1001 Albums Summary

Really starts off with a trio of bangers. The influence this album has is readily apparent. Sometimes it can be hard to view a work of art separate from the art it has influenced. It is hard to view a work alone and not think of the many pieces it has gone on to influence. Sometimes a work of art might not stand the test of time on its own but rather as a piece of all it helped create. I think this album is not that. I think it does stand on its own. I might like some of the music is inspired more, but I liked this quite a bit.

It's Miles Davis. I mean... cmon.

Nothing wrong with it, just not very interesting.

The instrumental song "R.L Got Soul" is quite good

The short instrumental section in "Hard Feelings" is the best part of the album. Overall, not a big fan of Lorde's singing voice.

Nice blend of punk and bluesy country. A bit long for what it is, but I dig it.

This rules. Probably my favorite album up to this point.

Could I listen to most of this album while playing Skyrim and it not break the immersion? Yes. 4 star album

I can't think of any other band that incorporates the guitar the way Dire Straits do. It isn't just a guitar solo or two per song. Used almost like punctuation during vocal sections. And the guitar sound is so clean. Really stands out during an era that was progressing to heavier distortion.

The Weight is already one of the top songs of all time. The rest of the track list could be nothing but white noise and this would be a 5 star album. Luckily, the rest of the songs are good too

Singers in bands tend to get all of the attention and credit. So when singers go off to do solo work, it offers the chance to recognize the unnoticed impact of the other band members. This is readily apparent for Morrissey. His solo work here isn't awful by any means but clearly Johnny Marrs's songwriting and instrumentation was a key aspect to The Smiths's success. The song complaining about Indian immigrants knocks this down a star though. There is something nefarious about hearing Morrisseys' sad wistful voice - so commonly heared mourning some lost love - complaining about non white people in the subway station. Yuck.

Dat sax tho

A trio of good songs (Tainted Love, Where Did Our Love Go?, and Say Hello, Have Goodbye) surrounded by meh.

I do not like Red Hot Chili Peppers. They are the music equivalent to licking an ashtray. That said, I liked the song Breaking the Girl decently enough. And Under the Bridge is good

Smooth as silk

Classic for sure. Not necessarily something I'd think to put on, but I won't complain when I hear it.

Probably my favorite Miles Davis. Not as accessible as Kind of Blue

Forgettable.

I went in not expecting to really like this because I'm honestly not a big queen fan. But I ended up liking it a decent amount. There is a noticeable drop when you get to a song that doesn't feature Freddie on vocals. But those songs do serve as a good pallete cleanser from the bombast of the Freddie songs. A 3.5 for sure but this site doesn't allow half stars for some god awful reason.

It might be due to very low expectations given the terrible album cover, but I didn't find this too bad. Some enjoyment to be had. I'm glad british people aren't real though.

Really wishing I had that half star increments... 4.5 album. Very good. Talking Heads rule

Good instrumentation. Worth another listen but didn't really draw me in

Electronics is tricky because it does not lend itself to just listening. It works better in context to something else. Be that dancing or as the soundtrack to a movie (for this album, The Matrix comes to mind). Without that context it risks becoming stale and repetitive. That said, I found this album to be pretty well paced. As soon as a song was nearing that repetitive state where my ears tune out, it added something new to the track to grab my attention. It would be a killer score for The Matrix.

You open an album with a French horn interlude and you've sold me

3.5. Some good songs here.

Ah, yes. A classic album from "The Misspelled Animal Names" I don't really want to be so reductive in only drawing comparisons to another band with a misspelled animal name. I think that is unfair to what this album offers that is unique. There are some neat production tricks. I think this is an album that would grow on me with subsequent listens.

Quite dull.

A live album is certainly a choice. Not a good one, mind you. But a choice for sure. I'm not against live albums in general. There are some great ones (looking at you Stop Making Sense) but I'd never put that over a full Talking Heads album. And this isn't even a good live album. It is short though.

A lot of fun. Very nice melodies. Quite revolutionary for 1978

3.5

4.5 I am biased because this was a big deal to 10 year old me. But I think it holds up. Probably the definitive anti-Bush era album. Jesus of Suburbia is still a top tier medly

Let's give this album one song to be anti-cop, but you know who really needs to be taken down a peg? Those damn hippies. So the rest of the album will be making fun of hippies. This is good satire.

Didn't feel much listening to this. It isn't bad or offensive in anyway. Just doesn't do anything for me.

The Eagles is one of those bands thst have a great song you discover on Guitar Hero and think "man, I should listen to more of these guys", only to discover that Guitar Hero chose their one good song and everything else pales in comparison. Hotel California is a great song. Unfortunately, nothing else on the album is as interesting sonically, lyrically, or thematically. Great album cover though.

Bummed this wasn't on spotify for some reason. The youtube audio quality wasn't as good. But I was surprised by this album. Wish I could listen to it more easily.

Chock full of great songs. The only misstep is Revolution 9. But as this is a double album, one song is not enough to drag it down.

3.5

It is not that it's bad per se, but in the context on 1001 albums I must listen to before I die? I'm questioning that level of praise. Quite generic.

No

A decent portion of songs felt like they went on just a bit too long. Started to feel monotonous. But that is the nature of this kind of music and it is less suited for casual listening. Regardless, a lot of it was quite catchy 3.5

Anything with a Twin Peaks sample gets at minimum 4 stars.

The only good thing to come from Aerosmith is Liv Tyler

3.5 I got to listen to this in NYC. But this album doesn't feature the song from Elf. So what's the point of anything anymore?

Lots of different styles. Quite engaging

This is the kind of metal that people who hate metal think all metal sounds like. Just incoherent noise. The only way this album works is if it is meant to be satire of this era of terrible metal.

Love the dark fantasy gothic vibes. Not the biggest fan of Ozzy's vocals but they aren't enough to detract from the music.

3.5 Good sound but it all kinda blurred together.

I really like the contrast between the chill vibes of the music and some of the heavier lyrics. And always good to know that the problems we have today have been persistent for decades. Not depressing at all Felt the mixing could have been better. Vocals seemed to really overpower the music, though that could easily be a problem of the YouTube version I listened to.

I've had several listens to this album before; because of its acclaim. This is the first listen that really clicked with me. Sometimes an albums prestige sets unfair expectations, and I think this is a prime example. Sometimes too, and album requires more than one listen to really sink in. Which can be an issue when ranking the albums on this list.

Torn thoughts on this one. On the one hand, if they wanted an album with this vibe on the list, why not go with Angelo Badalamenti's score for Fire Walk With Me. Arguably the best film noir soundtrack on existence. On the other hand, as I listened, it did begin to grow on me. I started to see scenes from a movie that does not exist play out in my mind. It does a great job of playing with tropes and expectations to create visuals from nothing but music. And that's pretty neat. So I can see why it would be on the list from an experimental point of view. Doubt I will go back to listen again but I did have fun with it.

Those drums tho

I liked this a lot. Decent variety. Sounds great. Will go back to listen again

Pretty bland

I like Neil Young's voice. This may not be his best offering but it is decent. 3.5

Undoubtedly influential to the sound of thr early to mid 60s (looking at you early Beach Boys and Beatles albums). However, it just doesn't really offer anyrhing all that exciting or interesting in retrospect. It is very short though so it never out stays it's welcome.

Ultimate chill. Makes the days worries slip away and reminds you that, in the end, everything will be all right

I've gotten to the point I dread seeing yet another 60s-70s psych rock album. A genre I enjoy but is over represented on this list. So a good test of an album of this genre is that even though I groaned seeing this album pop up (I've not listened to it before) I really enjoyed it.

I've always had a blind spot for MJ. This is likely due to the fact that I grew up hearing all of the many many controversies and scandals and South Park jokes. Honestly, up until the day he died, I kinda thought MJ was always a joke. No one ever really liked him or his music. And I just never really went and listened to test that thought. So I enjoyed this album quite a bit. Always happy to have a push to listen to things that I for some reason never bothered to before.

Liked the instrumentation. The vocals were okay

Im not a big Elvis fan. This album didn't change that. But it wasn't as bad as I expected

3.5

Surprise Kate Bush!

No idea why they didn't choose Toxicity for this list.

Love the atmosphere. The way songs build layer upon layer. Would take more listens to fully digest the lyrics but I'm sure they're depressing. But I plan to listen again. Alright, I wrote the above text right after my first listen then shortly after listened again. Can confirm: very depressing. But also not hopelessly so. A very beautiful album both sonically and lyrically. One of the best I've discovered from this list so far.

I am admittedly ignorant to the intricacies of music production. But man, why don't more albums sound this good? The mixing is fantastic.

Van Halen is great example of a group that is technically proficient, but so so boring. It is montage music. On its own it offers nothing. Put it as the backing track to a cool work out montage? Then it'll be pretty neat.

3.5

Chill vibes; good times

Bright as a summers day with lyrics that bring take all the cheer away. Good stuff

There isn't a thing I, or anyone on this site, could say that hasn't been said hundreds of times before. It's like trying to write about Citizen Kane. It may not have been their final release, but it was their final recorded and they went out with the biggest bang possible. The 2nd side medley is one of the best things recorded in popular music history.

Liked the sound for the most part. Nothing too stand out. I could see it growing on my after more listens but for now I'd go 3.5

Very theatrical and vibrant but also moody. Very good

Look, 1001 albums is a lot of albums. And I am sympathetic to the fact that after a while it may get tiring or boring coming up with that many albums that really deserve to be listened to. So maybe you decide to break up the tedium and add in a few troll albums. That is the only explanation I can accept for why this album is on this list. There are so many grunge adjacent 90s rock albums that could take its place. Hell, put Nevermind on here twice for all I care. Beyond being exceptionally generic, it doesn't even sound good. The mix is very muddy. Like I am listening to it on speakers lying submerged in a pool filled with the tears of the many musicians who deserved a place on this list over this album.

Undeniable in its impact on what would become the sound of most alt indie rock for the next few decades. More interested in creating a mood with its music than catchy melodies, it is easy to see how the "emo" artists of decades to come wouldn't have been without albums like this. It is hard to judge the album on its own apart from this influence. In ways it holds its own, and in others it feels lacking. Probably a 3.5

I respect this more than I like it. Maybe with further listens I could eventually like it.

Liked more than I would have expected

Context is important in music. Some things do not lend to casual listening as well as others. And electronica is a prime example. Often too repetitive for just listening, it benefits heavily from hearing it in the right context. Namely, when dancing. This album surprised me though by offering a bit more. At times quite cinematic.

One of the worst hours of my life. However, I understand why it is on the list. To fully appreciate the beauty of life, you must glimpse the deepest depths of despair.

4.5. Trying to not have too many 5 stars but this could easily be one.

I wish British people were still this cool

Smooth listening for a nice sunny day

Kinda boring. Never been a big fan of American Pie and it was by far the highlight of the album.

The pinnacle of okay

The Stones are a quintessential Greatest Hits band for me. You could compile a lengthy and killer album with their greatest hits. But any individual album is a bit lacking. This is a 3.5. The one-two punch of Wild Horses and Can't Hear Me Knocking rules enough to bump it to 4 though.

I like the balance between the up beat higher energy tracks and the slower contemplative ones. Some of these songs are prime staring -out-a-rain-soaked-bus-window or listlessly-swinging-in-a-park-on-a-foggy-summer-night tracks.

More albums should have the artist explaining the mechanics of their songs. In some ways, I enjoyed those explanations more than the music itself.

This album just did nothing for me. It isn't bad per se, but very forgettable.

I think I'd be more accepting if this was intended as a Led Zeppelin parody.

As the soundtrack to an experimental disaster or war film, this would be 4 stars. Having two drum sets played in sync (a move I highly respect) creates this wall of sound that the saxophones, while always ahead of it, are constantly on the run from it. It creates a highly chaotic sound that is very much its own thing. And then having the audacity to make the

Great instrumentation. Look, I am by no means a prude. I am not 17 and scared of Sabrina Carpenter. But this genre of 70s era dudes talking about how their dicks are gifts to the world is neither exotic, sexy, or sensual. It is just annoying and gross.

Not really my thing. But I 100% understand it's placement on the list. Monumental in modern pop history.

This happens with a lot of heavy punk and metal bands. I love the instrumentation but the vocals leave a lot to be desired. Not that I want the vocals to be super clean or anything. Just more on par with the quality of the instrumentals.

Within the first 4 songs, there is more variety and experimentation that many artists have across multiple albums. Insane to think what this would have been like to experience upon release.

I can understand some of the negative reviews if this was the first time they had listened to this album. I believe this is my third time listening and the first time it really clicked. Partly that is due to listening with more rapt attention instead of casually listening at work. But I believe having some familiarity with the album allowed me to better digest it as a whole. That is an inherent flaw in listening to a new album everyday. Some albums require time and multiple listens for them to fully make sense.

I want to like this more than I do. It has so many elements that should add up to an album I really enjoy. But something in the production really saps all the energy that should be present. It comes off sounding really flat. That this made it on the list and Weezer's Blue Album didn't is maybe a war crime?

Maybe I shouldn't read reviews on her before listening. Because so many reviews on here reference to this album being spooky. This really got my hopes up. A New Orleans style spooky album? Sign me up. I have no idea where any of those reviews are coming from. Nothing spooky about this. It is decent though.

When I saw this was an hour and six minute electronica album, a bit of dread came over me. It was not alleviated by reading the numerous 1 and 2 star reviews. So maybe going in with so low of expectations helped, but I did not dislike this as much as I feared I would. I didn't super love it or anything, but it was enjoyable enough of a listen. No where near the worst this lost has offered so far.

Didn't really dislike it but it all blended together after a while.

The transition from the "I Love my Car" song to the "You're my Best Friend" song is hilarious

The runtime can be a bit intimidating. But there is enough variety that it ends up working quite well. You could split this into one very good art pop album and one very good grunge album. But I think, when added together, the contrast between them makes for an excellent mega album.

Probably a victim of over hype. Oasis is so popular that this album feels like a let down. In a vacuum, it would probably be 4 stars. But I was expecting more from it. Is it unfair to rate it lower for that reason? Maybe.

I like reggae well enough. I don't seek it out on my own, but I don't dislike listening to it. Steel drums are cool. I like the almost lethargic groove. But a full album of reggae is too much reggae for me. It loses its appeal by the halfway mark.

A 5/5 for its influence, no doubt. But rather one note on its own.

There are some good vibes here. But not enough to sustain its long runtime. In the right mindset and atmosphere, I could see myself enjoying this more. If I was listening to this while going on a drive or a walk on a rainy fall day, it might be a 4 star album.

I played tenor sax in high school jazz band. Coltrane is THE guy.

I really really hate Aerosmith. At what age does someone writing a song called "Young Lust" go from pretty creepy to borderline pedophilic to just straight pedophilia? Cause Steven Tyler was 41 when this was recorded. Gotta figure out where on that spectrum this places him

In years past, big band was my go to for jazz. In recent years, I have become more fond of the smaller ensembles a la Thelonious Monk, Miles Davis, etc. But this was nice to go back to. It might not be my favorite form of jazz, but it is still a lot of fun.

Sounds like church music you'd hear on a planet from the Dune universe. It rules. Bjork rules I respect her unwillingness to stay in one lane for too long. Post (my favorite album of hers) is an all time banger and was critically and commercially very successful. She could have stuck to that sound and released numerous albums that would have sold well and - let's be real - been all timer albums. But she clearly thinks very deeply about music itself, not as simply a vessel to deliver a message or a catchy melody. She creates sounds that are unique and captivating. Love it or hate it, there is no denying that the sound of this album is uniquely this album. If you were to hear it in a vacuum years down the line, you will not mistake it for anything else. And she doesn't sacrifice catchy melodies either. I don't really buy into the idea that this album is some avant-garde inaccessible art piece (despite the myriad of 1 star reviews that seem to think so). It isn't random noise; there is melody. It isn't in some discordant key that makes the ear cringe. I do not know why people are so unaccepting of any time art goes out of the norm (be it film, music, painting), but I am glad artists like Bjork do not let it stop them.

I Am Waiting saves this album from a 2 star. And part of my love of that song is it's use in the movie Rushmore. I listened to the UK release which didn't have Paint it Black. That would have bumped it to a 3.5, but still a 3 on this site.

I really like Cat Stevens's voice. Wild World and Father & Son alone makes this at minimum a 4 star album. I'd give it 4.5 if I could.

A bit of a nightmare scenario for techno/electronic. Repetitive and long. The sounds and beats are good, they just go on far too long with little change.

Far too many 60s psychedelic rock albums on this list

Feels a bit lacking, but then you realize it came out the same year as Ghostbusters. Worth listening to just to see how far the genre has come and in such a relatively short amount of time.

At times, a worse Blade Runner score. At others, a worse Mega Man score. That my comparisons all came out a decade after, speaks to its innovation. But innovation only counts for so much.

A hard one to review. Partly because he sucks so much in real-life but also because any negative reviews will probably be looked at as reviews of Kanye as a person (again, he sucks). But I can say that I have listened to this album several times before he went fully off the deep end and I have never understood the hype. And after this listen, I still don't. It isn't bad and there are things I enjoyed. But it is too long and feels lacking because of how hyped it is.

I am dubious about the validity of listening to and rating a standard 40 minute album after one day. A 3 hour box set stands no chance of being fairly appreciated in that amount of time. I also find the idea of putting a compliation album like this on the list in the first place. Feels like a cop out to me. Would be like putting the 2009 Beatles box set on as a single entry.

Not at all what I was expecting from the band name, or the album title, or the album cover. In some ways, that made this album more palatable. But at best it is passable GTA loading screen music.

In some ways, having a ridiculous number of 60s psychedelic rock on this list does offer a good contrast to how different this album was from similar artists of the time.

3.5. Not a big Jimi Hendrix fan.

It is fine. It sounds good but it is nothing special. Doesn't do much for me.

Surprised by how lacking the instrumental is. On first glance it has everything you would expect from an early metal album. Heavy trudging guitar riffs. Occasional frantic solos. But everything feels so slow. Like the sound is caught in a layer of molasses or something. The end result is an album that sounds no heavier than Helter Skelter, and would be easily toppled by Metallica a few years later.

While I do agree that we do not need this fascist groove thing (now more than ever), that song might not be the most convincing approach. However, the rest of the album was quite good. Some great grooves.

This was a fun listen. Probably wouldn't go back to it often, but very easy and enjoyable listening.

Growing up seeing Flavor of Love on VH1, I would never have expected Flava Flav to have songs like this. I'd give it a 4.5, so I struggled between a 4 and 5. But hearing Burn Hollywood Burn right before seeing Spike Lee's Highest 2 Lowest cemented it as a 5.

Should absolutely be Demon Days or Plastic Beach. I get the idea of paying respect to albums that started it all (and this album is still very good), and I would be more accepting of this album on the list if just one of the other albums I mention were also on here. But this is not the best representation of Gorillaz, but nor is it the most culturally significant. Everyone and their dog knows Feel Good Inc, after all. Gorillaz deserves a 5 star album on this list, but I do not think their debut is 5 start unfortunately. Still very good though.

Just not my thing

That one od the top reviews on this site is a 1 star reviews that claims this album is directly responsible for later mass murders and is an affront to god and nature is really funny to me. So I must give it 4 stars.

Not too bad but nothing remarkable either. Kinda David Bowie lite.

I have a hard time putting to words what I love about Fiona Apples' music. There is something ineffable about it. But I am happy to just sit back and enjoy it.

Liked this a lot. Lots of variety. One of my favorite discoveries from this list.

Liked this a lot. Could easily be a 5 star with further listens

Really liked the drums The instrumentals were good too And the vocals were... there.

I have seen Thief so I know their stuff works great as a soundtrack. But I really enjoyed the atmosphere even without a film to accompany it.

Compared to later rock operas, it is lacking in both narrative and musical complexity. And because it is trying to tell a cohesive story, it is musically lacking compared to other albums from The Who. Major respect for being one of the first rock operas and there are still good moments.

My least favorite area in Disneyland is the Alice in Wonderland teacups. Not because of how nausea inducing they are, but because of my deep seated hatred of the calliope. So when this album started with a cacophony of discordant calliope, I felt I had landed myself in the deepest layer of Hell. Which is quite fitting when you consider the current state of the bands namesake. I was happy that they used it sparingly after. But a side effect of this list having so many god damn lates 60s psychedelic rock albums is that I can't appreciate them anymore. So the rest of the album was fine. It is probably better if you haven't been burned out by this authors weird obsession with the genre.

The most interesting thing about this album is the reviews on this website. Mostly because they have the same tone I would imagine parents had when this album came out. Idk why we need to jump to, "this album is evil and will corrupt the mind" when it is just try hard edgy metal. Some of the sounds I like. A general creepy atmosphere that is pretty unique. But it all sounds samey by the end and the aforementioned try hard edgy lyrics are cringe. But it is not corrupting or the end of the world.

I am fascinated by the hatred people have for U2. Does it all stem from them forcing their album onto Iphones? They just are not interesting enough for me to understand the hate they get. This album does feel like a major fluke for this list though. At least the other U2 albums had some level of influence on the future of music. This album doesn't even seem that interesting in the history of the band, let alone to the music scene as a whole. Which isn't to say I dislike it. Again, it is too uninteresting for me to even dislike it. It was fine. I enjoyed some moments. But there is nothing that I will remember.

Immediately listened again after it ended. If the wikipedia section for theme analysis is longer than most other albums's entire page, then you know it is a good album.

Just never been a big MJ fan. This album didn't really change that. Some good songs though.

Next to this list's propensity for late 60s psychedelic rock is its love for any and all New Wave Brit Pop Rock. Which is lame because, depending on what order one might get some of these albums generated, they might be completely over one of these micro genres by the time they receive an actual good album in said genre. This is a quintessential example of one of those albums that pollute the waters. There is nothing about this that I haven't heard done much better in many other albums. By this time next week I imagine I will have forgotten all about it.

10 years ago this would have been an easy 5. In recent years I have soured a bit on Muse. It isn't so much that I dislike them. I still enjoyed this album. It just felt more lacking than it once did.

Started pretty strong and kind of fizzled out by the end.

Classic 12 bar blues. Which after 40 straight minutes does get a bit repetitive. Any one of these songs in isolation is great. But one after the other lessens the experience.

Some albums are ubiquitous by their cover alone. Abbey Road andDark Side of the Moon come to mind. Even if you haven't listened to one of these albums, you know the cover. Nevermind is another one of these albums. And like the other two, it fully lives up to its status as an album thst deserves to be known.

Brian Eno working on a trilogy of David Bowie albums and then collaborating with David Byrne only 2 years later? Man was collecting Davids like they're infinity stones

I do like the vibes of Lana Del Rey albums. I don't seek her out very often, but if I ever want to feel like I am forlornly looking out a car window remembering the better times in life, then this (or any album from her) is a good choice.

This hits like a damn freight train.

If you like Bon Jovi, this might be an all timer. His three biggest songs in one album. Pretty insane. I do not like Bon Jovi. So I did not like this at all.

This is the music that plays in the club John Wick is fighting through.

I like the instrumentation, but I am not a fan of Eddie Vedder's vocals at all.

Unlike the majority of this style of rock album that is the penchant for this list, this album benefits from being put next to its peers. Like putting Usain Bolt next to some high school track stars. Are they all athletes? Sure. But one of them is obviously bounds ahead. Contrasting this to the similar albums of the time really highlights how insanely good this album is.and some of the best drum sounds you'll hear

Hypnotic and dreamlike. You listen to this with nice headphones, in a dark room, with your eyes closed, and you will be chill in ways you didn't know possible. Plus, an entire song based on a Twin Peaks reference? Sign me up. Do not understand the reviews saying this lacks energy or substance. Not everything needs to be a four part rock band.

Imagine if British people were real.

At first I was surprised how negative reviews were on here. The opening was very strong. It was also an instrumental. Once Master of Puppets started, I began to understand. I respect the idea but the execution is poor. For one, this would work much better as a studio album. The mixing of the symphony with the band would be better. And we could eliminate all of the awful crowd interaction. It is one thing to experience a crowd singing parts of a song when you are in the crowd, but on an album it is insufferable. I think it would also work better with new material and not covering old songs.

Did a triple take at a certain song's lyrics.

Rather boring

Sparse but oh so warm. One of the more personal albums I've heard. And not personal in the "this guy is baring his soul to me" way but more in a, "it sounds like he is playing in the room with me" kind of way. Very inviting.

This is the soundtrack for the Amelie sequel: "Amelie Goes 2 Hell".

Could probably become a 5 star with more listens.

Ich liebe das nicht

I was feeling a solid 2 stars - it isn't really my thing but I can expect what it did for the time, even if some of the lyrics are edgy cringe - then I got to the last song. And it was so grating that I have no choice but to one star it.

Instrumental was great. Could have used just about any other vocals

A few hits and a few misses. Definitely a mixed bag. But overall closer to positive than negative.

Perfection. As the name implies, this album is best listened to at night (or at least in the dark). Get a nice pair of headphones, no distractions, and let the sound envelop you.

A few lackluster songs but overall very good.

Really puts the noise in noise rock. I could barely tell when vocals started on any given song. And the instrumentals were not interesting enough to justify that. Eventually it became impossible to distinguish any particular sound from another; it devolved into a thick sludge of sound. I did not find anything positive about this.

Without a doubt better than their previous album. Far less grating and there are a few decent songs. Still not good though. Great album cover

Just kind of uninteresting

I knew maybe two songs from Grizzly Bear. One being Two Weeks from this album. And I liked both songs but for some reason I never decided to check out more of their stuff. And I should have, because this was very enjoyable. Will definitely listen again. Side note: why are so many reviews on here acting like this is some kind of stomp clamp, Mumford and Sons-esque album? Multiple reviews mention banjo and mandolin; instruments that are never once used in this album. Do people even listen to the albums before they write their reviews?

For some reason I thought the song "Slowride" was by Steely Dan. I really do not like the song "Slowride". So I was not looking forward to this album. Then I started listening and thought, "this sounds nothing like Slowride! How could this be the same band?!". Steely Dan did not make "Slowride". I have been living in ignorance all these years. This album was very good.

One of my favorite hip hop albums. Very fun laid back energy. Love all of the sampling.

5 stars for "Do You Realize??". The rest is also very good too

I read the artist as Bruce Springsteen. So I was really confused at first.

Some good moments but overall not my favorite

Much simpler than the folk that would become common place in the following decade (a la Bob Dylan). There are no 10 minute storytelling epics. No social or political commentey. Just simple songs about simple topics. The kind of thing you would hear by a campfire. It is cozy.

I enjoyed this pretty well. I enjoyed the music. I could tell there was a story line -I love an album with a story- but I don't speak French. So when I read the album story summary on Wikipedia, I had a bit of a, "what the fuck" moment. But then I thought about how art can depict bad things and it doesn't mean said art is in support of the bad thing. In this case, Lolita is a perfect example in the case of literature. And maybe the language barrier prevents me from fully grasping if this is more on the Lolita side of things. But then I saw that this guy recorded a song called "Lemon Incest" that he recorded with his daughter. When she was 13. So I am starting to think this guy might have been a bit of a creep? I still mostly enjoyed the album though. But it would probably feel a bit icky to listen to again in hindsight.

The line about Bill Gates and Donald Trumo not fighting didn't age well.

Baffling that conservatives thing Born in the USA is a positive song.

Banger after banger. Stairway to Heaven is for sure overplayed. But it got that reputation for a reason. I way over listened to that song in high school. But it has probably been over a decade since I have listened to it in full. And man, after such a long break it really hits again.

I like Marvin Gaye but this was just okay

5 stars for God Only Knows. Truly one of the greatest songs of all time.

I am sure most everyone knows the title track. It is a great song. Exciting yet chill. It is a double edged sword to open and album with it though. Because if the rest doesn't live up to it, then it feels like a let down.

Feels unfair to rate when I had to listen to a disjointed YouTube playlist; half in English, half in German. I liked the concept of it.

Can't really think of many bands who 1) have just about all of their hits on one album and 2) that album being their debut. And those hits are great for sure. But the stuff in between is lacking. It would be a 3.5 but I will be generous and round up.

Abysmal. I found no enjoyment in this at all

Funny album to get on Christmas Eve

Hard to give a some what "objective" review on Christmas. Is good.

Did Destiny's Child really need an hour? This albums is 30 minutes too long

Pretty much a perfect album. Great songs, great concept/story, great album cover, one of the best opening tracks. I could listen to this over and over again.

Sad I had to listen via YouTube.

Firm believer that most of what The Beatles did from Rubber Soul on is 5 stars. The older stuff is still worth listening to though. But I usually don't consider these albums as necessary for full through listens.

Was not a fan of this

Flat Eathers hate to hear Daft Punk come on at the club.

I like a good 12 bar blues. But a whole album gets a bit repetitive. But it is also very short. So it kinda balances out.

Very strong 4.5. I will round down though. None of the songs were skips, but a few weren't as good as the rest. They would probably grow on me with further listens though. Then this could become a 5 star.

Why are electronica albums so repetitive and so long?

I think I understand now why, for much of my younger life, I did not like rap. In my predominantly white, small, rural hometown, rap was synonymous with Eminem. And I do not like Eminem. Now, I do not dislike Eminem because I am offended or pearl clutching or anything like that. I am fully aware that the shock value is all a bit. He literally says so in Stan - which is a great song by the way. Maybe one of the most prescient songs of the 21st century. He then repeats this in the last track on the album. No, my issue with the shock value Eminem is going for is how trivial and childish and boring it is. It is equivalent to the torture porn horror films of the era. Trying to be shocking for the sake of it. Not much to say. Empty gesturing. Once you get over the initial shock of what you are hearing (if it even perturbs you in the first place) it becomes so mundane and uninteresting. I think the album does work though as an interesting time capsule of the late 90s early 2000s when politicians spent a decent chunk of time having congressional hearings about the dangers of Grand Theft Auto games, Eminem, and South Park. And I will hand it to the album for calling that out.

Very good. The opening track will make you transcend.

I was going to make a Jimmy Neutron comment but then one of the top reviews beat me to it. Nothing new under the sun and all that.

I was surprised this released in 2002. I was even more surprised to see they're from LA. Just listening to this, I would have assumed it was an early 90s East Coast Hip Hop album.

I love the album cover. If anything, it built expectations for what the album would sound like, and those expectations weren't really met. But I did enjoy it overall. Was not expecting the final song to be so explicit.

I have always thought of The National as Walmart brand Bon Iver. But The National came first?! I don't know what I believe anymore.

Message in a Bottle is good

Just not for me.

Morbidly, I am a big fan of art made by older people looking directly at their own mortality. I can see that most of these are covers would disappoint some, but it plays into the whole mortality thing. It is like he is reminiscing on all the music he has loved throughout his life.

Really feel I would need at least another listen to accurately rate. I like aspects but I would need more time with it for the lyrics to fully appreciate

It is listenable

So simple. Once you've heard the first song, you know what every song will be like. But it is also very short so it kinda works. If it was even 5 minutes longer it would probably be a much worse album. I love how they say "bop"

This started off decent enough. I was surprised how negative people were on it. But by the end, I started to understand. Hard to put to words but it got a bit grating as it went on.

Not a big fan of the titular song. Likely due to its overplayed status in pop culture. But the rest of the album was surprisingly good.

Like a weirdo surrealist Bond soundtrack

I have an appetite for destruction of this fuckin album off this list. Nothing about this band appeals to me. I don't like Axl Rose and his whiny little chipmunk voice. I don't like Slash and his stupid hat. I never enjoyed even playing their songs in Guitar Hero. And Guitar Hero makes any song as least 2x better.

One of my favorite jazz albums. So light and fun. A great introduction to more complex time signatures as well, but not at the sake of the music. You can listen without knowing anything about time signatures and it will be a great listen. But trying to figure out the timing for each song is very fun.

The only killing joke is listening to this album amirite?

No

Not bad. I like her voice. I like the stripped down nature of folk music. But an hour long album is a bit long for this kind of music.

I like the hit songs (The Scientist, Clocks). A handful of other songs were pretty decent. But for the most part, I just don't like Coldplay enough to sustain an entire album.

This ruled. I had never pulled the trigger on listening to Mars Volta and I am bummed I waited so long.

Very good. 4.5 for sure.

I have never held this album in as high of regard as her other albums. But it really clicked for me this listen.

Generally, I do not enjoy live albums (at least compared to studio albums). This doesn't really change that, though it is better than most live albums. There is a good energy and the crowd work does add a fun element. But I can't see myself ever going back to this album over the studio versions of his songs. 3.5 rounded up for Sam Cooke

Pretty good.

Some stripped down folk albums can be repetitive and boring. Some can lull you in and mesmerize you. This is the latter. I don't really know why it works where others fail.

The album cover really baited me and set my expectations too high. I was expecting some pirate shit. What I got wasn't bad, but in the shadow of my expectations, it was nothing but disappointment.

More digestible than some of her later more gremlin core albums. But still has a lot of what makes her so captivating to listen to.

This is what people who hate Metallica think Metallica sounds like. Metal is probably my lowest rated genre here. But I do like metal, it is just that most of the metal on this list sucks.

This was better than I was expecting. Still not great by any means but not bad.

Like all addictions, Jane's Addiction is bad for your health and should be avoided at all costs

I figured it out. The authors of this list hate metal and have specifically chosen metal albums to convince everyone else that metal is bad. I know the common complaint back in the day was, "this is evil music that darkens the soul and makes kids angry and violent." I wish this album made me feel anything other than 2nd hand embarrassment. It is so try hard and lame. It is Creed with double bass pedals and screaming.

Horrible Gloomy Sunday cover. Taking a star off for that alone.

You hear prog rock hip hop and you expect a certain level of cringe. A good kind of cringe. But this album veers too often into cringe for my liking.

Was always a favorite Beatles album of mine.

An all time best.

Pretty enjoyable. Some weak tracks. Wouldn't really revisit the album as a whole but don't regret listening

No no no no no.

Reggae just isn't really my thing. Maybe I am not chill enough. I respect it for its place in music history and culture, but I would never seek it out.

Listened to it twice in a row. I really like this band.

Just kinda bland. And way too long for how bland it is.

Not a big Clapton fan

More like trash metal, amirite? Worst album on this list (so far). It is like they heard Metallica and thought, "that is pretty cool. But it seems they spend a lot of time on song writing. Maybe we should just not do that." Every song is the same. They all start the same. The average song length is like 45 seconds. It is all how fast and hard can I strum these power chords. Or how fast and hard can I hit the drums. Or whatever the singer is doing. This was made for people to mindlessly headbang and mosh to.

I wanted to like this more than I did. It started strong but kinda meanders near the end.

Very very British. At times this is for the good. More often, it is not.

I am probably being extra negative because I had to listen on YouTube. But idk. This had some decent moments but mostly I just wanted it to be done.

Very pleasantly surprised by this

I have enjoyed the albums from them. Not quite 5 star worthy but very solid 4 stars

I said this with the other Morrissey album. I like The Smiths, but something about solo Morrissey is really lacking.

There are trumpet sounds I wouldn't think possible. I just wish it wasn't a live album. It drags it down a decent amount unfortunately.

I like some of the samples. But that begs the question: why not just listen to the original song the sample comes from?

Not really my thing. But I respect an all women band making this kind of music in the 1970s and calling themselves The Slits.