innit. Lots of plodding along and never really getting anywhere.
Never liked Pulp in my youth. Re listening to them again through this makes me appreciate them a lot more. This was a good album.
The music was fine. His voice and lyrics less so. Less Paul Simon the better.
Utter, utter shite! Everything about this is utter shite! If I could give it zero stars I would.
Quite liked this.
Never heard of Traffic before. Really liked Freedom Rider. The rest were pleasant background music.
Played REPEATEDLY EVERYWHERE when it was released. Nevertheless, it’s a polished album full of relevance even sadly 20 years after release. Like it.
It’s a shame bluegrass music has travelled beyond the region where people chose to listen to it.
Pffft. Starting with a 20 minute extended play of Inner City Life is certainly a statement. Sadly, it gets worse as you progress through the album. By the end you’ll need a lie down in a darkened room. Awful.
That guys voice can do one!
This albums inclusion is laughable. This was rubbish and overplayed/over-promoted at the time of release. Cannot believe there aren’t better albums than this to be included. Twee rubbish.
Nope.
Wasn’t expecting to like this as it’s not really a genre I like. However, was pleasantly surprised by how much I liked it in the end.
Confusing album. Some of it was very, very French and in no way rock, let alone industrial rock. However, every second track was a banger of industrial rock. No idea what they were saying though.
Heard songs from this many, many times on 6Music. It’s ok. Nothing more than that. I’d have liked it to be funkier.
Urgh. This was a tough listen. Not much variation in the music.
Singer has a funny accent put on for a few songs at the start, which isn’t great. Beige.
Nothing particularly differentiates this from any other 80s pop. Mediocre.
44 minutes in a dive bar.
Not for me this.
Some thrillers. Some fillers.
A truly terrible record. Crooning pub karaoke.
Some good, some bad. Overall, better than I expected. Definitely can tell William Orbit had involvement.
Middling.
Not for me. Yawn.
Like The XX and Jamie XX, but this album was underwhelming.
70s. Enough said.
Liked it.
What a chore it was listening to this.
Loooooonnnnnggggg last track.
A complete change from previous Radiohead albums. I bought this at the time and was shocked at how different it was. Now solidly one of my favourite albums of all time. It’s easy to mock this album. Haters are going to hate.
Long. Samey.
Great Christmas album.
Very of its time. Wouldn’t listen to it again
Dark, but enjoyable album.
My enjoyment of the Manics is tainted by their ever-presence in the late 90s on the radio. Can’t quite bring myself to like the singers shouty singing either. Sadly I can’t look past either of these.
Not an easy listen overall, but it’s better that some of the other more experimental stuff on the list. Only just though!
I don’t like The Who. This doesn’t change it. It’s not ground breaking. All the songs sound the same. It’s average at best.
Love this album. Awesome talents. Haters are gonna hate.
Short songs. All sound the same. None ever go anywhere. Trudgery.
Meh.
Liked this .
Love it. Every song is a banger!
Not my favourite Beta Band album. It’s good, but not great.
Ever present part of 1999-2000. Some good tunes in here. Quite eclectic. Some are quite poor though.
Not for me.
Background music in a Tarantino film.
Not for me, but can appreciate why people like it.
Vocals had annoying effects. Music by numbers. Forgettable
Forgettable. Not a fan of this genre and this hasn’t changed my mind. None of the songs had any distinguishing variation from any other.
Really enjoyed this. Doesn’t sound like an album from 1981.
Was ok. Didn’t dislike it, but wouldn’t seek it out to listen to again any time soon.
Ok. A sign of the future output from Blur.
40 minutes shouldn't be daunting, but this 40 minutes was. Found this difficult to listen to. Lackadaisical drumming and guitar playing throughout. Very few albums have I stopped, but only got half way through this before I felt I’d heard enough and wonder how they managed to become as big as they did. The musical version of Napoleon Dynamite.
Nope.
Fine. Dates, but important.
Didn’t warm to this. Quite a difficult listen.
Liked this. Some 6Music favourites here made this album familiar. Overall, doesn’t sound like an album that’s nearly 50 years old. Sounds quite modern.
Refreshingly different. More of this and less repetition of bands and artists with several albums would be welcome.
Down with this sort of thing! A White Stripes and now this! Stop making me feel bad.
Ok
Fine. Nothing more. Wouldn’t actively seek it out to listen to again.
Dated.
All thrilla
Generic 70s rock. It’s a shame that so much of this is part of the 1001 albums as it all sounds the same.
Energy. Energy. Energy. Wiggle. Wiggle. Wiggle. Wiggle.
Never heard any Neil Young before. Quickly realised that this is music to avoid.
How dare you.
Enjoyed, but can’t tell whether this is good or not because the amount of world music is so limited on this list. Perhaps a bit less repeated albums and more artists would have been better
Noise. First half of the album is awful. Second half is marginally better. Mixing of the tracks is terrible. They bleed into one another.
Awful. Have never understood the hype this man lives off.
Some good tracks, but some weaker ones too.
In my mind I see blue skies with a Concorde being tracked through it a dazzling vision of a near-future France. This is the soundtrack to that vision.
It’s a CCR album. They all sound the same. Excellent, but once you’ve heard one you’ve heard them all. Not surprising given the rate of output over a short time period. My bugbear is why so many of them if they sound the same. Get some other artists in the mix instead.
Meh
Dated
Good background music, but it’s all the same. Gets a bit doom loopy about half way through when you realise you’ve been listening to effectively the same track 6 times already and there’s more to go.
Not the demographic for thid
Enjoyed this. Dark and mesmerising. Searching out the back catalogue.
Loooong! Not as good as anything he did with the Pixies. Very of its time. Wouldn’t listen to it again.
Some funk. Not enough.
I’ve never understood Metallica. Generic metal with a guy who sounds like he is yodelling on vocals. The addition of a fawning crowd woooing at every chord change is unnecessary. The only saving grace of this album is the orchestra, which stops us from being a pile of shite that steams for two whole hours.
Three tracks were enough to have listened to the whole thing. This sort of stuff doesn’t deserve to spread beyond dive bars in the dustbowl.
It’s ok. Never really understood the hype. Meandering. The backwards track (if that’s what it was) was unnecessary.
It’s obviously good, but not my cup of tea.
Listened to this a lot during my university years. I liked it then. I like it now. Not something I’d play a lot nowadays though. Has that student vibe to it and I’m far from a student these days.
Not my favourite Nick Drake album, but it’s still good.
Never understood the appeal of Metallica. This shit wouldn’t be out of place at Eurovision.
This is garage, not electronic. It’s therefore instantly shit!
One long play song. Dreary.
Kept me interested, mainly because it was all over the place. More of a concept album and probably the reason why it’s been sampled by others. Liked the worst band in the world sonically.
Having heard it I’m not going to listen to it again. Nothing special or interesting here.
Feels like I’ve been living an early 2000s indie American film star life listening to this. It’s good background music, but only that. Ultimately, quite dull and plodding, like all early 2000s indie American films.
Softens jazz and takes the shrill edge of by adding the samba beat. Liked this. Wouldn’t actively listen to it, but would make some great background music for a dinner party were I to have friends or want to host a dinner party.
This is what all hip hop should have aspired to and be the benchmark for any comparisons within the genre. Lyrics are witty and tightly woven, but more importantly, don’t lower themselves to the misogynistic drivel that is pumped out and hailed as being outstanding (looking at you Mr Lamar).
Bought this on release. This is fine. Nothing more. It’s a bit scatter fun and ‘noise’ to be anything more than fine.
Never been a huge fan. Tried many times to listen to this band and see what others do, but can’t.
Not my favourite Chemical Brothers album. Sunshine Underground is far, far better than this. It’s ok.
Decent pop. Flashbacks on primary school discos in the 80s.
Urgh. Too dull to care about.
Refreshingly different
Felt I’d heard the whole album after the third song. Great vocals, but repetitive.
Any time I see a double album I weep a little for the time I’ll never get back. Brevity in an album is an art form within itself. This isn’t music that travels well. Dull, repetitive and closed lyrics about the south mean nothing to me.
Better than I expected it to be from the cover.
New band to me. Shit name though. First track had lots of promise and reminded me of DJ Shadow/UNKLE/RJD2 etc. and also made me think the first track belonged in a Guy Ritchie film. However, quality and my interest declined markedly after first track.
Only had two songs from the album on Spotify. Both were forgettable.
Great start. Lost interest about 5 songs in. Same as every Arcade Fire album.
I can get behind a Tina Turner album that is brash and in your face, but this isn’t. The bland, tepid music is really holding the vocals back. A few decent songs, but overall quite poor.
This was very, very middling. Listened to it whilst doing various tasks about the house. Nothing caught my attention, but the didn’t stop listening either.
It was fine.
Didn’t enjoy this as much as Fela Kuti.
Really wanted to like this as a sparse example of non-western music on the list. However, it’s just not up to it. 6 minutes of percussion not really my thing.
Not my thing.
Easy listening. Inoffensive
Three hours. Listened to the first hour then left the party as they’d run out of vol-au-vents. Great music though, but knocked down a star each as it’s not an album and it’s THREE HOURS LONG!
Album cover didn’t fill me with much hope.m. How wrong was I? Good album with some songs I recognised but didn’t know the artist. Now I do. Eclectic.
Second track 30 seconds in is enough to know this is shit. Probably what Andrew Tate listens to.
This wasn’t floating around at the time on tape. Never heard it. There’s a reason. It’s not very good.
Stadium pop.
Varied. Enjoyed listening to it. Even the fillers are thrillers.
Once you’ve heard one Adele song you’ve heard all her back catalogue and anything she’ll produce in the future. The uniformity would be something Ford would be proud of.
Enjoyed this. Short and snappy.
I was taken in by the hype for LCD in the mid 2000s, but quickly jumped off. Now firmly a fan. Really liked this album.
Two LCD Soundsystem albums in a row. This is certainly toned down by comparison to the others, but is excellent in its own way. The 13 minute track at the end made me think I’d been transported into the Minecraft universe though.
After the first three songs this got very ‘samey’.
I’ve never seen the appeal of the Beach Boys. Good vibrations is maybe good for about a minute then it becomes tedious. Same can be said for all other songs, but the tedium sets in sooner.
Fine. Some nostalgic songs on there, but there’s quite a few sub-par tracks on there. Haven’t sought out any REM album to listen to again, perhaps this is why.
Gets dull quickly
Another Bowie album….
Probably on the better side of good.
Better than the majority of the genre from this time, but the bar isn’t particularly high.
Nice voice, but every track is effectively a carbon-copy of the one that came before it. Good to have on in the background when cooking the dinner, but beyond that I wouldn’t actively listen to it.
It was ok. Of its time. Couldn’t listen to it frequently.
Fine. Musicianship is better than I remember it being. Lyrics are a bit meh now, but that’s society for you.
No. No. No. 19 minute opening track. Takes the piss.
Separating the man from the album this is still as consistently boring as I suspected it would be.
Organs, organs everywhere. Middling.
Fine
Quite dull
It’s very 90s, but it’s also very good. Something of a rarity from the period.
A mad album. At times I was listening and thinking this is a real 70s album, but at times it was music that you could quite imagine being made now with someone like Andre 3000. That said, all of it has clearly been made under the influence of copious amount of psychedelics.
TWO HOURS AND FIFTEEN MINUTES?!?!?!?
This is what I would imagine my band would sound like if I started one with no musical skill or ability.
Not for me.
As beige as beige can be. Little wonder I’d never heard of them.
Pleasant surprise. There’s quite a lot of punk on this list. This was one of the better ones.
How many Bowie albums are on this list?!?!
Like getting to like Guinness. I like Guinness, I don’t like Prince despite repeated attempts to do so. I’m always left thinking ‘right, so it’s five minutes to the song in and I’m ready for something to happen’.
Another where one album from the band would be sufficient. It’s a yes album, like the others. Fine, but nothing more.
Liked this. Didn’t understand a word of it.
I could insert the Big Lewbowski quote here, but I’ve been beaten to it by many other middle aged men.
Too much CSN and their offshoots on here. It’s all the same!
The inclusion of this is an insult to music.
Great album. More accomplished than his subsequent releases.
Not even the best Pet Shop Boys album.
Dislike country in any guise. If I were Skynet wouldn’t have bothered about John Connor, but instead sent a terminator back so stop the genesis of this genre.
Very of its time. I like later orbital stuff, but wasn’t a huge fan of this. Always waiting for something to happen. It didn’t.
Fine, but nothing more.
I can’t keep listening to this.
This sort of music explains why real men go to church with a semi-automatic under their jacket. Awful!
A great album. No fillers. Some nostalgia is influencing my opinion here, but who cares. It’s ace. Makes listening to all the Metallica albums on this list an absolute kick in the teeth.
I liked this and would happily listen to this very long double album several times before listening to any more country music. The music still seems fresh today. Whoever said it’s like being at a ceilidh hasn’t ever been to a ceilidh. It’s like being in an Irish pub with a warm fire. Lovely.
Mixed. Some really strong tracks that don’t sound dated in there, but fades towards the end where some do sound dated.
I’m clearly in the minority here, but this isn’t very good punk music. It’s boring. It’s also too long. It’s also repetitive.
I’m generally of the opinion that country music is shit. I started this expecting my opinion not to be changed. However, I liked this album. Don’t get me wrong. Country music is still shit, but if all country music was like this then my general opinion might well have been different.
As middle of the road as it can get. Plods along. Nothing bad, but nothing great either. If I had synethesia I’d be seeing a sea of beige.
This is the sort of album that would be played in a ‘high end apparel store’. So generic and soulless that no one realises how long they’ve been in the store. The production is fine, but the lyrics are incomprehensible. It’s the next decade version of that MJ Cole album on here. Both equally terrible and makes you question the whole point of the list. Is this really something that I needed to listen to before I died.
I had the same band three days ago. I like punk as much as I like country, which isn’t very much. This is music equivalent of something, in my view, of a book on a bookshelf that you put there to show your eclectic taste but have no genuine interest in. There’s probably a word for it in German. Ultimately, this isn’t very good because it’s a punk album.
I’m not really a fan of Damon Albarn. And I’m not really a fan of supergroups. Every project seems to become quite monotonous very quickly. This album fits that. It was dull and about supposedly about London, where I don’t live, so care even less.
Repetitive. In his later stadium stuff you can’t really tell how gravelly (bad) his voice is, but you can hear. I can see why people like this though, I’m just not one of them. Fine, but only a superfan could give this a 5/5.
Fine.
This is better than the live album on here, but only just.
This is fine. Screamadelica and XTRMNTR are better albums. You can see where they would eventually end up with this album. Ultimately, the songs are overlong and the majority plod along. Suitable for a cult 90s movie, but beyond that, not really memorable.
At least Transformer had some reasonably uplifting music to accompany the dark lyrics. This is just total and absolute darkness, like a black hole of music. Sucking all the enjoyment out of life track after track. I like The Velvet Underground and I like Lou Reed, but this is just soul destroying listening to this.
Great album. 30 minutes. Signalled pop musics arrival as a genre.
Fine, but I wouldn’t seek it out to listen to again.
t h i s i s s h i t Seriously. Two albums from this group of people who claim to be a band. This makes country music look good.
This was given to me the day after Brian Wilson died. Not what I’d have expected, but enjoyable. Topical themes.
The debut album from Muse was good. Everything after that was parodying glam rock. This album received so much air play in the year of release, which indicates the quality of music that year. Overall, this is quite shit.
It’s ok. Like most 90s rap the music is pretty monotonous sampling throughout. However, what really carries it is Chuck D. That raises it at least a star from what I would have given it.
This just didn’t do anything for me. Every song just kept putting images of Cheers in my minds eye.
Overall, some great songs and a solid part of the late 90s music scene. It’s got an overplayed Christmas number one. It’s got a song from The Matrix. A few fillers, but mostly killers.
I bet the drummer in this band was a right fanny! One Rush album is enough.
I hadn’t listened to this before and have managed to avoid listening to any Jay-Z albums. Having listened to this my decision has been shown to be a good one. The music is good, which isn’t surprising given who produced it. The rapping isn’t. H to the Izzo. Who the fuck cares?
Enjoyed this. Some familiar songs, especially if you listen to 6Music.
I can take or leave The Offspring. Some decent songs, some poor. Nothing great though.
I just don’t get jazz. I’m sure there’s some great musicianship on show here, but I can’t really tell. I also can’t get Garfield or any other 70s/80s cartoon out of my minds eye when listening to this genre. I now fancy some lasagne!
Don’t believe the hype! A few good bands does not make a scene. The Happy Mondays are not even a band you should listen to on an average day where there is nothing left to do let alone listen to before you die.
The music is great. Production values are so high. So many artists have samples from this band that you feel like you’ve heard these songs even if you haven’t before. Overall, a good album, but a bit of pace could be added here and there. Base plods along quite a bit. Not great, but good.
I was expecting to hate this. I detest Morrisey’s voice and ridiculous style. However, the music saved it. Some decent tracks. Some poor tracks. Ultimately, if Morrisey wasn’t singing it would have been rated higher.
Listened to the first three tracks of incoherent noise. The rap was ok, but I couldn’t bring myself to listen to the rest.
Enjoyed this. Never heard of this band, but the first song was familiar. Different and definitely something that deserves to be on the list.
Didn’t enjoy this.
Firstly, WTF is that album cover all about!?! Secondly, French electronica, on the whole, isn’t very good. You can tell whether electronic music is French in the first few seconds of listening to it because it has one short continuously operative sequence of twangy, nonsense sounds. They all do. It’s like The Gorillaz of electronic music. This is no different. At least Daft Punk managed to elevate their twangy French electronica beyond twangy French electronica. This did not. It’s just twangy French electronica.
So, a double album that isn’t absolute Shite. Finally! This is superb. So varied. Some of the songs were a bit weaker - not a surprise given his output - but even the worst song on the album is far above some of the other guff that’s on this list.
Never listened to this album before. Very familiar with the singles, but not beyond that. I can see why now. They’re a bit bonkers. Conceptual pop?
Fine, but nothing more than that.
Liked the mix of guitars and synths.
Not listened to much soul music. Liked this, but probably would find many opportunities or situations to listen to it. The music itself was really good. Well produced. Lyrics were good too. Only gripe is that the songs were a bit too long.
It’s CCR.
Different, which is nice. However, it played in the background when I was doing work around the house. I couldn’t distinguish one song from the next. Quite ‘samey’.
I’ve already listened to an Eagles album on here and didn’t think much of it. This is no different. So, so, so beige and pedestrian.
I don’t play video games nor do I live in the Mid-West USA. This album doesn’t have anything to appeal to me. Country music is not for me, but this isn’t the worst example of the many, many country artists on this list. So this raises it from what would be a one to a two star review. It’s better than the other shit country music, but that’s it.
Yee haw, let those gee tars play. This is a solid no from me. Why this list has so, so much country music on it is beyond me. Utter, utter pish.
This is the third My Bloody Valentine album I’ve needed to listen to on this list. Hopefully the last. This is the most coherent of the three, both in terms of the vocals being audible words and the music being actual music (to an extent), but it’s still not very good.
I don’t like Neil Young. Songs are dull. He can’t sing.
I’ve not been a fan of the rap/hip-hop offered up so far for two reasons. Firstly, the rampant misogyny can’t be given the tagline of ‘it was decades ago’. Secondly, some of the rap (I’m mainly thinking Jay-Z so far) is the sort of rhyme that you’d get laughed at by your primary school teacher for - H to the Izzo! This is better. The lyrics are interesting and offer something that it’s the two above. The music is also far more interesting too.
Music that is remarkably sanitised and uniform. You can walk into a room and after a second you can recognise its ELO from any of the tracks in this album or any other.
This was ok, but only ok.
Pretty poor stuff.
Really, really boring. It’s Doves, but without the character or energy.
There are a few decent tracks on this album. Not good, but decent. The kind that you could happily have on in the background and not interfere with what you are doing. However, there is quite a lot of filler in between those few decent tracks.
Wasn’t expecting to like this as I don’t like Morrisey and the other Smiths album I’ve listened to so far didn’t impress much. However, there were a few good tracks on here. Lots of variation as well, which was nice. Meat is Murder was odd though.
Found it on YouTube. It’s ok. Nothing more.
Never listened to anything by Anthrax before. It’s not really my sort of music, but my barometer for this type of music is ‘is it better than Metallica?’. This is, so it gets 2 starts.
Enjoyed this. Don’t think I would, but I did.
I like The Cure, but this never got out of first gear. It only really got out of first gear when the seventh song on the album started, but then quickly decided that first gear was where it was going to stay for the rest.
Enjoyed this. This is the second album I’ve been given where the day before someone in the band has died. In this case Ozzy himself. Is this random? Seems a bit to coincidental. I’d have given it 3 stars, but because I’m a stickler for my own principles I have given any metal band that is better than Metallica (which is all of them) an extra star. 4 stars, which even with my +1 for being better than Metallica, which all metal bands are, is more than fair.
I didn’t like Supergrass when they were desperately trying to be part of Britpop in the 90s. Not helped by ‘Alright’ being played on every radio station, which wasn’t many back then, on repeat. There youthful energy annoyed me, their voices annoyed me and Gaz Coombes sideburns annoyed me. Nothing has changed. I still don’t like them and am surprised by the average rating and the number of 4&5 star reviews for this. Solid 2 for me. It’s not Metallica levels of shit, but it’s close.
A country singer singing non-country songs. I don’t like country music. It doesn’t resonate with me, both culturally or geographically. However, there are some songs I like elsewhere covered well here. I like NIN and I like Hurt. I like this cover. I like Depeche Mode and I like Personal Jesus. I like this cover. However, there are other covers that simply don’t work, with Danny Boy being a prime example. This was therefore a mixed album for me. It’s not Fulsom Prison, but it’s ok. 3 stars.
I didn’t warm to this album with the first few songs. However, it had grown on me by the time it got to the song that I can remember hearing on MTV at the time, Stellar. Overall, there are a few decent songs on it, but it is quite ‘samey’ and there is overuse of the scratchy DJ sound. I’d probably agree with the decent number of people reviewing it that suggest it shouldn’t be on this list. 2/5 stars.
A foundational album that seems to draw love it or lothe it opinions on here. I’m in the middle. I can appreciate the shortness of the album at 25 minutes. I can also appreciate that this is the foundational rock and roll album. However, that doesn’t get away from the fact that the it is quite pedestrian. Whilst it’s 25 minutes it could easily be an extended play of one track as they all sound the same. 3/5 stars.
I hate Franz Ferdinand. I’d rather listen to every country album or every Metallica album on this list again than listen to this again. Franz Ferdinand (and others like The Kaizer Chiefs) was everything that was wrong with British music in the 2000s wrapped up in 38 minutes. A big warning sign is that it won the Mercury Music Prize, which seems to pick more losers than winners over time. It’s not a very good album. It is high tempo, but jettisons any sense of quality and longevity in the pursuit of what in the 2020s would be referred to as ‘vibes’. The band seems talentless other than having the ability to make noise and, most irritatingly, it was overplayed, which in itself shows you the quality of the music available to radio stations at the time. The band, and in particular the lead singer, were deeply irritating and smug. Who is listening to this now? No-one digs out a Franz Ferdinand album to have a listen to 20 odd years after it was made. No-one is that stupid. If I could give this 0 stars then I would. Makes a mockery of the list.
It’s a country album. The fact that any nominations it achieved for any awards were in specifically country sections suggests the cross-over of this, of much of the genre, is non-existent. I wouldn’t listen to this again, but then I wouldn’t have listened to it in the first place had it not been on this list as it’s country music. I didn’t think I’d need to listen to this before I died and I was proved right. 1 star.
This was better than I expected, though I’m not a fan of the singing style that has since become the ‘done way’ on any talent show. Well produced, though I could have done without it being over an hour long and the interludes were unnecessary. 2 stars.
As country albums go, this was better than most. I’ll qualify that by saying that I don’t like country music and mummy ratings reflect that with most being awarded 1 star. It just doesn’t mean anything to me. The lyrics are I’m singing about a lifestyle and landscape I don’t live in. This was marginally better. I was stripping my shower of sealant when listening to it and it flew my. I don’t know whether that was because I was needing to use a Stanley knife in close proximity to myself or whether the music was good. I’ll be generous and say the music was good and give it 100% more stars that I usually award country music on the list. 2 stars.
A good album and a sign of what was to come later in suburbs.
I liked the opening titular track. In keeping with his other albums on here I wasn’t a fan of the remaining tracks.
I like Talk, Talk, Talk and I like this album. Some frequent fliers from 6Music if you are a music loving Brit.
I remember watching a tape of Thriller at my mates house in what must have been the late 80s. I liked this album then and I still like it now. The only track I thought was weaker was the Paul McCartney one. Everything else was excellent.
Entirely unremarkable. 2 stars.
It’s hard to look past what U2, but mainly Bono, has become in the 21st Century. However, there are some songs on this that are good. There are also some that aren’t good. The ones that are good are sadly the blueprint for what U2 would become and churn out in ever-reducing quality for years to come. It’s no more than 3 stars, though if I could award decimal places I would have scored it 2.6/5.
Lovely voice, but I don’t think I’d listen to it again.
Enjoyed this as a break from the seemingly endless like of country music I’ve been getting from the list. Nice synths. Great vocals. Some cracking tracks. 4 stars.
I wasn’t a fan of Suede at the time. The singing that could easily be that of a choir boy who had yet to reach puberty. The effete styling. The fact that they all looked like their hair could be done with either a good wash or a lot less Brylcream. The desperate nod and winks to Morrisey. I’m still not a fan now. I’ve only managed to get half way through. The lack of variation in the songs hasn’t managed to shift my pre-listening view that I don’t like Suede.
A great album. Trail-blazing. You can see where so many contemporary artists and bands get their inspiration from with this album, such as LCD Soundsystem. I’d happily listen to this over and over again.
It’s not awful, but it’s a Simon and Garfunkel album. They’re all the same. All easily allow you to gloss over the whole thing.
It’s not generally my thing and I can’t relate to anything she sings about, but musically it’s fine. I wouldn’t listen to it again, but it’s not the worst thing I’ve listened to on this list by a long way.
I liked the earlier album on the list. This felt quite restrained by comparison. It also feels quite dull in comparison to a lot of metal music. It washed over me.
Not generally a fan of folk, but I liked this.
I’ve never really warmed to any of David Bowie’s music. This is no different. It’s a pleasingly short duration. Sadly, this is balanced by fewer, longer songs.
Hmm. Is this better than country, the worst type of music to exist on this list? I’m not too sure whether it’s better. At least with country I don’t relate to anything they’re on about, but at least I can appreciate the music to an extent. This, however, was just noise and a shouting German. I like industrial music and have appreciated the other industrial bands that have been on the list so far, but I won’t be listening to this again.
Having had an awful German industrial rock album where the instruments were made from scraps from the tip the day before this sounded really, really good by comparison. I’m taking that into account with my review here, but I genuinely liked this. I’ve never listened to Sonic Youth before, but they were big with some of my mates at school in the late 90s. Given this album was late 80s it’s pointing at where much music was going to be taken in the 90s and even early 2000s. Yip, I liked it, but knocking a star off because I think I might still be rebounding from the German industrial rock yesterday. 3 stars.
I only know of one Joan Armatrading song, which I like. This was more of the same. I liked this. The only criticism I would have is that it’s quite ‘samey’.
I don’t really like the Manics. Never have. A bit pretentious and shouty. There are a few decent songs on this album, but the majority are not good. 2 stars.
I have no idea about Jazz. This was ok to my philistinic ears.
I like dance music, but I’ve never really liked Basement Jaxx. I’ve always just thought of them as ‘noise merchants’ and this album reinforces this. It’s just noise. There is no flow. It’s all just noise!
A great album. In as much as every song my is punchy and takes the total listening to just beyond 35 mins, but also in that it did help revive interest guitar based music in the UK after so many years of pop shite.
Some great songs, but some middling songs too. There is no cohesion to the album either. Some mad faux-country for example. Not good. I can never quite put my finger on why I’ve never really liked the Stones, but this probably sums it up.
This is the sort of music that I could happily have on in the background when doing something because it really doesn’t offer anything fantastically interesting but trots along. Something that annoys me about Van Morrison though is that you spend 10-15% of the album listening to him simply making noises. 3 stars.
It’s AC/DC. Same as it ever was.
Never heard of the band. Was really, really boring.
Enjoyed this. Could see the influences it had elsewhere.
This was fine, but only fine. It was better that the other Wilco alumni I have listened to so far. The lyrics are quite dull, but it is made up for by the good instrumentation. I can’t say I’ll hold my breath for any improvement in the inexplicable third Wilco album to be included on the list.
This was everywhere when it came out. I liked it, but with time I liked it less and less as I wanted to hear something else. Listening back, I like it less now than I did then. I think this is slightly tainted by the absolute guff that they’ve released since and the gushing praise that comes there way when they do anything from the media. It’s not great. It’s not bad. It’s of its time. 3 stars, but only just.
I liked this better that the other Orbital album I’ve listened to on this list so far. Having said that, the first half of the album is better than the second half. 3 stars.
I’m not a huge fan of David Bowie, but I liked this album. My only annoyance was the huge amount of saxophone throughout the album. Truly an awful instrument.
Awesome
If you like bongos then this is the album for you. 1 hour 17 minutes of unadulterated bongoism. I have never really listened to much bongo music before. Apache was good. After that, it was fine, but I was very conscious of the amount of bongos and nothing else.
Never heard of this band before. Really liked this.
Yo, ho, ho and a bottle of rum. Was this intended to be a parody of pirates and their shit shanties? I just don’t get the appeal of this man and what he inflicts upon peoples ears.
Not as good as Kid A, but thats being picky. Great album. Haters are going to hate.
The songs released as singles from this album give you the impression it should be a belter. It’s not really. It’s too long and a lot of the other songs on it don’t hit nearly the same level. Pity, as she has a lovely voice and it’s clearly well produced.
This was ok. Nothing more than that. In that lies my lack of understanding about the adulation and mystique surrounding Iggy Pop. I don’t think there’s anything at the sharp edge of rock or punk on display here. It’s fine and nothing more than that.
Short, but not very enjoyable.
Entirely unremarkable.
Lots of love for this. I wasn’t feeling it. It’s not Butthole Surfers level of shit, but it’s not great.
This isn’t a genre of music I’d normally listen to. It’s not great. It’s very repetitive and the lyrics are poor. Hasn’t convinced me that this is something I should be listening to.
This is a good album. It’s not great, but it’s good. Doesn’t deserve the hate. Sure, later albums do, but this doesn’t.
The hits are excellent examples of 90s American pop. The rest of just filler. Apart from Sofa Pop - WTF?
Most 90s rap is awful. I wasn’t a fan then. Not a fan now. None of it has aged well. The overly aggressive and toxic lyrics just don’t make it pleasant to listen to. This doesn’t break that mould. The backing music is fine. The rapping isn’t. So whilst Doggystyle falls into the same bracket, at least the introduction of G Funk was stylistically different so makes the listening experience slightly less uncomfortable. This isn’t. No moulds have been broken in the making of this entirely generic 90s rap album.
This just merged into one constant guitar solo for me. Nothing I’d listen to again.
Jeff Beck is new to me. It’s ok. Rod Stewart isn’t new to me. That wasn’t great. Didn’t really sound like something from the 60s. Overall, not something I’d listen to again.
I bought this at the time of release. The double album, released to placate both artists I believe, allows for some songs and skits that wouldn’t have made it into a cleaner, shorter album. As a result there are some tough listens interspersed with some quality songs. Both albums are very different in style and have some real gems, such as Speakerboxxx & Happy Valentines Day, but both have stinkers too. What it certainly doesn’t lack is creativity. Overall, 3 stars.
I didn’t listen to it because I’ve been to a pub where a man with his shirt unbuttoned was banging out Angels on the karaoke machine. I don’t want the memory of that shit night to be worsened by this.
Great album. This and Halfway between the gutter and the stars are the peak of Fatboy Slims sampling powers.
Queen to me is like listening to a musical and a secondary school. The school band are all trying to outdo each other and as a result the music turns into bombastic nonsense. This is no different, apart from where Freddy Mercury takes a backseat where the band, understandably, takes a break. It’s hard work being 100% bombastic. The Brian May songs are just odd. A weird homage to country music just doesn’t fit, nor does a song where carburettors are mentioned either.
This is very of its time. A middling album from the low-fi, indie music of the 2010s. The first two or three songs are fine, but after that you realise that nothing is going to change. It doesn’t.
Liked this. Many familiar tracks.
I liked it less than the other Stevie Wonder albums I’ve listened to on this list. Some bangers on there.
Short. Not awful. That’s about it.
I like Pet Shop Boys early music. I don’t like this. Plods along.
Liked this. It’s good that I liked the first song because the rest were no different really.
This is why I’m persevering with this project. One year in and many, many country albums later I am rewarded with this. Hadn’t heard the name of this band before, but instantly recognised the first and second songs. The first because it’s a regular on 6Music and the second because it having been sampled. It’s a wonderfully eclectic, fresh and exciting album from start to finish. 5 stars without question!
Musically, this is excellent. Lyrically, it’s poor. It’s also far too long.
List for Life and The Passenger are great songs. The others are effectively Bowie b-sides that I’m not fussed about.
Never heard of this band. I can see why. The ragged end of Britpop just not wanting to give up the ghost. I won’t remember this album because it doesn’t deserve to be remembered.
Never heard of this band. Liked it.
Meh. Nothing more to add.
Abrasive. Didn’t like listening to the majority of this. All Apologies saves it from one star.
I just don’t get drum and bass. I don’t understand the appeal. Nothing changes, either within or between songs. It’s not pleasant to listen to at all.
Never heard of this band before. It’s not good, but it’s not awful. I don’t think I’d listen to it again.
Great album. I know the key Led Zepplin tracks, but going through their back catalogue through this project is great. So many good tracks.
Musically, this is very good. Lyrically, it’s poor and dated.
I found this repetitive. Even within songs, once you’d heard the first 20 seconds of the song, you’d effectively heard the whole thing.
Like the last Cocteau Twins album this was entirely different from anything else on the list and equally as pleasant.
Not a fan of The Who.
It’s Rod Stewart. You know what you get. It’s fine, but nothing more. Did I need to listen to this before I die? I’m not convinced.
I won’t listen to this again.
Music is fine. Can’t really say anything about the lyrics.
Liked this. High production values. Good harmonies. It works. Digital folk.
I didn’t warm to this. It wasn’t awful, but not something I’d play again.
Hmmmm. There are few albums on this list where I am baffled as to how they were included, but this is one of them. It’s terrible in every possible way.
I’m indifferent to ABBA, but I’ve heard the majority of the songs on this album enough for a thousand and one lifetimes.
I’ve had a series of 60s and 70s albums in recent weeks that I would not usually listen to and haven’t added any songs to my playlists. This hasn’t changed that. It was on in the background and it didn’t capture my attention once.
This was ok. For country music. I liked the first song. The rest not so much.
Great album. So in your face.
Liked this, but it’s not 5 stars. There’s not enough there and some of the tracks are poor in comparison to others.
I started listening to this with trepidation. I’ve heard Hallelujah enough for a 1001 lives to have been lived. It’s a great, but vastly overplayed. The rest of the album is mixed. Some really great songs on it, but some where his voice just becomes silly (and one wonders whether Muse listened to this album a lot in their formative years). Overall, 3 stars.
I don’t really like The Jam. If you like bass then this is for you. The middle of the album is stronger than the rest. That’s Entertainment is a good song. Many on here are just not very good.
I have no strong opinions either way on this album. Cocteau Twins for millennials.
Welcome to the hype train! The number of gushing reviews of this album is phenomenal. I’ve tried to listen to this album and appreciate it a number of times, such as when it was the soundtrack to The Force by Don Winslow. Sure, it’s not as offensive as most other rap from the time and therefore that makes the lyrics more engaging, but musically it’s shocking. I can’t think of a rap album where the backing music is worse than this. It’s insipid.
404 albums in and this is by far and away the worst and most undeserving album on here. In the 90s, Kid Rock didn’t make much of a splash outside the US of A, whereas his contemporaries, such as Limp Bizkit etc did (with hindsight they had some talent compare to this shite). All I knew of him was that he used to pop up on MTV Video montages as the odd fella in stupid oversized clothing thinking he was a pimp. Anyway, I never listened to any of his music because his image suggested it would be dogshite. Well, I’ve listened to the first song and the beginnings of rapping that makes Vanilla Ice look good and can confirm my suspicions were sound. This is dogshite music for people who grill music off the back of their vans. It’s a shame he never decided to be that cowboy who found a nest in the hills and chill like flint (WTF?!?) and put this shite to bed.
70s prog/psychedelic rock. It’s fine, but nothing more. Would I listen to it again. Probably not, but then I wouldn’t listen to any of this genre again.
This seems to draw out those who critique British punk with effusive praise. Americans? Anyway, it’s punk. It’s fine, but nothing more. Would I choose to listen to it again? No.
Not my cup of tea. The music is fine. Lyrics less so, though I don’t like Nick Cave or The Divine Comedy, so that’s probably got something to do with it.
The is was ok. Nothing more.
When the first three minutes of the first song, which lasts for nearly 19 minutes sounds like a toddler learning music by the discovery method then I’m out. Didn’t bother with the other 3 songs or the rest of the first. Didn’t have 1 hour 50 minutes to burn away today. I don’t feel bad about it in any way.
Hmmmm. Not much variation in the songs here. Lots of lyrics too. Sometimes less is more and this is certainly one of those instances.
This was ok. Some good songs, some average songs.
I expected to hate this, but I didn’t. I found it oddly captivating. The anti-MNC/TNC stuff was ahead of the game. Maybe this was the genesis of the riots that used to happen when the WTO used to have an annual high-five fest at different cities around the world? Granted, I needed to have the lyrics alongside me so I could at least read what was in the minds eye of the vocalist rather than his output. Would I listen to it again? Absolutely not. It seemed longer than 33 minutes and I don’t think I have the mental resilience to subject myself to it again. Did I hate it? No.
I remember being bored listening to this in the 80s. Nothing has changed.
I’ve never understood the appeal of Bruce Springsteen. He can’t sing. The songs are dull. It’s all a bit YOO ESS AAE for my liking.
I’m not generally a fan of jazz, but this is my kind of jazz. It’s laid back and unobtrusive.
Well known songs. Doesn’t mean I like them. It’s not the sort of music you can listen to and expect your family to respect you any longer.
This album was by entry into the world of sampling by the likes if of UNKLE, Burial, RJD2 etc. I can understand why it might not be to everyone’s taste, but I think it’s great. Just loads of samples spliced together in a simply sublime way.
This is what The Rolling Stones would have sounded like if they were from the west coast of the USA. I don’t really like The Rolling Stones.
I’m not a massive fan of rap, but I like Q-Tip. His lyricism is beyond most other rappers. The variation was good. I didn’t find myself getting board or annoyed with listening to the same old tropes from lazy rappers.
I was swept away in the zeitgeist when this came out in 2004. Always thought the first half of the album was far better than the second half. Never bought any more of their albums after that and jumped off the bandwagon. This, overall though, is a good record.
There are some songs on this that are fine, but I just can’t get past the put on accents and the fact that he spent the vast majority of his time after this record getting into scrapes all over the shop.
I have a huge amount of respect for Fergal Sharkey and his work in cleaning in forcing the government to make the water companies in England do their job properly and stop pumping shite into rivers. This was good. I’m not a fan of Teenage Kicks, but there were more songs on this album that I was familiar with than I thought I would be.
I didn’t warm to this. Not a single track that I didn’t want to skip.
Never bought any of his albums as I got the feeling from the reviews at the time that they were a bit too eclectic. After listening to the opening track then the second I thought I might have been right. However, everything after the opening track is the same. I got bored of listening to this. The only thing that peaked my interest every so often was forgetting I was listening to this and thinking ‘oh, is Thom Yorke on this track?’
I didn’t enjoy listening to this. Much as I didn’t enjoy the artwork. I found the repeating sounds too frequent to be enjoyable and the random sounds off-putting.
Really liked this. Sounds like it could have been made yesterday.
Awful artwork, but I liked this. I don’t go into anything that is described as ‘country’ music thinking I’ll like it, but I did like this. Easy listening. Not too ‘country’.
I’ve heard enough of Bowie’s back catalogue and this (which was massively overplayed on release) to not need to care too much when this was playing. It was on. I’ve listened to it, but didn’t really need to. I’ve heard enough Bowie on this list already.
I found this really, really boring.
Liked this.
A flatmate of mine at uni loved Beth Orton and would play her frequently. He was a prick so it taints my view of this album. Beyond that it is inherently average. I find her singing voice quite nasal and grating, which means it moves beyond background music. After the fourth song I nearly turned it off, but persevered. Wished I hadn’t. It’s not the worst thing I’ve listened to so far as the electronica lifts it’s somewhat, but beyond that it’s not something I would seek out to listen to again.
Five! FIVE! That’s how many Nick Cave albums are on this list. Why?! It’s not as bad as the soul destroyingly depressing others. That’s the only positive.
Great album
This was ok. Nothing more. Nothing less. Would I listen to it again? No.
Not as good as For Your Pleasure, but still decent enough.
I never listened to this on release. Don’t know why. I like it.
Never heard of this band before and wasn’t expecting much when I looked at the genre. However, I was surprised by how much I liked it.
Never heard of this band before. Two days in a row. Again, didn’t expect much. Was pleasantly surprised. I liked the odd timing and style. Easy listening.
I didn’t warm to this. Never heard of this band before. Won’t be seeking it out again to listen to.
I was indifferent to this when it was out. Indifferent now too. Some good, some bad. Would I listen to it again? Probably not. Why? Because the 90s were generally a shit time for British music.
I like the music. Everything is alright when it’s just the music. The singing though! I can’t stand the singers voice. It’s the fly in the ointment.
When Moon Safari first came out I enjoyed some of the songs, but some were just a bit too French Electronica for me. The base is always a bit bouncy in French electronica, so even when it’s a dark song the base lifts it to a place where it shouldn’t be. In comparison, any of the soundtracks done by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross have the same dark undertones, but the base reflects this. It’s not whimsy. Overall, this was just about fine. I can listen to a whole Air album because the whimsy air just does my head in. I listened to all of this and as a result my head was done in.
This was ok. Apart from Come on Aileen. Overplayed.
Never heard of this band before. Didn’t warm to it. The country style guitar sounds didn’t help convince me that this was an indie record.
The music was good. The lyrics were bad. Odd track at the end.
Liked this. Like a big band.
Urgh. I disliked the Shamen in the 90s. I dislike them still. Utter shite!
Wasn’t the worst thing I’ve heard so far, but will I ever seek this out to listen to again? No!
Very of its time.
The bad side of average.
Not for me.
Meh. I neither disliked or liked this. Would I listen to it again? No.
I really didn’t like this. What’s the point of it? Plodding, overlong tracks that don’t ever go anywhere. I’d imagine the lead singer thinks his vocals are psychedelic, but he just sounds like a breathless, incoherent fool. Begs belief that this is on the list where more coherent and interesting groups like Gomez aren’t.
This was ok, but only ok. It’s a bit poppy for my liking. Gran Turismo was better, but only marginally, as an album.
Liked this. Polished for a punk album.
FFS! 5 albums of the same dreary shite! Down with this sort of thing!
Meh. That’s all I can muster for this.
I was listening to this and everything was going ok. Sure, this was a change from the U2 of previous towards their Omnishite music of the late 20th and early 21st Centuries. It wasn’t unpleasant, but it wasn’t particularly engaging or exciting either. This all changed when One Love came on and I instantly recalled that fucking awful moment in 2020 when thousands of people were dying every day from Covid and a bunch of self-important thespians though that singing this together over the internet would make everyone feel better. Changed the game after that. Fucking Hollywood!
I bought this album on the strength of ‘Around the World’, back in the days of MTV2 being swarmed by Indie music it was something that perked my interest. However, like all Daft Punk albums, there is a lot of filler. Bangers held together my mediocrity.
Never heard of this band before. It was a tad pedestrian overall. When I saw reviews with Mariachi bands etc I thought it would have been a lot more punchy than it was sadly.
I’ve always liked but never loved Pacific 202 as a song, but hearing it within this album made me love it. This is a very good album.
Liked this, though the female singers voice deducts one star.
As rap/hip-hop goes this is a good album.
Bored. Bored. Bored. I’m not a fan of Springsteen’s early album, but at least they had some get-up. This was miserable.
Felt like I should’ve been watching Colombo throughout.
Great pop! Sadly, some fillers on here, but even the fillers are better than some of the stuff I’ve listened to on this journey through sound so far.
Urgh. Messages within the album are relevant, but instead of elevating the genre above the misogynistictic shite that talentless trope-hustler Kendrick Lamar pumps out this album flips it to heaux’s and inches instead. I’m saddened that this album exists let alone had a place on this list.
Never heard of this band before. Liked it enough for it to keep my interest. It’s funny how the likes of Suede and Blur can rise to the top and a band like this, which to my ears is better, doesn’t.
I don’t have any foundational knowledge to pass judgement on this album. Did I enjoy it? Mostly. Would I listen to it again? Probably not.
Some outstanding tracks on this album. Some others that wash over you.
I bought Goldfrapp’s first album on release and really liked it. The in-your-face electronica was great. This is pared back quite a bit. Meandering, but not unpleasant.
Really, really enjoyed this. I’ve had to endure U2, Metallica, Suede and Tom Waits to get to this. It’s almost been worth it. Almost.
Preferred solid air
I’m indifferent to The Kinks. It’s ok, but nothing more. Small doses are fine. Sadly, this was a bonus edition, which was longer. That was not ok.
I don’t really know what to make of punk. Is it good? Is it bad? This wasn’t as bad as some of the other punk on her, but equally wasn’t as good as some of the other punk on here. Middle of a very bumpy, pot hole-ridden road.
Full disclosure. I’m Scottish and will listen with greater attention to try and find something to like within anything from my kin. Orange Juice and Cocteau Twins are two examples where active listening has brought unexpected delight. Teenage Fanclub were always floating about in recommendations from magazines and friends in my youth, but I could never get into them. Every song, to my ears, always seems like it gets up to the desired speed as quick as possibly then whacks on cruise control, which ultimately makes the majority of songs never get beyond the mundane. Quite a few reviews I’ve read on here whilst listening cite Oasis as a similar, earlier, sound. I can hear this. Overall, fine, but nothing I’d return to.
I’ve never really liked Thin Lizzy. 70s rock isn’t really a genre that holds its own these days. A live version at over an hour has not made me change my mind.
I don’t mind this, but I wouldn’t seek it out to listen to.
I don’t like Morrissey. I thought it was mainly because he’s a twat, but you now realise it’s not. I realised that I liked listening to the music. I like Jonny Marr et al. Morrissey is however a twat. He clearly always has been. He can simply go away, but sadly I see I have another 5 albums to listen to. I’ve always wondered as well how much his music travels. I’m Scottish and can never remember hearing Morrissey until I moved to England. It’s like the musical equivalent of Monty Python.
Urgh! I had my first solo album from Morrissey yesterday and it became quickly apparent that the talent lay elsewhere and not with Morrissey himself. This is the second (of 4!) of his solo albums. They just aren’t good enough. I’ve started to wondered as well how much his music travels. I’m Scottish and can never remember hearing Morrissey until I moved to England and, granted, there is a live/hate thing about him here, but he doesn’t get a look in elsewhere. It’s like the musical equivalent of Monty Python.
I like this. Full disclosure, I was doing work and it was playing in the background.
Some Fatboy Slim tunes I love, some I don’t. I’m probably more of a fan of his ambient stuff, e.g. Song for Shelter, than I am of his Gangsta Trippin’ stuff. Sadly, some have been massively overplayed on the radio so I don’t love them anymore. This album is different to the Fatboy Slim that was everywhere in the late 90s and early 00s. It’s more house music than I suppose what could be referred to as EDM these days. Some tracks are good, some are not. Overall, fine, but not probably his best album overall.
A criticism I have of doing this project so far is the number of repeat artists on the list. Too much Beatles, Rolling Stones, Bowie, too much Metallica, far too much Morrissey etc. Some, I’m sure, can probably be included more than once as their sound changes, but some, like Morrissey are shitter as a solo artist so what’s the point. I like the White Stripes. I like this album. It’s quirky. But I’ve already listened to two other White Stripe albums (and a solo Jack White album) that are not that discernible from this. Even the album covers look similar FFS! I get it. I get their sound. Sadly, this means other artists, who in the name of eclecticism, should more likely be included on here, but are sadly omitted. This was fine, but could have told you that from listening to one album.
Upon refreshing today I was filled with dread. This week I’ve had two Morrissey albums back to back then this. Enough to sap the soul from even the most ardent fan of British music, which I’m not. Being a teenager in the 90s in the UK wasn’t great musically. The radio played a limited number of songs on what seemed like constant repeat - Brimful of Asha was one of them. I really don’t like the radio edit because I’ve heard it enough for several lifetimes. However, the album version is fa superior. It’s slowed down, which makes it work better. The rest of the album is mixed. I’m familiar with the first song as it’s been used a lot in adverts. There are some good songs on here. However, there are also some conceptual stuff that does work, but also some that doesn’t work. Overall, I can say I’ve come away from this album more positive than I thought I would and it’s a shame that Brimfull of Asha was ultimately their downfall.
This was fine, though I think listening to it at a latitude where it’s dark at 4 in the afternoon in January doesn’t help. Would I listen to it again? Probably not.
This was fine. It’s not really my kind of thing, but I can see equally why people like it or loathe it.
Hmmm. I think I’ve had enough of punk and post-punk now. I think you need to be aligned with this genre and a real fa to appreciate this. I’m neither, so didn’t.
Good lyrics, which is at odds with most other rap/hip hop music. The music let it down. The sampling wasn’t crisp enough. It sounded like an early rap/hip-hop album sadly.
I first heard of Nick Drake at university when I was listening, bizarrely, to a BBC R4 programme by Brad Pitt on how much he liked Nick Drake’s music. I’ve been a fan ever since and have all his albums. His guitar playing is outstanding and his voice is wonderful. His second album is more polished and I suppose more bombastic and less folksy than his first, but each is a delight in their own ways. Sad that he passed away so young
7 Neil Young albums! 7! The first song is fine, but then, as soon as the second song starts, you are reminded that everything this man produces is exactly the same. After that it gets tedious.
I liked this, but not as much as a lot of other people do. Is this album the musical equivalent of one of the books on the bookshelf that people have visible for their WFH online meetings that people can see in the background, but isn’t actually listened to very often. If I bothered to buy stuff then that’s what this album would probably be the equivalent of for me. It’s fine, but all the songs are effectively identikits - twangy guitars, heavy base, off beat vocals. It’s fine, but it’s just that. I’ve walked past the hype merchant in favour of the reality pedlar.
Odd album. Like listening to the child of Lou Reed and Frank Spencer. The second song should be familiar to anyone in the UK as it’s been used in adverts and because of this the band and the vocalists voice seemed more familiar than they were. However, the album was mostly miss. Some higher tempo tracks, where the weakness in the vocalists voice could be hidden, and some low tempo tracks where it could not. Would I listen to it again? No.
I’m not a fan of FKA Twigs music. It’s a bit too out there for my liking. The vocals are strained. The music is tinny like it’s being made on a laptop with some plug in desktop speakers and is generally all over the place, which is probably the style, but it just doesn’t do it for me.
I’ve grown less fond of rap/hip-hop as I’ve aged. There’s few genres that I can’t play in the house out loud, but this is one. Mainly because I can’t have misogynistic shite being played in a house where my wife and daughter live. This I can play, but I ultimately lose interest after about the fifth/sixth track as it’s quite similar. Clean, but quite samey.
I bought this album on release. I like Doves, but their second album is better. This has some crackers on it, such as The Cedar Room, but you do need to trawl through quite a bit of melancholic noise to get there.
Not very uplifting, but more uplifting than Nick Cave.
Heavy sigh. What’s the point of this? It’s not clever enough to be parody.
It was ok. After about half way I’d gotten a bit bored and thought I’d accidentally started playing a Disney soundtrack. Would I listen again? No.
I started liking this, but then every song was probably 3-4 minutes too long.
I’m not a fan of hip hop/rap in general, mainly because I don’t like the lyrical content of most modern stuff. However, this I like. Not just because it doesn’t seek to offend, but also musically it’s excellent. I’d happily listen to this and De La Soul all the time.
I like Sinatra. I like Bosa Nova. I like this less than the sum of its parts.
This was ok. I thought when I was listening to this that I’m not liking it as much as other folk albums, such as Nick Drake’s. It’s manly because I like the music and I like Joni Mitchell’s singing, but the two never meet.
I liked this. Relaxing electronic music.
Girlfriend was played incessantly on 6Music a few summers back. I didn’t like this song as it was just rehashing 80s music with a French twang. The rest of the same.
As alt-rock albums go this was fine. Skunk Anansie were about when I was younger, but they never really took off. I liked their earlier stuff as it was a bit more ‘edgy’ and raw. The top review of this album resonates with me and suggests that it’s a bit too produced and that this takes away some of the rawness that usually accompanies alt-rock albums. I’d agree with this. There are no edges to this at all.
I’d rather listen to this than the several Metallica albums I’ve needed to listen to so far, but it’s not wining that race by much. It’s all too similar to like too much. After a while my mind felt like it was being dragged into the soundtrack of an indie movie from the 2000s whether I liked it or not.
I’m indifferent to this. There are some ok tracks on here, but also some pretty poor tracks too. It’s a very ‘mid’ 2000s rap/hip hop album, which means it sits in the lower quartile of all rap/hip hop ever made.
This was ok, nothing more.
I didn’t warm to this at all. There’s nothing in my cultural capital that gives me an insight into any of the goings on in a country track. Ever.
Not really a fan of glam rock, but I’ll make an exception for this.
Never listened to Steely Dan before. This wasn’t bad.
Firstly, the glaring hypocrisy of several of the top reviews for this album is shocking. Sure, Kanye West is an anti-Semite, but I don’t see the same level of criticism being levelled at any of the several Pink Floyd albums on this list. To the album. It’s certainly different from the majority of rap released at the same time, which I suppose increased its popularity. The use of autotune isn’t great, but so goes the times. Personally, I’m a fan of Graduation and My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy over College Drop Out as the interludes, something which pervades rap/hip-hop more than any other genre, are gone by then and the tracks are grander and more accomplished. Overall, it’s one of the better hip-hop/rap albums in the list, but not one I would chose to listen to again.
Never heard of this artist before. This should be right up my street and the first track piqued my interest with a Vikings-like track. However, I found the rest of the album wanting. I was expecting, reading some reviews some interesting soundscapes that would be best listened to through headphones. I didn’t get any of that. It didn’t have the levels of someone like Caribou or Boards of Canada. Would I listen again? No.
I didn’t warm to this. After the first three songs it became repetitive and insipid. Not something I’ll revisit.
Great voices. Shame about the music. Dreary. Unthought I’d been listening for about an hour, but was only 20 minutes in. Persevered, but only just. Didn’t shift my opinion on country music.
Never head of this group before. It was ok. Would I listen again? No.
Sufjan Stevens does this sort of stuff so much better.
I liked this, but then I had no idea what was being said. Takes away some of the enjoyment when you feel like a philistine listening to it.
Hmmm. This was just ok. The backing music was interesting and the lyrics were interesting and beyond the usually misogynistic twaddle spat out by most contemporaries. However, I felt the lyricisms wasn’t as good as it could have been and his pitch kept on making me think of Vanilla Ice. MF Doom is more accomplished and would have filled this space better.
Liked this.
As relevant today sadly as it was when it was made. Good sampling too.
I like this less than the other album. It’s pretty eclectic and a bit bizarre, but that’s part of the fun. Would I listen to it again? Probably not, but I’m glad I have listened to it. Better this than some polished turds I’ve listened to already! Yes, that’s right I’m looking at you Metallica.
This was ok, though how it has managed to make a list of the 1001 albums to listen to before you die is beyond me. Would I listen to it again? No.
The Police certainly have a recognisable style. I like it, but I know others won’t. Mainly because of Sting. Another polarising individual I’ve seen on this list so far that people review instead of the music, which I’m guilty of to an extent to, is Morrisey. Who would you rather be stuck in a lift with? It’d be Sting for me. The singles do most of the heavy lifting on this relatively short album, but even then it’s still good.
I’d rather listen to this than any hip hop music produced today. Sure, it sounds a bit dated now, but the social commentary is still sadly relevant.
Yawn. Same old country themes with some twangy music. You only need to listen to the first two songs to know what every other song will sound like - either a riff on criminality or ‘romance’. The only blessing is that it’s just over 30 minutes long so the suffering is short-lived.
I liked this less than I have other jazz albums on the list so far. Can’t put my finger on why though.
Glam rock. Enough said.
A new one for me. I enjoyed this.
Some tracks were better than others. Sounded like a transitions album between 80s rock and what was to become 90s indie at times.
Never heard of this band before. Would I listen to this again? No.
15 minutes! Though the lyrics were quite basic the production values on this were better than other albums of this genre.
This was just noise interspersed periodically with something that resembled music.
Mixed. Some songs I really liked, some songs I didn’t. The opening track is weak.
I didn’t warm to this. Never heard of this band before. The opening track was intriguing until the guy started to sing. After that, a combination of the guys singing and dull tracks didn’t sustain my interest.
Liked this.
It’s not really my kind of music, but I ca appreciate the quality.
This has dated. It’s from the time when hip-hop albums were filled with skits, which is just a waste of time and effort. The lyrics are poor and, like all Eminem tracks, filled with language and intent that needs to be put in a bin and set on fire. It’s well produced, but beyond that I can’t give it any praise. Sad that stuff like this will be held in posterity as something that is part of the cultural record.
This was odd, but not unpleasant. Would it be something I would listen to again? No.
Odd intro. Felt like I was listening to the soundtrack from the Fallout tv series. Not unpleasant, but not something I’d choose to listen to again.
Ice T was in a film in the 90s with Rutger Hauer and Gary Busey called Surviving the Game, where he played a homeless man that was being hunted as game by some rich white guys. I haven’t seen the film since the 90s, but it wasn’t a particularly good film back then. I listened to Ice T’s music in the 90’s too. I thought it was ok then, but on reflection and listening now, it isn’t. Funny that.
Not something I’d listen to again. It was fine.
Pffft. This isn’t any different than anything else I’ve heard in this genre. Would I listen again? No.
Didn’t enjoy this.
I liked this album a lot when I was a teenager in the 90s. G-Funk was something different from the scratchy samples and base of the gangster rap floating around at the same time. Has this aged well? Musically, yes. Lyrically, no. I’ve put the album on a few times in the last few years and stopped it as it’s just too much to be listening to in anything but a private space.
Urgh, ffs. I’ve already listened to another of his albums on this list. I’d liken both albums to passing a busker on the street. Mostly shit and instantly forgettable. Why this guy has any albums on this list let alone two is beyond me.
Never heard of this guy before. Any riff on country music isn’t going to down well with me and this didn’t offer any surprises. Not as bad as standard country music, but not something I would listen to again.
Meh. I could take or leave Elvis Costello’s music.
I used to own this album. Whilst owning it I used to think there were some excellent tracks on it, but there was a decent amount of filler. My opinion hasn’t changed.
This period of music in the UK was dreary. This offers nothing to change my view. Would I listen to it again? No.
Peak Kanye. The man’s a prick, but this album is packed.
Never heard of this band before. Kept my interest. Fishcakes? WTF? Would I listen again? Yes, but I’d skip fishcakes.
Ooft. Sub album art and sub music.
Nothing special
Urgh. Second Elvis Costello album in a week. The man can’t sing.
Liked this. Wasn’t ever going to be anything different.
1 hour 48 minutes… As a live album it’s good, but that’s to be expected when every song is effectively the same.
Don’t have any particular feelings either for or against this.
Some great tracks, but also some weaker ones too. Overall, the great tracks cover for the weaker ones.
I didn’t warm to this, but I was never a fan of them at the time. It’s all over the shop! Pick a lane! Trying to be something they ultimately weren’t means that it lands in nothingness. It astonishes me that there are two albums from this entirely forgettable band on this list.
Musically very good. Lyrics a bit hot and miss. Stylistically, you can hear what it led to.
Big BLAND star. That is does this by straddling several styles is remarkable.
Had no strong opinion on this either way. 5 Brian Eno albums though???
This was my played frequently in the early 90s and the band have an affinity with the Tartan Army that can’t really be explained given they are from down under. Overall, I enjoyed it more than I thought I would.
Amiga 500/Comodore 64/ Spectrum ZX vibes in the first 20 seconds of track one. Sadly, that was the best bit.
Others have commented how awful early 2000s music was. The fact that the first three tracks on this album were all massively overplayed on UK radio says so. This album is fine, but only that.
I didn’t enjoy listening to this. Oddly paced. Long tracks. Not as bad as country music though.
I knew of Pavement in the 2000s, but any time I tried to listen to them I ultimately got bored. No different now. Fine as something in the background, but nothing more.
Pop-hop? I didn’t warm to this. I was thinking it was over-produced then who pops along to confirm my thinking? H-to-the-Izzo!
Really enjoyed this. Not a band that was really in my radar before this. Sure, I knew about ‘where is my mind’ from the closing credits of Fight Club, but never really sought them out. Sad I didn’t before now. Both this and the other album on the list have been added to my playlists. Not the solo stuff though, that isn’t as good.
I like Arrested Development, but if I had a gun to my head and needed to choose an inoffensive 90s rap group to listen to it’d be A Tribe Called Quest. Sorry, but the music is just a little better.
Aerosmith in my mind are a bunch of weird looking fellas with unwashed long hair and poorly fitting clothing that bounced out generic movie rock (I’m thinking Armageddon, Mrs Doubtfire etc) in the 90s. I know very little of the Aerosmith that existed before this, but it does taint my view. Nothing hard rock about this. More akin to glam rock, which is fine if that floats your boat. It doesn’t float mine. The first track was an insipid and had glam rock vibes. It generally didn’t get any better. A few better tracks, but I wouldn’t ever choose to listen to this again.
I’ve heard some of the tracks in the radio before, but never knew the band. I like this. In this bands influence on future generations ,e.g. Weezer (Just what I needed) is clear.
Liked this. Would happily listen to it again.
I didn’t mind the other Common album on the list. I don’t like this one that much. It’s over-long at 1 hour 17 minutes and it feels it. It’s repetitive. Sure, it’s got a different sound to listen to rap, but more variation and less hubris.
Musically excellent. The eclecticism of it makes it even more appealing.
Not for me.
80s synth pop. Singles are the best part of this album. The other tracks are sub-par.
I found this tedious. Overlong too.
My least favourite Massive Attack album.
This takes me back to the early 90s when music in the UK was grim. I didn’t warm to this. The first song was musically fine, but the guy can’t sing. It didn’t get any better.
Funny how people don’t get incensed about the politics of these guys but make it the first thing they say about others. I wouldn’t ever actually listen to this by choice. Sure, it’s fine, but not my choice of music.
Didn’t like this. Tried to like it, but it’s just too shouty. Music for spree killers.
It’s ok. It’s far too long though.
Quite dreary. Would I listen again? No.
This was better than the other ZZ Top album on this list. The other album is what I knew ZZ Top as. This was a pleasant surprise.
I bought this album at the time. It was at the fore-front of what turns out to have been a couple of decades of scandi-obsession in the UK. Scandi-noir, hyyge etc. It’s varied. It’s fresh compared to the vast majority of stuff being released at the time. A welcome breath of fresh air.
Heck, this is so culturally appropriated that they even changed their accents too.
Intro is excellent. Sadly, the rest doesn’t quite live up to it. It’s fine, but only that. I prefer Jamie XX’s music to that of The xx.
I put this in whilst changing the cartridges in my kitchen mixer tap. It wasn’t a taxing job at all, but I can’t really pick out anything from this album I noticed. Says it all really. The top review at the time of writing this suggests this is dinner music for an all inclusive holiday dinner. Bang on. Inoffensive background musak.
Steely Dan’s Aja then this. What have I done to upset the random generator? This was even more dull than Aja.
Like the other Bee Gees album on this list it’s not what you’d expect from the disco guys. I don’t like the Bee Gees disco stuff, but I now realise I like it more than this. It’s really poor as an album. Even as a concept album it’s all over the place.
Unavailable on Spotify. Every other album was though. Listened on YouTube, which meant I heard more adverts for start-up banks than any music I liked. This wasn’t something that I wanted to be listening to on a nice sunny day
The music was good. Shame about, what can only be loosely described as, singing.
Not something I would choose to listen to, but when I was listening to it I enjoyed it.
I sighed as soon as this album came up. I’ve heard enough psychedelic rock on this list already (59% through) to never hear any ever again. It’s no different than anything else from the genre and offers nothing of interest.
I like The Undertones. The music is good. Even if it weren’t the fact that Fergal Sharkey has devoted his later years to getting water companies and the government to stop pumping shite into rivers is commendable in itself. Top man!
Music to do things to. It’s a bit uninvolved for me to fully get on board with it, but it’s good to have on whilst doing something overtly middle class. In fact, I’m going to get my tagine out the garage. See you later.
I first thought: yet another psychedelic rock album. Effectively another Pink Floyd album. Yawn! However, this isn’t really psychedelic rock. It’s just odd. It’s got a bit of a Beatles mashed with Chas and Dave vibe to it. I didn’t enjoy listening to it.
It was fine, but nothing more than that.
I like The Smashing Pumpkins, but I came later to their work so the first album I was really familiar with was Melancholy… This is great. I could happily listen to this again and again.
I’m indifferent to this genre. I wouldn’t choose to listen to it. Some groups capture my interest. Some groups quickly lose my interest. This sits firmly in the middle. The music was good, but it never really went anywhere. As a result it’s, as the kids say, ‘mid’.
Hmmm. I liked early Miss Elliott stuff. It was experimental and the videos on MTV were also interesting. The Intro to this album is unnecessary. Sadly, Missy Elliott was at the forefront of the odd rhythm stuff that culminated in Timbaland shitting over any genre he could with his generic off-rhythm beats and wiki-wiki mouth sounds. The lyrics also are a function of their time with heavy and consistent name dropping brands and wealth-signalling products. Would I listen to this again? No.
My parents had this on vinyl and I always remember flicking through the collection and coming to this and thinking what a shit cover it was. The music is fine, but it’s no different than any of the other 70s rock on here and therefore probably shouldn’t be on the list. One for the genre would be enough since it all sounds the same.
What have I just listened to? Why did someone feel I needed to listen to this?
This is an album where I feel the trailblazers have been overshadowed by those in their wake.
If one was judging an album by its cover then this would score low. Judging it by its music also scores it low. Nothing memorable other than his abnormally high pitched voice, which jars after a short time.
I like Arcade Fire. However, I always feel that just when a song is about to hit its stride is clicks autopilot and chugs along doing the same thing for several more minutes. In a roundabout way I suppose I like Arcade Fire but I quickly get bored.
Liked this. It is a bit dated, but still enjoyable.
New band for me. I really liked this. Excellent musicianship.
A big, fat whopping no. This is the epitome of awful country music.
I like this (and bought it on release), but I like it less than Lost Souls.
Some great tracks
This was alright, but nothing more. One of the more dubious album covers I’ve seen so far.
Enjoyed listening to this. Not something I would actively seek out though.
Lots of sassy reviews from people that can’t be arsed after 20-30 albums and give up. Disclaimer: I bought this album on release. It was a welcome break from Oasis and the hangers on in the late 90s. Sure, some of the songs were massively overplayed on the radio and Fran and the boys were everywhere you looked, but I think that just showed the desire for something different that mono-brow and mono-tone Mancs.
I liked listening to this. I recognise the second track from something. Can’t figure out whether it’s an advert or tv series though. No clue whatsoever as to what was being said though, which always makes me pensive.
This is was fine. Would I choose to put this on again? No.
Enjoyed this.
Very dated. I didn’t enjoy listening to this.
I liked this. In listening to more ska music through this list than I ever have before I realise that I like ska. This is probably the best ska album I’ve listened to so far.
I liked this, but it’s a shame it’s a live album.
This isn’t enough of a transition from the pop nonsense that they were before this. Norwegian Wood is a great song, but not enough of this ilk for my liking. It’s fine, but this iteration of the Beatles isn’t my cup of tea (yet).
There’s clearly talent there, but I didn’t enjoy listening to this in the slightest.
Liked this.
I had no idea what was being said at all, but enjoyed the music. It’s raining and cold in June. This takes me somewhere where the weather is nicer and there’s a cold drink in my hand.
Pffffft. I’ve heard better from bands doing the same stuff.
A mixed album. Some tracks I really liked, but some of the tracks with a greater mix of acid house I didn’t like as they were a bit monotonously repetitive.
Short. Varied. Like 50% of this review.
I didn’t like this album at the time. My opinion hasn’t changed. Another example of a turd being less whiffy than all other turds in the British music industry at the time.
Better than the other Mothers of Invention album on the list, but it’s not a high bar.
I like Hot Chip. Always have. I would say that in my view The Warning is a better album as it really introduced the group to a wider audience and has some absolute classics from the group on there. This is a good album and shows that they’ve really hit their stride as a group, but it doesn’t have the breakthrough relevance of The Warning.
Enjoyed Facist Groove Thang. Didn’t enjoy much else.
Sure, it’s Stevie Wonder, so it’s going to be good stuff. But, not as good as the other albums on the list.
Wouldn’t listen to it again, but enjoyed it when I listened to it.
Not my genre. Music was fine. Lyrics less so. Ultimately, it did become tedious from about 1/3 of the way in as it didn’t really change.
This was fine. Would I listen to it again? No.