Reviews (page 9 of 9)
”Baby do you LHOOVE MHEE” ”RhYThm ÄND bLUEs” ”TAKE MY LOOVE AND RHAN AWAY WHAAAAAAAAAAA” ”TRY TY TYYY TYY TYY TRTY TY TYY TYYY TYYY” ”BEIBEE CREISEE….. PSAIKHOO” "WHOOOOOOOO-O-O-O" Paskaa Paskaa Paskaa
Not my style.
I couldn’t make it through this album. I tried but this music is just not for me. It sounds outdated and feels generic for the time. 2/10 Fav track: none Least fav: dirty robber
I’m not sure how important this album can be since every cover sounds way worse than the original. Get this off the list ASAP.
Puwing.
This is an album that has expired. I get that this is the basis of rock and roll, but it's just all bleached bones to me now to hear. My Dad would be tapping his foot!
Mixing is rather awful, I don’t care for listening to albums that “maybe” created a sub genre. unless it’s an album that’s actually doesn’t want to make me poke holes in my ear drums with a pin. There cover of good golly miss Molly is considered a hate crime in 38 states
Can’t tell an album by the cover, I suppose. I was expecting some harmonies, maybe some sweetness, but these guys sound like a completely unskilled and totally overexcited cover band from some region not known for its music or art scenes … oh, wait, that’s what they were.
More of the same american pie on cocaine crap. Lame.
this one can stay in the attic
I had to read some reviews to understand why this album might be included in a list of 1001 historically important albums. It seems that this is debatably a precursor to punk, a proposition that nonetheless seems to be disputed. Without this historical association I struggle to find any reason to elevate this album above the rest of the beatlesesque sounds of the mid 60s. If anything the shitty audio quality (which normally doesn't at all affect my judgement of an album) renders this album not only uninspiring, but almost unlistenable. 2/10
Somebody told this guy that he should do the James Brown "WAAAAOOOWW!!" scream as often as possible, and he took that advice to heart. At first it was mildly annoying, but by the end of the album (which feels much, much longer than 30 minutes), I was making a mental note to avoid this band in the future at all costs. Best track: Whichever one has the lowest WAAAOOOWW to time ratio. I'm not going to listen again to figure it out
First Listen: I hate bands that just have a bunch of other people's hits and don't do anything original with them. This is a 1/5 for me. This might have been great back in 1965, but now, it is just a compilation of other bands' hits. Nothing to see here folks. Next.
Not sure I understand the hype on this one. Pretty generic sounding bar band. I guess this came out around '65, sure doesn't sound innovative or forward looking. Sorry not drinking the Kool aid on this one. 1 🌟
blodige ører pga. lydkvalitet. De hyla kunne de vært foruten. Sonic weapon burde det hett. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_weapon
Hated it
I understand that it’s a classic but could not vibe
The music is too loud for me
Classic rock and roll recognised some of the tracks generally very enjoyable
Not my style