A classic. Possibly their peak.

A classic. Possibly their peak.

First half is a 5/5 then it tails off in tir second half.

Some nice songs but not my cup of tea. Too flowery.

Was going to gibbs it 2 but didn't hate it. Was just bored. I think with mor familiarity I'd give it a 3.

Mildly listenable but rarely memorable. Pyramids and Lost the most interesting followed by the worst song on the album (Monks)

Very much enjoyed the first half but trailled a little. Loved y fact that a 35 minute album has 10 songs and one is 9 minutes.

I've always said Elvis Costello is an artist I respect but don't care much for. This was the first album I've heard of his. It was alright. Some good songs. Bit long. His voice ia mildly annoying but I like him more now.

Perfectly nice in parts, quite relaxing but equally quite boring. Vocalists a bit unmemorable (although a couple of times reminded me of someone else). Can see how Jamie xx is seen as a good music person.

This is the only Prince album I know well. It starts brilliantly in the first two songs and then proceeds to bump down slowly slowly towards a slightly boring conclusion wirh a few higher bounces.

First time I've actually heard this. I'm in yng minority in preferring they're later more melodic stuff which this gradually gets closer too but is still covered in funk. Similar pattern to many of the albums so far: just too long.

Easily enjoyable. Although I realise half the 60s were just covers albums.

Really wanted to give this 3.5. It started off so well, has so much going for it and definitely had more songs that I'm lively to go back to rhan most new things to be here, but some of it was a little rough. As with the little I already knew, the bass in the first track pushes this up for me not down.

Some great songs. Some good songs. Some annoying. Some do all three (Prophet's Song) but all in all tt album which proves to me why I can never love Queen.

It was all the same song. A perfevtlt ok but quite repetitive song.

Glorious final album. Dark, beautiful instrumentation.

This was not as bad as I expected, but mostly because I was appreciating the instrumentation (some of it quite novel even for today) rather then Elvis' irritating voice.

My first Led Zep album so biased. Does it have the best songs? No? But it holds together brilliantly and is possibly the best produced LZ album. Range, interesting songs. Highlight being the mandolin on Gallows Pole.

I'm sure with more patience I'd have enjoyed it more, but it was a bit much.

Rather enjoyed this. Only knew y one song before but it was more proggy than their popular stuff.

I like lots of extreme and heavy music. This was the first album on this list I skipped parts of (granted I probably listened to 90% but I had enough on a few songs). There were a songs which were quite alright but, but that it's that extreme (most of it is shock for shocks sake) most of it felt like being mildly assaulted audibly. Glad i was justified in never getting into MM as a teenager.

Great start after the horrors of MM. Trailled a bit towards tuf end.

Perfectly nice apart from the hackneyed blues songs. Never heard JT before but I imagine there is more out there I'd prefer

Honestly? Was pretty bored. But this is the problem with rushing day by day . This of the kind of album that I'd probably love with many multiple listens. Maybe. So it can have a 3 but I found little i enjoyed first time.

Never actually heard before although I knew a lot of the songs. Really enjoyable.

Never got into LCD and was intrigued. I liked it a bit is the best I can say.

Hard to follow that opener but much of the rest also very nice especially the two closers.

Lots of good stuff but (as is SOAD) all over the place and lacking some of the melody of their latter albums.